I'm one of the few people that refuse to make that ridiculous comment that he doesn't make NFL-caliber throws. He does, but he's not required to nearly as often as Sanchez and Stafford.

He's obviously a talented college QB, but he has more going against him in regards to becoming a NFL QB compared to the other two.

Playing in a pro style offense is a HUGE advantage for Stafford and Sanchez.

Does Bradford have potential?

Absolutely.

But is that potential worth a $60M investment and a top draft pick, knowing that he has a hill to climb right out of the box, learning how to take snaps, use proper footwork on drops, and read defenses pre/post snap?

Bradford has potential, I'm just not sure it's going to be realized early enough to make him worth that large of a financial investment.

Even Herbstreit and Corso said he's going to have a large learning curve if he does declare.

Montana's arm and Jake Plummer's head. I don't see it.

I agree. Though while I agree Tebow put this game on his back and took control, could they suck him off any more?

I love TEbow. He got robbed on the Heisman this game proves it.

Eh.

Doesn't bother me, the kid has earned it, IMO.

A Heisman trophy and 2 NC's.

The kid is obviously the heart and soul of that team.

He just finds a way to win.

I've watched at least 6 games this year of Stafford's, and I think you're wrong.

Dude is the best prospect, in the realm of what I look for, that I have seen since Plamer.

Disclaimer: I'm just a man with an opinion.

Try educating yourself about how overrated Stafford is and how (until late last season) he was considered a disappointment... considering how highly recruited he was coming out of high school.

Stafford completed barely over 55% of his passes last season and was horrible his freshman year (52% completion %, 7 TDs compared to 13 INTs).

In his two biggest games of the season this year... against Alabama and Florida (the two most NFL-caliber defenses he faced this year) Stafford was average at best (completing just over 57% of his passes) against Alabama and was horrible (under 55% completion %, 0 TD and 3 INTs) against Florida.

Both of those games were also losses.

Stafford is a fraud.

If you're talking about the NFL, Tebow is irrelevant. If you're talking about tonight's game, he deserved all the praise.

Robbed. I'm not going that far.

I said he deserves credit, but are you watching this.....come on

You may be right, but I don't see it. I love football......We'll see.

Stafford = Ryan Leaf's composure and Todd Marinovich's resume.

See, I can make baseless comparisons too.

I don't have too much of an issue with your post, other than the use of the word fraud.

Stafford did seem to have his worst games against the best competition.

I had a post a while back about his stats against the top half of the SEC and the bottom half of the SEC. He basically beat up on the weak sisters, and struggled mightily against the good teams.

However, I have to ask WTF you meant by this:

[QUOTE]Have you seen Stafford play? He was a mediocre QB for most of his career (until this year) and runs the most un-NFL like offense of the big 3 (Sanchez, Bradford and Stafford).

Georgia runs a pro offense. As does USC.

Oklahoma doesn't run anything resembling a pro offense. (unless your name is lil stumppy)

[quote=OnTheWarpath58;5371878]I don't have too much of an issue with your post, other than the use of the word fraud.

Stafford did seem to have his worst games against the best competition.

I had a post a while back about his stats against the top half of the SEC and the bottom half of the SEC. He basically beat up on the weak sisters, and struggled mightily against the good teams.

However, I have to ask WTF you meant by this:

Very true

I heard them call him one of the top 5 to 10 college football players of all time. All time is a long time, especially in college ball, and I haven't watched that much college ball. So I really can't say. He doesn't wow you, but he's money.