ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Veach's '21 Offseason Plan to Keep Us Thriving: Let's speculate (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=336980)

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 02-11-2021 02:43 AM

Just watched the Bucs game again. Boy did Sneed have a terrible game

Dull Tools 02-11-2021 03:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 15544134)
I sure hope Frank Clark will consider restructuring his deal.

He got paid big bucks to sack the QB and cause disruption in the backfield.

He's not meeting his end of the bargain....not at his salary. Only Mack and Donald have a bigger cap hit as far as defensive players are concerned.

I think the only option to get rid of him would be to do what the Rams did with Goff. Try and trade him with some picks. Hopefully there will be a willing taker as there are plenty of teams with awful defences.

kccrow 02-11-2021 06:53 AM

1. Do whatever it takes to fix the offensive line.
2. If there's the opportunity, add a decent pass rusher but don't do it at the cost of #1.

Reid has been fine with WR beyond round 1 throughout his career, I'm not worried about that.

In58men 02-11-2021 07:23 AM

TRADE BACK!!!!!!!!

Use whatever extra pick(s) on OL.

MahomesMagic 02-11-2021 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 15544322)
I'd love TY Hilton on a 1-year rental. Had a down year last year.

Probably won't happen, but maybe a small chance.

If the point from moving on from Sammy is we need someone that is likely to be healthy TY doesn't fit that criteria.

He is very talented but has been injury prone recently.

If he comes super cheap, sure.

RunKC 02-11-2021 08:57 AM

One FA I’d really look into if the price is right is KJ Wright. He’s a lot more rangy than Damien Wilson and he’s very balanced.

Whatever it takes to make sure that shit stain Neimann doesn’t see the field

smithandrew051 02-11-2021 09:08 AM

I trust Burt

pugsnotdrugs19 02-11-2021 09:16 AM

One thing I’m loving about mock drafts I’ve looked at is there seems to be some real depth at the majority of our major need areas.

Veach always talks about letting the depth of a position in a draft class or FA class guide decision making.

Draft is deep at OL, FA is deep with receivers.

Well let’s pretend they bring Osemele back as he clearly loves being a Chief. Based on the draft depth alone at OL, they could get two long-term starting caliber players along the OL in the first 100 picks. Especially if they trade back from 31 and add another day 2 pick.

You could leave the draft with short and long term answers along the OL AND still use quality resources at other needs. I’m thinking WR in free agency probably. If you could make the Jason Kelce thing happen, options really open up.

O.city 02-11-2021 09:30 AM

I'd restructure and resign guys like Mathieu, Jones, Mahomes etc. Guys you know are still in their prime during the deal etc.

I'd flip a 4th rounder to the Eagles for Kelce and do something financially to get that money under control and better for KC.

I'd take a swing and sign Osemele to play LG. Thats a shot, but if it works out, thats what you need in the middle. Put LDT at RG.

I'd look at the tackles in the draft and see waht I like. See what's going on with Schwartz and go from there.

Ideally, if we get a little lucky, you could spend a 4th round pick and go into next year with a OL of

Niang-Osemele-Kelce-LDT-Schwartz

It may not work out. But for just a 4th, thats got some real potential.

The Franchise 02-11-2021 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15544508)
I'd restructure and resign guys like Mathieu, Jones, Mahomes etc. Guys you know are still in their prime during the deal etc.

I'd flip a 4th rounder to the Eagles for Kelce and do something financially to get that money under control and better for KC.

I'd take a swing and sign Osemele to play LG. Thats a shot, but if it works out, thats what you need in the middle. Put LDT at RG.

I'd look at the tackles in the draft and see waht I like. See what's going on with Schwartz and go from there.

Ideally, if we get a little lucky, you could spend a 4th round pick and go into next year with a OL of

Niang-Osemele-Kelce-LDT-Schwartz

It may not work out. But for just a 4th, thats got some real potential.

