ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Favre to the Chiefs!!!!???

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Favre to the Chiefs!!!!??? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=186949)

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 4844457)

I never said we were close to being a good team. Hence my post....."We have holes ****ing everywhere."

For instance if the Chiefs were in the same position right now as Minnesota, It would be dumb not to trade for Favre for a 4th-5th rd pick.

:spock:

Dude, I was agreeing with your take on the state of the team. We are a long way off from filling in one spot and making a run at the AFC title.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 4844652)

Agreed. I'll never forget his smarmy look on Hard Knocks last year when Herm and Dick Curl are just about to go with Brodie as the starter, and Carl chimes in with his "Don't forget about Damon Huard" directive, the douche.

Bout made me sick to my stomach watching that :Lin:

In all honestyl the Chiefs run almost the exact same offense now that the Packers do.

But still....no.

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy (Post 4833935)

Guru, I like you so I'll tell you what I'm gonna do, just for you..

first month free, plus I'll steal a whole bunch of footage from nfl films and the networks and "create" a highlight film

LMAO I"ve been looking into who the proper party within the NFL is to turn in GoChiefs and his plagerism buddies. It would be hilarious if Goodell's Goons came calling for Clayton and his mommy answered the door.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 4844451)

Green Bay is one of the best teams in the NFC behind only DAL and NYG.

I don't see a problem in sitting Rodgers for another year. It's not like it will hurt his development. He's still really young. If Brett can be a prob bowl QB for another year then you have to start Brett Favre. It'd be one thing if Favre was playing like a Rams Joe Namath but he's not. He's still a legitimate top 5 QB in this league. He's been the face of that organization for years. You start Favre and say sorry to Rodgers and let him wait another year. GB owes that to Favre in all he's done for that organization. If Favre is playing like shit and is primarily the reason why GB is losing then you bench him and start Rodgers.

If Rodgers wants to be traded then they trade him. Rodgers showed he can be good so I doubt GB would do something like that though they did draft Brohm.

You know what sucks for the Packers? His contract is up after this year. His entire career he played in one game for millions. I'm sure that adds to the Packs frustration with this whole deal. They still probably aren't 100% in what they have in Rodgers.

The main objective of this season is to once and for all flush the Herm/Dictator Carl mess down the collective toilet. 0-16 is a real possibility and bringing Favre in would ruin that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 4844898)

The main objective of this season is to once and for all flush the Herm/Dictator Carl mess down the collective toilet. 0-16 is a real possibility and bringing Favre in would ruin that.

I don't think 0-16 is a real possibility. Even the Dolphins won last year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 4844901)

I don't think 0-16 is a real possibility. Even the Dolphins won last year.

True, but we do have the team and coaching staff for a legitimate run at perfection.

Keep hope alive Chiefs fans! 0 for 16 can happen in '08!

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 4844626)

Maybe he just only turned around their entire franchise into a contender just about every year since he's started.

With the only exception of 2005, GB has at least been 8-8 in all of Favre's years starting as their QB.

What did Derrick Thomas do for KC.......or Tony Gonzalez????

Winning the SB is great, but Favre has been one of the faces of the NFL.

Peyton Manning only won a single title. You wanna dog on him too? Newsflash.........Winning the SB in the NFL is a very hard thing to do and many players on get to play in only one of them, maybe perhaps a couple if they are lucky enough.

It would be one thing if Favre wasn't playing at a high level. But he is and just came off of a Pro Bowl season. You don't fix whats not broken. Favre should start in 2008 and if for whatever reason he sucks real bad, then you can bench him for not playing well.

How many players on that team on offense want to see Favre come back. Players bust their asses for players like him.

You really think any player on that team would reject Favre coming back because they think they need to move on?

I think his point is with the fact although he has won a Superbowl it was with way more talent than KC has to offer. He is one of the greats but nobody can argue much of what he has done is regular season for the most part. It will be strange to see him in Miami gear next year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 4844898)

The main objective of this season is to once and for all flush the Herm/Dictator Carl mess down the collective toilet.

For you maybe...

It was fun watching Harmon Kilibrew in the early 70s on a young Royals team, but they didn't start winning until he was gone. It would be the same with Farve, fun to watch for a year or two then when the team is really ready to make a run it won't have a QB. We saw that act with Schottenhiemer in the 90's, a good team with no QB, so I would rather see a different act this time around.

Develop the young QB while the rest of the team is being rebuilt.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 4844898)

The main objective of this season is to once and for all flush the Herm/Dictator Carl mess down the collective toilet. 0-16 is a real possibility and bringing Favre in would ruin that.

That's a foolish statement.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief (Post 4844626)

I think that Ron Wolf is the guy responsible for turning that franchise around, and Favre was a large piece of that puzzle, as was Reggie White.

But the fact is, Favre pissed away opportunities with his gunslinger mentality and boneheaded decisions as much as he contributed to the winning.

Fact is, their one SB win he didn't do anything special in that game or the playoffs.

Desmond Howard, White, and that RB (whose name escapes me) who had a remarkable postseason that year every bit as responsible, if not more than Brett favre.

And I thought my disdain for Peyton Manning was pretty well documented around here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 4845249)

Desmond Howard, White, and that RB (whose name escapes me) who had a remarkable postseason that year every bit as responsible, if not more than Brett favre.

Dorsey Levens. Andre Rison also contributed to the SB win.

whatever dope your smokin' send it over.