ChiefsPlanet
Page 6 of 6 « First 2345 6
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs A guy on Sportsnation just said.... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=252270)

aturnis 11-09-2011 11:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornstock (Post 8094505)
I'd say theres very little,if anything, left of the Chan offense. You can still see a lot of Charlie Weis stuff in play though (minus his great playcalling...call a play to set up a play, working the matchups, etc.) However right how the offense looks like something cross between Weis and Mike Solari's offense. Or worse, Bill Muir.

Moral of the story: promoting offensive line coaches to OC has not worked for the Chiefs in recent history.
Who said anything about Chan Gailey's offense? That offense left with Gailey. Haley was OC in this system one year, then Weis, and now Muir. 3 years, 3 OC's one system.

Easy 6 11-09-2011 06:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 8094604)
Meanwhile, we have Ben Roethlisberger with a questionable O-Line, Drew Brees with a questionable O-Line, and Aaron Rodgers with a questionable O-line, all winning SBs.


But lets keep trying to win a SB with mediocre QB play.

It's so obvious that's how championships are won.
NO ITS NOT WHEN WILL YOU GAI'S LEARN? WINNERS ARE BUILT ON O LINES, LINES LINES LINES I SAY!

YOUR CASTLE HATRED HAS BLINDED YOU!

JD10367 11-09-2011 06:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chop (Post 8090006)
If the Patriots didn't have Tom Brady they would be the Chiefs (no playmakers).

Hurts but it's kind of true.
No, it's kind of ****ing stupid. Both the Patriots AND Chiefs have playmakers. Unless that moron doesn't count Wes Welker and Rob Gronkowski (both near the top of the NFL stats), or Aaron Hernandez or Deion Branch.

I love blanket statements with no basis in reality. Just looking at this season--not his body of work, but THIS season--frankly, Brady has tailed off and is a direct contributor to the past two losses. If they didn't have Brady? They'd probably still be 5-3. He hasn't won a single game by himself. He doesn't take the field on offense and play 1-on-11.

BossChief 11-09-2011 06:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD10367 (Post 8095671)
No, it's kind of ****ing stupid. Both the Patriots AND Chiefs have playmakers. Unless that moron doesn't count Wes Welker and Rob Gronkowski (both near the top of the NFL stats), or Aaron Hernandez or Deion Branch.

I love blanket statements with no basis in reality. Just looking at this season--not his body of work, but THIS season--frankly, Brady has tailed off and is a direct contributor to the past two losses. If they didn't have Brady? They'd probably still be 5-3. He hasn't won a single game by himself. He doesn't take the field on offense and play 1-on-11.
no way


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:29 PM.
Page 6 of 6 « First 2345 6
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.