If the woman had text messages from the accused that may corroborate her story, passed a polygraph and there were multiple people who knew of the incident right after the fact then no, he shouldn't play

Or, it was the right thing to do for Tyreek and his family to get those issues sorted out.

But again, the Chiefs are a classy organization...unlike the Rapetriots.

Ok.

Noted.

P-graph results are inadmissible in a court of law.

At this point it's a he said/she said.

If the DA of Pitt or MIA indicted AB I'd have a different PoV.

You should read this post, Rapetriots guys. He's right.

Not how it works rape man.

This back and forth over which organization is more virtuous is silly.

Both the Pats and the Chiefs have very talented and decent people at the top.

I'm sure that was the Chiefs intent.....give him time to sort out his life. During the offseason....

Enlighten me.

The Pats have people who have been proven to be habitual cheaters at the top.

That is circumstantial evidence and not vetted by pre-trial motions, discovery and the defendant's right to due process.

Suspending Mahomes for speculation and he said/she said is not the right thing to do.

not to mention the owner loves chinese hookers

Feel free to google it yourself while you're searching up your rape Defense, as it'll let you know that a polygraph admittance is up to the judge presiding the case.

He also can be punished without even being Guilty. If he can't produce evidence to support himself beyond she's a money hungry whore, he's ****ed. Ask Ezekiel Elliot. They do not have to wait for a verdict in any case to do whatever they please, and he hasn't shown any real compelling evidence that would really make me think he's not a rape man.

Legally, sure.

But not with the NFL's investigation.

Patriots are such sleazy ****s

Hard to miss games when he was cleared in July.