ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Whitlock: Why should the Chiefs bring Haley back? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=220265)

DaneMcCloud 12-22-2009 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6370463)
But, there are reasons to believe shit can and will get better.

And what would those reasons be?

And you can't say "rookie head coach that will learn" or "talent depleted roster".

ToxSocks 12-22-2009 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6370439)
LMAO

This HAS to be a joke



Again, are you joking? I've got about 10,000 posts suggesting what they should "do".

Read them.



He failed miserably this year. I see absolutely no indication that won't occur next year.



JFC, are you an n00b? In preseason, I was all over Darryl Harris and Colin Brown. Bowe, Cottam, Charles, Carr, Flowers, Dorsey, Albert, Morgan, Richardson, Leggett and Page ALL SHOULD BE the foundation in which the Chiefs build around.

Considering that many of them haven't seen the field as much as they should have this year, I have my doubts about Haley & Pioli's talent evaluations.

But quite honestly, I think you must have missed 95% of my posts this year.



Gee, thanks.


:facepalm:

Im on this forum every day. I see your posts dude.

Yes, Pioli and Haley have ****ed up royaly. I agree, the choice to cut Pollard was a dumb move. I agree that Cottam should have been starting the whole time. But how much of that is on Pioli vs Haley? I blame Haley for those moves.

Pioli failed to bring in decent vets. Yes, we are all aware of that. But, lets say he brings in some good vets this offseason. Let's say our ILB's and Ron Edwards, and a few of our O-linemen are moved to second/third string and some quality players are brought in to start. Then would you say we have decent depth?

IMHO, Pioli brought in the Depth/special teamers this past offseason knowing, at worst, they could be soild depth/special teams contributers next season. He hoped to get some starters out of this project. Maybe we did find some starters, maybe we didn't. i don't know if i agree with this plan or not, but, he now knows what he has. for sure. Maybe he is adding the core first, and then adding the stars second. Either way, im willing to give him more then 14 games to determine wether or not Pioli is a failure.

Haley on the other hand, gets a much smaller window.

DaneMcCloud 12-22-2009 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6370525)
Im on this forum every day. I see your posts dude.

Yes, Pioli and Haley have ****ed up royaly. I agree, the choice to cut Pollard was a dumb move. I agree that Cottam should have been starting the whole time. But how much of that is on Pioli vs Haley? I blame Haley for those moves.

Pioli failed to bring in decent vets. Yes, we are all aware of that. But, lets say he brings in some good vets this offseason. Let's say our ILB's and Ron Edwards, and a few of our O-linemen are moved to second/third string and some quality players are brought in to start. Then would you say we have decent depth?

IMHO, Pioli brought in the Depth/special teamers this past offseason knowing, at worst, they could be soild depth/special teams contributers next season. He hoped to get some starters out of this project. Maybe we did find some starters, maybe we didn't. i don't know if i agree with this plan or not, but, he now knows what he has. for sure. Maybe he is adding the core first, and then adding the stars second. Either way, im willing to give him more then 14 games to determine wether or not Pioli is a failure.

Haley on the other hand, gets a much smaller window.

Maybe, maybe, maybe.

If, if, if.

That's all I see in your post.

Conjecture.

When Pioli & Haley deserve credit, I'll credit them.

When they don't, I won't.

Bottom line.

BossChief 12-22-2009 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6369782)
What the hell are you talking about? Wilkerson did shit here. 1 sack in his entire Chiefs career. 11 in 2 years in Tampa. And he didn't have the benefit of Jared Allen in Tampa.

What about the hordes of DL he "improved" in Buffalo and Cincinnati. Umm...who, exactly? Tim "T-Rex" Anderson?

You know what that shows me? That Krumrie is the problem, not the solution.

So, Krumrie is the problem in KC because his lines years ago for different teams werent very good? Really?

Who did he fail at doing his job with in KC is my question.
Jimmy Wilkerson was only coached by TK for 2006+2007 and its not his fault they had to dedicate the majority of the playing time at de to Jared Allen and their new first round DP LDE, Tamba Hali, those two were the producers. CP should have re-signed him and penciled him in as the starter after he traded JA.
Tanks improvement year to year here should be credited to his coaching.
Dorsey has been playing out of position since the day he got here, but look at the progress he made from last year to this one and then pat TK on the back and give him credit for it. He should have been a collosal bust as a 5-tec, on paper, I bet 90% of all bbs would have concluded that if polled on it.
You should see dramatic improvement in TJs play next year if my assumption is correct (this is of course if our, hopefuly new, dc doesnt want to bring in all his own assistants)

Shit lets look back at the job he did with one of the better players he was given in Buffalo and how he did without him, shall we?

Aaron Schobels sacks
2004 8
2005 12
2006 14 <-----this was his last year coached by TK
2007 6.5
2008 1
2009 7

Seems he fell of after TK left to me, whats it look like to you?

I honestly cant comment on the other prospects he was given there as I would be talking out of my arse and I try not to do that.

I would fairly say that there really aren't any players that he missed the boat on in KC, so far, as far as getting them to improve their play each year they were under his coaching, can you? (by you, I mean anybody on the forum, not trying to call you out, I value your opinion more than others here to be honest)


Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6369921)
The Pittsburgh Steelers ARE the Pittsburgh Steelers for one reason and one reason alone:

THE DRAFT. PERIOD.

fyp

DaneMcCloud 12-22-2009 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6370550)
fyp

Uh, sorry, but you are WRONG.

DeezNutz 12-22-2009 02:00 PM

Coach Slap Dick is now being defended on this forum. LMAO.

Last year, he was working with nothing but first day talent on the D-line, and he managed to achieve records with this group.

This year, he has yet another 1st rounder, and we've consistently been getting gashed. Yes, the LBs and secondary have to shoulder responsibility, too, but to claim that we've seen jack shit out of Slap Dick is amazing.

BossChief 12-22-2009 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6370554)
Uh, sorry, but you are WRONG.

The team has consistently drafted well over the last 15-20 years and well before that. It is what allows them to allow FAs to always leave and they just insert the next guy in line that they drafted.

