ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Peter King: Chiefs will listen to trade offers for Albert (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271265)

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9512588)
In reality the first four years of his career doesn't have anything to do with what kind of QB he is now. His last 30 starts he's put up a 96.5 QB rating. That's his most recent work. That will be more indictative of the QB his is right now then his career stat line. I don't know how many sacks he had over that span. It'd interesting to know though.

He was sacked 44 times in 2011.

Ain't that some shit?

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512589)
If you want to say Alex Smith compares to Matt Cassel in how they play football, or their level of play...then you're just a ****ing moron.

Well, facts are facts.

Both those male quarterbacks enjoy dinking and dunking!

In fact, one enjoys it even more!

BigMeatballDave 03-18-2013 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9512591)
He was sacked 44 times in 2011.

Ain't that some shit?

He was on pace for 41 last season.

However, Keapernick was on pace for 35. Still shitty.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9512590)
He was dead last in the league this year in first downs allowed.

Now ain't that some shit?

So tell me Hootie...is Sean Smith the worst CB in the NFL, or is he the guy who was dead last in the league in first downs allowed?

Pick one!

he was dead last in first downs allowed?!?! OMG

hopefully he wasn't dead last in times he brought down a runner with ankle tackles...

or dead last in smiling on the field

if he's all three of those things I think Dorsey should be fired immediately...

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-18-2013 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9512587)
Facts are facts, Hootie.

In the case of Alex Smith vs Matt Cassel, their careers are similar, their abilities are similar, the way they play football is similar.

I'm not going to list all of this shit again. None of it can be argued.

You're just being a little shitbird.

Actually you should. "Alex Smith vs Matt Cassel" sounds like "the people vs"-thread for this season. Sublime it would be.
Posted via Mobile Device

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:14 PM

Tom Brady likes to dink and dunk, too. He throws a lot of short passes.

cdcox 03-18-2013 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512566)
and Rodgers is arguably the best QB in the NFL...

I was just saying...comparing someone's sack total to Peyton Manning's is ridiculous. You know, since his entire game is predicated on not taking sacks and making quick reads.

In 2011 Alex Smith's sack rate per dropback was 8.5%

Compared to:

Tebow 9.5
Cassel 7.1
Sanchez 6.6
Rodgers 6.1
Schaub 5.1
Brady 4.8
Palmer 4.8
Rivers 4.8
Eli 4.4
Brees 3.4

Under 5 seems to be a good benchmark. 8.5 in a dink and dunk offense :doh!:

philfree 03-18-2013 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9512591)
He was sacked 44 times in 2011.

Ain't that some shit?

Then he was on pace for far fewer in 2012. Seems his arrow is still pointing up. I'm going to keep my expectations in check but Smith is better than Cassel.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9512595)
He was on pace for 41 last season.

However, Keapernick was on pace for 35. Still shitty.

No one gives a **** about Colin Kaepernick.

We give a **** about Alex Smith, and he LOVES to take sacks, as if each one extended a drive.

BigMeatballDave 03-18-2013 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9512600)
Then he was on pace for far fewer in 2012.

Actually, no.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512598)
Tom Brady likes to dink and dunk, too. He throws a lot of short passes.

Yeah but he's, you know, a hall of famer.

You're getting increasingly obtuse as the offseason wears on.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9512599)
In 2011 Alex Smith's sack rate per dropback was 8.5%

Compared to:

Tebow 9.5
Cassel 7.1
Sanchez 6.6
Rodgers 6.1
Schaub 5.1
Brady 4.8
Palmer 4.8
Rivers 4.8
Eli 4.4
Brees 3.4

Under 5 seems to be a good benchmark. 8.5 in a dink and dunk offense :doh!:

I think a good way to describe Alex Smith is average.

HOWEVER

When Clay spews all his garbage around about PFF and how GOSPEL PFF is...I just want to know how Alex Smith is SO ****ING BAD when THE BIBLE OF JUDGING A PLAYER ON STATISTICS that is PFF.COM had him as the #8 QB in '11 and on pace to be the #11 QB in '12?