Exact copy of the offseason that I posted in the draft thread.

O.city 02-11-2021 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15544537)
Exact copy of the offseason that I posted in the draft thread.

You copied me.

O.city 02-11-2021 09:45 AM

If I could sign one decently big free agent, it woudl be Hassan Reddick

The Franchise 02-11-2021 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15544539)
You copied me.

Bitch, I posted mine yesterday.

RunKC 02-11-2021 10:04 AM

Would love Hassan Reddick but I don’t see how that guy doesn’t get paid big. Some team will want an athletic former first rd pick like him

O.city 02-11-2021 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15544586)
Would love Hassan Reddick but I don’t see how that guy doesn’t get paid big. Some team will want an athletic former first rd pick like him

He'd be nice across from Clark.

Some Gm's with balls are gonna win this offseason.

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 10:39 AM

Hell no to Osemele and LDT as your 2 starting Gs. Both are injury prone and put us at a higher risk of ending right back where we were.

O.city 02-11-2021 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544643)
Hell no to Osemele and LDT as your 2 starting Gs. Both are injury prone and put us at a higher risk of ending right back where we were.

It's not ideal. I'd probably draft another one or something in the mid rounds.

But it's more likely the route you will have to go from a financial spot.

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 10:45 AM

Seriously. LDT has been available for 30 games the past 3 seasons he's suited up for us. That does not include his opt out season. For comparison, Sammy Watkins has been available for 34 games his 3 years here.


He's less reliable than HAMMY TWATKINS.

Pants 02-11-2021 10:46 AM

Hey, guys, I know! Let's just go to the Offensive Line forest and pick us 5 new awesome linemen off those trees! Duh! So easy.

staylor26 02-11-2021 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544643)
Hell no to Osemele and LDT as your 2 starting Gs. Both are injury prone and put us at a higher risk of ending right back where we were.

Dude, you have unrealistic expectations and you’re setting yourself up for disappointment.

The Chiefs will sign guys like Remmers and Osemele while drafting a couple guys too.

They aren’t going to sign any top free agents.

And they’ll be fine because the OL wasn’t even much of an issue until they had Remmers and Wylie as their bookends.

The Franchise 02-11-2021 10:48 AM

Dane Brugler and Matt Miller both have us taking Landon Dickerson, OG/OC in the first round.

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15544659)
Dude, you have unrealistic expectations and you’re setting yourself up for disappointment.

The Chiefs will sign guys like Remmers and Osemele while drafting a couple guys too.

They aren’t going to sign any top free agents.

And they’ll be fine because the OL wasn’t even much of an issue until they had Remmers and Wylie as their bookends.

Just 1 is not ideal, but whatever. Out of your goddamned minds if you think pencilling in both those brokedicks to be starters is a good idea.

staylor26 02-11-2021 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544665)
Just 1 is not ideal, but whatever. Out of your goddamned minds if you think pencilling in both those brokedicks to be starters is a good idea.

The offense was completely fine when Remmers was at RT.

Penciling them in as starters is fine as long as we also improve our depth. The goal is to make sure we never have those 2 as our T’s again. As long as we do that, we’ll be alright.

pugsnotdrugs19 02-11-2021 10:51 AM

Idk that injuries are something you can be too predictive of when it comes to linemen. They all seem to get hurt at different times, especially how LDT did with guys falling on his legs.

Even iron man Schwartz couldn’t last forever.

Just get as many capable ones as you can.

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 15544672)
Idk that injuries are something you can be too predictive of when it comes to linemen. They all seem to get hurt at different times, especially how LDT did with guys falling on his legs.

Even iron man Schwartz couldn’t last forever.

Just get as many capable ones as you can.

Osemele tore both his knee ligaments running down the field. After his myriad of injury issues throughout his career, I think you can pretty confidently put him in the brokedick tier.

