ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   On to the 2010 Draft (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=206883)

Coogs 05-04-2009 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5736932)
Don't count out Jevon Snead.

The only true pro-style QB of the group. If he has a decent senior season, I wouldn't be shocked to see him go mid-late 1st round.

I was watching something the other day on Snead. May have been Total Access, but I am not positive on that. They were saying Snead may have a shot at being the #1 overall pick in next years draft.

He definately sounds like someone to keep an eye on the fall.

bdeg 05-04-2009 12:38 PM

I'm with you on spikes. But I'll wait and see what Cottam's got before I put Gresham in my top 10. Same goes for a RT in the 2nd. If they thought enough of Brown to take him in the 5th they must think there's a chance he can eventually play the spot, and his size gives him a lot of upside. If after a year they think he's not improving enough, maybe.

DeezNutz 05-04-2009 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccogoo (Post 5738099)
Tebow is going in the first round. Bank on it.

Especially considering that Urban brought in a pro style guy to work with Tebow on throwing mechanics, and will install pro style sets. I think he's genuinely concerned about getting Tebow into the first round (I mean, the kid, if anybody, deserves it if he's capable - he's a good kid, and a hell of a football player, and I'd never count out anybody with that much physical talent and drive).

0 percent chance.

Jump pass, FTW.

ArrowheadMagic 05-09-2009 11:59 PM

Spikes takes too many plays off. no thanks....

Chiefshrink 05-10-2009 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCTrojan (Post 5722256)
2010 draft?

Please, God, make it stop.

Hey, Mayock already has his first mock 10 for next yrROFL

Chiefshrink 05-10-2009 12:10 PM

Chiefs and Broncs will be close to each other in 2010
 
Keep this in mind, that there is a very strong chance that Denver and KC will be picking very close together in next yr's draft. Why? Because remember Denver traded away there first rd pick(2010) to Philly and Denver only has Chicago's first rd pick of 2010(Cutler trade).

What McDaniels has done to the Broncs is disasterous(if you are a Broncs fan) and beautiful(if you are a Chiefs fan-Me). I see the Chiefs winning at least 5 and maybe 7 games at the most and Denver will win 3 at the most IMO with this year's schedule for both teams.

Trading away that 1st rd pick will not only haunt them but it is also known that Bowlen did not want to pay for 2 1st rd picks in 2010 in an uncapped yr. Might have been smart but when you have as many holes as Denver does what a way to have bolstered your D up with 2 1st rd picks in the top 12. Remains to be seen.

I see the Chiefs and Bears having similiar records by year's end and look for the Chiefs and Broncs to picking within 1-3 slots from each other((8-12)competing for that NT IF our experiment doesn't work out which it probably won't and you know Denver doesn't have a NT either.

Denver either takes a LB or NT and Chiefs will either take a NT or LB IMO since both do not have all the pieces yet and both will run a hybrid 3/4 this season. Look for the NT/LB to be the competing position because Josh probably won't take a QB in the first rd(Patriot Way). Will be interesting to see the the possible moving up or down in the 1st rd next yr to compete for that NT or LB.

Reaper16 05-10-2009 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sportsshrink (Post 5753981)
Keep this in mind, that there is a very strong chance that Denver and KC will be picking very close together in next yr's draft. Why? Because remember Denver traded away there first rd pick(2010) to Philly and Denver only has Chicago's first rd pick of 2010(Cutler trade).

What McDaniels has done to the Broncs is disasterous(if you are a Broncs fan) and beautiful(if you are a Chiefs fan-Me). I see the Chiefs winning at least 5 and maybe 7 games at the most and Denver will win 3 at the most IMO with this year's schedule for both teams.

Trading away that 1st rd pick will not only haunt them but it is also known that Bowlen did not want to pay for 2 1st rd picks in 2010 in an uncapped yr. Might have been smart but when you have as many holes as Denver does what a way to have bolstered your D up with 2 1st rd picks in the top 12. Remains to be seen.

I see the Chiefs and Bears having similiar records by year's end and look for the Chiefs and Broncs to picking within 1-3 slots from each other((8-12)competing for that NT IF our experiment doesn't work out which it probably won't and you know Denver doesn't have a NT either.

Denver either takes a LB or NT and Chiefs will either take a NT or LB IMO since both do not have all the pieces yet and both will run a hybrid 3/4 this season. Look for the NT/LB to be the competing position because Josh probably won't take a QB in the first rd(Patriot Way). Will be interesting to see the the possible moving up or down in the 1st rd next yr to compete for that NT or LB.