APPARENTLY THE SACKS HE TAKES DON'T REALLY AFFECT THAT PFF RATING.

So I suppose it can't really hurt his team all that much.

cdcox 03-18-2013 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9512600)
Then he was on pace for far fewer in 2012. Seems his arrow is still pointing up. I'm going to keep my expectations in check but Smith is better than Cassel.

9.4% sack rate per dropback in 2012. Arrow pointing down.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512596)
he was dead last in first downs allowed?!?! OMG

It's pretty bad.

Basically if you need a first down you throw at Sean Smith.

But don't worry, Bob Sutton is the new Gunther....he will fix everything.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9512608)
Yeah but he's, you know, a hall of famer.

You're getting increasingly obtuse as the offseason wears on.

No.

You use PFF to prove your point when it backs you up...but then ignore it when it doesn't.

You are a hypocrite and you lack general football knowledge. You don't know what you're watching. It probably stems from the fact that you weren't athletic.

The Alex Smith/Matt Cassel comparison is total garbage. They do not have any similarities. Their only similarity is they were both traded to the Chiefs for the #34 overall pick.

That's where it ends.

Now if you want to debate that Alex Smith is average with an upside that stops at efficient game manager, then I'd have nothing to debate...because I'd agree.

But the people saying he's Matt Cassel? You're all ****ing idiots.

BigMeatballDave 03-18-2013 10:22 PM

I'll wait to see what Alex does as a Chief before hating on him.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9512611)
9.4% sack rate per dropback in 2012. Arrow pointing down.

hey I have no doubt the 49ers had an elite team around him

but it's hard to go 19-5 in 24 games as a starter

in short, he's not as bad as this board is trying to sell him as

he's a game manager...

does that excite me? No.

BUT HE'S NOT MATT CASSEL

that's just ****ing ludicrous

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512614)
The Alex Smith/Matt Cassel comparison is total garbage. They do not have any similarities. .

Factually, they do.

Sorry.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9512621)
Factually, they do.

Sorry.

because if you compare their career stats they match up?

lololololololol

you can always twist the stats to have them read however you want

watch a ****ing game every once in a while guy

cdcox 03-18-2013 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512610)
I think a good way to describe Alex Smith is average.

HOWEVER

When Clay spews all his garbage around about PFF and how GOSPEL PFF is...I just want to know how Alex Smith is SO ****ING BAD when THE BIBLE OF JUDGING A PLAYER ON STATISTICS that is PFF.COM had him as the #8 QB in '11 and on pace to be the #11 QB in '12?

APPARENTLY THE SACKS HE TAKES DON'T REALLY AFFECT THAT PFF RATING.

So I suppose it can't really hurt his team all that much.

Alex Smith:

Very accurate on short throws
Sack machine
Bad on 3rd down
Has never generated a lot of production in terms of yards per game or TDs
Avoids interceptions
Performed best when sheltered

Andy Reid:

Offense runs through the QB position
Depends on lots of production from the QB position
His WCO has a downfield flavor

I don't see this as a good match at all.

BigMeatballDave 03-18-2013 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9512621)
Factually, they do.

Sorry.

Statically, John Elway was an average QB.

Do you think he was an average QB?

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512624)
because if you compare their career stats they match up?

lololololololol

you can always twist the stats to have them read however you want

watch a ****ing game every once in a while guy

This isn't about stats.

It's about play style.

Which means watching games and seeing that they both do the same shit for awhile now.

Come on Hootie. There's no way you win this argument. They're both dink and dunk mother****ers, and there's no way around it.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9512628)
This isn't about stats.

It's about play style.

Which means watching games and seeing that they both do the same shit for awhile now.

Come on Hootie. There's no way you win this argument. They're both dink and dunk mother****ers, and there's no way around it.

Tom Brady has been a dink and dunk mother ****er for 3 years now.

BigMeatballDave 03-18-2013 10:27 PM

Aaron Rodgers was sacked 51 times last season.

Sack machine...