O.city 02-11-2021 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544675)
Osemele tore both his knee ligaments running down the field. After his myriad of injury issues throughout his career, I think you can pretty confidently put him in the brokedick tier.

Don't disagree. At all. But he's gonna be cheap. And if he's healthy, you can get a big surplus of value from him if he stays healthy. I'd also draft some guys in there, but you're gonna have to hit on something here.

pugsnotdrugs19 02-11-2021 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544675)
Osemele tore both his knee ligaments running down the field. After his myriad of injury issues throughout his career, I think you can pretty confidently put him in the brokedick tier.

When I say sign him, I’m saying for the minimum.

Because if he does play, especially in the playoffs, the value is likely to be tremendous.

Chris Meck 02-11-2021 10:56 AM

I think a lot of times there's a physical ceiling with low picks and UDFA's. There are exceptions (small school, or poor coaching, etc.)

I think what we ran into is what happens when injuries plus the limitations of developing depth from low range talent combined.

We won't be signing high end FA's I don't think, but yes, some lower end vets will be necessary. Osemele, if he can play would be great. Remmers probably returns although I sincerely hope he's not starting.

And Niang you have to hope hits. and you're going to need to draft a couple.

And hope that maybe a Darryl Williams, or Prince Wanegho can play.

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 11:05 AM

We also got an incredibly lucky draw through the AFC side of the playoff bracket this year that helped mask our OL woes.

Cleveland was playing without Vernon and Garrett was on a snap count and clearly hurting when he did play.

Buffalo had a good chunk of their DL on the IR and their DEs really aren't that good at rushing the passer anyway.

Hell, we almost lost the Falcons game and a chance to lock up HFA early because Grady Jarrett made the IOL his collective bitch.

Chris Meck 02-11-2021 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15544664)
Dane Brugler and Matt Miller both have us taking Landon Dickerson, OG/OC in the first round.

That doesn't seem to be all that great of value at #31.

I'd rather DE or one of the OT's.

RunKC 02-11-2021 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 15544683)
When I say sign him, I’m saying for the minimum.

Because if he does play, especially in the playoffs, the value is likely to be tremendous.

I’d bring him back and put him on the practice squad for quality depth.

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15544708)
I’d bring him back and put him on the practice squad for quality depth.

LMAO Sign him to the PS and hold him until the playoffs? That'd be hilarious if it happened.

The Franchise 02-11-2021 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15544706)
That doesn't seem to be all that great of value at #31.

I'd rather DE or one of the OT's.

Nope.

In Miller’s case he states that it’s what he’s hearing....not what he would do.

Not a fan of drafting a lineman coming off an ACL tear to fix the line.

staylor26 02-11-2021 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15544719)
Nope.

In Miller’s case he states that it’s what he’s hearing....not what he would do.

Not a fan of drafting a lineman coming off an ACL tear to fix the line.

He’s hearing the Chiefs want Dickerson?

Could you post the quote please?

The Franchise 02-11-2021 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15544723)
He’s hearing the Chiefs want Dickerson?

Could you post the quote please?

Not necessarily the player.

Quote:

But first, a few rules:

* No trades.
* No compensatory picks until they’re all announced by the NFL.
* Team needs are pre-free agency, which means some top tier needs will be met by re-signing current players.
* This mock is based on what I’m hearing, not what I would do.
Quote:

31. Kansas City Chiefs —
Team Needs: Tier 1 CB, WR, IOL | Tier 2 LB, OT, TE | Tier 3 IDL, EDGE, CB

The Pick: OC LANDON DICKERSON, ALABAMA
Analysis: There should be one mission in Kansas City this off-season: Protect Patrick Mahomes.

Many will look at the Chiefs’ offensive line and assume that they’ll be fine if healthy in 2021, but a closer look tells you it’s unlikely they’ll be healthy. Or fine.

Eric Fisher tore his Achilles in the AFC Championship Game. He’s out a year. Minimum.