I guess I may have missed your point there. Im always game to learn a new trick, back your comment with something I can get behind. I love the Rooneys and know they are great owners but I guess I dont fully understand why you feel that way.

About every single difference maker they have was drafted by them, right or wrong?

Chiefnj2 12-22-2009 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 6370501)
I have one question......

When Vrabel went down and Studebaker stepped in.....and had a lights out ****ing game.......

Why the **** did Vrabel immediately go back to his starting job? He's old and broken down and he's not helping this team out physically. Let Studebaker step into the starting role and see if he can repeat his performance. Vrabel is nothing more and should be nothing more than a part-time player right now. The same thing goes for Mike Brown.

That's an excellent question. So is the question about why Richardson wasn't given a chance to play RT earlier. Jwhit or another reporter should ask it at the next press conference rather than dwell on stupid crap that Haley won't answer like "Does Matt Cassel have enough self awareness to criticize himself."

ToxSocks 12-22-2009 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6370515)
And what would those reasons be?

And you can't say "rookie head coach that will learn" or "talent depleted roster".

No. I wouldn't say those things.

1. The continued improvement of our CB's. If we could add an Eric Berry to that mix and get Page healthy again, that's a pretty damn good secondary.

2. Hali has been a good surprise. Is he a Pro Bowler? No. But we can win with him. He went from being a bust last season, to a player we can with this season.

3. We have found some decent depth at LB. None of our ILB's are starters. But, Belcher and Mays provide decent depth. Studebaker looks like a solid OLB in the making, but he gets pushed around at the LOS. Maybe another offseason to build some bulk and work on technique will help with that. If we can add a starter from the draft and a decent starter F/A this offseason, we could be looking at a strong LB unit.

4. Haley's scheme looks pretty damn good. The execution and his game management, not so much. BUT, you can start to see what he wants to do with the offense. Now, he needs some better players and they need more practice, and we may be seeing the offense begin to blossom.

5. We have found a great back in Charles. I know, i know, he didn't start right away. But it's not like he wasn't getting used. Haley was looking for ways to get him the ball. LJ was a 2-down back with JC coming in at 3rd down. And to JC's credit, he has been getting better each week. But, so has our O-Line.

6. Our O-Line. They are starting to gel. They look like they understand there assignments. The start of the season, they didn't even know who they were suppose to block. They look like they know now. Albert continues to grow. I see a solid LT that is quick enough to run trap plays and screens. And you know that is what Haley wants to do. Maybe the reason why we didn't see a guy Like Richardson early, is because he wasn't ready. Callaghan and Ndukwe are young O-linemen that got in early. So, Haley is willing to play young O-linemen.

7. Chris Chambers. Now we have a vertical threat. Add a Golden Tate or someone with a like skill set to that mix....Now we have a soild WR core

There are things to be excited about. There are some positives. Pioli has a great track record for finding F/A's. That shit doesn't just disappear overnight. As long as they don't out think themselves in the Draft (tyson Jackson) Pioli will be alright. IF our GM has it together, then wins will come.

We have some pieces in place. Shit is starting to take mold. We can all go on for days about what they did wrong, but why?

PunkinDrublic 12-22-2009 02:18 PM

Haley is not going to get fired. All we can do is hope he can take a step back in
the offseason and realize his approach has failed monumentally and make some
coaching changes starting with Clancy and his failed scheme. The dam broke last Sunday
after we were starting to really have our defense exposed against Buffalo.
Posted via Mobile Device

BossChief 12-22-2009 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6370574)
Coach Slap Dick is now being defended on this forum. LMAO.

Last year, he was working with nothing but first day talent on the D-line, and he managed to achieve records with this group.

This year, he has yet another 1st rounder, and we've consistently been getting gashed. Yes, the LBs and secondary have to shoulder responsibility, too, but to claim that we've seen jack shit out of Slap Dick is amazing.

If Carl Peterson didnt trade Jared Allen (who had his most production under TK) or allow Wilkerson to leave, he might be our DC by now.

flame away, buddy.

ToxSocks 12-22-2009 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6370634)
That's an excellent question. So is the question about why Richardson wasn't given a chance to play RT earlier. Jwhit or another reporter should ask it at the next press conference rather than dwell on stupid crap that Haley won't answer like "Does Matt Cassel have enough self awareness to criticize himself."

Studebaker found himself in the right place, at the right time. Now he's a hero? Come on guys. He has no pass rush moves yet. He gets pushed back at the LOS.

If he were starting, then people would find ways to bitch about him too. He didn't look any better out there than Vrabel, but at least Vrabel can read the "O"

Now, im excited about Studebaker, don't get me wrong. I have hopes for him and i do think he is a good young talent. But he has not been that great. And Richardson got destroyed at RT in the preseason. It was obvious he had a long ways to go.

DeezNutz 12-22-2009 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6370663)
If Carl Peterson didnt trade Jared Allen (who had his most production under TK) or allow Wilkerson to leave, he might be our DC by now.

flame away, buddy.

You really think Slap Dick "coached up" Jared Allen?

Tell me why this talented coach got so little out of so much last year. 4 day-one picks, and they couldn't stop the run or rush the passer. Please defend this.

DaneMcCloud 12-22-2009 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6370638)
No. I wouldn't say those things.

1. The continued improvement of our CB's. If we could add an Eric Berry to that mix and get Page healthy again, that's a pretty damn good secondary.

2. Hali has been a good surprise. Is he a Pro Bowler? No. But we can win with him. He went from being a bust last season, to a player we can with this season.

3. We have found some decent depth at LB. None of our ILB's are starters. But, Belcher and Mays provide decent depth. Studebaker looks like a solid OLB in the making, but he gets pushed around at the LOS. Maybe another offseason to build some bulk and work on technique will help with that. If we can add a starter from the draft and a decent starter F/A this offseason, we could be looking at a strong LB unit.

4. Haley's scheme looks pretty damn good. The execution and his game management, not so much. BUT, you can start to see what he wants to do with the offense. Now, he needs some better players and they need more practice, and we may be seeing the offense begin to blossom.

