ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   GBN Report: 2010 SENIOR BOWL GAME REVIEW (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=222893)

RustShack 02-11-2010 10:52 PM

EDIT- Yes I know he was drafted as a DE and OLB's used to be DE's once upon a time. But fact is hes not one on our team anymore.

Saccopoo 02-11-2010 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6526335)
EDIT- Yes I know he was drafted as a DE and OLB's used to be DE's once upon a time. But fact is hes not one on our team anymore.

So, what you're saying is that with Hali switching to the 3-4 ROLB spot that we now only have 2 first round draft picks on the defensive line and we now need another one to complete the trifecta?

Are you advocating a nose tackle with our first round selection this year? Terrence Cody? Dan Williams?

RustShack 02-11-2010 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6526379)
So, what you're saying is that with Hali switching to the 3-4 ROLB spot that we now only have 2 first round draft picks on the defensive line and we now need another one to complete the trifecta?

Are you advocating a nose tackle with our first round selection this year? Terrence Cody? Dan Williams?

I didn't say we need to draft a NT in the top five at all, douche bag.

RustShack 02-11-2010 11:06 PM

But if we are talking about drafting a NT before a LG, C, RG, or RT in the top five. Then yes I would.

RustShack 02-11-2010 11:08 PM

The fact is this years top five pick shouldn't be used on a linemen on either side of the ball.

Mr. Flopnuts 02-11-2010 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6516731)
And you know this how? You obviously haven't watched him play... so where do you get your info? (btw... what position does Hali play and what position does Woodley play? Here's a hint... NOT THE SAME ONE DUMBASS)

Also... you do know that until U-M put him at DE, Graham had played LB his entire career...

ROFL I've never seen Austin ownage quite like this.

keg in kc 02-11-2010 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6526395)
ROFL I've never seen Austin ownage quite like this.

That was pretty funny. Not that watching saccopoo try to talk about Graham wasn't funny enough on it's own.

RustShack 02-11-2010 11:18 PM

A deaf mute who has just watched one game of football in his life could own sacapoo when it comes to talking about football. Hes just a ****ing idiot.

Saccopoo 02-12-2010 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 6526395)
Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief
And you know this how? You obviously haven't watched him play... so where do you get your info? (btw... what position does Hali play and what position does Woodley play? Here's a hint... NOT THE SAME ONE DUMBASS)

Also... you do know that until U-M put him at DE, Graham had played LB his entire career...
I've never seen Austin ownage quite like this.

Ownage? That he took offense about a comparison between Hali and Graham in terms of the position that they played in college, then proceeded to start screaming "Woodley! Woodley! Woodley!" and then mentioning something about Graham playing linebacker in high school?

(BTW, I never even mentioned Woodley, so I still don't understand why the Hali/Woodley comparison was brought up anyway.)

That's "ownage?" I guess if you say so...

Saccopoo 02-12-2010 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6526384)
I didn't say we need to draft a NT in the top five at all, douche bag.

You seemed to get pretty bent out of shape about not having Hali's first round draft status on the defensive line anymore. I just figured that you were so distraught about having him be a first round linebacker now, that you were advocating a new first round defensive tackle to take his place.

Or perhaps you are just a bit miffed that with Hali now playing linebacker, that it would nullify any potential pick of Rolando McClain because that would give the Chiefs three first round picks at linebacker versus only two on the defensive line. And we all know how bad you are on McClain's jock.

