ChiefsPlanet
Page 7 of 8 « First 3456 7 8
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Byrd to NO Saints (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=282143)

BossChief 03-11-2014 08:38 PM
Ward didnt want to return to Cleveland.

Who can blame him for taking less to go to a winner?

OldSchool 03-11-2014 08:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 10482082)
Bpa meets position of need
Yeah, but if there's a guy that I would rate in the top 20 available and I have Byrd in my 25-30 range, I'm not going to pass on the top 20 guy for him unless I truly think that Commings has zero shot at becoming a starting caliber FS. That's when I would see Ward as the pick I would make.

Pretty much the same thing that SF did with Reid last year.

Mugsy 03-11-2014 08:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 10482109)
Ward didnt want to return to Cleveland.

Who can blame him for taking less to go to a winner?
They probably could have tagged him for what they paid Whitner.

O.city 03-11-2014 08:42 PM
Is Rafael bush available now?

Iconic 03-11-2014 08:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mugsy (Post 10482089)
Screw the stats. They paid Whitner a million more a year than Ward got from Denver because he sucked in coverage. They could have signed him a long time ago. He was drafted to be a building block and they had the money. PFF can suck my ass. ROFL
I'm not going to argue that Ward is better than Whitner, because that's just not true. However, they are very close, and your getting this all wrong. The Browns didn't leave ward; Ward left the browns. He took less money to play on a potential SB team.

Edit: and who knows, there might even be a bonus in his contract.

Mugsy 03-11-2014 08:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 10482163)
I'm not going to argue that Ward is better than Whitner, because that's just not true. However, they are very close, and your getting this all wrong. The Browns didn't leave ward; Ward left the browns. He took less money to play on a potential SB team.

Edit: and who knows, there might even be a bonus in his contract.
If he meant that much to them, they would have tagged him. They wanted someone better.

Iconic 03-11-2014 09:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mugsy (Post 10482192)
If he meant that much to them, they would have tagged him. They wanted someone better.
Not really, Whitner just fits Pettine's Defense better. Pettine does not believe in FS and SS. He views both positions the same and switches guys around all the time. Whitner's your guy in that type of D.

Mugsy 03-11-2014 09:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconic (Post 10482234)
Not really, Whitner just fits Pettine's Defense better. Pettine does not believe in FS and SS. He views both positions the same and switches guys around all the time. Whitner's your guy in that type of D.
Nah, I don't agree. The last two regimes didn't seem to want to lock him up either. They knew 2013 was the last year they had him. None of the three GMs (and HCs) they've had in the last three offseasons re-signed him. He's not good in coverage. Re-signing him was never a priority for any of them. It's more than their current flavor of the month GM and coaching staff.

GoChargers 03-11-2014 09:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 10482087)
Well that's no ****ing good.
Why? It'll just make it that much more hilarious when Fivehead chokes in the playoffs again. :clap:

SeeingRed 03-11-2014 09:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefforlife (Post 10481779)
They only had two million in cap space, how the heck did they do that?
ya thats what im saying :hmmm: the f**k?...he wouldve been a good get for us. Oh well

Iconic 03-11-2014 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mugsy (Post 10482283)
Nah, I don't agree. The last two regimes didn't seem to want to lock him up either. They knew 2013 was the last year they had him. None of the three GMs (and HCs) they've had in the last three offseasons re-signed him. He's not good in coverage. Re-signing him was never a priority for any of them. It's more than their current flavor of the month GM and coaching staff.
K

TEX 03-11-2014 10:15 PM
Just a couple of days ago the Saints were in CAP HELL. Looks like they found a way to make a splash and sign a very good player. THEY FOUND A WAY! Meanwhile, KC lost more than the Saints cut, and haven't done dick. :shake:

OldSchool 03-11-2014 10:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEX (Post 10482664)
Just a couple of days ago the Saints were in CAP HELL. Looks like they found a way to make a splash and sign a very good player. THEY FOUND A WAY! Meanwhile, KC lost more than the Saints cut, and haven't done dick. :shake:
Brees is also 35 years old and in the twilight of his career. The Saints have a small window to win right now as well. They're pretty much in the same boat as NE and Denver. It's now or rebuild with a new QB in a couple of years for them.

houstonwhodat 03-12-2014 04:09 AM
Super Bowl.

houstonwhodat 03-12-2014 04:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEX (Post 10482664)
Just a couple of days ago the Saints were in CAP HELL. Looks like they found a way to make a splash and sign a very good player. THEY FOUND A WAY! Meanwhile, KC lost more than the Saints cut, and haven't done dick. :shake:
It's all about Mickey Loomis and Sean Payton.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:32 PM.
Page 7 of 8 « First 3456 7 8
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.