ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs I like what Haley did yesterday... (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=215091)

petegz28 09-28-2009 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6119178)
If the coaches believed the game was over at 21-7, every single one of them should be fired today. Immediately.

Well, you don't know what they thought. But the fact is just about everyone who watched the game knew it was.

petegz28 09-28-2009 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6119182)
And Pioli had it figured out, too. That's why we went with the 27-year-old, win-now QB.

Wow, I guess you would have rather had Thigy?

We had to get Cassel when we had the chance. No one said it was the preferred time. And again with your filp-flopping. You know and even said yesterday what the Maangment says to the public is usually not what is said behind closed doors.

DeezNutz 09-28-2009 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 6119185)
Wow, I guess you would have rather had Thigy?

No, I would have drafted a QB.

And I would have worked to improve the line, which Pioli should have been doing anyway. Even if he doesn't touch the line, you can sit a n00b for the entire year, if necessary.

Fish 09-28-2009 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 6119156)
Yea, cause passing was the answer....you're right. We had stellar pass protection.

Yeah... you're probably right... R2P2 all the way.... I'm glad our offensive minded coach is leading this team in the right direction for the future....

Nevermind that this same excuse didn't work for the previous coach who had the same problems....

petegz28 09-28-2009 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 6119188)
Yeah... you're probably right... R2P2 all the way.... I'm glad our offensive minded coach is leading this team in the right direction for the future....

Nevermind that this same excuse didn't work for the previous coach who had the same problems....

Dude, I can want to score 10 TD's every game and have the plays to do it. If I don't have the players to execute the plays then it doesn't matter.

DeezNutz 09-28-2009 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 6119188)
Yeah... you're probably right... R2P2 all the way.... I'm glad our offensive minded coach is leading this team in the right direction for the future....

Nevermind that this same excuse didn't work for the previous coach who had the same problems....

Shhh...

Everything Herm did was wrong, but everything Haley does has a purpose.

petegz28 09-28-2009 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6119187)
No, I would have drafted a QB.

And I would have worked to improve the line, which Pioli should have been doing anyway. Even if he doesn't touch the line, you can sit a n00b for the entire year, if necessary.

Well, I guess O-Lineman-R-Us was out of the good stock.

And had we gone that route you would be crying in a year or two that we improved the line and now have a rookie QB and we should have got Cassel when we had the chance.

The_Doctor10 09-28-2009 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy (Post 6118879)
An NFL offense will not work with the O-line we have. It won't matter who we play. We can't run block or pass block. No to mention pick up a blitz.

So is that a vote for the spread? If only they hadn't fired Gailey, eh?

Fish 09-28-2009 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 6119190)
Dude, I can want to score 10 TD's every game and have the plays to do it. If I don't have the players to execute the plays then it doesn't matter.

Chan didn't have the players to execute the plays last year either.... what did he do with it? And what was the response?

petegz28 09-28-2009 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unleash_the_Phury (Post 6119196)
So is that a vote for the spread? If only they hadn't fired Gailey, eh?

I like the spread myself. I don't think any of us knows what the real deal was with Gailey. As I understand it, he wanted out way back in May or sooner and we told him no.

DeezNutz 09-28-2009 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 6119195)
Well, I guess O-Lineman-R-Us was out of the good stock.

And had we gone that route you would be crying in a year or two that we improved the line and now have a rookie QB and we should have got Cassel when we had the chance.

LMAO.

I can promise you that I wouldn't have been "crying" about not acquiring Cassel.

petegz28 09-28-2009 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 6119199)
Chan didn't have the players to execute the plays last year either.... what did he do with it? And what was the response?

A bunch of crying that Thigy and the Pistol wasn't the answer?????:thumb:

DeezNutz 09-28-2009 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 6119207)
A bunch of crying that Thigy and the Pistol wasn't the answer?????:thumb:

And they weren't. Not long-term.

Do you disagree?

petegz28 09-28-2009 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6119211)
And they weren't. Not long-term.

Do you disagree?

No. But for someone to sit here and say we should have kept Gailey because of such is stupid.

Bearcat 09-28-2009 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish (Post 6119188)
R2P2 all the way

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28 (Post 6119190)
10 TD's

I know this is crazy talk, but maybe something in between? Perhaps we shouldn't run it up the center's butt every play, but we don't have to throw a hail mary every play, either?

Surely there are plays that can get the 14 defensive players out of the box without requiring Cassel to hold onto the ball very long.

Maybe we can turn over the playcalling napkin next week and find out!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.