ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs cut someone to make room for NT Anthony Toribio (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=233005)

Reaper16 09-06-2010 10:10 AM

I remember the Bengals draft being praised for taking value at nearly every pick.

SAUTO 09-06-2010 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach (Post 6981012)
Well, not doubting your word, but it would be a wise idea to provide the link for the person(s) in question that said they loved the bengals killed it, loved it, etc.

yeah i did but the post got ****ed up.

hell there's even a thread about it


give me a sec

SAUTO 09-06-2010 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coach (Post 6981012)
Well, not doubting your word, but it would be a wise idea to provide the link for the person(s) in question that said they loved the bengals killed it, loved it, etc.



i hope these are enough, there ARE more though

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5717315)
The Giants and Eagles consistently win at the draft and the Bengals just rocked the house.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRon (Post 5717305)
That's just it. For those of us that are disappointed, it's not about who we picked. It's about who else was on the board at the time we made the pick.

For instance, look at the Bengals draft. I like what they did. Also I like the Giants and the Eagles drafts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5716812)
Oh, great. I just noticed that the Bengals (who had a sick draft) signed Daniel Skuta from GVSU, another player I've advocated for in this thread.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 5715203)
The Bengals are pwning this draft. Bernard Scott is a ****ing great pick.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5714181)
Eagles, Ravens, Patriots, Bears and Bengals are tearing it up in this draft.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5713082)
There's nothing quiet about the Bengals Draft.
They're kicking ass and taking names!!!

Andre Smith
Rey Maualuga
Michael Johnson
Chase Coffman
Jonathan Luigs

All 5 of these guys are starting-caliber draftees.

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 5713074)
Five top talents in the first four rounds. A lot of people might not like the Andre Smith pick, but if he can get his shit together, they might have the top draft this year.


Round 1, Pick 6 (6) Andre Smith OT 6'4" 332 Alabama

Pick Analysis:Marvin Lewis has stated that he wants to get back to running the football, and Smith gives the Bengals a dominating offensive tackle to run behind. Though he had a series of mishaps in the run up to the draft, there is no denying that Smith is one of the best tackle prospects in the draft.


Round 2, Pick 6 (38) Rey Maualuga ILB 6'2" 249 Southern Cal

Pick Analysis:After surprisingly dropping out of the first round, Maualuga lands with the Bengals at No. 38. The high-motor playmaker from USC gives Marvin Lewis a heavy hitter at middle linebacker. With last year's top pick (Keith Rivers) coming back from an injury, the Bengals have a pair of young and athletic linebackers to anchor the middle of the defense.


Round 3, Pick 6 (70) Michael Johnson DE 6'7" 266 Georgia Tech

Pick Analysis:The Bengals pick up an edge rusher with first-round talent with their selection of Johnson. A tall, rangy athlete with explosive quickness, Johnson has the ability to run down quarterbacks from the backside. Though he doesn't play with great effort at all times, he has the potential to be an impact player as a situational pass rusher.


Round 3, Pick 34 (98) (Compensatory selection) Chase Coffman TE 6'6" 244 Missouri


Pick Analysis:A foot injury prevented him from probably being drafted higher. He's an excellent receiving tight end, but he'll have to learn how to block. He has outstanding hands and will be one of those move-type tight ends. His father was an All-Pro tight end with the Packers. His coach at Missouri said Coffman is the one guy who will go to the NFL and be good right away.


Round 4, Pick 6 (106) Jonathan Luigs C 6'4" 301 Arkansas

Pick Analysis:Cincy needed a center and looked at all of them. The Bengals staff coached at the Senior Bowl saw Luigs quite a bit. He was a four-year starter and was the center of the year in 2007. Some people feel he tailed off, but he has made all the calls at the line. The question is, how is he going to handle the power nose tackles? He may have to hit the weight room a bit to handle the Ravens and Steelers defenses.
Round 5, Pick 6 (142)
Round 6, Pick 6 (179)
Round 6, Pick 36 (209) (Compensatory selection)
Round 7, Pick 6 (215)
Round 7, Pick 40 (249) (Compensatory selection)
Round 7, Pick 43 (252) (Compensatory selection)

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 5713004)
The Bengals are killing this draft.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5712992)
Bengals keep kicking ass in this draft.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delano (Post 5712085)
Bengals take Michael Johnson.

