![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
we have enough here at home to last till rapture. but?????
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hey, that sounds like my ex-wife. She never did become refined and usable. |
Quote:
Secondly. The oil companies are recording record profits. If their margin is so low, you are going to have to back that claim up. |
Quote:
The average net profit margin for the S&P Energy sector, according to figures from Thomson Baseline, is 9.7%. The average for the S&P 500 is 8.5%. So yes, energy companies are more profitable than many others...but not by an inordinate amount. http://money.cnn.com/2008/04/29/mark...buzz/index.htm |
Looks to me like they have pretty significant profits Donger.
1. Exxon Mobil Exxon Mobil • See more Fortune 500 data for Exxon Mobil Fortune 500 rank: 2 2007 profit: $40.61 billion Fortune 500 rank #2. DO you see that? #2. $40.6 Billion in one year because they are greedily gouging the American people. |
Quote:
And they are. |
So you think semantics makes it okay? I don't care what their profit margin is. $40.6 billion is excessive.
|
It is the highest-ever annual profit from a U.S. company, a record Exxon also set in 2006 and 2005.
|
Quote:
|
Look at these numbers
$ millions % change from 2006 Revenues 372,824.0 7.4 Profits 40,610.0 2.8 Assets 242,082.0 — Stockholders' equity 121,762.0 — Market value (3/28/2008) 455,929.3 — Profits as % of Revenues 10.9 Assets 16.8 Stockholders' equity 33.4 Earnings per share 2007 $ 7.28 % change from 2006 10.0 1997-2007 annual growth rate % 15.8 Total return to investors % 2007 24.3 1997-2007 annual rate 14.3 Industry: Petroleum Refining Rank Company 500 rank Revenues ($ millions) 1 Exxon Mobil 2 372,824.0 2 Chevron 3 210,783.0 3 ConocoPhillips 5 178,558. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.