ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   KU ***OFFICIAL KU @ CU Game Thread*** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=216418)

WilliamTheIrish 10-18-2009 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 6181912)
Actually, KU has one of the best running attacks in the conference. The problem last night, IMO, was that they brought Sharp back in too soon. Or at least they should have given Opurum half the carries. That guy tore some shit up the last 2 weeks. But CU's defense really played well against the run last night. They were keying on Sharp big time.

Prior to last night, KU is/was 10th in the conference in rushing, averaging 101 ypg on 53 attempts. For a dazzling 1.9 ypc average.
Last night's game probably didn't help that as KU finished with a -8 net yards rushing.

Their leading rusher was Sharp.(13-37).

Coach 10-18-2009 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6181934)
Prior to last night, KU is/was 10th in the conference in rushing, averaging 101 ypg on 53 attempts. For a dazzling 1.9 ypc average.
Last night's game probably didn't help that as KU finished with a -8 net yards rushing.

Their leading rusher was Sharp.(13-37).

Yowza....

ArrowheadHawk 10-18-2009 09:20 AM

Its simple. When Reesing has a good 4 quarters KU wins. If not they don't.

mikeyis4dcats. 10-18-2009 09:32 AM

[quote=Lzen;6181912]Actually, KU has one of the best running attacks in the conference. [quote]

ROFL


RUSHING OFFENSE G Att Yds Avg TD Yds/G
--------------------------------------------------------
1. Iowa State.......... 3 130 666 5.1 6 222.0
2. Kansas State........ 3 122 502 4.1 8 167.3
3. Oklahoma State...... 2 83 293 3.5 4 146.5
4. Texas............... 3 106 323 3.0 3 107.7
5. Colorado............ 2 77 189 2.5 3 94.5
6. Oklahoma............ 2 72 181 2.5 2 90.5
7. Nebraska............ 2 63 175 2.8 1 87.5
8. Missouri............ 2 59 159 2.7 2 79.5
9. Texas Tech.......... 3 69 204 3.0 3 68.0
10.Kansas.............. 2 53 101 1.9 3 50.5
11.Texas A&M........... 2 64 96 1.5 1 48.0
12.Baylor.............. 2 38 95 2.5 0 47.5


RUSHING Team Cl G Att Yds Avg TD Long Yds/G
----------------------------------------------------------------
1. Toston,Keith........ OSU SR 2 50 217 4.3 1 12 108.5
2. Robinson,Alexan..... ISU JR 3 50 282 5.6 2 37 94.0
3. Thomas, Daniel...... KSU JR 3 54 236 4.4 4 24 78.7
4. Helu Jr., Roy....... NU JR 2 34 156 4.6 1 41 78.0
5. Stewart, Rodney..... CU SO 2 45 148 3.3 2 18 74.0
6. Arnaud,Austen....... ISU JR 3 37 196 5.3 3 22 65.3
7. Washington, Der..... MU JR 2 30 115 3.8 1 23 57.5
8. Valentine, K........ KSU SR 3 18 157 8.7 3 61 52.3
9. Murray, DeMarco..... OU JR 2 29 104 3.6 0 15 52.0
10.Opurum, Toben....... KU FR 2 26 101 3.9 2 12 50.5
11.Batch, Baron........ TTU JR 3 25 147 5.9 1 33 49.0
12.Brown, Chris........ OU SR 2 31 93 3.0 2 15 46.5

:spock:

ArrowheadHawk 10-18-2009 09:42 AM

[QUOTE=mikeyis4dcats.;6181960][quote=Lzen;6181912]Actually, KU has one of the best running attacks in the conference.
Quote:


ROFL


RUSHING OFFENSE G Att Yds Avg TD Yds/G
--------------------------------------------------------
1. Iowa State.......... 3 130 666 5.1 6 222.0
2. Kansas State........ 3 122 502 4.1 8 167.3
3. Oklahoma State...... 2 83 293 3.5 4 146.5
4. Texas............... 3 106 323 3.0 3 107.7
5. Colorado............ 2 77 189 2.5 3 94.5
6. Oklahoma............ 2 72 181 2.5 2 90.5
7. Nebraska............ 2 63 175 2.8 1 87.5
8. Missouri............ 2 59 159 2.7 2 79.5
9. Texas Tech.......... 3 69 204 3.0 3 68.0
10.Kansas.............. 2 53 101 1.9 3 50.5
11.Texas A&M........... 2 64 96 1.5 1 48.0
12.Baylor.............. 2 38 95 2.5 0 47.5


