ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Babb: Chiefs' Hali is quietly racking up sacks (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=234360)

Saul Good 09-29-2010 07:49 PM

I would like to see one quote from someone last year that mentioned our Safeties when bitching about switching to the 3-4. It was all about Hali, Dorsey, and lack of a true NT.

DaneMcCloud 09-29-2010 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7049733)
I would like to see one quote from someone last year that mentioned our Safeties when bitching about switching to the 3-4. It was all about Hali, Dorsey, and lack of a true NT.

More bullshit.

Do a search on DaneMcCloud and Mike Brown, then shut the **** up.

DaneMcCloud 09-29-2010 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7049728)
I guess Arenas is a 3-tech, right?

Go back to the DC, Dummy

OnTheWarpath15 09-29-2010 07:57 PM

Getting Corey Mays off the ****ing field has helped this defense way more than anyone is giving credit for.

Saul Good 09-29-2010 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7049742)
More bullshit.

Do a search on DaneMcCloud and Mike Brown, then shut the **** up.

Just so I'm clear, your contention was that the Chiefs, when determining what style of defense they were going to play as they rebuilt their team from the ground up, should have considered which system best fit Mike Brown's skill set? It sounds like a pretty smart thing to say, but you're a pretty smart guy.

philfree 09-29-2010 08:08 PM

LOL..I just remembered that I have an auto'd mini helment signed by both Tamba Hali and.....Jared Allen. (digging in the in the cabnet grumbling.."where is is my precious?"....)


PhilFree:arrow:

dirk digler 09-29-2010 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7049733)
I would like to see one quote from someone last year that mentioned our Safeties when bitching about switching to the 3-4. It was all about Hali, Dorsey, and lack of a true NT.

That may be true with regards to switching to the 3-4 but there was alot of bitching about our safety play and has been for several seasons.

Saul Good 09-29-2010 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 7049775)
That may be true with regards to switching to the 3-4 but there was alot of bitching about our safety play and has been for several seasons.

Of course there was. Our Safeties were terrible, but that didn't have anything to do with playing a 3-4 or a 4-3. People are pretending that the Safeties we added equate to adding personnel that fits a 3-4 system as if Berry and Arenas are 3-4 Safeties as opposed to 4-3 Safeties.

philfree 09-29-2010 08:12 PM

So at this point are there people who still contend that we shouldn't have switched to the 3-4 LAST YEAR?

PhilFree:arrow:

DaneMcCloud 09-29-2010 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7049768)
Just so I'm clear, your contention was that the Chiefs, when determining what style of defense they were going to play as they rebuilt their team from the ground up, should have considered which system best fit Mike Brown's skill set? It sounds like a pretty smart thing to say, but you're a pretty smart guy.

Just shut the **** up.

JFC, you're a ****ing moron.

Again, do a search, Asswipe.

DaneMcCloud 09-29-2010 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7049781)
Of course there was. Our Safeties were terrible, but that didn't have anything to do with playing a 3-4 or a 4-3. People are pretending that the Safeties we added equate to adding personnel that fits a 3-4 system as if Berry and Arenas are 3-4 Safeties as opposed to 4-3 Safeties.

What? Who said that?

You're a reerun. You might wanna think about having that checked.

dirk digler 09-29-2010 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7049781)
Of course there was. Our Safeties were terrible, but that didn't have anything to do with playing a 3-4 or a 4-3. People are pretending that the Safeties we added equate to adding personnel that fits a 3-4 system as if Berry and Arenas are 3-4 Safeties as opposed to 4-3 Safeties.

I'm not around as much as I used to be but that would be the first I have heard of that. BTW Arenas plays nickel corner not safety

Saul Good 09-29-2010 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7049784)
Just shut the **** up.

JFC, you're a ****ing moron.

Again, do a search, Asswipe.

I'm not going to do a search for stupid shit you've said. I can read it right here. Guardian says that the only player we added for 3-4 personnel was Smith, and you countered by listing off 3 Defensive Backs as if those guys are somehow 3-4 DBs but not 4-3 guys.

You don't know what the f*** you are talking about. Mike Brown sucked because he was 3 years past his prime, not because he was playing in a 4-3. John McGraw sucked because he didn't have the talent, not be cause he was playing in a 4-3.

You are the one who was bitching that Hali and Dorsey couldn't play in a 4-3. Don't act like the clown shoes you are wearing go with your tie.

Saul Good 09-29-2010 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 7049793)
I'm not around as much as I used to be but that would be the first I have heard of that. BTW Arenas plays nickel corner not safety

It's right here in this thread:

Originally Posted by Saul Good View Post
I would like to see one quote from someone last year that mentioned our Safeties when bitching about switching to the 3-4. It was all about Hali, Dorsey, and lack of a true NT.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 7049742)
More bullshit.

Do a search on DaneMcCloud and Mike Brown, then shut the **** up.

Again, our Safeties sucked, but it had nothing to do with 4-3 versus 3-4. Dane said it was stupid to switch to the 3-4 because we didn't have the personnel. The only front 7 player we have now that we didn't have last year is Smith, and he's filled in for TJ who was playing well.

I'm pretty sure that it wouldn't have been a good idea for Haley to have said, "I'd like to switch to a 3-4 as we rebuild, but we need to stay in a 4-3 because it fits Mike Brown's style".

dirk digler 09-29-2010 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7049823)
It's right here in this thread:

Originally Posted by Saul Good View Post
I would like to see one quote from someone last year that mentioned our Safeties when bitching about switching to the 3-4. It was all about Hali, Dorsey, and lack of a true NT.

Again, our Safeties sucked, but it had nothing to do with 4-3 versus 3-4. Dane said it was stupid to switch to the 3-4 because we didn't have the personnel. The only front 7 player we have now that we didn't have last year is Smith, and he's filled in for TJ who was playing well.

I'm pretty sure that it wouldn't have been a good idea for Haley to have said, "I'd like to switch to a 3-4 as we rebuild, but we need to stay in a 4-3 because it fits Mike Brown's style".

I can't speak for Dane but I think he was talking about complaining about the safties in general not about moving to the 3-4. Dane can correct me if I am wrong.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.