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:27 PM

Peyton Manning is a dink and dunk mother ****er now.

philfree 03-18-2013 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9512611)
9.4% sack rate per dropback in 2012. Arrow pointing down.

So they were throwing the ball alot less? He had 20 sacks in 9 starts.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512629)
Tom Brady has been a dink and dunk mother ****er for 3 years now.

You are a poor debater, Hootie.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9512631)
Aaron Rodgers was sacked 51 times last season.

Sack machine...

This is what I'm saying.

Rodgers takes a SHIT TON of sacks.

NOW...it's because he's always looking downfield and looking to extend plays...

which isn't really what Alex Smith does.

but yeah, this is Rodgers' biggest flaw. Sometimes he just needs to take what the defense gives him rather than making hero plays.

Once he fixes this one minor glitch he has the potential to be the best ever.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9512631)
Aaron Rodgers was sacked 51 times last season.

Sack machine...

Dave, you'd think after last offseason, in which I completely ****ing destroyed you in every argument, you'd learn, but you just don't.

Jesus, man.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9512633)
So they were throwing the ball alot less? He had 20 sacks in 11 starts.

he started 9 games I believe...with his 9th game playing a quarter against the Rams before getting concussed.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9512635)
You are a poor debater, Hootie.

where have I been a poor debater?

this debate was over after PFF had Alex Smith at #8 in 2011.

Not because I think that site is really worth a shit, but because you do. You parade that site around like it is the say all and be all.

So if that's the case, we have a QB that has shown he can be a top 8 NFL QB.

WHAT A STEAL!

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512642)
where have I been a poor debater?
!

You brought up a hall of famer trying to defend Alex Smith.

Twice.

You are hopelessly obtuse.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:31 PM

he compares Alex Smith's 2011 to Cassel's 2011

yet Cassel got an overall NEGATIVE PFF ranking and Alex Smith was the 8th best QB in the NFL.

so once and for all CLAYTHAN

are we using PFF as fact or fiction? Because you can't use it as both.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9512644)
You brought up a hall of famer trying to defend Alex Smith.

Twice.

You are hopelessly obtuse.

he dinks and dunks it to Aaron Hernandez, Wes Welker and Danny Woodhead in their hurry up offense every single game.

Dink and dunk isn't terrible football if you're making the right reads...

especially when you have a guy like Jamaal Charles

now, again...I'm not excited for Alex Smith. He's average. We could win 10 games next year. What does that do for me? Yay! A 1st round loss to Houston or Indy or Cincy. Sounds fun.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512645)
he compares Alex Smith's 2011 to Cassel's 2011

yet Cassel got an overall NEGATIVE PFF ranking and Alex Smith was the 8th best QB in the NFL.

so once and for all CLAYTHAN

are we using PFF as fact or fiction? Because you can't use it as both.

It's fact.

And Cassel's best games (lol) in 2010 were given good ratings.

That's what Alex Smith is capable of. Matt Cassel's ceiling...is Alex Smith's ceiling.

Is that clear enough for you?

okcchief 03-18-2013 10:34 PM

Clay's system of using PFF to support his biased views only is obviously the perfect system. We should just leave at that.

cdcox 03-18-2013 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512629)
Tom Brady has been a dink and dunk mother ****er for 3 years now.

Do you seriously think Brady and Smith are comparable?

If you choke down on the short stuff on Brady he will eat you alive on the intermediate passes. When defenses play Brady, they give him the underneath stuff as the lesser of evils. When defensing Smith, teams can cheat up because he isn't a threat to destroy their team downfield.

Smith isn't horrible, but he's a bad match for Reid and isn't a franchise QB.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512648)
We could win 10 games next year.

We won't win 10 games this year.

Just as we weren't winning 10 a year ago.

philfree 03-18-2013 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512639)
he started 9 games I believe...with his 9th game playing a quarter against the Rams before getting concussed.

Yeah I already corrected it. It makes a small difference. So he was on pace for about 35/36 sacks.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 9512652)
Clay's system of using PFF to support his biased views only is obviously the perfect system. We should just leave at that.

There's nothing biased about my views on Alex Smith.