RUSHING Team Cl G Att Yds Avg TD Long Yds/G
----------------------------------------------------------------
1. Toston,Keith........ OSU SR 2 50 217 4.3 1 12 108.5
2. Robinson,Alexan..... ISU JR 3 50 282 5.6 2 37 94.0
3. Thomas, Daniel...... KSU JR 3 54 236 4.4 4 24 78.7
4. Helu Jr., Roy....... NU JR 2 34 156 4.6 1 41 78.0
5. Stewart, Rodney..... CU SO 2 45 148 3.3 2 18 74.0
6. Arnaud,Austen....... ISU JR 3 37 196 5.3 3 22 65.3
7. Washington, Der..... MU JR 2 30 115 3.8 1 23 57.5
8. Valentine, K........ KSU SR 3 18 157 8.7 3 61 52.3
9. Murray, DeMarco..... OU JR 2 29 104 3.6 0 15 52.0
10.Opurum, Toben....... KU FR 2 26 101 3.9 2 12 50.5
11.Batch, Baron........ TTU JR 3 25 147 5.9 1 33 49.0
12.Brown, Chris........ OU SR 2 31 93 3.0 2 15 46.5

:spock:
Well our starting running back did miss 2 games an he came back sluggish. So they may not be one of the best but they certainly aren't where they show up on that list.

WilliamTheIrish 10-18-2009 09:54 AM

Quote:

Well our starting running back did miss 2 games an he came back sluggish. So they may not be one of the best but they certainly aren't where they show up on that list.
Sharp, in his career, hasn't made it through a season w/o being nicked up. These stats are only for 2 conference games so the sample size is low. It could change, but the schedule for KU ramps up from here.

mikeyis4dcats. 10-18-2009 10:03 AM

[quote=ArrowheadHawk;6181979][quote=mikeyis4dcats.;6181960]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 6181912)
Actually, KU has one of the best running attacks in the conference.
Well our starting running back did miss 2 games an he came back sluggish. So they may not be one of the best but they certainly aren't where they show up on that list.

and they certainly aren't one of the best in the conference....

Mr. Laz 10-18-2009 10:13 AM

wow ... K-state finally wins a game and all the wildcat fans suddenly turn into mouthy mu-ish fans.

WilliamTheIrish 10-18-2009 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6182036)
wow ... K-state finally wins a game and all the wildcat fans suddenly turn into mouthy mu-ish fans.

LMAO

Who had Laz in the pool?

mikeyis4dcats. 10-18-2009 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6182036)
wow ... K-state finally wins a game and all the wildcat fans suddenly turn into mouthy mu-ish fans.

how are we mouthy, we are just correcting Lzen's distorted view of his teams rushing prowess. Which we would have probably done even had we lost.

Crybaby.

ArrowheadHawk 10-18-2009 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 6182057)
how are we mouthy, we are just correcting Lzen's distorted view of his teams rushing prowess. Which we would have probably done even had we lost.

Crybaby.

We don't need no stinkin' rushing. We have Reesing.

mikeyis4dcats. 10-18-2009 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadHawk (Post 6182068)
We don't need no stinkin' rushing. We have Reesing.

true....thats what confused me about what Lzen said....of all your offensive attributes, rushing hasn't ever been the strong point. Not terrible, but nothing to tout on the internet.

kstater 10-18-2009 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6182054)
LMAO

Who had Laz in the pool?


Not me, I was trying my damnedest last night to get my Sam Hall pick to cash in.

Lzen 10-18-2009 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6182036)
wow ... K-state finally wins a game and all the wildcat fans suddenly turn into mouthy mu-ish fans.

Funny, I was thinking the same thing.

WilliamTheIrish 10-18-2009 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lzen (Post 6182080)
Funny, I was thinking the same thing.


WINNER!!!

*and post 900


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.