ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Houston Signs (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=293416)

The Bad Guy 07-16-2015 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11601772)
Joel Corry

Chiefs have $8.63M of salary cap room after Justin Houston's deal. There should be right around $27.5M of '16 cap space (assumes $150M cap).

Either roll it over or sign someone else?

28 million in cap space is very nice with the large deals they've given JC, Alex, Maclin and Houston.

They'll roll some over but I really think they'll make a play for Mathis.

Mother****erJones 07-16-2015 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ (Post 11601700)
yah, this Broncos team is better than that Broncos team so you can curse, cuss and live in the fairy land of kc denial but it still doesn't change the fact that the Broncos are the Broncos and the chiefs are well... because chiefs.

As much as I ****ing hate Denver, yall own us. Pure and simple. These fans are in denial and have trash talked PM for 3 years and he's been our daddy since he's entered the league.

Mother****erJones 07-16-2015 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 11601880)
28 million in cap space is very nice with the large deals they've given JC, Alex, Maclin and Houston.

They'll roll some over but I really think they'll make a play for Mathis.

Intel? Because Reid has denied interest in Mathis. Things can change certainly in an instant for sure though.

Packfan12 07-16-2015 09:23 AM

I would like to see KC win that division.

Mother****erJones 07-16-2015 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11601823)
Dj and Tamba won't cost much if they wanna stay next year.

I agree. This defense is close knit. They want to stay together and I believe they will for another year beyond this season.

Packfan12 07-16-2015 09:27 AM

We play Denver coming off a bye but at Mile High. That will be tough.

DaneMcCloud 07-16-2015 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefGator (Post 11601819)
Smith is making quite a bit this year ( 7+ million if I remember correctly). I would expect any new contract for him to REDUCE the cap hit this year.

Makes more sense to give a player like Howard or DeVito an extension/raise. But honestly, most of the players that are entering UFA are playing this year on a 'prove-it' type of situation.

Sign Stephenson to an extension? Why would we and why would he?

DeVito? No. He's old and just cut his number in half.

Howard? Possibly, depending on whether or not he continues to ascend.

O.city 07-16-2015 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 11601837)
Dumping Smith for those players is not a wise move and I think Smith is overrated. But maybe if Peters blooms...

Why us smith overrated?

DJ's left nut 07-16-2015 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 11601787)
Not sure why, either.

They obviously structured the deal in such a way that it would open up cap space this year for somebody.

Yeah, but I keep forgetting about that rollover feature.

There's really no 'downside' to backloading, provided you're smart about it. If you do it just to free up a bunch of money that you'll burn on overpriced fading vets (i.e. Evan Mathis), then it's stupid.

If you do it just to create some flexibility and be opportunistic should the right player come available or approach the team about an extension, then worst case scenario is that it doesn't get spent and it still rolls over into next season. At that point, Houston will have essentially 'forward paid' the first $8 million of next year's cap hit by taking less this year.

It's the same thing Smith did with his deal last year. Everyone bitches about Smith's cap figure over the next 3 years but they forget that he took a pretty massive cut last year that rolled over into this season and as such has actually pre-paid some of those dollars.

The Bad Guy 07-16-2015 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 11601891)
Intel? Because Reid has denied interest in Mathis. Things can change certainly in an instant for sure though.

Don't have any inside info on it. Just a hunch.

Reid denied interest when the Chiefs barely had 500k in cap space. Far different ball game now.

The Bad Guy 07-16-2015 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 11601915)
DeVito? No. He's old and just cut his number in half.

Howard? Possibly, depending on whether or not he continues to ascend.

It Catapano can play at a solid level, DeVito shouldn't be here next year.

DJ's left nut 07-16-2015 09:58 AM

Wow. Take a look at this article regarding a 'fair' deal for a Houston extension:

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-...ton-and-chiefs

That's damn near identical to what the Chiefs actually did. KC tacked an extra year on the end that both helps Houston's agents say they got Watt money while also spreading the signing bonus number out a bit more, but otherwise it's virtually a carbon copy of what the Chiefs ended up signing Houston to.

It really is all a show. This sure looks like the end game was pretty apparent from the start.

