Awesome. Thank god.

I'll throw this out there again as last time, it didn't get much traction. But how about keeping only Alex and Foles on the 53? It'd open up another slot for someone, and maybe Hogan could go practice squad? Too risky?

I guess my response to the riskiness is that if we're down to our 3rd string QB, it really ain't gonna matter.

Thoughts?

You'd be surprised. Lots of teams without a backup QB.

There's a dearth of QB's in the NFL, especially those familiar with the WCO.

Ruling out a trade is silly.

They've been trying since his dumbass fumble changed the game vs New England.

And some things Bray will be anything in the NFL...
Posted via Mobile Device

Murray isn't backup quality...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's insane that people want only 2 QBs on this roster.

If your guys go to other teams when you cut them, and your starter goes down longterm, who's your backup? Some dick**** off the street who has no clue what your offense is about?

3rd backup quality absolutely
Posted via Mobile Device

Makes sense-I would rather have Dat, Reaves or Dadi-over letting Bray get another paycheck for nothing.

Hoyer is better than Cutler which is just sad.

Come on now...

I suspect Bray or Murray would be available as I don't see BOTH of them being picked up. Plus, as I said, you ain't gonna win consistently with your 3rd string QB anyway. So why not chance it?

Obviously, SNR, you are not a fan of such riskiness whilst I might honestly consider it.

I've said this several times in response to Meatloaf

We should have drafted Dak Prescott over DeMarcus Robinson!!!