![]() |
Chiefs trade their 1st for for Tunsil, 4th for Hopkins. It all goes down on draft day.
You heard it here first, folks. |
Quote:
The Chiefs just gave more money to a RT than their previous LT signed for that they moved from RT. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Chiefs didn't move Orlando from RT to LT, the Ravens did that. The Chiefs were clearly not satisfied with Orlando's performance this year and they rightly shouldn't have been. It's exclusive from the other situation where Wylie was an even bigger bag of dicks, he just so happened to cost substantially less. Taylor has played a whopping 2 career collegiate games at LT. Him playing LT is a fallback plan, not THE plan. I'm confident of that. Taylor made that abundantly clear in his presser. |
Quote:
|
Another crazy thought! We all expect Veach to get us Hopkins or OBJ which for example, Hopkins will cost about $19M. So getting Tunsil + Hopkins is just not gonna happen.
How about: Texans get: #31 2024 1st 2025 1st CEH Chiefs get: #12 Tunsil With the #12 pick we take 1 of the top two WRs, Quentin Johnston or Jaxon. So now we have the best OL in the NFL plus a young stud and cheap WR to pair with our other guys. Value is actually spot on if you look at the numbers! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Then move this year's 3rd + MVS for D. Hopkins, and restructure CJ to make the money work. OT Tunsil WR Hopkins DL J Carter, T Wilson, or M. Murphy + 7 Draft picks between rounds 4-7 lol now there's a draft plan! |
|
Tunsil just signed a 3 year, $75 million dollar deal with the Texans. They also offloaded Cooks to Dallas…
|
He signed an extension 3 years 70 millions... highest paid LT in the game again.
Texans also traded cooks to the Boys for 6 and 5. |
I'll embed.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Per Saint Omni, <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Texans?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Texans</a> star LT Laremy Tunsil is once again the highest-paid tackle in NFL history, securing a 3-year deal worth $75M with $50M fully guaranteed and $60M in total guarantees. The blindside protector does a true reset on the market. Tunsil represented himself. <a href="https://t.co/pEC68BRPSu">pic.twitter.com/pEC68BRPSu</a></p>— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1637450940067332103?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 19, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Anticlimactic but not surprising. Texans would've been crazy to let him go.
|
Quote:
|
Never wanted him anyway.
Take my word for it. No need to check my previous posts on the subject. Dude sucks anyway. |
Quote:
|
I assume that means Dallas is out on OBJ now?
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
I'd rather get Mahomes another weapon.
We have elite G-C-G which is perfect match to awareness, mobility of Mahomes. Just don't be dog shit. |
Quote:
|
He resigned with the texans 3 for 75
|
I wonder if Veach had been trying to get both Tunsil and Cooks.
|
Quote:
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Per Saint Omni, <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Texans?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Texans</a> star LT Laremy Tunsil is once again the highest-paid tackle in NFL history, securing a 3-year deal worth $75M with $50M fully guaranteed and $60M in total guarantees. The blindside protector does a true reset on the market. Tunsil represented himself. <a href="https://t.co/pEC68BRPSu">pic.twitter.com/pEC68BRPSu</a></p>— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1637450940067332103?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 19, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
I knew it was a pipe dream but was hoping varch would pull a rabbit out of his butt
|
Tunsil got the deal OBJ thought he was going to get......................
|
I can’t imagine paying this bum that kind of money! You couldn’t give me picks to make him the left tackle of my favorite team, the Kansas City Chiefs!
|
Quote:
|
The film study that I’ve put in over the last two and a half hours has been eye opening to day the least
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
So a whole lot of drama for nothing?
|
Quote:
|
I’m glad this stupid pipe dream is over.
Now all we need is for Nuk to get traded to wherever. |
Tunsil is going to give guys like OBJ and Lamar false optimism with serving as their own agent.
|
Quote:
https://media3.giphy.com/media/1xonT...200w.webp&ct=g |
Quote:
Then he gets a young capable Tackle with the right traits for 80% of the cost of the highest paid guy. Goddam I love Brett Veach |
Never seemed very likely that Tunsil would be traded, but it was interesting to think about for a while. Glad Veach didn't get sucked into overpaying for Tunsil at the end of the day. Too bad Tunsil will never win a SB.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think he learned that he needs to go into negotiations with a firm line that he won’t cross. We saw it with Silverback, AJ and now Tunsil. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You can have the highest paid RT if your LT is on a rookie deal. Yeah we have a rookie at LT but the rest of the line is amazing, leaving us with only one questionable spot, LT. I think Taylor can make the switch if necessary but then we have two questionable spots, both Tackles. Not ideal, basically what we had last year but with more upside. I dont like that we dont get a 1st round edge in this scenario but given it solves the O line for years, Id take it and be happy. |
I'm fine with it. Would have taken a ton of high draft picks and would have killed our cap situation for the next several years. All in on grabbing OBJ or Hopkins and making a huge trade up in the draft for our franchise left tackle
|
It was a fun conversation and one worth entertaining. The smoke was real, Veach scoped it out. After signing Taylor there was no way we were going to trade for Tunsil. I believe Taylor was Plan C after Orlando and Tunsil. Veach works fast.
In the end we saved a lot of money and draft capitol by not moving on Tunsil. |
Quote:
As for trading up, what I've been seeing is that people are enamored with "don't trade multiple 1s" but then the reality is we're 1 pick removed from saying we're giving up multiple 2's. It's not like we're giving up two top-15 picks anymore. If Veach wants it, he should go up and get it. There has been communication with Houston, so I'm guessing they also discussed the cost to move to #12... I'd guess it's: #1-31, #2-63, #3-95, #6-207, 2024-1 for #1-12, #3-73 I'd do that for Broderick Jones. With 73, you could move back up into the 60's for a 4th and high 6th probably. So, if there's a guy you feel like you're missing out on then go back up and get him. We have a lot of picks, and not a lot of holes. If you can fix LT for 5 years and have RT locked down with Taylor for 4... Man, that's pretty good. I won't pound the table for it to happen, but it's something that would make some sense to me. If not, I have other thoughts at 31. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
nfl.com has him having signed a 3 year extension w houston
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Taylor is playing LT. They're not gonna put a rookie in at LT. Tunsil was literally never gonna happen. Plus the Chiefs aren't setting the ****ing market at RT. That's ridiculous.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.