ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports The LAC Lake Show Thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=173841)

kcxiv 02-24-2010 09:51 PM

31 year old kobe is better then 25 year old Kobe. 31 year old Kobe is a way better player. Not as physically talented, but everything else is better.

Miles 02-24-2010 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY (Post 6557009)
He continues to evolve as a player. The way he has played the last two years with the constant physical problems is nothing short of amazing. Funny you would choose to use compiling as a way of dismissing greatness when it has been used as the entire foundation for establishing Jordon as the greatest ever throughout this entire thread.

The subtitle changed he has made to his game over the past year or so to make up for his aging has been pretty damn impressive.

I haven't read most of this thread, but how could MJ be considered a compiler type?

Miles 02-24-2010 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 6557068)
31 year old kobe is better then 25 year old Kobe. 31 year old Kobe is a way better player. Not as physically talented, but everything else is better.

Not really. He is a much more savvy player these days but he was better a few years ago.

Mr. Arrowhead 02-24-2010 10:31 PM

hell of a game on tonight, vs my mavs

BIG_DADDY 02-25-2010 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miles (Post 6557096)
The subtitle changed he has made to his game over the past year or so to make up for his aging has been pretty damn impressive.

I haven't read most of this thread, but how could MJ be considered a compiler type?

So you don't want to read the thread you prefer I go back and do the work and summerize it here? No thanks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miles (Post 6557107)
Not really. He is a much more savvy player these days but he was better a few years ago.

He's more savvy, even more clutch, a better leader and his ability to overcome some pretty crazy physical adversity and rise up like he never has before and you want to categorize all that as compiling and think he was a better player earlier in his career. OK

To each there own. That's why they call them opinions. I am not really interested in breaking down the definition of compilation with you. Ever since Kobe came in the league there has been a group of people who came out and said nobody will ever be greater than Jordan as if they had an investment in that fact. Kobe won't win a Championship. Kobe will never win a championship without Shaq. Kobe will never come close to have the 6 championships Jordan had. Now if exceeds everything it's just compiling and no indication of his greatness as a player. Whatever.

Miles 02-25-2010 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY (Post 6557710)
So you don't want to read the thread you prefer I go back and do the work and summerize it here? No thanks.

He's more savvy, even more clutch, a better leader and his ability to overcome some pretty crazy physical adversity and rise up like he never has before and you want to categorize all that as compiling and think he was a better player earlier in his career. OK

To each there own. That's why they call them opinions. I am not really interested in breaking down the definition of compilation with you. Ever since Kobe came in the league there has been a group of people who came out and said nobody will ever be greater than Jordan as if they had an investment in that fact. Kobe won't win a Championship. Kobe will never win a championship without Shaq. Kobe will never come close to have the 6 championships Jordan had. Now if exceeds everything it's just compiling and no indication of his greatness as a player. Whatever.

My comment about whatever previous arguments were raised in this thread about MJ being a compiler is mostly just blowing it off as a poor argument for whoever raised it.

I'm not arguing that Kobe isn't an elite player nor one of the best at his position that the game has seen. His ability to play at that high of a level and how he has changed his game over the past few years to make up for the slight loss of athleticism has been damn impressive.

Still at his peak is doesn't quite measure up to Jordan which isn't a knock on how good of a player he really is.

BigCatDaddy 02-25-2010 11:15 AM

One of the reason's Kobe fails in comparison is because Jordan dominated basketball for pretty much a decade. He was by far the best player in the league and his team won 6 out of 8 titles and probably would have one 8 in a freaking row if he didn't decide to go play baseball during 2 of his prime years. Jordan was viewed as the champ that took on all comers and never lost (He wasn't the same guy playing against the Magic) once he won the title. The dude quit for 2 years and came back and won 3 more titles. Kobe and the Lakes don't have the same period of dominance that Jordan had in the NBA. You really can't even count the titles that Shaq lead the team to, because Kobe wasn't the guy that led the team and Kobe already lost 1 NBA finals. Once Jordan was "Jordan" he was no doubt the best, and nobody ever took that title from him. Kobe had the chance but couldn't get past the Celtics.