Mitchell Schwartz hurt his back in October and hasn’t practiced since. There were rumors throughout the playoff run that he could retire.

Laurent Duvernay-Tardif opted out of the 2020 season and could return, but he was a rumored cap casualty before the season. He could be waived as the team moves into expensive years for Frank Clark, Chris Jones and Tyrann Mathieu.

The interior of this line was already patchwork, which was exposed in the Super Bowl as Mahomes ran for his life. General manager Brett Veach watched his star player take shot after shot on Sunday night. That lasting image will prompt him to secure the offensive line through the 2021 draft.

To start that process, finding a captain on the line and an anchor in the middle is gigantic. Landon Dickerson has the toughness, leadership, strength and technique to be trusted with creating the pocket for Mahomes to step up into. He’s a Day 1 starter who finds himself available this late only because a torn ACL suffered in the SEC Championship Game.

Dickerson would be slated for an early season return. Right in time to slide into the starting center spot.

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 11:23 AM

Analysis: There should be one mission in Kansas City this off-season: Protect Patrick Mahomes.

https://media.tenor.com/images/b9ab3...a88e/tenor.gif

RunKC 02-11-2021 11:26 AM

Landon Dickerson is talented but please Veach say no to broke dicks:

Quote:

Dickerson began his collegiate career at Florida State. He was named the Seminoles' starter at right guard during training camp and became the first true freshman offensive lineman to start a season opener since Jamie Dukes in 1982. He started the first seven games of the season before suffering a season-ending knee injury.[4] Dickerson started the first four games of his sophomore season before missing the rest of the season due to injury.[5] He used a medical redshirt after sustaining an ankle injury two games into his junior year.

Dickerson started the first 11 games of the season for the Crimson Tide as a redshirt senior before suffering ligament damage in his right knee against Florida in the 2020 SEC Championship Game.[12] He

smithandrew051 02-11-2021 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544761)
Analysis: There should be one mission in Kansas City this off-season: Protect Patrick Mahomes.

https://media.tenor.com/images/b9ab3...a88e/tenor.gif

I’m fine with calling that the top priority, but it’s hardly the only thing we need to do.

We need a second legit WR. Watkins can be that guy, but he couldn’t stay healthy or even produce consistently. I don’t think the guy we need is on the roster currently unfortunately.

We need more pass rush. If Jones and Clark aren’t getting 8-12 sacks each with consistent pressure, then we need another edge rusher to give us 6-8 sacks.

Hoover 02-11-2021 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15544773)
Landon Dickerson is talented but please Veach say no to broke dicks:

PASS

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 15544776)
I’m fine with calling that the top priority, but it’s hardly the only thing we need to do.

We need a second legit WR. Watkins can be that guy, but he couldn’t stay healthy or even produce consistently. I don’t think the guy we need is on the roster currently unfortunately.

We need more pass rush. If Jones and Clark aren’t getting 8-12 sacks each with consistent pressure, then we need another edge rusher to give us 6-8 sacks.


We need a bunch of big and strong OL to Protect Patrick Mahomes.

What a coincidence. I agree with everything you said.

staylor26 02-11-2021 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544786)
What a coincidence. I agree with everything you said.

So ignore all other needs and only address OL?

I’m curious, would you go OL in the 1st and 2nd?

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15544788)
So ignore all other needs and only address OL?

I’m curious, would you go OL in the 1st and 2nd?

If the board falls right and the WR, DE, and OL talent when it's your time to choose is near equivalent, then absolutely yes.

The Franchise 02-11-2021 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544801)
If the board falls right and the WR, DE, and OL talent when it's your time to choose is near equivalent, then absolutely yes.

And literally nobody has said that they shouldn’t do that.

staylor26 02-11-2021 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544801)
If the board falls right and the WR, DE, and OL talent when it's your time to choose is near equivalent, then absolutely yes.

Now what if DE and WR, not OL, are clearly BPA for our first 2 picks?

