Pick 1.4 is over 60% of the points total by itself. :spock::spock:

So, In doing a little research the last time the 1st overall pick was dealt (kinda) was in 2004 when the Giants and Chargers swapped picks for Eli and Rivers, The Chargers had the #1 overall pick and the G-Men had the 4th overall. So a difference of 3 picks. They ended up swapping QB's (1.1 for 1.4)as we all know after the Chargers drafted Eli first and the Giants took Rivers and then the Chargers gained a 3rd round pick in that years draft (2004) Nate Keading and a 1st round pick next season (2005) Shawne Merriman.

But this is when contracts were still a big deal and both deals here were for QB's. You could argue on the Chiefs behave this year that if a team is moving up for a Franchise QB to the top spot in the draft it is worth a lot. But again, what is the market for the pick and how bad do the Chiefs want out and what is the situation with Albert?

You schooled me then.

Still, four picks for three spots is far too high of a price for this market.

If that's the move, we should consider ourselves fortunate to merely get Philly's #1 next year. Anything beyond that is gravy.

If several teams have fallen in love with Geno. We can rape them for picks. *Sigh* I'd rather just take him though.

I'll say it again. Jokell would be one of the worst selections in team history. What a ****ing joke.

Not picking Geno kills this account and username. Not picking Barkley or Geno seals my exit from Chiefs football. I'm not practicing this reeruned, insane bullshit anymore.
Posted via Mobile Device