5. We have found a great back in Charles. I know, i know, he didn't start right away. But it's not like he wasn't getting used. Haley was looking for ways to get him the ball. LJ was a 2-down back with JC coming in at 3rd down. And to JC's credit, he has been getting better each week. But, so has our O-Line.

6. Our O-Line. They are starting to gel. They look like they understand there assignments. The start of the season, they didn't even know who they were suppose to block. They look like they know now. Albert continues to grow. I see a solid LT that is quick enough to run trap plays and screens. And you know that is what Haley wants to do. Maybe the reason why we didn't see a guy Like Richardson early, is because he wasn't ready. Callaghan and Ndukwe are young O-linemen that got in early. So, Haley is willing to play young O-linemen.

7. Chris Chambers. Now we a vertical threat. Add a Golden Tate or someone with a like skill set to that mix....Now we have a soild WR core

There are things to be excited about. There are some positives. Pioli has a great track record for finding F/A's. That shit doesn't just disappear overnight. As long as they don't out think themselves in the Draft (tyson Jackson) Pioli will be alright. IF our GM has it together, then wins will come.

We have some pieces in place. Shit is starting to take mold. We can all go on for days about what they did wrong, but why?

1. Um you DO realize that Flowers, Carr, Charles Studebaker, etc. were already on the squad, right?

2. Hali is NO surprise: He is what he's ALWAYS been: An average pass rusher and completely useless against the run.

3. Haley's a completely bumble**** when it comes to evaluating the offensive line. Rudy Niswanger? Are you ****ing kidding me? Wade Smith is 10x the center as Niswanger. Play Nsukwe out of position at Right Tackle was a good thing? Starting O'C over Richardson was a good thing? JFC.

4. Chris Chambers is 31 years old and he'll be 32 to start the season. Who knows if he'll chose to return but firstly, he's not a long term solution and secondly, the wheels could fall off at any second. Plus, he's got a serious domestic situation to deal with.

I don't see anything here that you've stated that makes me believe that Todd Haley is a competent coach worthy of returning.

DaneMcCloud 12-22-2009 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6370603)
The team has consistently drafted well over the last 15-20 years and well before that. It is what allows them to allow FAs to always leave and they just insert the next guy in line that they drafted.

I guess I may have missed your point there. Im always game to learn a new trick, back your comment with something I can get behind. I love the Rooneys and know they are great owners but I guess I dont fully understand why you feel that way.

About every single difference maker they have was drafted by them, right or wrong?

JFC.

The "reason" that the Steelers are successful and have been successful for half a century is due to the ownership.

Don't you understand that?

They've had several GM's and only three coaches since the 70's. They're not successful because they've stuck with those coaches, they're successful because success starts from the top. The Rooneys have hired the right people for four decades.

That isn't an accident.

DaneMcCloud 12-22-2009 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6370669)
Studebaker found himself in the right place, at the right time. Now he's a hero? Come on guys. He has no pass rush moves yet. He gets pushed back at the LOS.


He's a 6th rounder from a Division III school. On a shit team like the Chiefs, who have absolutely no playoff hopes and whose primary mission SHOULD BE to find and build a youthful core of players, Mike Vrabel should be no where near the field except in the event of injury.

That's what is SO damn confusing about the direction of the current Chiefs:

There IS no direction.

PERIOD.

BossChief 12-22-2009 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6370638)
No. I wouldn't say those things.

1. The continued improvement of our CB's. If we could add an Eric Berry to that mix and get Page healthy again, that's a pretty damn good secondary. I agree

2. Hali has been a good surprise. Is he a Pro Bowler? No. But we can win with him. He went from being a bust last season, to a player we can with this season. I agree

3. We have found some decent depth at LB. None of our ILB's are starters. But, Belcher and Mays provide decent depth. Studebaker looks like a solid OLB in the making, but he gets pushed around at the LOS. Maybe another offseason to build some bulk and work on technique will help with that. If we can add a starter from the draft and a decent starter F/A this offseason, we could be looking at a strong LB unit. I dont think any of our current LBers end up as longterm starters here except Hali. We need three starting linebackers

4. Haley's scheme looks pretty damn good. The execution and his game management, not so much. BUT, you can start to see what he wants to do with the offense. Now, he needs some better players and they need more practice, and we may be seeing the offense begin to blossom. after the first sentence, I thought you were about to go full reerun...glad you didnt, I somewhat agree with your statement there except the first sentence.

5. We have found a great back in Charles. I know, i know, he didn't start right away. But it's not like he wasn't getting used. Haley was looking for ways to get him the ball. LJ was a 2-down back with JC coming in at 3rd down. And to JC's credit, he has been getting better each week. But, so has our O-Line. this really isnt a credit to Haley though, IMHO Charles is excelling in spite of Haley so far, not because of him.

6. Our O-Line. They are starting to gel. They look like they understand there assignments. The start of the season, they didn't even know who they were suppose to block. They look like they know now. Albert continues to grow. I see a solid LT that is quick enough to run trap plays and screens. And you know that is what Haley wants to do. Maybe the reason why we didn't see a guy Like Richardson early, is because he wasn't ready. Callaghan and Ndukwe are young O-linemen that got in early. So, Haley is willing to play young O-linemen. Starting to ****ing jel? **** NO THEY ARENT! Albert is the only linemen that has improved at all all year. Just because we just played the Borwns and Bills, doesnt mean "the line is jelling"
7. Chris Chambers. Now we have a vertical threat. Add a Golden Tate or someone with a like skill set to that mix....Now we have a soild WR core Chris Chambers is old and has another year, or MAYBE 2 if we are lucky, and his attitude doesnt go into the shitter like it has at previous teams after a good first year.

There are things to be excited about. There are some positives. Pioli has a great track record for finding F/A's. That shit doesn't just disappear overnight. As long as they don't out think themselves in the Draft (tyson Jackson) Pioli will be alright. IF our GM has it together, then wins will come.

