ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=270480)

GloryDayz 11-20-2013 09:51 PM

Well, we're not at 10,000 yet, but getting close...

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-20-2013 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier (Post 10208396)
Great QBs elevate. Shitty QBs need good players around them.

fxd.

Kaepernick 11-20-2013 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall (Post 10208239)
I wasn't saying anything about your character. Just because you admit that you might have been wrong and take it off means little. Way to turn a molehill into a mountain though. :thumb:

So you had no point in posting to me.

Thanks. I always appreciate meaningless drivel from people who have no clue why they are talking to me. :rolleyes:

Kaepernick 11-20-2013 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10208258)
The thing about Alex...he is so consistently meh it makes you wonder if he can ever get it together.

It's not like he can mix in an "oh that was impressive" game every once inawhile....he literally doesn't. I mean even Cassel did that.

And that is why I am already ****ing done with the turd. I smelled him in the offseason and the stench is only getting thicker and more disgusting.

Has it been that long since the Giants game. He seemed to be arrow up here after his 2nd half play in the Giants game. That was your big highlight from Alex for the year.

Kaepernick 11-20-2013 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 10208266)
Games played?
Posted via Mobile Device

Anybody with a brain knows Andy is still developing and reaching his peak while Alex has hit his ceiling.

I'll answer your question,

Andy = 45 starts
Alex = 92 starts.

Sorter 11-20-2013 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 10208360)
No, I am pointing out that when you have a QB like we do we can't be dropping easy passes. I have no problems with cutting Smith if he doesn't improve. I also have no problems cutting Bowe or Avery if they don't catch the god damn ball more either. And take Dex with them.

A WR group of Jenkins, Ernest, and Williams would definitely be more productive.


Pete, your logic is completely justifiable and I have no idea why anyone would ever ridicule your posts.

Hammock Parties 11-20-2013 10:28 PM

If only Bowe could catch the perfect passes Alex throws him.

http://uranus.ckt.net/~gochiefs/ughalex.gif

Red Dawg 11-20-2013 10:28 PM

Why all the Smith debate still? We know he is flawed badly. Nothing coaches can do about it. He was the best they could get for now after Philly said no to a Foles deal. Who else was there?

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-20-2013 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 10208484)
Why all the Smith debate still? We know he is flawed badly. Nothing coaches can do about it. He was the best they could get for now after Philly said no to a Foles deal. Who else was there?

That Guy(pick one).

hometeam 11-20-2013 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 10208484)
Why all the Smith debate still? We know he is flawed badly. Nothing coaches can do about it. He was the best they could get for now after Philly said no to a Foles deal. Who else was there?

In this case, we is a relative term.

Sweet Daddy Hate 11-20-2013 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10208483)
If only Bowe could catch the perfect passes Alex throws him.

Sigh...I miss Gif'd Up...

Bearcat 11-20-2013 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10208483)
If only Bowe could catch the perfect passes Alex throws him.

Yeah, but that was probably a much less crucial part of the game than a first down 3 minutes into the game.

O.city 11-20-2013 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10208483)
If only Bowe could catch the perfect passes Alex throws him.

http://uranus.ckt.net/~gochiefs/ughalex.gif

Bowe needs to make that catch. It wasn't a great throw, no. But it also was one that was very catchable and it's one that I wouldn't even have called a miraculous catch had he made it.

Hammock Parties 11-20-2013 10:44 PM

It was a very poor throw, and an incredibly difficult catch.

O.city 11-20-2013 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10208532)
It was a very poor throw, and an incredibly difficult catch.

Yeah, no.

Not a good throw, but it's not an "incredibly difficult catch".


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.