There's no reason for me to dislike him other than the fact that he is of questionable ability.

BigMeatballDave 03-18-2013 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9512638)
Dave, you'd think after last offseason, in which I completely ****ing destroyed you in every argument, you'd learn, but you just don't.

Jesus, man.

:D

This has nothing to do with that.

I see NOTHING about Smith that reminds me of Cassel.

Alex's mechanics are far superior.

Like I said, I'll wait to see what happens before I shit all over Smith. Plug your vagina, the Chiefs offense will be pretty good this year.
They aren't winning any SBs, but at least it will be entertaining.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:36 PM

LOL

so any QB that plays the game of his life, like Cassel did against Seattle, that's his ceiling? And that's what you use to compare everyone to?

Shit, in that case. Cassel has a Matt Ryan ceiling.

Shit, Matt Cassel played like TOM BRADY against Seattle in 2010!

NICE ALEX SMITH HAS A TOM BRADY CEILING! ALEX SMITH WAS 18 FOR 19 FOR 4 TD'S THIS YEAR AGAINST A POTENT CARDINALS PASSING DEFENSE!!!

OMG!!!

THAT'S THE BEST GAME EVER!

ALEX SMITH HAS A JOE MONTANA CEILING! HE DID IT THIS YEAR! IN 2012! HE PLAYED JOE MONTANA GOOD!

ALEX SMITH = JOE MONTANA

CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9512657)
Alex's mechanics are far superior.

But the results are the same.

Dink.

Dunk.

Sack.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9512653)
Do you seriously think Brady and Smith are comparable?

If you choke down on the short stuff on Brady he will eat you alive on the intermediate passes. When defenses play Brady, they give him the underneath stuff as the lesser of evils. When defensing Smith, teams can cheat up because he isn't a threat to destroy their team downfield.

Smith isn't horrible, but he's a bad match for Reid and isn't a franchise QB.

lololololololol

yeah I think Alex Smith = Tom Brady

how many times do I have to say it?

I THINK ALEX SMITH IS AVERAGE.

I also know he's better than Matt Cassel and compares to him in NO WAY, SHAPE OR FORM.

It's a terrible, awful comparison.

cdcox 03-18-2013 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9512631)
Aaron Rodgers was sacked 51 times last season.

Sack machine...

Sack machine + TD machine + yardage machine >>>> Sack machine

BigMeatballDave 03-18-2013 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9512654)
We won't win 10 games this year.

Just as we weren't winning 10 a year ago.

Shitty coaching staff is gone.

They'll be better.

11-5.

Bank on it.

:)

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512660)
LOL

so any QB that plays the game of his life, like Cassel did against Seattle, that's his ceiling? And that's what you use to compare everyone to?

Shit, in that case. Cassel has a Matt Ryan ceiling.

Shit, Matt Cassel played like TOM BRADY against Seattle in 2010!

NICE ALEX SMITH HAS A TOM BRADY CEILING! ALEX SMITH WAS 18 FOR 19 FOR 4 TD'S THIS YEAR AGAINST A POTENT CARDINALS PASSING DEFENSE!!!

OMG!!!

THAT'S THE BEST GAME EVER!

ALEX SMITH HAS A JOE MONTANA CEILING! HE DID IT THIS YEAR! IN 2012! HE PLAYED JOE MONTANA GOOD!

ALEX SMITH = JOE MONTANA

CHAMPIONSHIP!!!

You're spiraling off course now.

I'll bump this thread and completely destroy you in a few months.

The real reason you're doing this is because the facts are undeniable...and it's pissing you and everyone else off that I am so, so right again about this team and our quarterback.

Deal with it boys. I don't have a crystal ball, just a brain. Try turning yours on.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:38 PM

THIS IS AWESOME!

ALEX SMITH PLAYED 1 GAME JOE MONTANA GOOD!

THE 49ERS GAVE US A 29 YEAR OLD WITH A JOE MONTANA CEILING FOR A 2ND ROUNDER AND A CONDITIONAL!?