L.A. Chieffan 02-25-2010 11:19 AM

the competition jordan faced could be said to be inferior. his team never faced a dominant center in the finals nor was there another player that had another alpha dog on the same team at the same time. plus the guy who "quit" for two years maybe was expelled from the league by stern for gambling issues. maybe
Posted via Mobile Device

Miles 02-25-2010 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6557806)
One of the reason's Kobe fails in comparison is because Jordan dominated basketball for pretty much a decade. He was by far the best player in the league and his team won 6 out of 8 titles and probably would have one 8 in a freaking row if he didn't decide to go play baseball during 2 of his prime years. Jordan was viewed as the champ that took on all comers and never lost (He wasn't the same guy playing against the Magic) once he won the title. The dude quit for 2 years and came back and won 3 more titles. Kobe and the Lakes don't have the same period of dominance that Jordan had in the NBA. You really can't even count the titles that Shaq lead the team to, because Kobe wasn't the guy that led th team and Kobe already lost 1 NBA finals. Once Jordan was "Jordan" he was no doubt the best, and nobody ever took that title from him. Kobe had the chance but couldn't get past the Celtics.

It would have been interesting if he hadn't taken that time off and faced the two years of the Rockets with Hakeem at his peek.

I do think that measuring titles or who had the better supporting cast is a bit weak when evaluating a player. It is part of the equation but not the trump card that everyone makes it to be.

BigCatDaddy 02-25-2010 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miles (Post 6557847)
It would have been interesting if he hadn't taken that time off and faced the two years of the Rockets with Hakeem at his peek.

I do think that measuring titles or who had the better supporting cast is a bit weak when evaluating a player. It is part of the equation but not the trump card that everyone makes it to be.

No it's only part. Or we would be including Robert Horry in the discussion :)

Miles 02-25-2010 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6557851)
No it's only part. Or we would be including Robert Horry in the discussion :)

Greatest mediocre player to be a total badass when it mattered.

BigCatDaddy 02-25-2010 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6557819)
the competition jordan faced could be said to be inferior. his team never faced a dominant center in the finals nor was there another player that had another alpha dog on the same team at the same time. plus the guy who "quit" for two years maybe was expelled from the league by stern for gambling issues. maybe
Posted via Mobile Device

He faced a HOF dominant center year after year in the eastern conference finals, a pretty damn good 2 guard in the finals in Drexler, a HOF power forward and HOF point guard on the same team for a few years and a HOF small forward another year. He seen it all bro.

Miles 02-25-2010 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6557872)
He seen it all bro.

Just not Hakeem and Bob ;)

L.A. Chieffan 02-25-2010 11:35 AM

so u admit that no other team at the time had two players that would be considered alphas playing together? like kobe faced against the celtics?
Posted via Mobile Device

BigCatDaddy 02-25-2010 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miles (Post 6557882)
Just not Hakeem and Bob ;)

True, but they were not as good as any of the 6 teams Chicago beat IMO.

BigCatDaddy 02-25-2010 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6557888)
so u admit that no other team at the time had two players that would be considered alphas playing together? like kobe faced against the celtics?
Posted via Mobile Device

Jordan beat the Jazz and Kobe lost to the Celtics. I'm not seeing your point. The Jazz were also a much better team because they played better team basketball. The Celtics were basically the Heat from a few years ago.

L.A. Chieffan 02-25-2010 11:43 AM

lol garnett pierce and allen wouldve destroyed those 90s jazz teams. each their own
Posted via Mobile Device

Miles 02-25-2010 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6557895)
True, but they were not as good as any of the 6 teams Chicago beat IMO.

Not saying they would have beaten the Bulls with MJ but I don't agree with that at all. Hakeem/Drexler was as good of a combo they would have faced.

Miles 02-25-2010 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6557928)
lol garnett pierce and allen wouldve destroyed those 90s jazz teams. each their own
Posted via Mobile Device

I think you are underrating how good Stockton and Malone really were. Still that Boston team was damn good before age caught up with them.

BigCatDaddy 02-25-2010 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6557928)
lol garnett pierce and allen wouldve destroyed those 90s jazz teams. each their own
Posted via Mobile Device

You make the mistake of assuming "Alpha Dogs" means having a better team. What happened when those Alpha Dogs Shaq and Kobe met a good TEAM (Pistons) with no alpha dogs in the finals?

What happend when a team that had of 3 of the top 50 players of all time in there early 30s went up against the Jazz? Not the same thing that happend when 3 elite players in their early 30's played the Lakers was it?

