| Rambozo |
01-25-2013 01:44 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by FringeNC
(Post 9350649)
As if all this grading is precise. There is some probability distribution of performance of the player: He may hit his grade, he may underperform his grade, or he may exceed his grade. In the modern NFL, if you don't have one of the 10 best QBs in the league, you can't win -- so you draft a QB, and hope you get right-tail performance. If not, rinse and repeat - and the new rookie scale makes that easier to do.
|
I mostly agree man and good post. The grades will change on a lot of players before the draft. They always do. The grades almost ALWAYS change after the draft unless you are like Von Miller good. Some guys are better than their initial grade and some guys are worse.
I know teams will reach on QBs more than ever but, there is a cut off point in which they will do so. You can bet your ass they already have a system in place for that very thing and it is accounted for on their draft board. Whether a QB is a ten pick bump after grade, a twenty pick bump, or no bump at all, I don't know?
that's all got to do with how the Chiefs view BPA and like I said yesterday, teams do that differently. There is no specific formulafor all 32 teams like some like to think.
We all have our opinions and predictions but the bottom line is that we can't predict the future and we don't know the Chiefs ranking system. We just have to hope the Chiefs scouts are seeing the right things and look at for ourselves until the draft. Post what you see and read and write it here. Have fun with it. |
