ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs More proof these coaches and decision makers are incompetent (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=197154)

DaneMcCloud 11-22-2008 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 5239419)
I would like you to show me one post that even insinuates that Thigpen would have performed at this level.

If you do do, I'll give you props. Until then, I call a big BS.

Well, eat some crow, Homey. 9/21/2008:

http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showpost....9&postcount=29


Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5041709)
Exactly.

The Chiefs were in a position to score two more times today and failed. One was a missed field goal, the other on the goal line.

I know people are going to bitch, bitch, bitch but for 7th round QB who was waived from his team who played against 1-AA competition, the kid has performed beyond my expectations.


http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showpost....0&postcount=31

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5041720)
What the **** is the point of playing Huard? Come on, Mic. Tell us.

Huard's a washed up, never was. Tyler Thigpen is young player who put the Chiefs in a position to score 4 times in his second start and scored twice.

Let him GROW. He played better this week than last week and my guess is that he only gets better.

Huard only gets hurt. And hurts the team.

http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showpost....1&postcount=42

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5041911)
First off, they're essentially the youngest team in the league. They aren't "used" to losing because most of these guys are rookies. Secondly, Thigpen hasn't been horrible. He's a 7th round 1-AA guy forced into starting.

Do any of you actually think that Tony Romo would have performed better if he had been forced into starting for the Cowboy 3 1/2 seasons before he played?

I don't think he would have done as well, frankly.

http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showpost....4&postcount=75

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5044954)
Regardless of his QB rating or what the talking heads have to say, Thigpen drove his team down the field twice and scored touchdowns yesterday and put them in a position to score twice more. He's grown from last week.

And you want to bench that guy in favor of a 35-year-old Never Was with a noodle arm? Seriously?

Huard wouldn't have last 3 series yesterday against that pass rush. Thigpen's running and escapability yesterday is what gave the Chiefs a chance to score.

http://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showpost....2&postcount=77

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 5044982)
Sorry, Man. I'd take Thigpen any day of the week over Huard. Imperfections and all.

See, Thigpen actually has a chance to become a solid NFL QB. Huard's had his chance and failed.

It may take him the entire season. Or a few more years. Who knows? But he's got far more upside than Huard. He's also got youthful enthusiasm.

I'll take all of that any day of the week over Noodle-Arm. Warts and all.


RustShack 11-22-2008 04:55 PM

I said Croyle would get hurt and Thigpen would lead us to the Super Bowl. I'm still not sold on him, but I don't see QB as one of our biggest needs as of right now.

beach tribe 11-22-2008 04:58 PM

So you said that Thigpen should be starting(like everyone else, except the Huard ball suckers.)

And you said that Thigpen has an chance to become a solid NFL QB.

I'm really not trying to be an ass here, but I said no one predicted Thiggy to be playing at this level. A lot of us were on the start thiggy wagon, and thought he might improve, but noone predicted him to play this well, and there's nothing in those posts to say you did either, but you did say "the kid has played well above my expectations."

That said, I'm not trying to argue or say you didn't have high expectations for him. Plus you did pull hard for him to stay in the lineup. So prop things to you Mr. Mcloud.

KChiefs1 11-22-2008 07:35 PM

Herm is a dumbass.

TrickyNicky 11-23-2008 03:52 PM

So, uh, Wilkerson had 2 sacks today.

notorious 11-23-2008 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrickyNicky (Post 5242745)
So, uh, Wilkerson had 2 sacks today.

Wow, some people thought he was worthless. He is now within shouting distance of passing the Chiefs' entire D-Line in sacks this year.

We shall just wait and see, but keep the crow warm for the haters in the mean-time.

Mecca 11-23-2008 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 5243031)
Wow, some people thought he was worthless. He is now within shouting distance of passing the Chiefs' entire D-Line in sacks this year.

We shall just wait and see, but keep the crow warm for the haters in the mean-time.

16 players have more sacks than the Chiefs team.

notorious 11-23-2008 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5243034)
16 players have more sacks than the Chiefs team.

That is sad and pathetic.

The Bad Guy 11-23-2008 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrickyNicky (Post 5242745)
So, uh, Wilkerson had 2 sacks today.

Good evaluation Gun.

Otter 11-23-2008 05:17 PM

100

Hootie 11-23-2008 05:42 PM

the Chiefs aren't going to get 13 sacks this year...no ****ing way...disgusting disgusting disgusting team...rebuilding isn't even an excuse for this abortion of a defense (and special teams)...

Halfcan 11-23-2008 06:29 PM

Jimmy did nothing but make plays-Cheaps cannot evaluate talent

Brock 11-23-2008 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 5243343)
Jimmy did nothing

FYP

milkman 11-23-2008 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 5243659)
FYP

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halfcan (Post 5243343)
Jimmy did nothing cause the Chiefs cannot develop talent

FHPB

fixed his post better


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.