And
Hakeem, Barkley, Drexler > Pierce, Garnett, Allen

BigCatDaddy 02-25-2010 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miles (Post 6557935)
Not saying they would have beaten the Bulls with MJ but I don't agree with that at all. Hakeem/Drexler was as good of a combo they would have faced.

Maybe as good of combo, but I don't think as good of a team.

Miles 02-25-2010 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6557990)
Maybe as good of combo, but I don't think as good of a team.

Horry, Cassel and Smith were all damn solid players during the second time around. Same thing the first time but Thorpe/Maxwell instead of Drexler.

vailpass 02-25-2010 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6557928)
lol garnett pierce and allen wouldve destroyed those 90s jazz teams. each their own
Posted via Mobile Device

Whatever makes you feel better.

BigCatDaddy 02-25-2010 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6558047)
Whatever makes you feel better.

Yeah, I think he said he watched the NBA before 2000, but I'm not sure that is the case.

PunkinDrublic 02-25-2010 12:32 PM

Mavs are 5-1 since the all star break including last nights awesome victory over the Lakers. We totally raped the wizards in that Josh Howard trade. We may not beat the Lakers in a playoff series, but we're good enough to get past the thuggets.
Posted via Mobile Device

L.A. Chieffan 02-25-2010 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6558096)
Yeah, I think he said he watched the NBA before 2000, but I'm not sure that is the case.

so youre saying you havent watch the NBA since 2000. oh, ok that makes sense now.

BigCatDaddy 02-25-2010 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6558156)
so youre saying you havent watch the NBA since 2000. oh, ok that makes sense now.

I said this when?

Dude, your arguements have all been smashed and you resort to this.

L.A. Chieffan 02-25-2010 01:07 PM

please dude, dont pull the "ive been watching the nba longer" card bullshit out on me. my dad took me to see showtime playoff games at the fabulous forum when i was a kid. my friends and i would pay $12 a ticket and sit right behind the clippers bench at the sports arena back in the 90s and i saw jordan and ewing and stockton, malone etc etc etc... LIVE. i still go to staples at least 4 or 5 times a year.

you live in st. joes? whens the last time you even saw a live nba game? back when jordan was still playing?

give me a break dude, dont act like youre mr. nbaexpert because youre old. LMAO

BigCatDaddy 02-25-2010 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6558192)
please dude, dont pull the "ive been watching the nba longer" card bullshit out on me. my dad took me to see showtime playoff games at the fabulous forum when i was a kid. my friends would pay $12 a ticket and sit right behind the clippers bench at the sports arena back in the 90s and i saw jordan and ewing and stockton, malone etc etc etc... LIVE. i still go to staples at least 4 or 5 times a year.

you live in st. joes? whens the last time you even saw a live nba game? back when jordan was still playing?

give me a break dude, dont act like youre mr. nbaexpert because youre old. LMAO

Still waiting for your rebuttle on the arguements "Alpha Dog", but nice try on the deflection.

L.A. Chieffan 02-25-2010 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 6558197)
Still waiting for your rebuttle on the arguements "Alpha Dog", but nice try on the deflection.

Have you ever been to an NBA game? :eek:

BigCatDaddy 02-25-2010 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6558208)
Have you ever been to an NBA game? :eek:

I have not. My sister got to see a Bulls game vs the Celtics when Jordan played in the early 90's. Perhaps you would be better off debating her although I still like her chances.

Anyways, tell me again how the Celtics of 2 years ago "destroy" the Jazz of the 90's. That's right, they had Garnett, Allen, and Pierce all between 30-35, even though the Jazz beat the Rockets with 3 of the greatest 50 players in NBA history between the ages of 30-35.

L.A. Chieffan 02-25-2010 01:26 PM

john stockton vs. matt maloney.

enough said

BigCatDaddy 02-25-2010 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6558247)
john stockton vs. matt maloney.

enough said

LMAO. If that's the best you got, I think it is.

L.A. Chieffan 02-25-2010 01:47 PM

look, if you want to know specifically why the Jazz beat the Rockets in the 97 WCFinals then Stockton completely owning Matt Maloney is about a good reason as any. Malone statistically edged Barkley and Clyde was a shell of himself. What more do want?

