ChiefsPlanet
Page 7 of 7 « First 3456 7
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs 3-3 after six games. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=214347)

KCrockaholic 09-17-2009 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6081466)
I would say the Ravens are better than the Bengals just because they have a better DL, OL, and Ray Lewis and Ed Reed. The Bengals are better everywhere else though.
Im done with this conversation. :shake:

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6081448)
No. We will go 3-1 against that division. We have the rest of the AFC North at home.
Wow, the rest of the AFC North is at home....see, and I thought you had two at home and two away.... that seems like a competetive advantage to me.

Quesadilla Joe 09-17-2009 11:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6081472)
Wow, the rest of the AFC North is at home....see, and I thought you had two at home and two away.... that seems like a competetive advantage to me.
My bad. I thought the Baltimore game was at home.

Quesadilla Joe 09-17-2009 11:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR (Post 6081437)
Chad Johnson is every bit as good as Randy Moss and Larry Fitzgerald?

Die, dumbass.
If Randy Moss and Larry Fitzgerald had Ryan Fitzpatrick throwing them the ball last year instead of Tom Brady and Kurt Warner then I guess you would understand.

keg in kc 09-17-2009 11:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6081491)
If Randy Moss and Larry Fitzgerald had Ryan Fitzpatrick throwing them the ball last year instead of Tom Brady and Kurt Warner then I guess you would understand.
Yeah, Tom Brady had a great year.

Wait, what?

Quesadilla Joe 09-17-2009 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6081497)
Yeah, Tom Brady had a great year.

Wait, what?
Matt Cassel is better than Ryan Fitzpatrick.

RealSNR 09-17-2009 11:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KnowMo2724 (Post 6081491)
If Randy Moss and Larry Fitzgerald had Ryan Fitzpatrick throwing them the ball last year instead of Tom Brady and Kurt Warner then I guess you would understand.
Shut the **** up. Watch Randy Moss and Larry Fitzgerald play and you'll see that even with great QBs there's a reason why they're some of the most talented WRs to ever play this game. Ochocinco doesn't come ****ing close to what they can do.

bowener 09-17-2009 11:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6081028)
What about the Cowboys is great to you? Seriously.

If they had a better coach, then perhaps, but otherwise this is a talented team that underachieves and loses focus.

They lost five of their road games last year, INCLUDING the game against the Rams.
Demarcus Ware.

He will conquer Alberts like Cortez conquered the Yucatan, and he will eat Cassel's heart too...

DaneMcCloud 09-17-2009 12:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6081132)
We'll be 0-6. Just like we were going to lose last week's game by 30 points.
A loss is a loss, regardless of the score.

The NFL doesn't award extra points for being close.

RealSNR 09-17-2009 12:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowener (Post 6081566)
Demarcus Ware.

He will conquer Alberts like Cortez conquered the Yucatan, and he will eat Cassel's heart too...
Who the hell is "Alberts"?

Pioli Zombie 09-17-2009 12:08 PM
As Chris Rock would say "Are you out of your mind?????"
Posted via Mobile Device

htismaqe 09-17-2009 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6081571)
A loss is a loss, regardless of the score.

The NFL doesn't award extra points for being close.
They also don't adjust scores to account for yardage.

The whole argument goes both ways. They played poorly on both sides of the ball. And yet they did JUST enough to stay in it until almost the end. Good? Bad? I don't know. It is what it is.

DaneMcCloud 09-17-2009 12:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 6081631)
They also don't adjust scores to account for yardage.

The whole argument goes both ways. They played poorly on both sides of the ball. And yet they did JUST enough to stay in it until almost the end. Good? Bad? I don't know. It is what it is.
My point was aimed directly at Mic's assertion that they didn't "lose by 30 points".

Had it not been for the blocked punt for a TD (very rare) or DJ's interception return to the goal line, setting up a TD, it would have been 28 points.

But that's neither here or there: A loss is a loss.

We've already discussed the merits of the Chiefs play this past week and now it's in the books.

It's Raider time!

Sweet Daddy Hate 09-17-2009 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6081690)
My point was aimed directly at Mic's assertion that they didn't "lose by 30 points".

Had it not been for the blocked punt for a TD (very rare) or DJ's interception return to the goal line, setting up a TD, it would have been 28 points.

But that's neither here or there: A loss is a loss.

We've already discussed the merits of the Chiefs play this past week and now it's in the books.

It's Raider time!
This.

SenselessChiefsFan 09-17-2009 02:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowener (Post 6081566)
Demarcus Ware.

He will conquer Alberts like Cortez conquered the Yucatan, and he will eat Cassel's heart too...
Demarcus Ware ain't sh... nevermind.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:04 PM.
Page 7 of 7 « First 3456 7
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.