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15544805)
And literally nobody has said that they shouldn’t do that.

I'll take it a step further and say if the WR and DE talent is marginally better than the OL talent I'd still take the OL.

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15544811)
Now what if DE and WR, not OL, are clearly BPA for our first 2 picks?

Then I'd say you should've traded up for an OT in the first.

RunKC 02-11-2021 11:39 AM

Looking at Matt Miller’s mock and man oh man is this draft filled with a ton of quality OL and receivers.

I’m gonna be on the trade down train all the way to the draft.

Juan Thornhill, Rashad Fenton, Nick Allegretti, L’Jarius Sneed, Mike Danna, Tershawn Wharton, Mecole Hardman. All these guys were available from the mid 2nd rd on.

This staff has been one of the best in the league at scouting and finding these gems. Trade back, load your picks up and trust your board to fill our needs.

htismaqe 02-11-2021 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544813)
I'll take it a step further and say if the WR and DE talent is marginally better than the OL talent I'd still take the OL.

That's exactly the kind of mistake we don't want.

The only thing worse than having a shitty line would be having a shitty line that we spent valuable picks on.

The Franchise 02-11-2021 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544816)
Then I'd say you should've traded up for an OT in the first.

**** value. Draft offensive line. Got it.

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15544822)
**** value. Draft offensive line. Got it.

Yep. The most valuable thing the Chiefs can do this Offseason is ensure Mahomes stays upright and protected to the best of their ability.

RunKC 02-11-2021 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544813)
I'll take it a step further and say if the WR and DE talent is marginally better than the OL talent I'd still take the OL.

Yeah uh this pretty much bolded in gigantic text in draft history on the “what to not do” section

The Franchise 02-11-2021 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544829)
Yep. The most valuable thing the Chiefs can do this Offseason is ensure Mahomes stays upright and protected to the best of their ability.

And then when we have no pass rush? Or Hill goes down and we have dick at WR?

O.city 02-11-2021 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15544819)
Looking at Matt Miller’s mock and man oh man is this draft filled with a ton of quality OL and receivers.

I’m gonna be on the trade down train all the way to the draft.

Juan Thornhill, Rashad Fenton, Nick Allegretti, L’Jarius Sneed, Mike Danna, Tershawn Wharton, Mecole Hardman. All these guys were available from the mid 2nd rd on.

This staff has been one of the best in the league at scouting and finding these gems. Trade back, load your picks up and trust your board to fill our needs.

the Allegretti love around here is a bit much. He's fine. He's a backup IOL spot starter.

Chief Roundup 02-11-2021 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15544788)
So ignore all other needs and only address OL?

I’m curious, would you go OL in the 1st and 2nd?

I am not trying to interrupt you alls conversation here, but that has to depend on who is there and how much they are going to be able to help the team.
I don't have a problem with the team going OL in the 1st and 2cd if all the players of other positions that they deemed valuable at those positions are gone. If we can get the OT Jenkins in the first and then the DL, CB, and WR prospects are gone in the 2cd but a top IOL is available then yep that is the best value to upgrade the team.

htismaqe 02-11-2021 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544816)
Then I'd say you should've traded up for an OT in the first.

So just sell it all to get an OT?

Seriously, that makes no sense.

By all means, draft an OT if one is there.

But drafting one out of perceived need, talent or value be damned, is how you end up like the ****ing Texans, not the Chiefs.

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15544833)
And then when we have no pass rush? Or Hill goes down and we have dick at WR?

We can still win. Our toughest games have come when the opponent gets consistent pressure rushing 4 and dropping 7.

htismaqe 02-11-2021 11:46 AM

I can't ****ing wait until this team trades up for an OT that starts the season as a backup guard.

That's going to be ****ing AWESOME!

O.city 02-11-2021 11:46 AM

You need an all around roster to win SB's. Can't lock in on a certain spot.

