![]() |
Quote:
|
Anything to get those turds Reyes and Roaches Nachos off the field
|
Quote:
|
Not much difference in 34 and 43 these days anyway. Teams are in different front about 75 percent of the time.
|
Quote:
Because yeah, Nunez-Roches struggled like hell to anchor in the run game. Honestly, I just don't know that he has the 'want to' to be a plus run player. I can't say that I blame him, it's thankless as **** and he gets quite a bit of love for his splash plays in the passing game. |
As long as he's taking up double teams for most of any given play, great signing.
|
Quote:
Better run stuffer than anyone on the roster. He's got a lot of value here. |
Quote:
|
Its apparent that as a run stuffer, he certainly rises above the "jag" word being thrown around by some
Theres no good reason to poo-poo this signing, he very much fills a desperate need |
There has been numerous players who had really poor PFF grades that came and played in this defensive regime and played really good football.
They've earned my trust on these types of deals, plain and simple. I think Logan, starter or not, is a nice addition in that DL room and presumably helps our biggest defensive weakness last year. |
He's going to be a rotational depth guy with the potential for more. If he pans out and returns to form, great. If he doesn't, then we know the scheme wasn't the issue and he'll be released/not-resigned.
Low risk, high upside signing. Lets not read into it anymore than what it really is. His contract pretty much dictates what he is. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Cheaper than Poe was. Better than Poe is (now). Sign me up.
Did you see our run defense last year? I didn't either. |
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.