For the Browns to get to the Super Bowl, they’d ostensibly have to get by the Chiefs. Without Hill, that is more likely than with him. I’m not sure the connection could be any clearer.

Losing Hill is a big loss against the Patriots or Chargers. It makes beating those teams more difficult.

For the Browns to get through the Chiefs though, Baker Mayfield would have to out-duel Patrick Mahomes. “More difficult” than “practically impossible” is still “practically impossible”.

Losing the Cheetah hurts that’s for sure.

The Browns should've won at least 9 games last year, and probably would've if Baker had started from week 1.

It's very likely they'll win the AFC North this year (can't remember the last time I thought that), and IMO, will make the playoffs with at least 10 wins, regardless if Hunt plays.

The Super Bowl is probably a stretch this year though. Regardless, considering that just a year ago Vegas had them winning a paltry 4 games, this team is rocketing into the top tier of teams in the league.

Honestly though, what's Greedy supposed to say? "I think we're going 8-8"? Would anyone respect that more than saying "we're going to upset the league"?

I was thinking more like the lasers to Kelce vs Denver and Cleveland. Or Mahomes final drive vs. New England in AFCCG, two great passes to Ware and Robinson. Or the crazy TD to Chark vs Seattle.

West, Robinson, Ware. If you get open, Mahomes will get the ball to you

They’re better than the chiefs right now

The locker room will probably decide what happens to the Cleveland Browns.


They could be great, they could implode.

Veach needs to swing a trade for Patrick Peterson

That gives us a top 5 o and a top 5 d.

Greedy is simply being...greedy.

Put the single malt down and breathe...

It is interesting that Veach didn't want to give up any more 2020 picks during draft day trade talks.

Surely we can appropriately view that as potential dry powder available for another acquisition or two.

And yes, I called you Surely.

FAX