Since when did WorldNetDaily start publishing football articles?

Kyle DeLexus 05-10-2009 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sportsshrink (Post 5753981)
Keep this in mind, that there is a very strong chance that Denver and KC will be picking very close together in next yr's draft. Why? Because remember Denver traded away there first rd pick(2010) to Philly and Denver only has Chicago's first rd pick of 2010(Cutler trade).

What McDaniels has done to the Broncs is disasterous(if you are a Broncs fan) and beautiful(if you are a Chiefs fan-Me). I see the Chiefs winning at least 5 and maybe 7 games at the most and Denver will win 3 at the most IMO with this year's schedule for both teams.

Trading away that 1st rd pick will not only haunt them but it is also known that Bowlen did not want to pay for 2 1st rd picks in 2010 in an uncapped yr. Might have been smart but when you have as many holes as Denver does what a way to have bolstered your D up with 2 1st rd picks in the top 12. Remains to be seen.

I see the Chiefs and Bears having similiar records by year's end and look for the Chiefs and Broncs to picking within 1-3 slots from each other((8-12)competing for that NT IF our experiment doesn't work out which it probably won't and you know Denver doesn't have a NT either.

Denver either takes a LB or NT and Chiefs will either take a NT or LB IMO since both do not have all the pieces yet and both will run a hybrid 3/4 this season. Look for the NT/LB to be the competing position because Josh probably won't take a QB in the first rd(Patriot Way). Will be interesting to see the the possible moving up or down in the 1st rd next yr to compete for that NT or LB.

I believe the Bears will win more than 5 or 7 for sure. I think we will win 4 or 5. I don't expect us to be picking close at all actually.

kansastiger 05-10-2009 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5723106)
Does LSU have one coming out?

I'm an LSU fan, and the only logical selection for the DL with a 3-4 scheme that you'll find coming from the Tigers is Al Woods. He's a big space filler, but he has the same problems with nagging injuries as Dorsey. I played against Dorsey in high school, and he's been bothered by injuries since his senior season. I will tell you this, you'd be hard pressed to find a guy that is as humble and hard-working as Dorsey.

Anyway, if you're wondering who the next player from LSU that the Chiefs may take, or the guy that may prove to be the most beneficial from LSU, Richard Dickson. TE who has great hands, gets open, makes catches in traffic, and he's hard-nosed. He'll probably go later in the draft, but if KC picks him up, he'd be a steal.

Offensive line, Ciron Black is the obvious frontrunner from LSU. I wouldn't expect him to take over at LT as soon as he gets out of college, but I could see him making the transition within his first few years.

DaKCMan AP 05-10-2009 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowheadMagic (Post 5753574)
Spikes takes too many plays off. no thanks....

ROFL

Chiefshrink 05-11-2009 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyle DeLexus (Post 5754894)
I believe the Bears will win more than 5 or 7 for sure. I think we will win 4 or 5. I don't expect us to be picking close at all actually.

The Bears have no elite recievers and their O-line is average at best and on the downslide. The Bears won't be able to run as good and their will be more of an intense pass rush on Cutler with average recievers. Just because they have Cutler doesn't guarantee a 10win season or the playoffs. Oh and their D is aging fast and is not what it was which means Cutler will have to work with a much longer field like he did here in Denver.

Again Chiefs and Broncos will picking within 1-3 slots of each other.

MoreLemonPledge 05-13-2009 04:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sportsshrink (Post 5756945)
The Bears have no elite recievers and their O-line is average at best and on the downslide. The Bears won't be able to run as good and their will be more of an intense pass rush on Cutler with average recievers. Just because they have Cutler doesn't guarantee a 10win season or the playoffs. Oh and their D is aging fast and is not what it was which means Cutler will have to work with a much longer field like he did here in Denver.

Again Chiefs and Broncos will picking within 1-3 slots of each other.

I agree that the Bears D is getting old, but their running game will be fine. Even without good receivers, just having Cutler will make them respect the passing game, opening up draw plays (or at least that works on Madden).

Mecca 05-15-2009 06:24 PM

You all had a prospect debate without me? I'm shocked and appalled.

Kyle DeLexus 05-15-2009 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5769142)
You all had a prospect debate without me? I'm shocked and appalled.

It wasn't as good.

KCrockaholic 05-15-2009 10:26 PM

How may we live on???


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.