Hammock Parties 07-16-2015 10:00 AM

Now all the Clarks need to do is plant some weed in his car and the substance abuse clause can kick in!

The Franchise 07-16-2015 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11601940)
Wow. Take a look at this article regarding a 'fair' deal for a Houston extension:

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-...ton-and-chiefs

That's damn near identical to what the Chiefs actually did. KC tacked an extra year on the end that both helps Houston's agents say they got Watt money while also spreading the signing bonus number out a bit more, but otherwise it's virtually a carbon copy of what the Chiefs ended up signing Houston to.

It really is all a show. This sure looks like the end game was pretty apparent from the start.

Joel Corry is smart when it comes to contracts. He's a good follow on twitter for contract breakdowns as well.

ToxSocks 07-16-2015 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 11601933)
It Catapano can play at a solid level, DeVito shouldn't be here next year.

Catapano? LMAO

DeVito's replacement is already on the the team and it sure as **** isn't the Great White Hype.

penbrook 07-16-2015 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 11601945)
Catapano? LMAO

DeVito's replacement is already on the the team and it sure as **** isn't the Great White Hype.

Yea Howard is replacing Devito

ToxSocks 07-16-2015 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 11601946)
Yea Howard is replacing Devito

yup

RealSNR 07-16-2015 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 11601849)
The latest argument I heard here about Hunt cheapness being the source of all our ills is that Clark is keeping the team from drafting a first round QB because he doesn't want to pay what it would cost for a contract extension if said QB was deserving of one.

Wasn't that Black Bob, though?

DJ's left nut 07-16-2015 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 11601945)
Catapano? LMAO

DeVito's replacement is already on the the team and it sure as **** isn't the Great White Hype.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 11601947)
yup

Seconded.

I had a Howard post typed but when I was looking for any news on his possible extension I found that Corry article instead and thought it was much more interesting.

Catapano can't be counted on for anything at this point. However, if Howard goes out there and makes a leap like Bailey did last year, that's just the thing you keep some powder dry for. The in-season extension that keeps an ascending player off the market.

RunKC 07-16-2015 10:15 AM

Catapano will be nothing more than an obvious passing down DL. But hey if he can get 4 sacks this year it's a steal being he was a 7th round pick.

Mr. Laz 07-16-2015 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11601940)
Wow. Take a look at this article regarding a 'fair' deal for a Houston extension:

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-...ton-and-chiefs

That's damn near identical to what the Chiefs actually did. KC tacked an extra year on the end that both helps Houston's agents say they got Watt money while also spreading the signing bonus number out a bit more, but otherwise it's virtually a carbon copy of what the Chiefs ended up signing Houston to.

It really is all a show. This sure looks like the end game was pretty apparent from the start.

an agent's point of view has nothing to do with fair

Halfcan 07-16-2015 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Packfan12 (Post 11601893)
I would like to see KC win that division.

:thumb:

This should be our year. But if PM adds one more playoff meltdown on his resume before he retires-so be it. I hope it is us that knocks them out of the playoffs this year.

It would be sweet to finally get revenge and end his career with a loss to us.

DJ's left nut 07-16-2015 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz (Post 11601968)
an agent's point of view has nothing to do with fair

An agent is going to know more about a player's market value than you or I ever will. Hell, he's going to know more about a player's market value than a GM will because the GM is prohibited by the CBA from calling around to find out - it's collusion.

An agent is going to know a hell of a lot more about the market value for a player than anyone else you could talk to.

O.city 07-16-2015 10:53 AM

So, are people actually upset that we signed Houston?

loochy 07-16-2015 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11602015)
So, are people actually upset that we signed Houston?

i think blackbob is the only one

O.city 07-16-2015 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy (Post 11602027)
i think blackbob is the only one

Ah, ok

Hammock Parties 07-16-2015 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11602015)
So, are people actually upset that we signed Houston?

I feel so badly for him.

Shaid 07-16-2015 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11600640)
Hmmm. On the surface, I don't like that. I'd prefer to eat more cap this season while we appear to be pretty loaded and ready to make a run.

