ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs are looking for a 2nd and a pick in 2014 for Albert (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271388)

B14ckmon 03-24-2013 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 9525336)
I have a hard time believing this rumor at this point. I mean, if we are right about Albert wouldn't teams be falling over themselves to trade a 2nd for Albert. Seems like a deal would be done already the way this regime has shown their willingness to pull the trigger on shit.

1) The team would have to feel like they can definitely extend him since he is on a a 1 year franchise tag.

2) We still had some good tackles in FA. I expect that the just now signing of Vollmer, will speed up any trade of BA and the signing of Andre Smith wherever he ends up.

milkman 03-24-2013 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 9525342)
Word of the millennium - mediocrity.

You're right.

This team has not been consistently mediocre since the 90s.

They've been mosly a bucket of shit for the last decade, with a couple of medocre seasons thrown in, just for the hell of it.

But that's okay.

Trading for Alex Smith is a first step back on the path to consistent mediocrity.

Ace Gunner 03-24-2013 11:01 AM

mediocrity is going to be a step up for the team. this team was officially shit when Kendrell Bell showed up but it's been suspect ever since Gunther became the HC. (facepalm)

Bugeater 03-24-2013 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudy Was Offsides. (Post 9525339)
2013 CP word of the year- hyperbole

Stop. More annoying than the straw man of 2011

So who were you in 2011?

RunKC 03-24-2013 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9525472)
You're right.

This team has not been consistently mediocre since the 90s.

They've been mosly a bucket of shit for the last decade, with a couple of medocre seasons thrown in, just for the hell of it.

But that's okay.

Trading for Alex Smith is a first step back on the path to consistent mediocrity.

What is your plan?

penbrook 03-24-2013 11:28 AM

Eric Fisher to work out for the Chiefs this week!!

RunKC 03-24-2013 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9525165)
No he didn't lose them the game, he didnt win it either when he had chances, he simply managed it. The 2011 9ers were the 90's chiefs with a better running game and a better te.


He's not going to be asked to manage games here. Reid has voiced what he wants/likes his qbs to do. Apparently, he sees those things in Alex smith. Obviously he's more experienced knowledgable than I am in said matter, but up to this point Alex smith hasn't consistently show those traits.

Nobody played well against the Giants in the playoffs that year. Rodgers looked like shit, Brady looked like shit, Ryan looked like shit. Their defense dominated everyone.

And Alex Smith has played in an offense where Harbaugh put the chain on his leg so he couldn't do much more than manage a game.

How do you or anyone know what he'll look like in Andy's offense with more freedom to make plays?

NWTF 03-24-2013 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 9525472)
You're right.

This team has not been consistently mediocre since the 90s.

They've been mosly a bucket of shit for the last decade, with a couple of medocre seasons thrown in, just for the hell of it.

But that's okay.

Trading for Alex Smith is a first step back on the path to consistent mediocrity.

Now Alex Smith is not a franchise QB, and it would take odd/rare type events (2000 Ravens epic D, playing a Rex Grossman led team, etc) for him to be at the helm of a SB win because hes just not on that level, but would it be worth it if he led the team to a playoff victory/s down the road putting an end to the loosing streak, which is the longest in NFL history? I do think hes capable of that. With more improvements made all around I think he could provide the stability to achieve similar success last seen around here by Marty's teams.

O.city 03-24-2013 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9525557)
Nobody played well against the Giants in the playoffs that year. Rodgers looked like shit, Brady looked like shit, Ryan looked like shit. Their defense dominated everyone.

And Alex Smith has played in an offense where Harbaugh put the chain on his leg so he couldn't do much more than manage a game.

How do you or anyone know what he'll look like in Andy's offense with more freedom to make plays?

Keep making excuses.


When he had to have te chains taken off in order to win games by throwing the ball, like he will be asked to do here, he wasn't very good. I'm sure clay can show you a record or numbers or some shit.


What exactly has he shown that makes you think he will succeed in an Andy Reid offense?

I've stated that I think he has the potential to do it, but to this point there isn't much evidence

Hammock Parties 03-24-2013 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 9525557)
Nobody played well against the Giants in the playoffs that year.

And Alex Smith competed fewer passes than all of them.

That's our Alex!

ChiefsCountry 03-24-2013 11:43 AM

Alex Smith is 3-13 all time when throwing 35 or more times per game, which what a normal Andy Reid team does every game. That is a pretty damn good sample size to say he will blow ass when forced to throw all the time.

BigMeatballDave 03-24-2013 11:50 AM

LMAO

Don't you guys get tired of bitching about the same thing over and over?

Let it go.

Ebolapox 03-24-2013 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooge (Post 9525390)
You might feel better if you ass ****ed your mother.

ROFL

using some of my own material against me I see. well played, dentist. well played.

RunKC 03-24-2013 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9525568)
Keep making excuses.


When he had to have te chains taken off in order to win games by throwing the ball, like he will be asked to do here, he wasn't very good. I'm sure clay can show you a record or numbers or some shit.


What exactly has he shown that makes you think he will succeed in an Andy Reid offense?

I've stated that I think he has the potential to do it, but to this point there isn't much evidence

I think he has potential to be a good QB, unlike the others who think he's Matt Cassel.

He's shown he can win games and take control when he has the freedom to be let loose. Proved it against Detroit, proved it against Andy Reid's Eagles and he proved it against a franchise QB in a shootout in the playoffs.

People need to realize that a QB doesn't have to light up the stat sheet and throw 30+ TD's to be a good QB.
Joe Montana threw 30 TD's once in his career, every year Tom Brady won a SB he didn't have great stats.

And Alex Smith looks like Matt Cassel you say? You know who else has looked like Matt Cassel? Eli Manning and Joe Flacco. They've looked worse than Matt Cassel in multiple games in their career.

For years Giant and Raven fans had this same argument about them that people are having on this board.

RunKC 03-24-2013 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 9525575)
Alex Smith is 3-13 all time when throwing 35 or more times per game, which what a normal Andy Reid team does every game. That is a pretty damn good sample size to say he will blow ass when forced to throw all the time.

I prefer to use his stats his last 2 years since:

A. He has a QB coach who knows WTF he's doing and he'll have that here.

B. He has pretty strong talent on his team and he'll also have that here.

In those 2 years, Alex Smith was 2-2 throwing 35 or more times.

He was also 9-3 in those 2 years when threw the ball 30 or more times.

Pretty interesting when we take a look at things in a realistic perspective huh?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.