BigCatDaddy 02-25-2010 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6558313)
look, if you want to know specifically why the Jazz beat the Rockets in the 97 WCFinals then Stockton completely owning Matt Maloney is about a good reason as any. Malone statistically edged Barkley and Clyde was a shell of himself. What more do want?

They won because they had the better TEAM despite the Rockets having 3 guys averaging over 18 points a game. You can't just cherry pick matchups like that, or I could just say

Kendrick Perkins vs Pau Gasol.

Ray Allen was also a shell of himself and Garnett was far from healthy when the beat the younger Lakers team.

L.A. Chieffan 02-25-2010 02:10 PM

I think Perkins is actually vastly underrated defensively. We're just arguing hypotheticals anyways. I've already admitted that MJ is the best ever, but the criteria that I use is just different from what you use.

BigCatDaddy 02-25-2010 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6558410)
I think Perkins is actually vastly underrated defensively. We're just arguing hypotheticals anyways. I've already admitted that MJ is the best ever, but the criteria that I use is just different from what you use.

Yeah, no way to tell for sure. I actually believe the 80's Celtics and Laker teams are superior to any team the 90's or 00's have seen anyways.

kcxiv 03-10-2010 04:46 AM

Teams now days are much better then teams of the 90's. So much competition out there right now. There are ALOT of teams with 2 good to very very very good players on teams now.

There are about 10 teams in the NBA now days that have multiple good players. There was NEVER this much talent in the NBA before. I cant think of anytime. Go through the rosters of the play off contending teams. Its quite frankly insane how much talent the NBA has right now.

http://s48.radikal.ru/i122/0909/66/0a4a721f9b4b.gif

Lakers been playing kinda not in it right now. Interesting interview with Bynum tonight after the game. He said the team has lost focus and is just waiting for the play offs. He said they gotta get their head outta their butts basically. lol He had a beastly game tonight. I was more impressed with his defensive presence though.

One more thing. Kobe did it again. lol

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DI77yMTsPR8&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DI77yMTsPR8&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

L.A. Chieffan 03-24-2010 11:15 PM

SPURS SUX

L.A. Chieffan 05-02-2010 10:28 AM

bump for gasols awesomness and utahs beatdown today.

L.A. Chieffan 05-02-2010 01:58 PM

utahs defense is a joke

LA in 5

BIG_DADDY 05-03-2010 01:11 AM

The Bynum knee thing could be a big deal.

BWillie 05-03-2010 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY (Post 6731896)
The Bynum knee thing could be a big deal.

Bynum is going to end up getting Danny Manning'ed

BIG_DADDY 05-03-2010 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie007 (Post 6731901)
Bynum is going to end up getting Danny Manning'ed

You gotta watch out for those guys that develop too quickly.

kcxiv 05-03-2010 03:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY (Post 6731896)
The Bynum knee thing could be a big deal.

Well, he's played with that all year. He should be able to play through it. Some pain and what not. They said he just re aggravated it when it got hyper extended. So we will see.

Stil had 8 and 10, not bad. what our issues is, the stupid bench at times. So cant wait until Farmar is gone this offseason.

BIG_DADDY 05-03-2010 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 6731927)
Well, he's played with that all year. He should be able to play through it. Some pain and what not. They said he just re aggravated it when it got hyper extended. So we will see.

Stil had 8 and 10, not bad. what our issues is, the stupid bench at times. So cant wait until Farmar is gone this offseason.

I really thought either Farmar or Sasha would step up at some point. Bench has sucked all season.

I do wish Bynum could give us a couple seasons without the injuries. The guy has monstor potential if he could just stay healthy.

RedNFeisty 05-03-2010 11:02 AM

Sorry dude, not the Laker's year! Someone else is going to take it this year, maybe the Sharks?? :)

BIG_DADDY 05-03-2010 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnygrl (Post 6732346)
Sorry dude, not the Laker's year! Someone else is going to take it this year, maybe the Sharks?? :)

If the media had it their way they would just crown Lebron right now. I was sooooo wishing the Celtics had pulled off game 1.

RedNFeisty 05-03-2010 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY (Post 6732393)
If the media had it their way they would just crown Lebron right now. I was sooooo wishing the Celtics had pulled off game 1.