If his cap hit is minimal this year, it's just going to jack it up in future years and I'd prefer not to see multiple $20+ million cap hits like the Suh deal.

Whatever. Dorsey has earned the benefit of the doubt for the most part. If true, though, we're certainly going to make a run for someone/several someones. If we structured it like that to just sit on the cap space I'll break some shit.

I was thinking the same but you do now have the ability to carry over cap from the previous year so that might also be worth considering. Then we need to think about the other players we'll want to sign to long term deals, like Poe, etc. Maybe they'll start working on getting some of those done early. They should.

ThaVirus 07-16-2015 11:14 AM

Someone explain this "rolling cap over to next year" thing, please..

Pasta Little Brioni 07-16-2015 11:22 AM

Somewhere Stop's creature sobs profusely

Mother****erJones 07-16-2015 11:22 AM

If you're upset about this, then you're just the person that bitches to bitch. You'd complain if you were hung with new rope.

DJ's left nut 07-16-2015 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11602044)
Someone explain this "rolling cap over to next year" thing, please..

If you don't spend it, it carries over into the following year.

So if the Chiefs don't spend $8 million of this year's cap and next year's 'base' cap is $150 million, the Chiefs would actually have a cap of $158 million.

Rausch 07-16-2015 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11602015)
So, are people actually upset that we signed Houston?

Only the biggest of the big dip$#its...

DJ's left nut 07-16-2015 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 11602059)
Only the biggest of the big dip$#its...

It's one of those "If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him" kind of things.

No, nobody worth mentioning is upset about the Houston signing. However, it's CP. Whenever everyone's happy, nobody has anything to say. So we have to just assume that a fair number of people are unhappy so we can call them idiots.

Maybe he blows out his knee tomorrow and never takes the field again. If so, shit happens. This is a fair deal for a great player and there's just no reason to be upset about it.

Fortunately, nobody really is.

Rausch 07-16-2015 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11602064)
It's one of those "If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him" kind of things.

No, nobody worth mentioning is upset about the Houston signing. However, it's CP. Whenever everyone's happy, nobody has anything to say. So we have to just assume that a fair number of people are unhappy so we can call them idiots.

You, a few weeks ago, made a point of pegging me as one of those people.

http://quicklol.com/wp-content/uploa...emotivator.jpg

BigMeatballDave 07-16-2015 11:39 AM

Suck it, blackbob http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=434

Pasta Little Brioni 07-16-2015 11:42 AM

Is black bob the worst poster of all time?

BigChiefFan 07-16-2015 11:43 AM

I'm stoked that ownership stepped up and dug deep in the coffers. The future looks bright and love the team the Chiefs are building. It's great players want to play for the Chiefs.

ThaVirus 07-16-2015 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11602056)
If you don't spend it, it carries over into the following year.



So if the Chiefs don't spend $8 million of this year's cap and next year's 'base' cap is $150 million, the Chiefs would actually have a cap of $158 million.


Wow, that's pretty cool. That must be a new development..?

O.city 07-16-2015 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11602064)
It's one of those "If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him" kind of things.

No, nobody worth mentioning is upset about the Houston signing. However, it's CP. Whenever everyone's happy, nobody has anything to say. So we have to just assume that a fair number of people are unhappy so we can call them idiots.

Maybe he blows out his knee tomorrow and never takes the field again. If so, shit happens. This is a fair deal for a great player and there's just no reason to be upset about it.

Fortunately, nobody really is.

I'm pissed

O.city 07-16-2015 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11602127)
Wow, that's pretty cool. That must be a new development..?

Since the last cba, and iirc, the chiefs have done it a few times.

Wake up dummyo:-)

ChiefGator 07-16-2015 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11602131)
Since the last cba, and iirc, the chiefs have done it a few times.

Wake up dummyo:-)

Yeah, Pioli was good at that one.

RINGLEADER 07-16-2015 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11602056)
If you don't spend it, it carries over into the following year.

So if the Chiefs don't spend $8 million of this year's cap and next year's 'base' cap is $150 million, the Chiefs would actually have a cap of $158 million.