HOLY **** THAT IS SOME GOOD RAPE

cdcox 03-18-2013 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512665)
lololololololol

yeah I think Alex Smith = Tom Brady

how many times do I have to say it?

I THINK ALEX SMITH IS AVERAGE.

I also know he's better than Matt Cassel and compares to him in NO WAY, SHAPE OR FORM.

It's a terrible, awful comparison.

Why the hell do we have our fate tied to a mid-career average QB?

cdcox 03-18-2013 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512670)
THIS IS AWESOME!

ALEX SMITH PLAYED 1 GAME JOE MONTANA GOOD!

THE 49ERS GAVE US A 29 YEAR OLD WITH A JOE MONTANA CEILING FOR A 2ND ROUNDER AND A CONDITIONAL!?

HOLY **** THAT IS SOME GOOD RAPE

You think Smith has a Joe Montana ceiling????????????

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9512669)
You're spiraling off course now.

I'll bump this thread and completely destroy you in a few months.

The real reason you're doing this is because the facts are undeniable...and it's pissing you and everyone else off that I am so, so right again about this team and our quarterback.

Deal with it boys. I don't have a crystal ball, just a brain. Try turning yours on.

how are you going to destroy me?

I said Alex Smith was an average QB.

I guess if he throws like a girl and turns the ball over 20 times in the first 5 games then I'll admit he's Matt Cassel, Jr.

but if he is as average as I think he'll be...I'm sure the Chiefs will be right around .500 in week 5, week 10, and week 17.

Doesn't excite me. I'm just not dumb enough to think Alex Smith and Matt Cassel are comparable QB's.

BigMeatballDave 03-18-2013 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9512673)
You think Smith has a Joe Montana ceiling????????????

YES! HE'S 100% SERIOUS!

BigMeatballDave 03-18-2013 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512675)

I'm just not dumb enough to think Alex Smith and Matt Cassel are comparable QB's.

This

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9512673)
You think Smith has a Joe Montana ceiling????????????

For the smart man that you are, you have terrible reading comprehension.

Clay said that Matt Cassel = Alex Smith because in 2010 his best game (Seattle) was comparable to any Alex Smith game in 2011.

I countered with Alex Smith in 2012 and his 18 for 19, 4 TD performance against an above average passing defense that beat Tom Brady in New England is something that would rival a Joe Montana game...

so therefore in Clay's world Alex Smith has a Joe Montana ceiling, you know, since his best game in 2012 was Joe Montana-esque.

okcchief 03-18-2013 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9512656)
There's nothing biased about my views on Alex Smith.

There's no reason for me to dislike him other than the fact that he is of questionable ability.

I don't like Alex Smith, but the way you only bring up stats that effect him negatively is laughable.

I've watched them both play plenty because my wife is a 49er fan. He dinks and dunks but he can move the chains. Cassel dinks and dunks to 3 and out. Cassel is horrible. There are many backups that should start in the league over him. Smith is average.

I don't like the Smith move, but there is no question in my mind he's better than Cassel. You don't have to justify to me that we would be better off rolling the dice on Geno. The exaggeration isn't necessary. If you watch both play one is clearly better than the other.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9512671)
Why the hell do we have our fate tied to a mid-career average QB?

wasn't my idea

all I'm saying is

I'm not stupid enough to say Alex Smith is Matt Cassel...

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512670)
THIS IS AWESOME!

ALEX SMITH PLAYED 1 GAME JOE MONTANA GOOD!

THE 49ERS GAVE US A 29 YEAR OLD WITH A JOE MONTANA CEILING FOR A 2ND ROUNDER AND A CONDITIONAL!?

HOLY **** THAT IS SOME GOOD RAPE

http://i.imgur.com/hYSfD.gif

cdcox 03-18-2013 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9512677)
YES! HE'S 100% SERIOUS!

Okay, I see that he was Hottieing.

The question then becomes, why doesn't our QB have a Joe Montana ceiling? Geno certainly does (remember Joe was a 3rd round draft pick).

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 9512683)
I don't like Alex Smith, but the way you only bring up stats that effect him negatively is laughable.

