More Police nonsense. Father arrested for Speaking Against Sexually Explicit...
 

Teenaged psychology is a weird subject.

First, I'd like to state that there isn't a "right" answer. What works for one child may not work for another. Growing up, my mother was about as lax as could be. She was more of a friend than an authority figure. I waited until I was 18 to have sex (just because I felt that was the smart thing to do) and am now about to be 25 with no life ruiners-er, I mean kids. Meanwhile, in the same household, my little sister got pregnant at 17.

Based on my experience, I'd be inclined to not shelter my children from things like sex, drugs and violence but talk as openly as I could with them about those things and the dangers involved.

but i afraid to talk to my kids about teh secks

You should try reading it again.

I had to read Sod and Stubble in high school. I was 3 chapters in before I'd knocked up a sweet girl from town and came down with polio.

Still didn't quite get it.

The article is poorly worded, but it seems that the district "will take immediate action to revise these policies to include notification that requires parents to accept controversial material, rather than opt out.”

When did they issue this statement about taking immediate action? Unknown

The policy apparently requires/required parents to accept controversial information, rather than opt out. So he did not have the opportunity to opt out.

Frankly it's bad journalism and bad writing, since we can't tell what the policy was at any specific time or know what the policy is now.

If they did have a policy in place that let parents opt out, I doubt this would be a story.

Perhaps you should because the only people claiming that there wasn't a notice beforehand were "outraged" parents.

I love it.

No way I would let my kids read that filth.


Kids, shut your mouths and go back to playing COD/GTA (any other mature rated game with sex or extreme violence) and then let them watch game of thrones.

But a book, oh noes.

No, the previous policy was an opt out policy. The new one requires the parent to accept controversial information.

Show me where I missed this information.

He was escorted out for not following rules, him contineousely disobeying the officer to get up and leave is why he was arrested.

And I have a feeling the reading list went out at the start of the year. Some parents just like to ignore those things until someone else tells them about it personally. How the **** do you know how to turn to the exact page to be offended by? Second thought, they can all **** off. 2007 is how long it has been required. Maybe pay attention to your kids.

I am sure the school board is taking immediate action and not rejecting the claims that the parents did not know the material for the fun of it.

And how is it OK that parents are required to accept controversial information?

Because some kids have already been exposed to it so it doesn't matter!

This.

"The pussification of America continues."

Exactly