I would like to see the Celtics take it over the Cav's, we will see. And of course the media is going to lick Lebron's starfish clean, maybe it has something to do with his two MVP awards. ;)

BIG_DADDY 05-03-2010 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnygrl (Post 6732419)
I would like to see the Celtics take it over the Cav's, we will see. And of course the media is going to lick Lebron's starfish clean, maybe it has something to do with his two MVP awards. ;)

Perfect time for him to get the award.

kcxiv 05-03-2010 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY (Post 6732079)
I really thought either Farmar or Sasha would step up at some point. Bench has sucked all season.

I do wish Bynum could give us a couple seasons without the injuries. The guy has monstor potential if he could just stay healthy.

The achillies thing was just a bad deal, but his other 2 injuries were freak accidents by his own team. that was sucks. People wanna say injury prone, but when you have 240 lb men falling on your knees and your 7'1 thats not going to end up well.

RedNFeisty 05-03-2010 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY (Post 6732439)
Perfect time for him to get the award.

I'm just happy Kobe didn't get it. Personally, I am tired of seeing the Lakers, I'd rather let Lebron and the Cav's have some more sunshine.

BIG_DADDY 05-03-2010 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnygrl (Post 6732473)
I'm just happy Kobe didn't get it. Personally, I am tired of seeing the Lakers, I'd rather let Lebron and the Cav's have some more sunshine.

**** Lebron and the Cavs, Kobe needs his 5th ring. :LOL:

IMO Lebron is out of there next season anyway. Why would anyone want to stay in that shit hole? Bet he ends up in Miami.

RedNFeisty 05-03-2010 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY (Post 6732486)
**** Lebron and the Cavs, Kobe needs his 5th ring. :LOL:

IMO Lebron is out of there next season anyway. Why would anyone want to stay in that shit hole? Bet he ends up in Miami.

Screw Kobe and his fifth ring!! :p
If this is Lebron's last year, then may he go out with a bang! It doesn't really matter to me who wins between the Celtics and the Cav's, I just like going for the underdog normally and the Cav's are favored by what 6 or 7 points?

BIG_DADDY 05-03-2010 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnygrl (Post 6732515)
Screw Kobe and his fifth ring!! :p
If this is Lebron's last year, then may he go out with a bang! It doesn't really matter to me who wins between the Celtics and the Cav's, I just like going for the underdog normally and the Cav's are favored by what 6 or 7 points?

Cavs -6. I would love to see a Celtics/Lakers Final. This is the Celts last hoorah so I would l would love to see this happen. I have no love for Lebron. I'm already sick and tired of the media ass licking frenzy.

kcxiv 05-03-2010 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY (Post 6732592)
Cavs -6. I would love to see a Celtics/Lakers Final. This is the Celts last hoorah so I would l would love to see this happen. I have no love for Lebron. I'm already sick and tired of the media ass licking frenzy.

NO matter how the media tries to spin it, Kobe is still leading in jersey sale for years in a row now. Fans have spoken. Media is trying, but Kobe is Kobe.

BIG_DADDY 05-03-2010 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 6732654)
NO matter how the media tries to spin it, Kobe is still leading in jersey sale for years in a row now. Fans have spoken. Media is trying, but Kobe is Kobe.

Funny, just received a Kobe jersey for my kid today.

vailpass 05-03-2010 12:40 PM

Have any of you seen what the TV ratings are for the playoffs this year? I'm wondering how pro hoops is doing viewer-wise.

L.A. Chieffan 05-13-2010 10:52 PM

LAKERS! LAKERS!

MAMBA! MAMBA! LUOL DENG SUCKS!

MAMBA!!!!!

L.A. Chieffan 05-13-2010 10:52 PM

Potential Lakers V. Celtics ONCE AGAIN.

Its all Mike Browns ****INGG FAULT!

Buck 05-13-2010 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6757594)
Potential Lakers V. Celtics ONCE AGAIN.

Its all Mike Browns ****INGG FAULT!

I'm not looking forward to either the Magic or Celtics, but lets focus on the Suns for now.

L.A. Chieffan 05-13-2010 11:00 PM

I have the plan set out already for Game 1.

We insert Luke into the starting lineup. Within the first 30 seconds he "accidently" elbows Nash in the eye. Repeatedly. Luke suspended for the series. Lake Show cruises to the finals

BWillie 05-13-2010 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6757620)
I have the plan set out already for Game 1.

