Saying that malls don't want that clientele is the opposite of saying I was wrong. Are you a CoMo mult?

I had that album. I was 15 when it came out, and I don't give a shit. The airline was right, and this dude's a dipshit.

Were you wanting Depends this year for Christmas? Or just the usual Prunes and Carrots trey?

33's pretty old, I know. I'm only the target demographic of nearly every major corporation on the planet.

You do realize he has a totally different image now. I'm a fan of Dookie, but not this new lame crap. Nobody from then is going to those links to side with him now.

You post like you're 80, that's why I made th Prunes And Carrots remark. You really must have a stick up your ass to thnk they way you do at 33, I feel sorry for you.

Nearly EVERY major corporation on the planet, you say? That's really impressive, in a few more years maybe I'll be that impressive too.

I haven't liked the last few albums either. They'll always be die hards that stick with them no matter how badly they start pussing out though. People stuck with Metallica through ReLoad and St. Anger.

Maybe, but it depends on your ethnicity, income, and family structure. There's a reason that advertisements are priced based on ratings in specific demographics. I carry a meter that tracks everything I watch or listen to on the television/radio. I get nice checks every month in return for doing so. Like it or not, that's the way the world works.

Not the same thing though. Metallica is Metallica, and Greenday is Greenday, think about what you're posting.

You really are one stipud mother****er.

...And none of those bands will ever assimilate into society.

http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h1.../Metallica.jpg

I stuck with them until that crappy Black Album came out.

If the airline felt they were right they wouldn't have issued an immediate apology and probably gave him all kinds of free tickets for his inconvenience.

I disagree. They didn't want this to turn into a big deal. There was a similar incident with a woman whose skirt was too short a year or two ago.

http://plancksconstant.org/blog1/200...rt_to_fly.html

First off, I am always disappointed whenever some petty functionary worries himself over some minor dress issue when there are bigger threats to the security of this country. One would think that airline officials should be troubling themselves over the threat of Islamic terror instead of acting like Islamic terrorists who think scantily clad women are like sizzling steaks.

Here's the story:

Pantagraph,
Airline tells woman skirt too short to fly

SAN DIEGO -- A 23-year-old woman who boarded a Southwest Airlines plane in a short skirt for a flight to Arizona says she was led off the plane for wearing an outfit that was considered too skimpy.

Kyla Ebbert said a Southwest employee asked her to leave her seat while the plane was preparing to leave San Diego's Lindbergh Field on July 3.

Ebbert, a student who was headed to Tucson for a doctor's appointment, said Friday on NBC's "Today" show that the employee told her she would have to catch a later flight.

"You're dressed inappropriately. This is a family airline. You're too provocative to fly on this plane," she quoted the employee as saying.

"I said, 'What part is it? The shirt? The skirt? Which part?' And he said the whole thing."

Ebbert was eventually allowed back on the plane after offering to adjust her sweater but said she was humiliated and embarrassed.

I don't care about baggy pants. I care about walking around with your ****ing underwear hanging out. They make pants designed to look baggy without having to show off your underwear.

What I want to know is why the hell he was flying SW in the first place.