![]() |
This is too hypothetical at this point.
What is the realistic trade value the Chiefs can get for Chris Jones... top 15 first round draft pick? Bottom of the first round draft pick? Who can the Chiefs realistically afford to keep with Chris Jones’ contract (and big new potential contract) out of the way... Watkins + Fuller + Breeland? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And let's now talk about Berry. Paying big money second contracts is far from a no brainer. |
If the Chiefs got a 2008 Jared Allen haul for Jones, you'd all take it. Yeah, the 2008 team was rebuilding and needed multiple picks more than they needed Jared Allen, but it's basically the same principal here. Every man has his price.
We got a 1st and two 3rds out of Jared Allen (17th, 73rd, and 82nd overall). There isn't a reasonable draft partner who has two 3rd round picks in this year's draft, but we'd probably be able to get equivalent value if we traded with a team drafting in the top half of the 1st round and they threw in a 4th or a 5th somewhere down the line. For example, the Cardinals have plenty of cap room but don't have any playmakers on their interior defensive line. They need a WR, but this is one of those stupid deep drafts at that position. So they part with 9th overall and throw in a 2021 pick of some sort. Chiefs now have: 1.9 1.32 2.63 3.96 4.something 5.something Now think of the trade down options they could maneuver around with both of those 1st rounders. Yeah, that means we no longer have Chris Jones. But in exchange, we gain a lot more flexibility to plug holes in the roster with a free agent or two in future seasons. We could also see drastic improvements at LB and/or OL, get a young cheap starter at CB, and still be able to find some more weapons for Pat on offense at WR, TE, and/or RB. It's boring. It's not sexy. But it virtually guarantees we'll be contending for the Super Bowl for at least the next 3-4 years without having to rely on luck when it comes to injuries so much. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know its apples and oranges, but look at what the Red Sox just did. They traded way Mookie Betts, a generational player so they could get Reid of a stupid huge contract. In the short term it hurt, in the long term it allows them the flexibility to compete. Look at the Bears, the feel good story of 2018, everything was great when they got Mack, but now their team is a mess, and they want to trade him and let another top ten defensive pick walk. This has never been about making it all work under the cap next season, its about what's best for the Chiefs moving forward long term. |
Jones will be back /end thread
|
Letting go of Jones is a mistake. Veach will find a way to sign him without messing up the cap. He was a huge part of our defense's success this year. There is just no way to replace him.
|
Picks 1-15 and another pick? Deal.
Picks 16-32 and another pick? I’m interested but I’d have to see. 2nd rounder and lower? Get ****ed. This obviously entails us not trading him to the Raiders, Broncos, Chargers or Patriots. I would prefer an NFC team or a bottom tier team like the Dolphins. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'd like to see them restructure and keep Sammy Watkins. Keep that young core on offense together for as long as possible. Teams know to beat the Chiefs you need at a minimum 30 (unless Mahomes is playing on one leg). That's tough.
1.) Restructure Sammy 2.) Tag and trade Jones for a first and a third. 3.) Draft Kenneth Murray (Dolphins #23 pick via Jones trade). 4.) Draft JK Dobbins (Chiefs #32 pick). 5.) $20 million saved in cap space from Jones trade and the rest of your draft picks address interior Oline and defense. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.