I feel like I'm in a twilight zone when I'm the calm one not freaking out. The Chiefs need to upgrade the OL. They aren't stupid, they will.

I'm excited.

Pants 02-11-2021 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544829)
Yep. The most valuable thing the Chiefs can do this Offseason is ensure Mahomes stays upright and protected to the best of their ability.

No shit. Nobody wants to see Patrick get demolished by the pass rush. But you have to be realistic.

I feel like you're reacting to what happened in the SB when basically every starter was hurt/opted out and people had to be reshuffled. You gotta take those blinders off, man. We were fine until Fish went down.

Andy Reid said our Oline will be fine and he's optimistic about them going into the 2021 season. Do we need help? Of course. But you can't expect them to spend all of their resources on Oline. That will never happen and it shouldn't happen.

htismaqe 02-11-2021 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544837)
We can still win. Our toughest games have come when the opponent gets consistent pressure rushing 4 and dropping 7.

And what happens when you just take whoever is there because they're an OL and they ****ing suck or don't fit the scheme?

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15544836)
So just sell it all to get an OT?

Seriously, that makes no sense.

By all means, draft an OT if one is there.

But drafting one out of perceived need, talent or value be damned, is how you end up like the ****ing Texans, not the Chiefs.

Jesus ****ing Christ when have I ever insinuated you'd trade up to just draft any OT? You're trading up to draft an anchor on your line that you're confident is a decade plus starter for you. There's a couple of those in this draft.

staylor26 02-11-2021 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 15544835)
I am not trying to interrupt you alls conversation here, but that has to depend on who is there and how much they are going to be able to help the team.
I don't have a problem with the team going OL in the 1st and 2cd if all the players of other positions that they deemed valuable at those positions are gone. If we can get the OT Jenkins in the first and then the DL, CB, and WR prospects are gone in the 2cd but a top IOL is available then yep that is the best value to upgrade the team.

I meant go into the draft thinking we have to get OL with our first 2 picks.

O.city 02-11-2021 11:47 AM

I actually feel better taking WR's later, Andy and CO can develop skill players really well.

EVERYONE CALM DOWN.

htismaqe 02-11-2021 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15544841)
You need an all around roster to win SB's. Can't lock in on a certain spot.

I feel like I'm in a twilight zone when I'm the calm one not freaking out. The Chiefs need to upgrade the OL. They aren't stupid, they will.

I'm excited.

As you well should be. Free agency and the draft is WIDE OPEN. There's no reason to zero in on anything, the Chiefs have tons of options.

htismaqe 02-11-2021 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544844)
Jesus ****ing Christ when have I ever insinuated you'd trade up to just draft any OT? You're trading up to draft an anchor on your line that you're confident is a decade plus starter for you. There's a couple of those in this draft.

And when that doesn't happen and you've given up 2 or 3 1st round picks to get them?

Chief Roundup 02-11-2021 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15544836)
So just sell it all to get an OT?

Seriously, that makes no sense.

By all means, draft an OT if one is there.

But drafting one out of perceived need, talent or value be damned, is how you end up like the ****ing Texans, not the Chiefs.

Come on man. It depends on how high up they would have to trade to get the OT that they wanted and what that compensation was to get there.

O.city 02-11-2021 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15544845)
I meant go into the draft thinking we have to get OL with our first 2 picks.

They won't.

People are losing their minds because we lost in the Sb playing an OL made up of guys off the street against a top 3 DL in teh league. Shit happens.

O.city 02-11-2021 11:50 AM

I wouldn't have a problem trading up for a LT. If you aren't sold on Fisher coming back and think whoever is the anchor at LT for the next however long, go for it. LT is important.

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15544848)
And when that doesn't happen and you've given up 2 or 3 1st round picks to get them?

LMAO I love how you assume the worst is going to happen when the Chiefs draft OL in these hypotheticals. "Every OL the Chiefs could possibly draft will suck. The DEs and WRs won't though, jeez value on the board blah blah blah."

