Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He's showed consistent production. Really wild to me that this board would rather have Ronald Darby than Dee Ford. Honestly mind blowing. |
Quote:
|
If he's cheap sure, otherwise you could literally get David Long in the 2nd and get Darby 2.0 without the injured labia.
|
Quote:
You can't just say "he was hurt in 2017" and gloss over the fact that he's been hurt consistently going all the way back to college. He's had back surgery twice - he's had a spinal discectomy to remove bulging discs from his back. His back is not ever going to be the same. It might not hurt but he's actually missing tissue between the vertebrae that absorbs shock. Putting his hand in the dirt and engaging offensive linemen up close might actually re-aggravate it. It's not worth the risk, especially not at the amount of money that got thrown around. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Again, this defense is far less reliant on players winning matchups by themselves up front. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
They did the right thing with Ford. If they turn around and use that money on Ronald Darby, I won't like it but there's not much I can do about it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Good Riddance !!;) |
Quote:
Why even have defensive ends, lets just put LBs in and drop 9 every play. This is the new NFL! |
Perhaps fords production has a direct correlation with the amount of dropbacks opposing offenses were forced to have.
You know, other teams playing catch up for the entire game will allow the edge rushers to get after it. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.