I heard yesterday on NFL Radio that the Houston deal was "team friendly" in year two and would give the Chiefs a lot of cap space (evidently relative to how it could have been structured), but then never heard or found the exact deal. Sorry if it's been posted somewhere herein but does anyone have those specifics yet?

ToxSocks 07-16-2015 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER (Post 11602172)
I heard yesterday on NFL Radio that the Houston deal was "team friendly" in year two and would give the Chiefs a lot of cap space (evidently relative to how it could have been structured), but then never heard or found the exact deal. Sorry if it's been posted somewhere herein but does anyone have those specifics yet?

Someone broke it down a few posts back.

I wouldn't exactly call it team friendly. Sounds like someone made that shit up. Year 1 is team friendly. Year two is 19million.

Tribal Warfare 07-16-2015 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 11602179)
Someone broke it down a few posts back.

I wouldn't exactly call it team friendly. Sounds like someone made that shit up. Year 1 is team friendly. Year two is 19million.

Teicher said that on ESPN

RINGLEADER 07-16-2015 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 11602179)
Someone broke it down a few posts back.

I wouldn't exactly call it team friendly. Sounds like someone made that shit up. Year 1 is team friendly. Year two is 19million.

Ah thanks. It was Pat Kirwin I think.

go bo 07-16-2015 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmd'r&Chief (Post 11600444)
Anybody can do the math. At an even break all 6 years, that's over 16 million, that's a nice cap hit. Of course I'm sure that the hit this year will be less impacting, which only means the hit in the future years will be even more impacting.

Nobody gives 2 ****s about you're ****ing approval. You think you're something relevant because you have no life and hang around these boards in an unhealthy fashion? Come back to planet earth, you in denial, senile, dumb ****. I'll punch your ****ing mother right in her ****ing twat.

hey, milkman is younger than me and i'm not senile yet!

Nightfyre 07-16-2015 02:33 PM

Chiefs should use some of that space to extend Poe for like 8 years.

Tribal Warfare 07-16-2015 02:51 PM

<div id="embedVideoContainer_455513667906" class="embedVideo"><iframe id="embedVideo_455513667906" name="embedVideo_455513667906" src="http://cbsprt.co/1K9MqAo" width="640" height="360" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe></div>

for shits and giggles

Halfcan 07-16-2015 03:30 PM

Prisco got owned!

How can he say VDbag had a better year than Houston? Dumb.

ct 07-16-2015 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 11601094)
Approach them about it now. With the tag option, just gotta get 1 locked up

honestly i think poe is the one who is getting overvalued, he may be the one who walks

Quesadilla Joe 07-16-2015 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 11602402)
Prisco got owned!

How can he say VDbag had a better year than Houston? Dumb.

Prisco is saying what we've been telling you guys for months... Houston gets most of his sacks in bunches against bad tackles. Von is not allowed to go one on one against bad tackles, teams double him constantly. Houston is a good player but he isn't the elite, cream of the crop talent that Von is.

RunKC 07-16-2015 03:51 PM

Until Von gets 23 sacks he's not as good as Houston. He's not even a top 3 defensive player from his draft class.

Quesadilla Joe 07-16-2015 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11602452)
Until Von gets 23 sacks he's not as good as Houston

So you're saying that Justin Houston is better than Reggie White?

RunKC 07-16-2015 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 11602444)
Prisco is saying what we've been telling you guys for months... Houston gets most of his sacks in bunches against bad tackles. Von is not allowed to go one on one against bad tackles, teams double him constantly. Houston is a good player but he isn't the elite, cream of the crop talent that Von is.

JJ Watt gets half of his sacks vs a terrible Jags and Titans offensive line

BigMeatballDave 07-16-2015 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 11602444)
Prisco is saying what we've been telling you guys for months... Houston gets most of his sacks in bunches against bad tackles. Von is not allowed to go one on one against bad tackles, teams double him constantly. Houston is a good player but he isn't the elite, cream of the crop talent that Von is.

**** YOU

DJ's left nut 07-16-2015 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 11602444)
Prisco is saying what we've been telling you guys for months... Houston gets most of his sacks in bunches against bad tackles. Von is not allowed to go one on one against bad tackles, teams double him constantly. Houston is a good player but he isn't the elite, cream of the crop talent that Von is.

