![]() |
Quote:
No costs are getting passed on. Their product distribution costs are fixed and my consumption doesn't cause them any extra work or product consumption. Also, I wouldn't have bought Sunday Ticket anyway so it's not like they lost me as a customer. If it wasn't there as a free stream then I just wouldn't have watched. They could easily make money off me if they offered a way to buy single games. I would gladly pay a reasonable price to watch a reliable stream of my favorite team's game - but they won't offer that for whatever reason. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I've tried buying various packages when I've traveled, and every time I do, I get shut out because the package "only works in the USA" or "only works for games shown in your local market". I suspect that the NFL has some huge Gordian Knot of conflicting and overlapping contract agreements dating back to the Great Depression that is impossible to navigate and provide the customer with a straightforward and convenient product. They really need to fix that. And by the way, why would I ever buy a package that "only works for games shown in your local market"? If it's shown in my local market, I'll just watch it on TV. |
Quote:
|
The windmill I tilt at is I only want to deal with one company. I don't want to juggle different subscriptions even if they are only $5 a month or whatever.
If ESPN+ was an add on to YouTube TV, I would add it. No, I'm not going to sign up for your separate ESPN package, but at least I didn't have to watch WV beat KU, so there's that. |
Quote:
I guess maybe I care a little bit because they'll likely overcharge me, but it seems like there's a way this could be done. |
test
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yes, that stream on crackstream really drives up your cost. And so confident in being incorrect. Some things never change., |
FB Streams is top notch
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.