I like their draft a lot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5712084)
Bengals are having a damn good draft.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delano (Post 5709634)
Bengals, Jaguars and Texans have done pretty well.


Frankie 09-06-2010 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6979675)
'09 Draft Class:
Succop is a slightly above average kicker.

Common Hamas. Succop so far has been better than that. But anyway, isn't it sad that the the highlight of our '09 draft is the last player chosen in the entire draft?:(

Frankie 09-06-2010 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs (Post 6979708)
I think people are being too hard on Magee. He had a decent rookie season and he looked OK this preseason. He's probably not starting material but he can clearly get off a block and get after the passer in nickel packages. For a third round pick that isn't horrible.

For a team like us, especially when the GM forces an immediate change in the defensive system, the first 3 rounds of picks must be starter material.

Frankie 09-06-2010 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6979855)
Hence 4-12, 2-14, 4-12

Damn, I hope this is not a pattern. We may be looking at a 2-14 season coming up.:eek:

Reaper16 09-06-2010 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6981053)
i hope these are enough, there ARE more though

None of those posts declare the Bengals as the outright winner of the draft, which is what the original charge was.

-King- 09-06-2010 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6980980)
I'd rather have Heyward-Bey than Crabtree, too. Heyward-Bey has upside.

What upside does he have over crabtree?
Posted via Mobile Device

Reaper16 09-06-2010 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcChiefsKing (Post 6981139)
What upside does he have over crabtree?
Posted via Mobile Device

The physical attributes, speed namely, that the Raiders so prized in Heyward-Bey give him a higher ceiling. Crabtree seems maxed out, is slow, is a poor route-runner. Heyward-Bey has a better chance of busting than Crabtree but also a much better chance at becoming an elite player.

RedThat 09-06-2010 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 6981097)
Common Hamas. Succop so far has been better than that.

I agree Succop is one good kicker.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 6981097)
But anyway, isn't it sad that the the highlight of our '09 draft is the last player chosen in the entire draft?:(

Sure. If you choose to look at it that way, then yeah it is miserable.
But what is the sense? It's done, it's over with. Nothing we can do about it, that draft is history. Can we just move on?

*Anyway, it's great to see we got a kicker. I've wanted one for years because I felt this franchise never had a really good one for a long time. Now we have one. Thank you lord.

-King- 09-06-2010 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6981156)
The physical attributes, speed namely, that the Raiders so prized in Heyward-Bey give him a higher ceiling. Crabtree seems maxed out, is slow, is a poor route-runner. Heyward-Bey has a better chance of busting than Crabtree but also a much better chance at becoming an elite player.

Eh, Heyward Bey will never have a 1k season in his career.
Posted via Mobile Device

Titty Meat 09-06-2010 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6980980)
I'd rather have Heyward-Bey than Crabtree, too. Heyward-Bey has upside.

I'd rather have Crabtree he played well with a shitty QB. You what they say if "I buy a lottery ticket I have the chance to be a millionare". Thats how I feel about Heyword-Bey he was a 2nd round talent not a first.

The Bad Guy 09-06-2010 12:41 PM

Yeah, I don't know why in the hell people would rather have Hey-Bey over Crabtree. Crabtree runs great routes, has better hands. The speed thing is overrated when you have stonehands.

RedThat 09-06-2010 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6981212)
Yeah, I don't know why in the hell people would rather have Hey-Bey over Crabtree. Crabtree runs great routes, has better hands. The speed thing is overrated when you have stonehands.

At the end of the day, it really comes down to who is the more polished player? I'll take Crabtree 9x out of 10 over Heyward Bey.

Heyward Bey's speed is overemphasized because we all know Al Davis is infatuated by speed.

Reaper16 09-06-2010 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6981166)
I'd rather have Crabtree he played well with a shitty QB. You what they say if "I buy a lottery ticket I have the chance to be a millionare". Thats how I feel about Heyword-Bey he was a 2nd round talent not a first.

I agree with you, more or less. I personally wouldn't have touched either one until the second round.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.