This was a stupid argument when it was made years ago as justification for dealing Jared Allen. It's a stupid argument now.

Virtually ALL pass-rushers get their sacks in bunches and a vast majority of those come against poor lineman. Miller had 6 games last year where he didn't get a sack; Houston had 3. And yes, 7 of Houston's sacks came in 2 games (Rams and Chargers) but the thing about those games is that Houston controlled those football games. So setting aside the fact that it means that Houston had 15 sacks on the season even if you take out his two best games (still more than Miller's 14), Houston's performance in those 2 games was enormous.

If you have a player like Houston or DT (or yes, even Miller) that is going to go out there 2 or 3 times a year and just put the opposition in a stranglehold, that's incredibly valuable. It's also how virtually all pass-rushers manifest their worth to a defense.

But again, I think the fact that Houston is also a premier coverage and run-support strong-side OLB is a feather in his cap rather than a knock against him as you keep trying to make it. Few players can get 22 sacks against a QB and hold their own in contain and coverage. Had they just put Houston in Hali's spot and sent him on kamikaze runs after the QB 80+% of the time, he'd have had more sacks. You note that he doesn't face premier LTs but ignore the fact that he had to operate on the strong side, dealing with a potential chip from the TE and more run responsibility. He took it in stride and was still an explosive pass-rusher.

Von's a year removed from his knee injury and playing essentially the same position as Houston is. We'll see what kind of impact he has. It will be pretty easily settled on the field.

BigMeatballDave 07-16-2015 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 11602457)
So you're saying that Justin Houston is better than Reggie White?

No, but that's because there is much more passing now than when he played. More opportunities for defenses today.

Also, eat shit you trolling turd herder.

Mother****erJones 07-16-2015 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 11602444)
Prisco is saying what we've been telling you guys for months... Houston gets most of his sacks in bunches against bad tackles. Von is not allowed to go one on one against bad tackles, teams double him constantly. Houston is a good player but he isn't the elite, cream of the crop talent that Von is.

You're right 22 sacks isn't elite. GTFO you ignorant buffoon.

Halfcan 07-16-2015 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 11602444)
Prisco is saying what we've been telling you guys for months... Houston gets most of his sacks in bunches against bad tackles. Von is not allowed to go one on one against bad tackles, teams double him constantly. Houston is a good player but he isn't the elite, cream of the crop talent that Von is.

:doh!:

Yep that sucks when D. players get sacks in bunches. I guess sacks only count if they are against All Pros now.

Houston had better stats, better in coverage, no penalties and barely missed being named D player of the year...

But please, keep telling how he is Not an elite player. STFU

Halfcan 07-16-2015 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11602477)
This was a stupid argument when it was made years ago as justification for dealing Jared Allen. It's a stupid argument now.

Virtually ALL pass-rushers get their sacks in bunches and a vast majority of those come against poor lineman. Miller had 6 games last year where he didn't get a sack; Houston had 3. And yes, 7 of Houston's sacks came in 2 games (Rams and Chargers) but the thing about those games is that Houston controlled those football games. So setting aside the fact that it means that Houston had 15 sacks on the season even if you take out his two best games (still more than Miller's 14), Houston's performance in those 2 games was enormous.

If you have a player like Houston or DT (or yes, even Miller) that is going to go out there 2 or 3 times a year and just put the opposition in a stranglehold, that's incredibly valuable. It's also how virtually all pass-rushers manifest their worth to a defense.

But again, I think the fact that Houston is also a premier coverage and run-support strong-side OLB is a feather in his cap rather than a knock against him as you keep trying to make it. Few players can get 22 sacks against a QB and hold their own in contain and coverage. Had they just put Houston in Hali's spot and sent him on kamikaze runs after the QB 80+% of the time, he'd have had more sacks. You note that he doesn't face premier LTs but ignore the fact that he had to operate on the strong side, dealing with a potential chip from the TE and more run responsibility. He took it in stride and was still an explosive pass-rusher.

Von's a year removed from his knee injury and playing essentially the same position as Houston is. We'll see what kind of impact he has. It will be pretty easily settled on the field.

