ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Fisher to LT? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=282553)

htismaqe 03-25-2014 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 10515116)
ROFL

Oh, man.

Are you trying to suggest that's not a possible outcome?

The Franchise 03-25-2014 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10515112)
The bolded part is simply wrong. Nothing about Fisher makes him basically a rookie this year.

The hell it isn't. He spent his entire rookie year at RT. He now has to learn how to play LT at the NFL level. He has to take the "learning" that he did last year of swapping everything and throw it out the window. The only bonus he will have will be a strength program for 1 year.

beach tribe 03-25-2014 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10515115)
Butthurt would imply that I have an emotive response. I'm not mad.

It was a horrible pick and they followed up with horrible moves. He was horrible for a large part of the year at RT but they're going to hand him the LT job.

If that screams "success" to you, I don't know what to tell you.

It tells me that they have faith in their pick, who is, by FAR, the most talented lineman on the roster.

htismaqe 03-25-2014 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 10515128)
It tells me that they have faith in their pick, who is, by FAR, the most talented lineman on the roster.

ROFL

Marcellus 03-25-2014 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10515120)
Plans change you ****ing moron.

Why should the plan change right now? They have the entire offseason, OTA's and TC to get him ready to play a position he played in college.

Have you seen Fisher play a snap at LT yet?

And you want to call me a moron?

Pffftttt.

jd1020 03-25-2014 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10515130)
Have you seen Fisher play a snap at LT yet?

Nope. But I've seen him play at RT and booooooooooy it wasn't pretty.

Buehler445 03-25-2014 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10515065)
Then you've completely wasted the #1 pick.

Drafting a T at 1.1 is enough of a waste as it is.

I'll take that over Chase Daniel starting.

Chief Roundup 03-25-2014 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 10515019)
As the backup behind the guy who earned the spot last year.

So because one got to play the position he earned it and because someone else did not play the position at all, even though that is his natural position, doesn't deserve a chance to play the position that he was drafted to play.

duncan_idaho 03-25-2014 09:31 AM

If you're trying to "win now" - which Dorsey CLEARLY was trying to do last year with the moves they made - you don't hand the most important line position to a guy who hasn't proven he can handle it.

Especially when another guy on the roster has shown he can.

But nothing the Chiefs have done so far THIS offseason (or failed to do, to be more accurate) has indicated the team is still in win-now mode.

So of course the next thing they'll announce is a huge contract extension for Smith...

Marcellus 03-25-2014 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 10515127)
The hell it isn't. He spent his entire rookie year at RT. He now has to learn how to play LT at the NFL level. He has to take the "learning" that he did last year of swapping everything and throw it out the window. The only bonus he will have will be a strength program for 1 year.

Pretty much every LT tackle taken high in the draft last year started at RT.

They are all slated to be LT sooner than later.

This isn't a new idea, they aren't reinventing the wheel here.

This is hilarious, you guys were bitching we had a 1.1 at RT and now you are bitching he is going to be LT.

JFC

Marcellus 03-25-2014 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10515133)
Nope. But I've seen him play at RT and booooooooooy it wasn't pretty.

He actually made steady improvement. The injury issues were a concern but that's not been his history.

L.A. Chieffan 03-25-2014 09:32 AM

Going from RT to LT isn't that big of deal. You guys are acting like he's gonna play defense now or something

htismaqe 03-25-2014 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 10515136)
So because one got to play the position he earned it and because someone else did not play the position at all, even though that is his natural position, doesn't deserve a chance to play the position that he was drafted to play.

Did I say that?

The Franchise 03-25-2014 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 10515139)
Pretty much every LT tackle taken high in the draft last year started at RT.

They are all slated to be LT sooner than later.

This isn't a new idea, they aren't reinventing the wheel here.

This is hilarious, you guys were bitching we had a 1.1 at RT and now you are bitching he is going to be LT.

JFC

Show me where I was bitching that he was going to play LT.

In fact....I think he should have played LT last year. Unfortunately they ****ed themselves by not getting rid of Albert.

Buehler445 03-25-2014 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 10515079)
Dude
was
a
Rookie.

I'm not saying he's junk. I'm saying leave his ass at RT until he is consistently better at LT than Stephenson.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.