BTW - Your sig is kinda ghey. Not the Iowa State one, but the little internet gif. It makes you look like you are 13 or so. I'm having a difficult time taking anything you say seriously when you've got "WAI" "NO WAI" "KENT B!" flashing repeatedly. (Not that I take anything you say seriously anyway as it seems all you can do is hurl personal insults with the now worn out RustShack mantra of "he never watched football." You really haven't provided anything of substance of late. Maybe it's just the whole "I know we really need an offensive lineman, but the "cool" kids want a kick returner so I'll play along so they let me into their gang and I can be a cool kid too." thing. It's probably eating at your very existence. The guilt, the inner conflict. Slowly disintegrating your subconscious, gnawing at your objective reasoning, poisoning your soul. I can see the conflict within you. Your words scream for help, for understanding.)

bdeg 02-12-2010 01:03 AM

oh shit, sacc bringin out the big guns.

i know my opinion doesn't count for a lot but poo brings a lot to the table. doesn't go along with the consensus and backs it up(whether or not u want to admit albert may not be an elite lt, dude has a point).

I think a lot of the backlash is based on the fact that we want to see this team as far along in the rebuilding as possible. If Albert can hold down the LT we've already got a key player and are therefore farther along in the process, but if he ends up not being able to the team is set back practically a whole year from a drafting standpoint. I think the dude is just a realist.

milkman 02-13-2010 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo (Post 6523817)
Again, you are being a douche. I specifically stated Brown, with the caveat that he was on IR all season.

How is that intellectually dishonest?

Let me clue you in - it's not.

If you want to argue for the sake of arguing, that's one thing. Maybe it's your only thing.

You are being intellectually dishonest because it was clear the reason he asked the question was the fact that none of the starters in the SB on the OL were first rounders, and he was asking a rhetorical question to make a point.

If you didn't know that, then you are a ****ing moron.

Which is it?

Are you intellectually dishonest or a moron?

The Bad Guy 02-13-2010 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdeg (Post 6526534)
oh shit, sacc bringin out the big guns.

i know my opinion doesn't count for a lot but poo brings a lot to the table. doesn't go along with the consensus and backs it up(whether or not u want to admit albert may not be an elite lt, dude has a point).

I think a lot of the backlash is based on the fact that we want to see this team as far along in the rebuilding as possible. If Albert can hold down the LT we've already got a key player and are therefore farther along in the process, but if he ends up not being able to the team is set back practically a whole year from a drafting standpoint. I think the dude is just a realist.

Albert isn't setting any team back a full year in rebuilding. Saying this makes Okung look like he's the best LT talent to come out in the last 10 years, which is hilarious.

A lot of the backlash is because the dude is a moron. It has nothing to do with the Chiefs rebuilding.

His takes are on the RoyR scale of excellence.

Albert isn't setting back any process a year. He is in the 2nd year in a new system, lost way too much weight in my opinion, and now we want to throw him to the wolves. This is exactly the same type of panic move that has constantly set this team back to the point where we have shit on this roster.

This team has far too many holes to worry about moving a player who has shown signs of being really good at the LT position to draft another one and move Albert elsewhere. Not to mention the fact that Russell Okung is not an elite prospect. We have zero idea whether or not he'd be an upgrade to Albert at the pro level. Albert is not going to be a LG with Brian Waters on the roster, so where does he play then?

This draft is loaded at playmakers at key positions we can upgrade and we are discussing drafting a replacement for a player, who one year ago, was viewed as a dominant LT for the future?

That's complete nonsense. He's the absolute only one who thinks Albert played like shit all year. That should tell you something.

RustShack 02-13-2010 11:32 AM

If you want to replace Albert fine, but at least wait until theres a ****ing better LT prospect than Albert in the draft. Or are you just worried because you know if we wait for a real LT we will pass on him because Albert will emerge in his third year like most players do?

milkman 02-13-2010 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6529069)
If you want to replace Albert fine, but at least wait until theres a ****ing better LT prospect than Albert in the draft. Or are you just worried because you know if we wait for a real LT we will pass on him because Albert will emerge in his third year like most players do?

Bag of Shit does make one solid point as it relates to taking a LT in this draft.

That being, should Albert prove he's not the guy, then LT becomes a need in next year's draft, a draft in which we could/should be looking at QB and WR in the first round.

That in no way diminishes the rest of his dumbassery.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.