We have some pieces in place. Shit is starting to take mold. We can all go on for days about what they did wrong, but why?

I see where you are coming from, but it seems to me that you are looking for reasons to be positive instead of looking at it fully objectively. Maybe Im of base and I am letting the losing effect my ability to be objective because I am starting to presume the worst because that is what we have had to deal with recently.

I hope we made the right choices and that a lot of this first year is chalked up to a total flush of a season to begin with in retrospect a couple years from now.

time will tell

ToxSocks 12-22-2009 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6370694)
1. Um you DO realize that Flowers, Carr, Charles Studebaker, etc. were already on the squad, right?

2. Hali is NO surprise: He is what he's ALWAYS been: An average pass rusher and completely useless against the run.

3. Haley's a completely bumble**** when it comes to evaluating the offensive line. Rudy Niswanger? Are you ****ing kidding me? Wade Smith is 10x the center as Niswanger. Play Nsukwe out of position at Right Tackle was a good thing? Starting O'C over Richardson was a good thing? JFC.

4. Chris Chambers is 31 years old and he'll be 32 to start the season. Who knows if he'll chose to return but firstly, he's not a long term solution and secondly, the wheels could fall off at any second. Plus, he's got a serious domestic situation to deal with.

I don't see anything here that you've stated that makes me believe that Todd Haley is a competent coach worthy of returning.


1. Just because they were on the squad, doesn't mean they haven't improved. What did JC prove last season? What did Studebaker do last season? And the question wasn't whether or not there was pre-existing talent, the question was if there was anything to be positive about. I told you, yet you continue to be negative.

2. Hali is a surprise. Did you honestly believe he would see success transitioning into the 3-4? Really? No one here did. Obviously he has his weaknesses. BUT, like i said, we can win with him. As i said, he is no pro-bowler, but TH will not be the reason we loose games.

3. Rudy has been improving. We have plenty of potential RG's right now. At the time we needed a RT. Ndukwe was asked to fill that need. he failed at it. Why start him at RG when we have better RG prospects? And do you seriously not remember how bad Richardson was? He was awful, and then after 1 game against the Browns he is better than O'C? Come on man, at least let's see him play another start before declaring him the best RT on the team.

4. So what if he is turning 32. The dude can play. He is a stop gap, but a good one. We can win with him. He has opened things up for this offense and there is plenty of reason to believe that he can carry that over. He is a playmaker, and we will ride him till his wheels fall off, same way we did Kennison. You're choosing to look at the glass half emptey. That's on you, dude.

Coogs 12-22-2009 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6370663)
If Carl Peterson didnt trade Jared Allen (who had his most production under TK)

Better check these stats out. He still has 2 games left this season.

http://www.nfl.com/players/jaredalle...e?id=ALL454745

ChiefUp 12-22-2009 02:50 PM

come on you cant fire Haley you just got ride of Herm after 3 years of crap then yas give the team to Haley who had a team of no talent hacks to start with and now with one more win then we would of had under Herm this year you guys want to scrap him and start all over I mean how long do yas want to be rebuilding

ToxSocks 12-22-2009 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6370715)
I see where you are coming from, but it seems to me that you are looking for reasons to be positive instead of looking at it fully objectively. Maybe Im of base and I am letting the losing effect my ability to be objective because I am starting to presume the worst because that is what we have had to deal with recently.

I hope we made the right choices and that a lot of this first year is chalked up to a total flush of a season to begin with in retrospect a couple years from now.

time will tell

Im trying to look at it objectivly. I could put together a list that's just as long about how this team is ****ed. But why?

WE ALL KNOW what is wrong with this team. It's no secret. Some people just want to say that there is nothing to look forward too. I see things that we can build upon.

People wanna say that im full of "ifs" and "Maybe's", well that's all we have right now if we want to look towards the future.

IF, that's right, IF we draft Eric Berry, how much better is our secondary? How many of those long runs and deep passes occur with Berry and Page in the lineup?

IF we can land an ILB in the draft, ala Cinnci, and sign a Hampton or Wilfork, how much better is our front 7?

IF we can add a Golden Tate in the second, or sign one in the offseason, how much better are our WR's?

I really don't think there is a fixing of Cassel, i don't Think Haley can be fixed either. They are what they are. But, im reserving hope. What else can we do?

Coogs 12-22-2009 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefUp (Post 6370737)
come on you cant fire Haley you just got ride of Herm after 3 years of crap then yas give the team to Haley who had a team of no talent hacks to start with and now with one more win then we would of had under Herm this year you guys want to scrap him and start all over I mean how long do yas want to be rebuilding

I'm not so sure about that anymore. All of the players that are doing any thing good are the ones Herm brought in. It would have been interesting to see what Herm would have done in the off-season compared to what the new regime has done.

Damn! I can't believe I just typed that! I may have to go have a drink or two just because.

DaneMcCloud 12-22-2009 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6370730)
1. Just because they were on the squad, doesn't mean they haven't improved. What did JC prove last season? What did Studebaker do last season? And the question wasn't whether or not there was pre-existing talent, the question was if there was anything to be positive about. I told you, yet you continue to be negative.

Are you ****ING KIDDING ME? Charles contributed a SHIT TON last year, when he was HEALTHY. Unfortunately, he had issues all year long with his hamstring.

JFC, you act like all of the sudden, after 4 years of college and one in the NFL, the guy woke up and was a good back.

And Studebaker? Again, do you know ANYTHING about these Chiefs? Studebaker was signed LATE in the season off of Philly's practice squad. He's a DIVISION III PLAYER. Not D-I, not D-IA, not D-II. Division THREE. And he was only with the Chiefs for their final 6 games.

****!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6370730)
2. Hali is a surprise. Did you honestly believe he would see success transitioning into the 3-4? Really? No one here did. Obviously he has his weaknesses. BUT, like i said, we can win with him. As i said, he is no pro-bowler, but TH will not be the reason we loose games.

LMAO

His numbers are nearly IDENTICAL to his numbers as a DE. And apparently, you didn't watch the Cleveland game because were do you think those 300 rushing yards came from?