We insert Luke into the starting lineup. Within the first 30 seconds he "accidently" elbows Nash in the eye. Repeatedly. Luke suspended for the series. Lake Show cruises to the finals

Steve Nash is cool. He plays a type of game that can go as long as Jason Kidd or longer. He'll be a successful old geezer. But Lakers roll in five.

RealSNR 05-13-2010 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6757594)
Potential Lakers V. Celtics ONCE AGAIN.

Its all Mike Browns ****INGG FAULT!

Lebron's had some shitty games. But know why the team is unable to even COMPETE when Lebron has shitty games? Mike Brown.

Know why Lebron didn't get a ring last year? Mike Brown.

Seriously, do you WATCH Cavs games? Do you see what Lebron James has to ****ing do just to keep his team afloat? There's NO gameplanning. On offense or defense. NONE. NO COACHING.

Hamas had it right. Mike Brown is the Herm Edwards of the NBA. Only fatter and less talkative.

DJ's left nut 05-13-2010 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan (Post 6757594)
Potential Lakers V. Celtics ONCE AGAIN.

Its all Mike Browns ****INGG FAULT!

You forgot Anderson Varajao.

L.A. Chieffan 05-17-2010 03:50 PM

BUMP PARA LOS LAKERS ESSE!!!!!!!

BIG_DADDY 05-17-2010 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY (Post 6732685)
Funny, just received a Kobe jersey for my kid today.

Hoop, there it is!!!!

88TG88 05-17-2010 08:47 PM

Okay gang

L.A. Chieffan 05-18-2010 08:47 AM

Pau mucho gusto

http://www.latimes.com/media/photo/2010-05/53795173.jpg

Amnorix 05-18-2010 09:05 AM

Be a real shame if this was like 2008 when you guys all had the Lakers' championship ticket punched only to watch them get flattened by the C's...


:D :p

BIG_DADDY 05-18-2010 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6764791)
Be a real shame if this was like 2008 when you guys all had the Lakers' championship ticket punched only to watch them get flattened by the C's...


:D :p

Gang Green is looking good. The game will be interesting tonight. Nothing worse than losing to the Celtics in the finals. Nothing sweeter than beating the Celtics in the finals especially at the end of these guys careers. I certainly hope that's what happens.

Amnorix 05-18-2010 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY (Post 6765039)
Gang Green is looking good. The game will be interesting tonight. Nothing worse than losing to the Celtics in the finals. Nothing sweeter than beating the Celtics in the finals especially at the end of these guys careers. I certainly hope that's what happens.

Yeah, same thing here. Heck, if hte C's win I can start up the "if KG hadn't hurt his knee, would Kobe have ever won a title without Shaq" line of argument. :D

Let's face it, we're both excited at the the thought of beating our archnemesis, and scared at the thought of losing to them. I wasn't a real believer in the Celtics this year until game 1 against Orlando, but they went 1:1 against Howard, kept him under control, kept a hand in the faces of the perimeter shooters, and completely dominated the game. It was a helluva impressive performance until they started playing not to lose in the 4th.

kcxiv 05-18-2010 11:28 AM

I want the C's to win it in the East. We need another Celtics/Lakers Finals.

Amnorix 05-18-2010 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 6765123)
I want the C's to win it in the East. We need another Celtics/Lakers Finals.

Everyone outside of New England and Southern Cal probably disagrees with you. :D

But I'm good with it. Be fun to watch.

kcxiv 05-18-2010 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix (Post 6765126)
Everyone outside of New England and Southern Cal probably disagrees with you. :D

But I'm good with it. Be fun to watch.

I am in Central Cali, and i could give a **** what they want. lol

Amnorix 05-18-2010 12:04 PM

Hey I'm from Boston -- Patriots, Red Sox, Celtics -- believe me, I'm plenty used to the rest of the country hating my teams. :D

L.A. Chieffan 05-18-2010 12:07 PM

Phil 46-0 when his team wins the first game in postseason.

BIG_DADDY 05-18-2010 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 6765158)
I am in Central Cali, and i could give a **** what they want. lol

Seriously, who gives a rats ass about the lost suns? This is the Celtics last hoorah with a bunch of aging superstars. Magic are going to be around for a long time so bring on the classic.

BIG_DADDY 05-19-2010 01:47 PM

Got two words for you, "Lost Suns"

L.A. Chieffan 05-19-2010 07:24 PM

kobes such a ballhogging selfish bitch


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.