ChiefsPlanet
Page 69 of 117 « First 195965666768 69 7071727379 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Alex Smith was not the problem Sunday, sorry haters. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=303901)

BigCatDaddy 12-01-2016 10:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12589076)
Agreed which explains why the Broncos won the SB last year with a QB who threw 9 TDs 19 INTs during the regular season.

Stop it with this QB is all that matters crap. Football is a team game. Always has been and always will be. No one player wins by himself, ask any QB, GM, coach in the league and they'll say the same thing.

How many SBs did Dan Marino win?
Ever looked at the salary scale by position? Teams check books tells a different story.

O.city 12-01-2016 10:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12589085)
Ever looked at the salary scale by position? Teams check books tells a different story.
Well, it's all about super bowl wins, correct?

How many ha e been win with a qb making the big max deal?

threebag 12-01-2016 10:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 12589081)
Alex has his moments. He has been nails in some games in particular certain moments but far to many the film break down show he's very conservative and inconsistent with scoring TD's and misses wide open receiver's too much.

His best asset is leadership and he doesn't throw int's much. In today's NFL those are still good traits to have but scoring is more important in my book the way games are played.

His scoring issue has really came to light this season because our running game has gone down hill. We don't run the ball like we should and that puts more on him to throw td's, of which he doesn't do much of.
I hear some voice of reason. The running game is the arrow in the heel so to speak. If the team gets healthy and the O can get it firing on a few more cylinders it would at least give a few more a "warm fuzzy".

RunKC 12-01-2016 10:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12589085)
Ever looked at the salary scale by position? Teams check books tells a different story.
There's only like 4 difference making QB's in the league.

O.city 12-01-2016 10:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12589102)
There's only like 4 difference making QB's in the league.
There isn't the big hall of famer like there once was, but qb play is still good.

BigCatDaddy 12-01-2016 10:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12589088)
Well, it's all about super bowl wins, correct?

How many ha e been win with a qb making the big max deal?
So you are against signing the best QB in the league if it requires a max deal?

Obviously the smart play is to draft a guy while he's cheap and build around him if he turns out to be good.

The Franchise 12-01-2016 10:27 AM
Who needs a QB:

Steelers - No
Browns - Yes
Bengals - No
Ravens - Maybe

Titans - No
Texans - No (contract)
Colts - No
Jags - Maybe but I'm going to go with No

Broncos - No
Chargers - No
Raiders - No
Chiefs - Maybe but we're not talking about them right now.

Patriots - No
Bills - Maybe
Jets - Yes
Dolphins - Tannehill has been playing better as of late....so I'll go no.

Cowboys - No
Giants - Maybe
Eagles - No
Redskins - Yes (although they could always just give Cousins a contract)

Falcons - No
Saints - No
Bucs - No
Panthers - No

Seahawks - No
Cardinals - Yes
49ers - Yes
Rams - No

Vikings - Maybe
Packers - No
Lions - No
Bears - Yes

So that's 6 teams who absolutely need one and 6 teams who might need to start looking at one.

mcaj22 12-01-2016 10:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12589114)
Who needs a QB:

Steelers - No
Browns - Yes
Bengals - No
Ravens - Maybe

Titans - No
Texans - No (contract)
Colts - No
Jags - Maybe but I'm going to go with No

Broncos - No
Chargers - No
Raiders - No
Chiefs - Maybe but we're not talking about them right now.

Patriots - No
Bills - Maybe
Jets - Yes
Dolphins - Tannehill has been playing better as of late....so I'll go no.

Cowboys - No
Giants - Maybe
Eagles - No
Redskins - Yes (although they could always just give Cousins a contract)

Falcons - No
Saints - No
Bucs - No
Panthers - No

Seahawks - No
Cardinals - Yes
49ers - Yes
Rams - No

Vikings - Maybe
Packers - No
Lions - No
Bears - Yes

So that's 6 teams who absolutely need one and 6 teams who might need to start looking at one.
Tannehill leads the NFL in most explosive plays (over 20 yards) lol

threebag 12-01-2016 10:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12589114)
Who needs a QB:

Steelers - No
Browns - Yes
Bengals - No
Ravens - Maybe

Titans - No
Texans - No (contract)
Colts - No
Jags - Maybe but I'm going to go with No

Broncos - No
Chargers - No
Raiders - No
Chiefs - Maybe but we're not talking about them right now.

Patriots - No
Bills - Maybe
Jets - Yes
Dolphins - Tannehill has been playing better as of late....so I'll go no.

Cowboys - No
Giants - Maybe
Eagles - No
Redskins - Yes (although they could always just give Cousins a contract)

Falcons - No
Saints - No
Bucs - No
Panthers - No

Seahawks - No
Cardinals - Yes
49ers - Yes
Rams - No

Vikings - Maybe
Packers - No
Lions - No
Bears - Yes

So that's 6 teams who absolutely need one and 6 teams who might need to start looking at one.
Too bad they didn't just grow on trees.

O.city 12-01-2016 10:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12589113)
So the best quarterbacks for the ones making max deals?
We've seen that once teams have to pay this qbs absurd deals, the odds of them winning superbowls have decreased.

Admittedly I jumped in to you guys conversation not really reading all of it, just stating that highly paid qbs don't seem to be translating to super bowl wins

The Franchise 12-01-2016 10:30 AM
Of the teams that I listed as a maybe......you could possibly remove the Jags (Bortles is still cheap), the Vikings (because they'll have Bradford and Bridgewater coming back from injury) and the Bills (if they think that Taylor is worth that contract.

rico 12-01-2016 10:31 AM
Man, it'd be frustrating as shit to be a Texans fan right now.

O.city 12-01-2016 10:31 AM
Yeah, I'd take tannehill here

threebag 12-01-2016 10:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12589121)
Of the teams that I listed as a maybe......you could possibly remove the Jags (Bortles is still cheap), the Vikings (because they'll have Bradford and Bridgewater coming back from injury) and the Bills (if they think that Taylor is worth that contract.
Bridgewater is probably done.

threebag 12-01-2016 10:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 12589123)
Yeah, I'd take tannehill here
He would have probably been nice to draft. He seems to be panning out.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:39 PM.
Page 69 of 117 « First 195965666768 69 7071727379 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.