Oh, that's right: Running over Tamba Hali!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6370730)
3. Rudy has been improving.

Rudy sucks ass. Unreal

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6370730)
We have plenty of potential RG's right now. At the time we needed a RT. Ndukwe was asked to fill that need. he failed at it. Why start him at RG when we have better RG prospects? And do you seriously not remember how bad Richardson was? He was awful, and then after 1 game against the Browns he is better than O'C? Come on man, at least let's see him play another start before declaring him the best RT on the team.

You're so ****ing full of shit. Seriously.

Potential right guards? First off, Wade Smith is THE BEST center, right guard, left guard and right tackle on this football team, bar none. Why he wasn't playing, let alone starting is ****ing beyond my comprehension. More proof that Haley can't evaluate talent.

Secondly, Nsukwe started 15 games at right guard last year for the Dolphins, yet the Chiefs played him out of position for weeks at right tackle. More proof of poor talent evaluation.

Richardson? Are you joking? When he filled in for Albert at left tackle, he did a tremendous job. The Browns had EIGHT SACKS of Rothlisberger yet one of Cassel with Richardson on the right side AND the running game was much improved.

If you can't see that, then you might as well stop posting.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6370730)
4. So what if he is turning 32. The dude can play. He is a stop gap, but a good one. We can win with him. He has opened things up for this offense and there is plenty of reason to believe that he can carry that over. He is a playmaker, and we will ride him till his wheels fall off, same way we did Kennison. You're choosing to look at the glass half emptey. That's on you, dude.

You're choosing to compare his career to Eddie Kennison's, just like some people are choosing to compare Cassel's to Green's.

Well, that shit don't fly.

First off, Chambers numbers have been steadily declining due to injury and age. He has legal issues and marriage issues stemming with an affair with a 25 year-old girl, which is why he was cut by San Diego. She's been charged with 11 misdemeanors. Furthermore, there is absolutely NO guarantee that he'll even want to return and quite honestly, I'd hate to see him get a contract and revert to his lame ass ways in San Diego.

This team should be focused on developing YOUTH, not rehabbing old ****S.

BossChief 12-22-2009 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs (Post 6370733)
Better check these stats out. He still has 2 games left this season.

http://www.nfl.com/players/jaredalle...e?id=ALL454745

I was talking about his time in KC. I should have specified that but it didnt enhance my side of the conversation.ROFL

BossChief 12-22-2009 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6370760)
Are you ****ING KIDDING ME? Charles contributed a SHIT TON last year, when he was HEALTHY. Unfortunately, he had issues all year long with his hamstring.

JFC, you act like all of the sudden, after 4 years of college and one in the NFL, the guy woke up and was a good back.

And Studebaker? Again, do you know ANYTHING about these Chiefs? Studebaker was signed LATE in the season off of Philly's practice squad. He's a DIVISION III PLAYER. Not D-I, not D-IA, not D-II. Division THREE. And he was only with the Chiefs for their final 6 games.

****!



LMAO

His numbers are nearly IDENTICAL to his numbers as a DE. And apparently, you didn't watch the Cleveland game because were do you think those 300 rushing yards came from?

Oh, that's right: Running over Tamba Hali!



Rudy sucks ass. Unreal



You're so ****ing full of shit. Seriously.

Potential right guards? First off, Wade Smith is THE BEST center, right guard, left guard and right tackle on this football team, bar none. Why he wasn't playing, let alone starting is ****ing beyond my comprehension. More proof that Haley can't evaluate talent.

Secondly, Nsukwe started 15 games at right guard last year for the Dolphins, yet the Chiefs played him out of position for weeks at right tackle. More proof of poor talent evaluation.

Richardson? Are you joking? When he filled in for Albert at left tackle, he did a tremendous job. The Browns had EIGHT SACKS of Rothlisberger yet one of Cassel with Richardson on the right side AND the running game was much improved.

If you can't see that, then you might as well stop posting.




You're choosing to compare his career to Eddie Kennison's, just like some people are choosing to compare Cassel's to Green's.

Well, that shit don't fly.

First off, Chambers numbers have been steadily declining due to injury and age. He has legal issues and marriage issues stemming with an affair with a 25 year-old girl, which is why he was cut by San Diego. She's been charged with 11 misdemeanors. Furthermore, there is absolutely NO guarantee that he'll even want to return and quite honestly, I'd hate to see him get a contract and revert to his lame ass ways in San Diego.

This team should be focused on developing YOUTH, not rehabbing old ****S.

Damn, you REALLY dont like it when people disagree with your opinions huh?

Geez Dane, cant a guy have hope anymore?

ToxSocks 12-22-2009 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6370760)
Are you ****ING KIDDING ME? Charles contributed a SHIT TON last year, when he was HEALTHY. Unfortunately, he had issues all year long with his hamstring.

JFC, you act like all of the sudden, after 4 years of college and one in the NFL, the guy woke up and was a good back.

And Studebaker? Again, do you know ANYTHING about these Chiefs? Studebaker was signed LATE in the season off of Philly's practice squad. He's a DIVISION III PLAYER. Not D-I, not D-IA, not D-II. Division THREE. And he was only with the Chiefs for their final 6 games.

****!


LMAO

His numbers are nearly IDENTICAL to his numbers as a DE. And apparently, you didn't watch the Cleveland game because were do you think those 300 rushing yards came from?

Oh, that's right: Running over Tamba Hali!



Rudy sucks ass. Unreal



You're so ****ing full of shit. Seriously.

Potential right guards? First off, Wade Smith is THE BEST center, right guard, left guard and right tackle on this football team, bar none. Why he wasn't playing, let alone starting is ****ing beyond my comprehension. More proof that Haley can't evaluate talent.

Secondly, Nsukwe started 15 games at right guard last year for the Dolphins, yet the Chiefs played him out of position for weeks at right tackle. More proof of poor talent evaluation.

Richardson? Are you joking? When he filled in for Albert at left tackle, he did a tremendous job. The Browns had EIGHT SACKS of Rothlisberger yet one of Cassel with Richardson on the right side AND the running game was much improved.

