ChiefsPlanet
Page 6 of 36 « First 2345 6 7891016 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Offensive Tackles (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=350248)

IowaHawkeyeChief 09-19-2023 10:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Balto (Post 17117883)
Don't watch the left side on that video. Gross
That not on Smith. He has outside first and should have help inside. Thuney was late. JMO

IowaHawkeyeChief 09-19-2023 10:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 17118948)
Does Andy Reid count since he benched him? I don't think I ever seen Reid bench a starter OL before during a game.
Andy just pulled him out to remove the target on his back for a minute and to calm him down...

ThaVirus 09-19-2023 10:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17118951)
LT.

Easily
A blue chip T on Mahomes’ blindside would be amazing

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPH83 (Post 17118952)
I think LT and I don't think it's close. A year ago I'd have said it's a toss up with WR but I think the main thing we need is time and confidence for Mahomes. Give him an LT you can stick on an island and RBs who can focus on being a true receiving option and I think we're golden. DE - cool to have a genuine rotation, but with Omenihu, FAU and Karlaftis they're not getting the reps so they're not giving as much vaue, imo.
I’d think a “great” DE would steal a majority of the snaps at the position. And I don’t think you can ever have too many pass rushers, though I understand the logic in feeling like we’re already well off so the resources would be better spent elsewhere.

Pitt Gorilla 09-19-2023 10:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17118951)
LT.

Easily
I tend to agree, although it'll be interesting to see what we have in Morris.

JPH83 09-19-2023 10:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief (Post 17118981)
That not on Smith. He has outside first and should have help inside. Thuney was late. JMO
Thuney has definitely been below par by his standards the first 2 games. I'm pretty certain he'll right that and we'll see better from that side. I think that'll go a long way to giving Mahomes confidence in this OL

JPH83 09-19-2023 10:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 17119005)
A blue chip T on Mahomes’ blindside would be amazing



I’d think a “great” DE would steal a majority of the snaps at the position. And I don’t think you can ever have too many pass rushers, though I understand the logic in feeling like we’re already well off so the resources would be better spent elsewhere.
Get an above average LT this year and take another swing at WR with the second pick. Then DT. Then I'm going pretty much all offense rest of the draft, IOL, RB, another WR, TE...whatever. Obviously you see where the talent is but man I'm gunning for offensive resources.

Next year I'm going WR R1 and then a whole load of D again.

O.city 09-19-2023 11:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 17119005)
A blue chip T on Mahomes’ blindside would be amazing



I’d think a “great” DE would steal a majority of the snaps at the position. And I don’t think you can ever have too many pass rushers, though I understand the logic in feeling like we’re already well off so the resources would be better spent elsewhere.
I don't think I'd chase "great" at DE by trading up for one. Could definitely use some more depth there, basically always, but I like some mid tier FA's for that.

LT for me. WR you could talk me into if it's like a Jamar Chase type that falls a bit but give me an athletic LT.

AKA the Alt kid.

-King- 09-19-2023 11:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 17119005)
A blue chip T on Mahomes’ blindside would be amazing



I’d think a “great” DE would steal a majority of the snaps at the position. And I don’t think you can ever have too many pass rushers, though I understand the logic in feeling like we’re already well off so the resources would be better spent elsewhere.
Using a 1st on a LT after paying a RT $20M would annoy me. Id take a WR.

old_geezer 09-19-2023 11:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 17119094)
Using a 1st on a LT after paying a RT $20M would annoy me. Id take a WR.
That's exactly why a stud LT on a rookie contract would be a good deal.

staylor26 09-19-2023 11:24 AM
I'm still trying to figure out why this weirdo Virus has my avy now...

Hammock Parties 09-19-2023 11:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 17119094)
Using a 1st on a LT after paying a RT $20M would annoy me. Id take a WR.
That's actually WHY you take a rookie LT. Cost control...

O.city 09-19-2023 11:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 17119094)
Using a 1st on a LT after paying a RT $20M would annoy me. Id take a WR.
Uh...that's WHY i'd take one.

I could basically have my LT and RT locked up for what....28 million a year for a while?

Chris Meck 09-19-2023 11:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 17119094)
Using a 1st on a LT after paying a RT $20M would annoy me. Id take a WR.
So plus level bookend OTs for like $23m would piss you off? You really don't understand the salary cap.

staylor26 09-19-2023 11:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -King- (Post 17119094)
Using a 1st on a LT after paying a RT $20M would annoy me. Id take a WR.
You are ****ing terrible at this LMAO

O.city 09-19-2023 11:47 AM
Using a 1 on a WR after taking 2 in the previous two years drafts in teh 2nd round woudl annoy me.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:42 AM.
Page 6 of 36 « First 2345 6 7891016 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.