I'm very curious about Philadelphia's Kafka too.

Who is that?

Tom Clements.

IF Stanzi ever gets a fair chance to compete. So far indications are he won't.

Yeah....and I think they're going to have to franchise Finley.

you can shove flynn up stanzi's ass and throw them both off a bridge...

anything that is not drafting a 1rd round QB next year is a complete and total ****ing disaster...

Through one of those covered wooden bridges in Iowa, no less. And I'm afraid that classic tandem would sink quickly because of all of the Iowa homers attached to Stanzi's sack.

Carl Peterson approves this post

Granted, it was one game and it was the preseason, but I thought Flynn looked awful vs the Chiefs.

I expect we'll sign him.

The Chiefs had better do whatever they have to do to make sure they come away with a QBOTF this coming year. The QB play has been so bad this year, they have no choice but to draft a legitimate replacement. We'll have a shot at Matt Barkley or RGIII. I'd be perfectly happy with either one.

If for some reason we don't draft a QB, we need a NTOTF. I haven't watched enough college football this year to know if there are any legit 1st round NT's worth taking. Also, drafting Trent Richardson sounds interesting. He would be a great compliment to Charles. If we end up trading down(which wouldn't surprise me at all), we could use another pass rushing OLB, a beastly MLB, or a starting guard/center/RT.

And Clark asks "How cheap?"

Lol, Charles (if he comes back the same he was) doesn't need a Trent Richardson compliment. He needs only a good enough powerful back. It's like you would put Charles and Peterson on the same team, do you really need that?? And trust me, having two supertar RBs on this team would only compensate marginally for the lack of QB.

This team has to do everything possible to get a top QB prospect in the first round. Anything else will be unacceptable.

This team also needs a nose tackle but with the return of Berry and if you put a decent QB on this team that can actually move the chains a bit to give some breaks to the defense, well a nose tackle as a top 10 pick is a NO NO.
In the second round though, that would be perfect.

Charles was only good because he played a easy schedule anyway/trolling

Drafting Richardson would also be an insurance policy. Nobody knows if Charles will ever be the same after the knee injury. Maybe he won't have the same speed and agility, or maybe he gets injured again. I hope he comes back 100%, but you just never know.

Couple things.

Tannehill, Foles, or Jones. No thanks. Atleast not until round 2 or 3.

I think Charles will eventually return to what he was. By the time next season starts it will pretty much be a year since he went down. With the technology and rehab they will go thru I think it will be fine.

I like RGIII or Barkley. They both are football guys. However, I don't really care if they are good guys or boy scouts like this front office wants. These guys are professional athletes who play on the team I like. As long as they are throwing touchdowns and leading us to playoff wins and Sb contention I don't care if they are assholes.

Just win baby.

i would deal all 7 picks to get Luck or RG3. Seriously. Those other 6 picks are only going to get us 2 or 3 mid level scrubs anyway to play on a team that will continue to suck without a franchise QB for another decade