If you can't see that, then you might as well stop posting.




You're choosing to compare his career to Eddie Kennison's, just like some people are choosing to compare Cassel's to Green's.

Well, that shit don't fly.

First off, Chambers numbers have been steadily declining due to injury and age. He has legal issues and marriage issues stemming with an affair with a 25 year-old girl, which is why he was cut by San Diego. She's been charged with 11 misdemeanors. Furthermore, there is absolutely NO guarantee that he'll even want to return and quite honestly, I'd hate to see him get a contract and revert to his lame ass ways in San Diego.

This team should be focused on developing YOUTH, not rehabbing old ****S.

Dude, take a chill pill man, you get so worked up over nothing.

Anyhow.......How many big plays did Charles have last year vs this year? You going to tell me he isn't an improving player? And Studebaker, once again you claim he was a talent from last year. Last year, he proved nothing. You saying that he was a DIV III player only reiterates that he is improving, which is exactly what i said.......JFC GRRRR ARRRR! AHHHH!!!Im so Mad YOU ****ING IDIOT ARRR!!!

Regarding Tamba: I never said he was a great player. But you seem to act like i said that. And yeah, they were running over Gilberry and the rook. How come no one runs 300+ yrds over him when Dorsey is in the game? You're just reaching for shit to argue with me about now. Face it dude, Hali is not a bad player, we can win with Hali. Accept it. Its ok.

And you claiming that Wade Smith is a good RG only reiterates what i was saying about Ndukwe. We needed him to play RT, because we already have guys that can play RG. And who is the best RT, Richardson or Smith? make up your mind.

Oh, ahem, ARGHHHH LMFAO!!!

And im Chambers will get over his marriage issues. You act like he is the first player to ever have a divorce, JFC ARRGHHH

Arghh

ToxSocks 12-22-2009 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6370704)
He's a 6th rounder from a Division III school. On a shit team like the Chiefs, who have absolutely no playoff hopes and whose primary mission SHOULD BE to find and build a youthful core of players, Mike Vrabel should be no where near the field except in the event of injury.

That's what is SO damn confusing about the direction of the current Chiefs:

There IS no direction.

PERIOD.

yeah, damn those Chiefs for trying to win games. Lets not put our smartest OLB on the field in an effort to improve the play of the other 10 guys on the field for the sake of this DIV III guy.

DaneMcCloud 12-22-2009 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 6370787)
Damn, you REALLY dont like it when people disagree with your opinions huh?

Geez Dane, cant a guy have hope anymore?

Hope all you want.

The facts are the facts.

DaneMcCloud 12-22-2009 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6370810)
yeah, damn those Chiefs for trying to win games. Lets not put our smartest OLB on the field in an effort to improve the play of the other 10 guys on the field for the sake of this DIV III guy.

Exactly. Let's not.

Studebaker has been a playmaker, period.

Vrabel has not.

Studebaker is under contract for the next three years.

Vrabel isn't under contract next season.

Studebaker is 24 years old.

Vrabel is 33 years old.

There is absolutely NO REASON for Mike Vrabel to be on the field with a 3-11 football team when it's quite possible that the younger guy is a better player with far more potential.

It's indefensible.

ToxSocks 12-22-2009 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6370815)
Hope all you want.

The facts are the facts.

So what positives do you have about the current team right now? You have beaten CP to death with your pessimistic attacks day after day. If you are such an objective expert, i would like to see the positive side of your analysis. Honestly, not trying to be a dick, i really do.

Contrarian 12-22-2009 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6366209)
I personally don't agree with how Haley calls a game, or how he manages and handles his team.

But I will say this, he's a rookie head coach, and was given a crappy roster from the start. Im not trying to stick up for the guy, all Im trying to say is, it would be hard for most coaches to thrive under those circumstances.

I absolutely agree with ya.
We had lost 10 games up to the Browns game. We played terrible in all areas last week. I don't understand how most of you view this scenario? Did you think we were going to be good? And if you knew we were going to be bad why are you saying you want a coaching change? When obviously every piece of the puzzle doesn't fit yet. It's just stupid.
A late hired GM, a late hired coach, late hired assistants, rookies that don't perform and lack talent, and veterens on their way out.

Fish 12-22-2009 03:57 PM

Well here's my Improvement List....

OLine improvement - The OLine actually has a little consistency at the moment. I didn't think they'd get much better after midseason, but they have. Slightly, but it's been enough to give the offense opportunities at least.

J. Charles - What a ****ing breath of fresh air after the LJ BS. Charles is quietly and persistently kicking ass since LJ pouted off to Cincy. Even when he's stuck with less than perfect run blocking, he's making things happen. And teams are noticing his big play ability. With LJ, I always expected 15-20yds tops from his best play of the game. With Charles, he can take any random snap to the house. His plays has done wonders for the rest of the offense(Other than Cassel...).

Succop - Mr. Irrelevant has proven he is not. Keep those kickoffs deep...

Hali - I include him only because I didn't think he'd contribute at all. But he is what he is. He's hit his talent ceiling, but despite that we can find uses for his skillset.

Dorsey - He's been great this season for what he's overcome. It's no coincidence that the game he's out, we let some punk nobody wear away all the grass at Arrowhead.

Aggressive 4th down calls - I know Haley has misused it numerous times, but I still love to see us leading the league in 4th down attempts. I love this mindset, and when used correctly I think this can make a real difference in keeping the offense unpredictable. With as little as we have to lose, why not...

Brandon Carr - I'm still not sold on Carr, but I have to say he has improved over the course of the season. He's got some Dale Carter "Big play or big mistake" moments still. But he might hang on in the league after all.

DaneMcCloud 12-22-2009 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6370833)
So what positives do you have about the current team right now? You have beaten CP to death with your pessimistic attacks day after day.

**** off if you can't deal with a realistic opinion.

I said back in May 2008 that the Chiefs would be 2-14. I was correct.

I said in May 2009, they'd be 4-12. We're yet to find out if that was right or wrong.

