ChiefsPlanet
Page 6 of 28 « First 2345 6 7891016 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs Tag Sneed and Grant him permission to seek trade. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=352556)

TwistedChief 02-29-2024 03:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 17423044)
Has any team ever used the Franchise Tag two years in a row on the same player?
Yes. Many.

I think teams used to be able to do it 3 years in a row.

kcgreene 02-29-2024 03:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 17423044)
Has any team ever used the Franchise Tag two years in a row on the same player?
Washington did it with Kirk I'm pretty sure.

DenverChief 02-29-2024 04:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie (Post 17423040)
You're making this way more complicated than it is. The offer sheet is basically irrelevant. No one is going to sign him to an offer sheet, because no one is willing to give up two first round picks for him. Sneed talks to other teams, the Chiefs and the team work out trade compensation, Sneed is traded, and then signs with the new team.

Theoretically we could keep Sneed and force him to play on the tag, but that's not ideal for anyone. Sneed is 27 and needs to get paid now, and we would probably decline to tag him again next year and lose him for nothing.
It isn't out of the realm of possibility - Dallas gave up 2, 1st round picks for Joey Galloway - but there are quite a world of possibilities. My hope is that a CJ extension allows us to extend Sneed. I just don't find a 2nd and 3rd round pick as compensation as palatable.

Coochie liquor 02-29-2024 05:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHOWTIME (Post 17422536)
I would trade Sneed to Atlanta for Pitts and/or pick 43.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">������������: The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> are “preparing for life” without star CB L’Jarius Sneed, per <a href="https://twitter.com/TonyPauline?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@TonyPauline</a> <br><br>“The overwhelming feeling is the Chiefs expect to be playing without Sneed in 2024 and rather than lose him in free agency and then receive a compensation pick in the 2025 NFL… <a href="https://t.co/8GcPoFZWC1">pic.twitter.com/8GcPoFZWC1</a></p>&mdash; JPAFootball (@jasrifootball) <a href="https://twitter.com/jasrifootball/status/1763022332912611627?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 29, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
They’re about to pay out the ass for Fields. And they just cut their backup TE. I’d pick up Jonnu Smith and kick the tires though.

IowaHawkeyeChief 02-29-2024 06:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 17421936)
Funny I had no idea I thought it was just a first round pick.



https://theathletic.com/4219776/2024...es-definition/
Franchise tag and non-exclusive franchise tag are two different things. The Ravens did a non-exclusive tage with Lamar last season and those rules you shared would have been in place. We just franchised Sneed so he will either play for the Chiefs at $19.2m or whatever the actual tag is or we will trade him to a team he has a verbal committment with for a contract and that we agree with the compensation. If we put the non-exclusive tag on him, no team would negotiate as they would have to give up two first.

Imon Yourside 02-29-2024 06:46 PM
I think James Hasty could step right into this role and do fine.

staylor26 02-29-2024 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coochie liquor (Post 17423156)
They’re about to pay out the ass for Fields. And they just cut their backup TE. I’d pick up Jonnu Smith and kick the tires though.
I wouldn't be so sure of that.

A lot of smoke that they're going to go all-in on Cousins.

If that's the case, they'll probably be agressive everywhere else too. That's a win now move.

Dunerdr 02-29-2024 07:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 17423255)
I wouldn't be so sure of that.

A lot of smoke that they're going to go all-in on Cousins.

If that's the case, they'll probably be agressive everywhere else too. That's a win now move.
Personally I’d take the Kirk stability over the Fields gamble. UNLESS you’re willing to Lamar Jackson style run him into the ground on the rookie contract and be willing to move on after his rookie contract. If you’re willing to pull out all the stops and use all of his traits I might lean that way. But even then a pocket passer >what fields has been so far.

pugsnotdrugs19 03-01-2024 07:59 AM
Haven’t heard much buzz about the Rams being a trade partner but truthfully that shouldn’t surprise us whatsoever if that turns out to be the case

Dunerdr 03-01-2024 08:03 AM
Rams!
 
1 Attachment(s)
!

DenverChief 03-01-2024 08:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunerdr (Post 17423580)
!
What did I miss?

Dunerdr 03-01-2024 09:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 17423623)
What did I miss?
Nothing actually just pugs saying the rams could be involved. Just a joke because they’ll trade the farm for anything

Nightfyre 03-01-2024 12:04 PM
Nate Taylor indicated that six teams have expressed interest in Sneed.

BigBeauford 03-01-2024 12:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 17424087)
Nate Taylor indicated that six teams have expressed interest in Sneed.
Hell yeah, let's start the bids! Do I hear a 2nd and a 4th?

raybec 4 03-01-2024 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 17424087)
Nate Taylor indicated that six teams have expressed interest in Sneed.
That would be great if it's true. Unfortunately there have been times where what Nate Taylor says he's hearing has been way off the mark.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 AM.
Page 6 of 28 « First 2345 6 7891016 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.