:thumb: Excellent Post! Rep worthy!

ThaVirus 07-16-2015 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11602459)
JJ Watt gets half of his sacks vs a terrible Jags and Titans offensive line


They also move him around the defensive line to match him up with the opponent's weakest offensive lineman.

Halfcan 07-16-2015 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11602491)
They also move him around the defensive line to match him up with the opponent's weakest offensive lineman.

I guess that makes V Dbag better than Watt- because he only plays against All Pros and is triple-teamed every single play according to Knowmore.

I wonder if Vonn ever got a drivers license?

-King- 07-16-2015 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11602477)
This was a stupid argument when it was made years ago as justification for dealing Jared Allen. It's a stupid argument now.

Virtually ALL pass-rushers get their sacks in bunches and a vast majority of those come against poor lineman. Miller had 6 games last year where he didn't get a sack; Houston had 3. And yes, 7 of Houston's sacks came in 2 games (Rams and Chargers) but the thing about those games is that Houston controlled those football games. So setting aside the fact that it means that Houston had 15 sacks on the season even if you take out his two best games (still more than Miller's 14), Houston's performance in those 2 games was enormous.

If you have a player like Houston or DT (or yes, even Miller) that is going to go out there 2 or 3 times a year and just put the opposition in a stranglehold, that's incredibly valuable. It's also how virtually all pass-rushers manifest their worth to a defense.

But again, I think the fact that Houston is also a premier coverage and run-support strong-side OLB is a feather in his cap rather than a knock against him as you keep trying to make it. Few players can get 22 sacks against a QB and hold their own in contain and coverage. Had they just put Houston in Hali's spot and sent him on kamikaze runs after the QB 80+% of the time, he'd have had more sacks. You note that he doesn't face premier LTs but ignore the fact that he had to operate on the strong side, dealing with a potential chip from the TE and more run responsibility. He took it in stride and was still an explosive pass-rusher.

Von's a year removed from his knee injury and playing essentially the same position as Houston is. We'll see what kind of impact he has. It will be pretty easily settled on the field.

Great post.
Posted via Mobile Device

ChiefGator 07-16-2015 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 11602477)
This was a stupid argument when it was made years ago as justification for dealing Jared Allen. It's a stupid argument now.

Virtually ALL pass-rushers get their sacks in bunches and a vast majority of those come against poor lineman.

Yep... reminds me of Vermiel saying things like, "If you remove the two long running plays we gave up, we held him pretty well." Most RBs gets yards in several large bunches in a game. Same with sacks.

MagicHef 07-16-2015 04:33 PM

Honestly, I think there's a perception issue with Houston, and I think that it's affecting how AFCW fans (including me) see him vs. how he's seen league-wide.

-Against Denver, he has 4.5 sacks in 7 games (0.64 sacks per game), and 1 sack in the last 4 games.

-Against Oakland, he has 3 sacks in 7 games (0.43 sacks per game).

-Against San Diego, he has 5 sacks in 7 games (0.71 sacks per game), but before his very last game, he had 1 in 6 games (0.17 sacks per game).

So against AFCW opponents, he's had 12.5 sacks in 21 games. Before the last game of the season, he had 8.5 sacks in 20 AFCW games (0.43 sacks per game). Against the rest of the league, he's had 36 sacks in 38 games (0.95 sacks per game). His pass rushing is way more effective against teams outside the AFCW.

BlackOp 07-16-2015 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 11602444)
Prisco is saying what we've been telling you guys for months... Houston gets most of his sacks in bunches against bad tackles. Von is not allowed to go one on one against bad tackles, teams double him constantly. Houston is a good player but he isn't the elite, cream of the crop talent that Von is.

If you rely on Prisco to validate a terrible opinion...He posted a 2014 top 100 list that other beat-writers/analysts laughed at...he was openly ridiculed for being an idiot. It was amazingly horrible. I guess it makes sense that you like him...he is unashamed about his hatred of the Chiefs and made sure he listed Von one spot above Houston. The guy is seriously a petty douche...that only gets mentioned because of this trait...instead of his writing.