The bottom line is that unlike you and a select few members, I am objective. I don't see "Unicorns and Rainbows" when I look at this roster.

I don't see a competent head coach who makes sound decisions and plays his best players.

I don't see a competent first time GM, who with more than 45 player acquisitions, has failed to bring any long-term stability to the roster at any position and have failed miserably to bring a playmaker at any position to the team.

If you believe otherwise, I'd like to see actual factual proof because I can back up each and every claim I've made.

Can you?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6370833)
If you are such an objective expert, i would like to see the positive side of your analysis. Honestly, not trying to be a dick, i really do.

Currently, the only true positive aspect of this team is the 2008 draft. Herm was given control of the draft and for the first time in decades, a foundation was put in place.

It's a damn shame that Scott Pioli couldn't add a ****ing thing to this foundation.

Titty Meat 12-22-2009 04:05 PM

I'll go on record and say Haley should be back next year.

ToxSocks 12-22-2009 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6370916)
**** off if you can't deal with a realistic opinion.

I said back in May 2008 that the Chiefs would be 2-14. I was correct.

I said in May 2009, they'd be 4-12. We're yet to find out if that was right or wrong.

The bottom line is that unlike you and a select few members, I am objective. I don't see "Unicorns and Rainbows" when I look at this roster.

I don't see a competent head coach who makes sound decisions and plays his best players.

I don't see a competent first time GM, who with more than 45 player acquisitions, has failed to bring any long-term stability to the roster at any position and have failed miserably to bring a playmaker at any position to the team.

If you believe otherwise, I'd like to see actual factual proof because I can back up each and every claim I've made.

Can you?



Currently, the only true positive aspect of this team is the 2008 draft. Herm was given control of the draft and for the first time in decades, a foundation was put in place.

It's a damn shame that Scott Pioli couldn't add a ****ing thing to this foundation.

Lol. Dude, you're hilarious.

If you predicted a 4-12 team, then why are you mad, lol? All of those issues you listed are symptoms of a 4-12 team. But you saw that coming right? So, you expected, a well coached, talented, 4-12 team? Uhm, ok. If we had everything going your way we wouldn't have a 4-12 season.

And i am not objective? YOU are not objective. Like i said i can put together a nice list of everything that is wrong with this team in conjunction with things that are right. Yet, you can only put together a list of shit that is wrong, yet you're objective? Uhm...ok.

And only a select few members have nothing positive to say about the team. Please......I am in the same exact boat as most on this forum. Just because no one else wants to debate with your stubborn, know-it-all ass doesn't mean that i am alone in my thinking.

I don't wear rainbow colored glasses, i know what this team is. We all do. Just because I don't join you in berrating this forum with negativity doesn't mean i don't know and acknowledge the teams many shortcomings. You pulled that conclusion out of your ass. I've never said this team is great, i never said this team was good. I never said i agreed with Pioli's draft, his F/A signings or Haley's game management. Did I? Yet you want to keep pretending like i've said such things in an effort to try to deter the fact that you are a pessimist. Face it dude. You act like im the first person to call you that.

I'm just calling it how i see it.

But of course, you're the only one who sees a bad team right? Because you know it all, and no positive comment could ever be right. Everything sucks in Dane's world. Pioli should be fired and this entire roster should just go with him after 14 games, right Dane?

And im sure YOU KNOW who Pioli attempted to sign, because you have Pioli's phone tapped, right? You don't know whether or not Pioli attempted to sign good vets. How many good vets would want to come to KC? Is the city enticing...eh no. The team enticing...eh no. The coach...eh, no. So, without overspending in your first year as a GM, how do you propose landing big F/A's?


would you like me to put together a list of shit that is wrong with this team? Will i be more objective in your eyes if i did that? hmm? Make you feel better?

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-22-2009 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6369828)
The fact that Cassel would even tell a reporter that with a straight face, even if his coaches gave him such a stupid evaluation, just further illustrates that he's part of the problem.

There isn't a ****ing quarterback alive who could take that evaluation with a straight face if they had any pride or belief in a team concept.

That just screams "cover your ass".

Pitiful.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6369876)
Sure as shit, they dropped the lead-in's to those questions:




Nothing like censoring press conferences...

Pitiful II

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6370931)
I'll go on record and say Haley should be back next year.

http://i689.photobucket.com/albums/v...d-haley-v2.jpg

ToxSocks 12-22-2009 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6371011)

Nice PhotoShop

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-22-2009 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6371013)
Nice PhotoShop

I wish I could take credit, but no such luck.

ToxSocks 12-22-2009 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6371129)
I wish I could take credit, but no such luck.

Ok, well since it isn't yours, they should've fixed the boo boo under Sweeny Todd. lol

Mecca 12-22-2009 05:14 PM

Todd Haley needs 3 years to prove he is the worst coach in the NFL, we got rid of Herm and got worse, didn't think I'd be saying that.

gblowfish 12-22-2009 05:15 PM

I think he should be fired.
I told him so.
He did not agree.

Mecca 12-22-2009 05:17 PM

Well just remember George, it was all your fault just ask those WPI guys.

DaneMcCloud 12-22-2009 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 6370984)
Lol. Dude, you're hilarious.

You're a moron.

I'm done responding to your bullshit little questions.

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-22-2009 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 6371188)
I think he should be fired.
I told him so.
He did not agree.

LMAO Concur did not occur.

gblowfish 12-22-2009 05:26 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots (Post 6371219)
LMAO Concur did not occur.

Haley says "No comment."

SPATCH 12-22-2009 05:26 PM

I wonder if Dane listens to scream-o music and cuts his wrists and lets the mascara run down his teary-eyed face...

guy has the rationale of a 14 year old girl

DaneMcCloud 12-22-2009 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_spatula (Post 6371235)
I wonder if Dane listens to scream-o music and cuts his wrists and lets the mascara run down his teary-eyed face...

He has the rationale of a 14 year old girl

Go **** yourself, cockbag.

You bring absolutely nothing to this forum.

