![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And Alex Smith still couldn't put together just a few drives for the win. Against an average defense. Which Brady absolutely shat on the following week. I cannot justify Smith not scoring 19 points with KCs weapons against those zone defenses. It's not all his fault, but much was offensively. Run game improvement would be nice, but would take care of itself with a legitimate passing game threat. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
$17.8 million for 15 passing TD's all year and a 1 TD/1 INT 172 yards, 69.7 QB rating in the playoffs with Hill, Maclin, Kelce and Conley to throw to.
Alex did a great job proving he was the most suffocating detriment to our cap last season. |
Quote:
Alex Smith cost this team 2 games that would've gave KC the shot at a number 1 seed. |
This is a bigger cock-tease than an old high school girlfriend.
|
Where is the "Gentlemen start your boners" quote in this thread?
Alex Smith out of here? YAS! |
This thread is deja vu all over again and again and again and again and again again and again and again again and again and again again and again and again again and again and again again and again and again again and again and again again and again and again again and again and again again and again and again again and again and again again and again and again again and again and again......................................
|
Don't tease yourselves, fellas. Smith is due a large bonus sometime in March, well before the draft. The Chiefs are not ditching Smith before they have a suitable (in their opinion) replacement on hand.
When does anyone think Dallas would cut Romo, anyway? After Smith's roster bonus? Once the Chiefs pay Smith that bonus, you can forget anything other than more handoffs, checkdowns and unnecessary scrambles in 2017. At this point, the best you can hope for is a stellar defensive draft in 2017. Build a top 3 defense and a top 10 run game and you might drag Alex to the Super Bowl. Outside of that, you are looking at Smith in '17 and maybe a young guy in '18. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Wouldn't it be better for us to give up say a 4th round pick than to sign him as a FA? We could avoid guaranteed $$ in case Romo gets hurt.
I don't want Romo but it just seems better for us if we were to do a trade deal instead of getting into a bidding situation and having to lose guaranteed $ on Romo. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.