Chief Roundup 02-11-2021 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15544845)
I meant go into the draft thinking we have to get OL with our first 2 picks.

No matter the position that would be a defeatist type attitude. I am sure that you are well aware of that and that is your point.

htismaqe 02-11-2021 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 15544850)
Come on man. It depends on how high up they would have to trade to get the OT that they wanted and what that compensation was to get there.

To get one of the top 4 guys, they're probably going to have to trade 1st round picks.

They traded 2 first round picks to get up to #10 to draft Mahomes. It will likely be that expensive or a bit more to do it this year.

It's simply not worth it when this team has so many needs.

htismaqe 02-11-2021 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544856)
LMAO I love how you assume the worst is going to happen when the Chiefs draft OL in these hypotheticals. "Every OL the Chiefs could possibly draft will suck. The DEs and WRs won't though, jeez value on the board blah blah blah."

You're assuming the best.

I'm asking valid questions.

You've basically said you're taking an OT no matter what happens. So I'm asking what you do if this or that happens. It's a logical response to somebody who speaks in absolutes and doesn't bother to consider alternative outcomes

O.city 02-11-2021 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15544860)
To get one of the top 4 guys, they're probably going to have to trade 1st round picks.

They traded 2 first round picks to get up to #10 to draft Mahomes. It will likely be that expensive or a bit more to do it this year.

It's simply not worth it when this team has so many needs.

Some needs are more important than others though. At some point, you gotta get a LT. It's pretty important.

htismaqe 02-11-2021 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544856)
LMAO I love how you assume the worst is going to happen when the Chiefs draft OL in these hypotheticals. "Every OL the Chiefs could possibly draft will suck. The DEs and WRs won't though, jeez value on the board blah blah blah."

By the way, assuming the worst would be me saying:

"They will fail."

I'm asking you:

"What happens IF they fail?"

I'm not assuming anything, at all.

I'm asking you to justify your position that they absolutely must take an OT no matter how the board falls.

htismaqe 02-11-2021 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15544866)
Some needs are more important than others though. At some point, you gotta get a LT. It's pretty important.

There's a dozen ways to get one that don't involve giving up a ton of capital to do it.

We're not fans of the Texans.

RunKC 02-11-2021 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15544829)
Yep. The most valuable thing the Chiefs can do this Offseason is ensure Mahomes stays upright and protected to the best of their ability.

Veach made a big offer to Andrus Peat last year when Fisher and Schwartz were healthy. He also drafted Niang despite them both being healthy.

He’s going to make moves on the OL.

TEX 02-11-2021 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15544851)
They won't.

People are losing their minds because we lost in the Sb playing an OL made up of guys off the street against a top 3 DL in teh league. Shit happens.

That, plus seeing #15 running for his life and getting killed. Kinda leaves a lasting impression.

staylor26 02-11-2021 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15544846)
I actually feel better taking WR's later, Andy and CO can develop skill players really well.

EVERYONE CALM DOWN.

If they wait a little on a WR, I’d prefer that they hedge their bets and grab 2.

Sassy Squatch 02-11-2021 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15544870)
By the way, assuming the worst would be me saying:

"They will fail."

I'm asking you:

"What happens IF they fail?"

I'm not assuming anything, at all.

I'm asking you to justify your position that they absolutely must take an OT no matter how the board falls.

Bullshit.

And when that doesn't happen and you've given up 2 or 3 1st round picks to get them?

when

when

when

O.city 02-11-2021 11:54 AM

The odds are, whoever we take at 31 is either a bust or a decent NFL starter based on the history of end of first round picks.

Picks at the end of the first just aren't as valuable as early rounders (I'll concede that to staylor in regards to RB's, still woudln't spend a first on one though) so if you have to trade a couple to get a dude thats a legit NFL stud, do it.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.