ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs I am afraid that Haley might have lost the team today. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=215034)

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-27-2009 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan (Post 6115787)
Who should he have brought in that he didn't? Come on. You must have names of people we passed over to be this passionate about it.

READ THE ****ING THREAD, YOU STUPID ****!!

FloridaMan88 09-27-2009 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6115783)
The loss isn't the concern. Conceding the game bothers me.

You could argue the Chiefs conceded the entire season by entering a season with a roster so void of talent.

I guess we should look on the bright side to the fact that the Chiefs are going to be forced to spend $$$ next offseason to avoid having their payroll drop below the NFL payroll minimum.

This after Clark Hunt said it was urgent the taxpayers of Jackson County open their wallet for millions of $$$ in stadium renovations and this as the Chiefs continue to charge $20+ for gameday parking.

I hope Clark brings his country club stiffs of a family out on the field during halftime next week, like he did during halftime of the Raiders game, and brings his fat ass GM with him so the fans in Arrowhead Stadium can shower them with the boos they deserve.

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan (Post 6115793)
Again, you and I are on the same page here.

I want to see the Chiefs do better. I want to see Cassel develop into a hell of a QB and I want to see the Chiefs dominate the line of scrimmage again like we used to.

I just want some of these people to tell me who we specifically didn't go after.

I'm about to call you a bunch of really abrasive names for ignoring the posts with the names.

dirk digler 09-27-2009 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan (Post 6115791)
If I were on the team, and the coach didn't call any pass plays and we were trailing by double digits and couldn't run for shit.... I may just have second thoughts about how qualified my coach was.

Haley answered this in his pC.

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6115803)
Haley answered this in his pC.

Really what was his answer?

"My players got ****ed in the ass so hard I figured we should just get it over with"

Easy 6 09-27-2009 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 6115683)
Wait, after 3 games he's going to lose the team? Really?

Yes.

Its all over.

chiefzilla1501 09-27-2009 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan (Post 6115793)
Again, you and I are on the same page here.

I want to see the Chiefs do better. I want to see Cassel develop into a hell of a QB and I want to see the Chiefs dominate the line of scrimmage again like we used to.

I just want some of these people to tell me who we specifically didn't go after.

We gave a long list. I think where we're on a different page is that I think for the offensive line, we should have been okay with stopgaps.

We're not talking long-term solutions here. I agree that with the available options, we probably would have gotten one at the most (if any). But there were plenty of short-term solutions out there. And given the importance of developing and protecting your QB that you traded for, it should have been a priority to at least make us as good at every line position as possible.

The lists every one has brought up consists of cheap, short-term fixes, all of which were better than our current options. None of them would have turned our offensive line around, but all of them would have made it better.

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-27-2009 03:11 PM

One more time, for the ****ing troglodytes:

OL

FA: Jason Brown, Ray Willis.

Draft: Round 2: Eben Britton, Max Unger, Andy Levitre, William Beatty (Cassel Trade)
Round 3: (Magee): Antoine Caldwell, Kraig Urbik, Louis Vazquez
Round 4: Jonathan Luigs
Round 5: Duke Robinson, Fenuki Tupou

Defense:

For DL: Olshansky, Canty,
For S: Jim Leonhard would have been a better pickup than Brown

DeezNutz 09-27-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6115802)
I'm about to call you a bunch of really abrasive names for ignoring the posts with the names.

Could be that he has you on ignore because of all the Sanchez talk.

He wasn't too happy with my allusion, in the game thread, to Sanchez's early success.

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:11 PM

I think it comes down to the Chiefs had a set amount of money they were spending they spent it on 2 players.

KcMizzou 09-27-2009 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 6115807)
Yes.

Its all over.

Sad, aint it? So who are the next hot GM and HC candidates?

Mecca 09-27-2009 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6115812)
Could be that he has you on ignore because of all the Sanchez talk.

He wasn't too happy with my allusion, in the game thread, to Sanchez's early success.

Oh so he's one of those bleeding vagina posters is he?

Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan 09-27-2009 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 6115808)
We gave a long list. I think where we're on a different page is that I think for the offensive line, we should have been okay with stopgaps.

We're not talking long-term solutions here. I agree that with the available options, we probably would have gotten one at the most (if any). But there were plenty of short-term solutions out there. And given the importance of developing and protecting your QB that you traded for, it should have been a priority to at least make us as good at every line position as possible.

The lists every one has brought up consists of cheap, short-term fixes, all of which were better than our current options. None of them would have turned our offensive line around, but all of them would have made it better.

Chiefzilla,

I'm not arguing with you. You provided me a list and I completely agree, some of them would have been an improvement.

It's the other gloom and doomers who I want responses from. I haven't seen a response from anyone but you.

I've also seen a few names brought up in other threads, and the same people who're bringing up their names now were the SAME people who were screaming that they were a waste of money, too old, not the right mix, etc. a few months ago.

So which is it? Should I believe them now or should I have believed them in May/June?

Easy 6 09-27-2009 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 6115814)
Sad, aint it? So who are the next hot GM and HC candidates?

I highly doubt that the game has passed Art Donovan by yet, lets try it...:shrug:

DaneMcCloud 09-27-2009 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan (Post 6115831)
Chiefzilla,

I'm not arguing with you. You provided me a list and I completely agree, some of them would have been an improvement.

It's the other gloom and doomers who I want responses from. I haven't seen a response from anyone but you.

I've also seen a few names brought up in other threads, and the same people who're bringing up their names now were the SAME people who were screaming that they were a waste of money, too old, not the right mix, etc. a few months ago.

So which is it? Should I believe them now or should I have believed them in May/June?

WTF?

Do you Hamas on ignore?

How the **** can you be so ****ing stupid?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.