Mother****erJones 07-16-2015 04:43 PM

Prisco is borderline reeruned.

Sweet Daddy Hate 07-16-2015 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 11601791)
And for anyone thinking we will keep Sean Smith next season..

Joel Corry ‏@corryjoel
Chiefs have $8.63M of salary cap room after Justin Houston's deal. There should be right around $27.5M of '16 cap space (assumes $150M cap).

Writing is on the wall. We will pay him just under $12 million if we franchise him.

I think we will be more proactive and keep that money for DJ, Howard, Abdullah, Tamba if he's still productive and hopefully one of Allen/Stephenson if they play well this year.

Gooooooood......

ThaVirus 07-16-2015 04:50 PM

Houston Signs
 
Franchise tag would be just under $11 mil for Sean Smith? It'll depend on how this season goes, and our money situation, but I'd think long and hard about that. IIRC, he's already scheduled to make $8 mil this year.

ThaVirus 07-16-2015 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 11602533)
Honestly, I think there's a perception issue with Houston, and I think that it's affecting how AFCW fans (including me) see him vs. how he's seen league-wide.

-Against Denver, he has 4.5 sacks in 7 games (0.64 sacks per game), and 1 sack in the last 4 games.

-Against Oakland, he has 3 sacks in 7 games (0.43 sacks per game).

-Against San Diego, he has 5 sacks in 7 games (0.71 sacks per game), but before his very last game, he had 1 in 6 games (0.17 sacks per game).

So against AFCW opponents, he's had 12.5 sacks in 21 games. Before the last game of the season, he had 8.5 sacks in 20 AFCW games (0.43 sacks per game). Against the rest of the league, he's had 36 sacks in 38 games (0.95 sacks per game). His pass rushing is way more effective against teams outside the AFCW.


You only play 6 divisional games a season. Seems like a favorable statistic for us.

I'd like to see the stats on that for the past two season with hurries included. People love to look at sacks but hurries are an important factor as well.

Red Beans 07-16-2015 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 11602545)
Prisco is borderline reeruned.

Don't insult the mentally handicapped.

DJ's left nut 07-16-2015 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 11602533)
Honestly, I think there's a perception issue with Houston, and I think that it's affecting how AFCW fans (including me) see him vs. how he's seen league-wide.

-Against Denver, he has 4.5 sacks in 7 games (0.64 sacks per game), and 1 sack in the last 4 games.

-Against Oakland, he has 3 sacks in 7 games (0.43 sacks per game).

-Against San Diego, he has 5 sacks in 7 games (0.71 sacks per game), but before his very last game, he had 1 in 6 games (0.17 sacks per game).

So against AFCW opponents, he's had 12.5 sacks in 21 games. Before the last game of the season, he had 8.5 sacks in 20 AFCW games (0.43 sacks per game). Against the rest of the league, he's had 36 sacks in 38 games (0.95 sacks per game). His pass rushing is way more effective against teams outside the AFCW.

I said in some random thread around here that Houston and Hali need to get their shit together against Denver, no question.

I feel like the Broncos tackles (with Manning's help) have been able to pretty much handle both Houston and Hali in one on one matchups and if you can do that against KC, you pretty much have us by the balls.

I think the team in general has largely played like monkeys ****ing a football against Denver and I think Manning is in their heads; it's not just Houston and Hali. If they hope to take the division from him this year, they have to play their A games against that squad and to this point they just haven't done it.

I will be sorely disappointed with Justin Houston if he goes out there and gets fed his lunch by the Broncos again this year. The Chiefs have a chance to do big things this year but it has to start with our best players playing their best games in our biggest matchups. It may not even show up on the stat sheet, but you can see it as the game unfolds. Houston and Hali have not risen to the occasion for certain and if I'm a Broncos fan, that's probably something that diminish Houston substantially in my eyes.

It's probably similar to how Chiefs fans viewed Champ Bailey. Eddie Kennison didn't always destroy Champ, but he did a couple of times and it sure made Champ seem mortal to us. Against the rest of the league he was probably a huge difference maker but I know I never worried about the fact that the Broncos had Bailey on their squad and it was almost certainly because of the number that Kennison put on him a time or two.