I've watched them both play plenty because my wife is a 49er fan. He sinks and dunks but he can move the chains. Cassel dinks and dunks to 3 and out. Cassel is horrible. There are many backups that should start in the league over him. Smith is average.

I don't like the Smith move, but there is no question in my mind he's better than Cassel. You don't have to justify to me that we would be better off rolling the dice on Geno. The exaggeration isn't necessary. If you watch both play one is clearly better than the other.

and pretty much THIS.

BigMeatballDave 03-18-2013 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 9512683)
I don't like Alex Smith, but the way you only bring up stats that effect him negatively is laughable.

I've watched them both play plenty because my wife is a 49er fan. He sinks and dunks but he can move the chains. Cassel dinks and dunks to 3 and out. Cassel is horrible. There are many backups that should start in the league over him. Smith is average.

I don't like the Smith move, but there is no question in my mind he's better than Cassel. You don't have to justify to me that we would be better off rolling the dice on Geno. The exaggeration isn't necessary. If you watch both play one is clearly better than the other.

IMO, Smith is an average starting QB, whereas Cassel is an average Backup QB.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512681)
Clay said that Matt Cassel = Alex Smith because in 2010 his best game (Seattle) was comparable to any Alex Smith game in 2011.

I never brought up the Seattle game. That was you.

But Cassel played several good games that year. Not elite performances but good games.

That's what we would get out of Alex for a whole year at his 2011 performance.

cdcox 03-18-2013 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512681)
For the smart man that you are, you have terrible reading comprehension.

Clay said that Matt Cassel = Alex Smith because in 2010 his best game (Seattle) was comparable to any Alex Smith game in 2011.

I countered with Alex Smith in 2012 and his 18 for 19, 4 TD performance against an above average passing defense that beat Tom Brady in New England is something that would rival a Joe Montana game...

so therefore in Clay's world Alex Smith has a Joe Montana ceiling, you know, since his best game in 2012 was Joe Montana-esque.

I posted, started scrolling up and hit that post. I didn't see the earlier one where you made it clearer that you were exaggerating.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okcchief (Post 9512683)
He dinks and dunks but he can move the chains. .

No he can't.

Over the course of his career he has consistently been among the league's worst quarterbacks at converting third downs.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9512689)
Okay, I see that he was Hottieing.

The question then becomes, why doesn't our QB have a Joe Montana ceiling? Geno certainly does (remember Joe was a 3rd round draft pick).

I'm just tired of Clay parading around every thread with his PFF rankings...but when they don't fit his argument he conveniently ignores them or in Alex Smith's case...dismisses them.

and then he says something ridiculous like the following:

Matt Cassel = Alex Smith because in 2010 his best game was equivalent to Alex Smith's best game.

In which case, I countered that OUTRAGEOUS argument by saying Alex Smith's 2012 game against the Arizona Cardinals @ Arizona against a great pass defense was Joe Montana-esque because he was:

18 for 19 and had 4 TD's and played a perfect game.

Which means Alex Smith = Joe Montana because he did it one time. (Actually twice he graded out perfectly in QBR against Buffalo in 2012 too)

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512698)
and then he says something ridiculous like the following:

Matt Cassel = Alex Smith because in 2010 his best game was equivalent to Alex Smith's best game.

That's not what I said.

You are hopelessly obtuse.

SAUTO 03-18-2013 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9512600)
Then he was on pace for far fewer in 2012. Seems his arrow is still pointing up. I'm going to keep my expectations in check but Smith is better than Cassel.

He took 24 sacks in less than 9 games iirc.
Posted via Mobile Device

cdcox 03-18-2013 10:48 PM

So everyone agrees that acquiring Smith (an average QB that is going to give us long odds of winning a SB, let alone building a dynasty) is a shitty move unless accompanied by the acquisition of a high-potential young development project?

philfree 03-18-2013 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9512701)
He took 24 sacks in less than 9 games iirc.
Posted via Mobile Device

I just counted them and came up with 20. I could have counted wrong I suppose but I don't think I did.

okcchief 03-18-2013 10:48 PM

It's kind of like Kyle Orton at the end of the 2011 season. He sucked in the redzone, but he was clearly more effective than Cassel. Even though dumb ****s like re-run said they were the same. Neither is a franchise QB and that's the problem. Let's not get carried away though.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:48 PM

I have to wonder if Alex Smith would take so many sacks if they weren't always in the lead?

