![]() |
Quote:
|
I voted yes, though I think banning is a bit strong of a punishment. I'd definitely vote yes if asked if his thread-making capabilities should be revoked.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ignore him; much like you're doing me right now. :D ingoring I mean. |
Exhibit A: Believer hasn't shown himself to be able to think outside of black and white terms.
Exhibit B: Believer hasn't (to my knowledge) even conceded that he's been a jerk or inappropriate in any way at all. I think we've all known someone who can't "take the hint". Lump that in with A & B and you've got a recipe for someone who isn't listening to our (reasonable and) increasingly specific requests for him to change his method. End Result: Words aren't getting through, time to utilize some technological tools. Give him 2 posts per day, and he can reply or start whatever he wants. Do we have that feature? |
He or she is a troll (and probably a regular in a halloween mask) and should be treated as such. It has nothing to do with religion.
|
Quote:
man, uncool to bring race into this. JK:p |
Quote:
Ahem, speaking of technological tools. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
give the credit to rainman, he said it. I laughed out loud to, so I thought I would share it with everyone, at least for the time being that the religion topic is still so strong. |
I've got it, we need the "partial ignore" button. The full on ignore button seems the same as banning to me.
We just want things to tone down in frequency and fervor, and tone up in awareness and common senseness....it's like adjusting the "suck" button on a sound board. Do we have THAT capability? http://www.commodore.ca/misc/jokes/suck_button.jpg |
I voted no only because I'm considering revoking thread starting privileges as a "first step".
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.