ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Fisher to LT? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=282553)

duncan_idaho 03-25-2014 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10515059)
Anyone that doesn't agree with the move is an idiot.

Anyone who blindly assumes Fisher is the best bet at LT and shouldn't have to EARN that spot is naive.

They're going to play him at LT because he was the "safe" pick at 1.1 and they have to do it for PR sake. That doesn't make it the "right' move or a move that is automatically agreed with.

But it's no guarantee he's going to be a success there, after watching him get his ass kicked for most of 2013.

htismaqe 03-25-2014 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10515097)
Lol, no shit. Fisher was drafted at 1.1 to be the LT, he is going to be the LT.

Any argument to the contrary is hilariously ridiculous and is only being made to be argumentative.

There is no downside to this move. You have to see if he is the player thought he was when you drafted him.

No downside?

ROFL

The Franchise 03-25-2014 09:23 AM

That's what makes this whole "tale of two offseasons" ****ing weird. The smart move would have been to let Albert walk, or take whatever they could get for him, after they drafted Fisher. But they couldn't do that because they had just traded 2 second round picks for Smith. They would have gotten at least a 3rd rounder in this years draft and Fisher wouldn't have had to learn a new position....and then move back.

Now he comes in this year....basically a rookie still....and he has to protect Alex Smith. Hope to God that strength program works out great for him.

htismaqe 03-25-2014 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10515101)
That's what makes this whole "tale of two offseasons" ****ing weird. The smart move would have been to let Albert walk, or take whatever they could get for him, after they drafted Fisher. But they couldn't do that because they had just traded 2 second round picks for Smith. They would have gotten at least a 3rd rounder in this years draft and Fisher wouldn't have had to learn a new position....and then move back.

Bingo.

BigMeatballDave 03-25-2014 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10515094)
So his position is a birthright?

That's how you build a winning team.

Your Fisher butthurt is showing.

:)

beach tribe 03-25-2014 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10515026)
Of course not.

But that's been the discussion all offseason, not whether Fisher WOULD start at LT but whether he SHOULD.

Only his play during real live games can determine that.

There is no way you can not start your 1.1 at LT.

He has to outright lose the job.

That's the way it works. The way it has always worked.

Marcellus 03-25-2014 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10515100)
No downside?

ROFL

Only if you like to argue about everything under the sun.

jd1020 03-25-2014 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10515097)
Lol, no shit. Fisher was drafted at 1.1 to be the LT, he is going to be the LT.

Any argument to the contrary is hilariously ridiculous and is only being made to be argumentative.

There is no downside to this move. You have to see if he is the player thought he was when you drafted him.

Such a dumb argument.

He was drafted to be the LT. He sucked at RT. So promote him to LT?

Who ****ing cares what he was drafted for when he can't even prevent Alex from being sacked from the side he can see?

Marcellus 03-25-2014 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10515101)
That's what makes this whole "tale of two offseasons" ****ing weird. The smart move would have been to let Albert walk, or take whatever they could get for him, after they drafted Fisher. But they couldn't do that because they had just traded 2 second round picks for Smith. They would have gotten at least a 3rd rounder in this years draft and Fisher wouldn't have had to learn a new position....and then move back.

Now he comes in this year....basically a rookie still....and he has to protect Alex Smith. Hope to God that strength program works out great for him.

The bolded part is simply wrong. Nothing about Fisher makes him basically a rookie this year.

BigMeatballDave 03-25-2014 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10515100)
No downside?

ROFL

Butt.

Hurt.

lol

htismaqe 03-25-2014 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10515105)
Your Fisher butthurt is showing.

:)

Butthurt would imply that I have an emotive response. I'm not mad.

It was a horrible pick and they followed up with horrible moves. He was horrible for a large part of the year at RT but they're going to hand him the LT job.

If that screams "success" to you, I don't know what to tell you.

beach tribe 03-25-2014 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10515025)
Or he may be all screwed up and have to start over...

ROFL

Oh, man.

Marcellus 03-25-2014 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10515110)
Such a dumb argument.

He was drafted to be the LT. He sucked at RT. So promote him to LT?

Who ****ing cares what he was drafted for when he can't even prevent Alex from being sacked from the side he can see?

No the dumb argument is to think the plan hasn't always been to move him to LT.

Just like many of the other tackles taken in the first round last year.

htismaqe 03-25-2014 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10515108)
Only if you like to argue about everything under the sun.

You do know that Alex Smith has an injury history, right?

jd1020 03-25-2014 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10515117)
No the dumb argument is to think the plan hasn't always been to move him to LT.

Just like many of the other tackles taken in the first round last year.

Plans change you ****ing moron.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.