Sometimes, when you're up a score...why force a ball rather than take a sack and just punt the ball away...especially when you have an elite defense?

There are just so many factors to statistics...

again, to me...Alex Smith lies somewhere between Trent Dilfer and Trent Green. He also lies somewhere between way ahead and way way ahead of Matt Cassel.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:49 PM

Anyway, not to derail this "Branden Albert thread," but this tweet scares me.

Quote:

@Jacobs71

I think Miami is the best landing spot for Albert. They have the cap to pay him what he wants. He fits their scheme really well.

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:50 PM

and that's the same thing with his lack of yards this past season...

why pass the ball all over the field when you're consistently winning? It made no sense.

we compare his passing stats to an Andrew Luck who's team was constantly fighting to win games which meant he was constantly throwing the ball and constantly racking up yards...

there are just so many freaking variables...

Alex Smith is what he is (not Matt Cassel)...but cherry picking stats to make him look like Matt Cassel just makes whoever is doing it look like a god damn moron.

philfree 03-18-2013 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9512704)
So everyone agrees that acquiring Smith (an average QB that is going to give us long odds of winning a SB, let alone building a dynasty) is a shitty move unless accompanied by the acquisition of a high-potential young development project?

Yeah we need the QBoTF in this years or next years draft. A 1st or 2nd rounder. Alex Smith alone isn't enough unless we win a SB with him. :)

SAUTO 03-18-2013 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9512655)
Yeah I already corrected it. It makes a small difference. So he was on pace for about 35/36 sacks.

Eight full games is half. I read 24 you read 20.
Ill go with your number just to make it easy.

That would be closer to 40 than 35 by my math
Posted via Mobile Device

Hootie 03-18-2013 10:51 PM

I'm ok with Albert leaving for a 2nd round pick (hopefully a 2 and a 4).

That trade wouldn't bother me a bit.

I'd still be trading for a trade down on draft day...to me it's Geno (not happening), trade down, or total bust.

SAUTO 03-18-2013 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 9512705)
I just counted them and came up with 20. I could have counted wrong I suppose but I don't think I did.

I just looked at the season total.
Posted via Mobile Device

okcchief 03-18-2013 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdcox (Post 9512704)
So everyone agrees that acquiring Smith (an average QB that is going to give us long odds of winning a SB, let alone building a dynasty) is a shitty move unless accompanied by the acquisition of a high-potential young development project?

I agree with that. Unless, he's one of those rare late bloomers which I seriously doubt. I do think they draft someone, and Stanzi will be gone. I also expect them to move away from Smith after next season if they aren't considerably better.

SAUTO 03-18-2013 10:53 PM

On fox sports.com
Posted via Mobile Device

Hammock Parties 03-18-2013 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512714)
.but cherry picking stats to make him look like Matt Cassel just makes whoever is doing it look like a god damn moron.

We're not cherry picking.

We're talking about entire seasons.

cdcox 03-18-2013 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess (Post 9512707)
I have to wonder if Alex Smith would take so many sacks if they weren't always in the lead?

Sometimes, when you're up a score...why force a ball rather than take a sack and just punt the ball away...especially when you have an elite defense?

There are just so many factors to statistics...

again, to me...Alex Smith lies somewhere between Trent Dilfer and Trent Green. He also lies somewhere between way ahead and way way ahead of Matt Cassel.

When everything goes well you get 2010 Matt Cassel. To me that is Matt Cassel's ceiling. That's what I thought his ceiling was when we acquired him. Alex Smith's 2011 isn't that different from Matt Cassel's 2010. Smith might be a little more consistent, might have a little higher ceiling. But if you push him like Reid's offense will, I think he could crack. I don't think he will blossom in to a top 8 QB.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.