By the way, there's some fool on 810 right now that thinks Dorsey is a bad hire.

They may be already worked out and he just prefers not to be announced until the GB season is officially over out of respect for the team.

my sense was he was talking about reid, but thought dorsey was a good prospect...

Now that is funny. Maybe he thinks we should bring back Carl?

Even if the Chief's knew who they wanted to take as the #1 pick why would they tip their hand?

Even if they were gung-ho about a QB, it would be terrible business to say so.

It reduces their trade opportunities to be in love with 1 player, and it gives the agent of that player a bigger dick to sodomize them with in negotiations.

I guess we just have to realize that between now and April 25th, there are going to be a lot of smoke screens and false leaks to attract offers, mess with other teams, etc.

I should probably just stay off Twitter/CP/etc. until then...but I just, can't, turn away.

He was saying they wouldn't work well together wasn't he?

Think if we can somehow trick a team into swapping us 1st pick and getting an extra 2nd round pick, and still scoop Geno 15th overall....:evil:

there's not much to negotiate in rookie contracts

not sure, I was kind of confused

something about the reid-GM-Clark thing he didn't like...but I don't think it was about dorsey specifically...could be wrong

Sam Bradford was the last guy to dip into that.

Tell me the benefit, besides making a bunch of people on here happy, that saying what you are doing in the draft?

Nevermind the fact that there will be new scouts here with their opinions, a new GM and the combine hasn't even happened or pro days.

i don't why he said they were interested in trading down...ask Clark