RealSNR 07-16-2015 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 11602457)
So you're saying that Justin Houston is better than Reggie White?

They played different positions, asswipe.

You may as well ask us if we think Dontari Poe is better than Deion Sanders.

milkman 07-16-2015 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 11601645)
Dude, YOU'RE the one that doesn't understand English.

Sorry, asshole. This time YOU'RE the dumbass. You've been the dumbass on this topic all offseason.

And I see it's still not registering.


Tell me this.

Can you say with certainty that Eric Kush is not a major downgrade from Hudson?

Can you say with any certainty that Allen is going to step up and play at a level better than Fulton?
Or that Fanaika will?
Or that Fulton will suddenly develop an athletic ability that he clearly didn't have last year?

Can you say with certainty that the good Donald Stephenson will show up at RT?
Or that Allen steps up there?

Is there any single player auditioning for any spots from center to RT that is a clear and certain upgrade?

Chiefs Pantalones 07-16-2015 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 11602558)
You only play 6 divisional games a season. Seems like a favorable statistic for us.

I'd like to see the stats on that for the past two season with hurries included. People love to look at sacks but hurries are an important factor as well.

Justin Houston led the league in QB pressures last year, with J.J. Watt coming in second.

Mr. Flopnuts 07-16-2015 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 11601765)
There had better be a player they want really damn badly to not max out the cap hit this year and shave some of that money off later. That's a ****ton of money from 2016 and onwards for 1 player. Worth it, but still.

Carry that cap into next year. Relax. They're covered either way.

aturnis 07-16-2015 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise (Post 11601837)
Dumping Smith for those players is not a wise move and I think Smith is overrated. But maybe if Peters blooms...

Based on last year alone, he was a shutdown corner. That doesn't mean he always has been or always will be, but he absolutely was, and it was obvious by game 5-6 he was killing it.

RealSNR 07-16-2015 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 11602639)
Tell me this.

Can you say with certainty that Eric Kush is not a major downgrade from Hudson?

Can you say with any certainty that Allen is going to step up and play at a level better than Fulton?
Or that Fanaika will?
Or that Fulton will suddenly develop an athletic ability that he clearly didn't have last year?

Can you say with certainty that the good Donald Stephenson will show up at RT?
Or that Allen steps up there?

Is there any single player auditioning for any spots from center to RT that is a clear and certain upgrade?

There's zero downgrade to either spot, and nothing is clear and certain. EVER. Justin Houston might play like shit. Alex Smith might throw for 5000 yards. But I'm pretty certain that we at the very least will see very slight improvements to both positions this season

Could it get worse than Zach Fulton? No, it can't. That's impossible. Because Zach Fulton is still around to be Zach Fulton if all of the candidates are worse than he is. And that's not very likely to happen. Anybody with an ounce of common sense would say that barring injury, the RG position has at least around a 90% chance or greater of giving us AT THE VERY LEAST a slight upgrade.

Could it get worse than Ryan Harris? The only reason why more people didn't bitch that guy out is because just two years ago Eric Fisher had the infamous distinction of being the worst ****ing ever RT the Chiefs have ever thrown out for a season. Oh, and Mike McGlynn happened to be playing on the same line. So no, Donald Stephenson or Jeff Allen can not be worse than Ryan Harris. Are they upgrades? Very very likely.

Overwhelming odds to have at the very least slight improvement at both positions on the right side. Massive upgrade at LG. Downgrade at C.

One position is NOT going to kill this OL and make it worse. That is ****ing silly. If it's worse than last year it's because we have a nasty injury at one of the tackle spots or to Ben Grubbs.

aturnis 07-16-2015 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 11602444)
Prisco is saying what we've been telling you guys for months... Houston gets most of his sacks in bunches against bad tackles. Von is not allowed to go one on one against bad tackles, teams double him constantly. Houston is a good player but he isn't the elite, cream of the crop talent that Von is.

False. Houston had sacks in all but 3 games. BUF, SEA, DEN. So, false.

Von IS most certainly allowed to go 1 on 1 with bad tackles. Eric Fisher shut him down late his rookie season. Alone. So again, false.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.