ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****The Nick Bolton Thread***** (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=338119)

Ming the Merciless 08-01-2023 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 17038317)
He was an overturned call from stealing MVP from Mahomes in the SB.

totally and he was like all-rookie team his 1st year with 112 tackles on 16 starts


started every game last year with 180 tackles (108 solo)


i think only one LB in the league had more solo tackles and combined tackles

Pasta Little Brioni 08-01-2023 01:42 PM

In my mind he had 2 TDs. That call was absolutely bullshit. Same with a lame ass call the Eagles got on a "catch" down the sideline.

Kiimo 08-01-2023 02:08 PM

I'm still a little bent out of shape that he wasn't starting from Day 1

Ming the Merciless 08-01-2023 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimo (Post 17038714)
I'm still a little bent out of shape that he wasn't starting from Day 1


he basically did


he had about 80% of the defensive snaps in the games during the 1st half of his rookie season and "started" 12 of the 17 games. I think he mightve been a little banged up toward the middle/end of the 1st season which is why his snap count actually got less toward the end of that rookie season. (as opposed to the opposite)



The thing thats crazy about his second season (last year) is that he stayed on the field every damn snap almost. close to what eric berry did, but not quite. To only miss about 1 snap in the last 10 games is pretty nutty. Plus getting like 11 tackles a game...


The guy is my favorite chief not named mahomes

Pitt Gorilla 09-20-2023 10:20 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">&quot;They should let us get busy back there at running back&quot; 🤣<br><br>We mic&#39;d up <a href="https://twitter.com/_nickbolton2?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@_nickbolton2</a> during our week 2 win. <a href="https://t.co/7HAOVB0jKn">pic.twitter.com/7HAOVB0jKn</a></p>&mdash; Kansas City Chiefs (@Chiefs) <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs/status/1704635287173812317?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 20, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Bump 09-20-2023 10:23 PM

I'm convinced, give Bolton all of CEH's carries.

tredadda 09-21-2023 08:02 AM

I really love watching him play. He has a nose for the ball and just rarely misses a tackle.

RealSNR 09-21-2023 08:11 AM

We can absolutely pay Bolton and we probably should. When you're an off-ball LB like Bolton who just makes the play and the tackle 99% of the time no matter what, it's like having an elite safety back there. It cleans up all of your problems.

Probably won't be able to keep Jones. But if we have to choose one or the other, I'd rather roll with in-his-prime Bolton with cheaper (but hopefully mostly reliable) interior DTs in front of him.

O.city 09-21-2023 08:34 AM

Is Bolton (insert amount) better than Tranquill? Cause there's a Tranquill available every year.

DJ's left nut 09-21-2023 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 17121287)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">&quot;They should let us get busy back there at running back&quot; 🤣<br><br>We mic&#39;d up <a href="https://twitter.com/_nickbolton2?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@_nickbolton2</a> during our week 2 win. <a href="https://t.co/7HAOVB0jKn">pic.twitter.com/7HAOVB0jKn</a></p>&mdash; Kansas City Chiefs (@Chiefs) <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs/status/1704635287173812317?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 20, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

"Let's go O, we got y'all boys!"

****ing love that leadership.

Bolton's not Ragland out there, folks. He's not just a replaceable run-stuffer. That's your team leader. That's the guy telling Leo where to go as the play is happening.

That's a guy who's so sound against the run that it will change gameplans. Teams are going to be hesitant to do that ground and pound shit against us because they just can't. He's as instrumental to our run defense as Jones is to the pass rush.

He and Humphrey are my 'must extend' guys and I'll just sadly wave at Sneed because I know that we can't pay him. And if letting Sneed go lets us keep Danna as the third guy out of those draft classes, I can live with that because I think Danna will continue to ascend.

I've said this since the Sutton days - offense is about stars that can make something from nothing. Defense is about simply not having a weakness that teams can exploit. You let Bolton walk and you're creating a weakness both in terms of your run defense and in terms of your communication.

He's hugely important.

O.city 09-21-2023 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17121511)
"Let's go O, we got y'all boys!"

****ing love that leadership.

Bolton's not Ragland out there, folks. He's not just a replaceable run-stuffer. That's your team leader. That's the guy telling Leo where to go as the play is happening.

That's a guy who's so sound against the run that it will change gameplans. Teams are going to be hesitant to do that ground and pound shit against us because they just can't. He's as instrumental to our run defense as Jones is to the pass rush.

He and Humphrey are my 'must extend' guys and I'll just sadly wave at Sneed because I know that we can't pay him. And if letting Sneed go lets us keep Danna as the third guy out of those draft classes, I can live with that because I think Danna will continue to ascend.

I've said this since the Sutton days - offense is about stars that can make something from nothing. Defense is about simply not having a weakness that teams can exploit. You let Bolton walk and you're creating a weakness both in terms of your run defense and in terms of your communication.

He's hugely important.

Weren't you against paying for "leadership" in the Frank Clark debate?

DJ's left nut 09-21-2023 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17121514)
Weren't you against paying for "leadership" in the Frank Clark debate?

Frank Clark wasn't a leader - he was just a loudmouth.

Guys don't follow bums and Clark was a bum. Guys don't follow dudes who take entire months off and Clark took entire months off.

Clark just wouldn't shut up. We all knew that guy in High School and none of us gave a shit what he had to say. We also knew the guy that played with his hair on fire, knew his shit every down and went hard every snap. We listened to that guy.

O.city 09-21-2023 08:45 AM

I dunno, for all his faults, guys seemed to listen to Frank.

I think your MU bias is showing here.

DJ's left nut 09-21-2023 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17121532)
I dunno, for all his faults, guys seemed to listen to Frank.

I think your MU bias is showing here.

MU Fans don't have a bias for their former players. By and large we shit on them WORSE than we do other guys.

But yeah, I loved Bolton going back to my STH for Mizzou. It's less about him being a former Mizzou player and more about him being a guy I watched every Saturday and who I saw improve week over week, year over year.

He's just a damn good ballplayer and his teammates respond to him.

Urc Burry 09-21-2023 09:00 AM

Anyone who is against paying Bolton doesn’t remember our Run D before him. Oh, and he’s 23


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.