Mecca 12-22-2009 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_spatula (Post 6371235)
I wonder if Dane listens to scream-o music and cuts his wrists and lets the mascara run down his teary-eyed face...

guy has the rationale of a 14 year old girl

Do you listen to dashboard confessional as you try to get Pioli's nut out of your eye?

SPATCH 12-22-2009 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6371239)
Go **** yourself, cockbag.

You bring absolutely nothing to this forum.

stickin to your guns

SPATCH 12-22-2009 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6371249)
Do you listen to dashboard confessional as you try to get Pioli's nut out of your eye?

uhhhhh left field

Sweet Daddy Hate 12-22-2009 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 6371234)
Haley says "No comment."

LMAO Chiefs Nation says "No Paycheck".

ToxSocks 12-22-2009 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6371199)
You're a moron.

I'm done responding to your bullshit little questions.

cuz you have nothing to say but the same ol retired ass bullshit you always spew. No surprise there

RedThat 12-22-2009 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6370513)
I've said that for YEARS in this forum.

So, you have owners like the Mara's, Rooney's, Krafts, DeBartolo's and Jones' that have multiple Super Bowls.

Then you have a team that hasn't won but three playoff games in 40 years, a team that went 15 straight years without a playoff appearance and a team that has now gone 16 years straight without a playoff win.

If the Mara's, Rooney's Kraft's, et al are "good owners" what does that make the owner of a team that has been virtually winless in the post-season for 40 years?

I have never been a big fan of Lamar Hunt. I've said it before on this forum, and others disagreed with me, and thats cool and all. But yeah, I think the facts really speak for themselves as far as the Chiefs being a losing franchise, and its directly linked to ownership no question.

hopefully, Clark is different from his dad, but Im not feeling all that optmistic about him either.

DeezNutz 12-22-2009 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 6371234)
Haley says "No comment."

Thanks for the avi.

orange 12-22-2009 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCDC (Post 6366173)
But, you don't fire someone after but one year. It is not the Hunt way and it is not the Pioli way, I am speculating.

http://images.google.com/url?source=...TOgquR0Z6AbZ6g?

kcxiv 04-27-2010 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedThat (Post 6371538)
I have never been a big fan of Lamar Hunt. I've said it before on this forum, and others disagreed with me, and thats cool and all. But yeah, I think the facts really speak for themselves as far as the Chiefs being a losing franchise, and its directly linked to ownership no question.

hopefully, Clark is different from his dad, but Im not feeling all that optmistic about him either.

No one is willing to give him a chance. Whats he supposed to do in 2 years running the show by himself? Chiefs fans are so used of losing, they just think everything is bad, they dont want to see if a new gm and new ownership can do anything. They arent even given a chance.

People are funny on this website that get all crazy about things and act as if they know more then the front office guys. There are so many ways to build teams and win with them, there is no one right formula. You just gotta get lucky on some picks and anything can happen. No one knows if their pick is going to turn out and make that leap to the next level. Anything can happen.

Sofa King 04-27-2010 07:35 AM

did you just re-up a fight from 6 months ago?

Bugeater 04-27-2010 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 6718111)
did you just re-up a fight from 6 months ago?

Yes he did, and I hope you're ready to throw down because you're part of it now.

OnTheWarpath15 04-27-2010 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King (Post 6718111)
did you just re-up a fight from 6 months ago?

Not only that, but the premise of his side of the argument is ****ed.

Clark Hunt has been running the show since before Lamar died.

That throws the "last 2 years" bit right out the window.

Hammock Parties 12-26-2010 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6366189)
In a perfect world, Haley would be fired.

http://www.nederhoed.com/weblog/media/seal_clubbing.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6367113)
FIRE THAT MOTHER****ER.

Fire him NOW.

Wait, I'm not clear on what you want. Say again?

kstater 12-26-2010 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 6366315)
The answers to these questions are...nothing.

However we'll see answers that involve things like process, time, yadda yadda.


So Mecca, what would you think about those that consider those answers like process, time, yadda yadda now?

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6366202)
Evidently.

And it's not even that. Most of these gutless schmucks would bring the guy back if he were only on a 1-year deal. Because evidently 1 season isn't enough to recognize abysmal failure when it's staring right at you.

These people can enjoy their principled stance. They'll be the same folks that ease right into the mob in 2011 when the psychotic shit-for-brains we have coaching this team finally gets canned (you can actually witness this phenomenon firsthand with the folks that are only now slowly realizing that Cassel is nothing more than Matt Moore with a large contract).

Only 1.5 seasons too late...


Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 6366392)
Scott Pioli makes Carl Peterson look like a hybrid of Bill Walsh and Don Shula.

And again - I MFing hate Carl Peterson.

I had only planned on quoting the first one, then I found the second quote.

TheGuardian 12-26-2010 08:40 AM

Now you see why I said that DJLN is the dumbest mother ****er on here?

Ralphy Boy 12-26-2010 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ralphy Boy (Post 6367159)
Purely speculation on my part, but I'd say he's more inclined to keep those that he hired, replace the ones he didn't and demote Clancy but keep him on staff. He and Pioli could care less if the fans are out for blood.

Personally I think you grade each unit individually and those who are worthy keep their job. At some point, you have to be realistic and acknowledge that certain position coaches are better than others even though a good DB coach can't make up for a horrible DL coach. Clancy peaked as a DB coach; he's been coaching past his skill level ever since.

Though we don't actually have a DB coach, Ronnie Bradford is a defensive assistant who's worked with them this season. He's never been given the title of DB coach, but that could be because Clancy is going to move into the role, like he did in Dallas in 01 & 02.

Not sure which of these idiots thought that getting rid of Pollard was a good idea, and they should lose a testical for it, but all in all that group has been pretty well coached. I haven't looked at how many deep passes we've given up, we're ranked #19 in total passing yards yet we've only got 19 sacks. That makes me think that if we had some QB pressure, the passing game would improve pretty easily. Those 19 sacks happen to be the 2nd lowest total in the league and 28 teams have 25 or more this season.

We are tied for the #22 spot in interceptions, with 11, but teams are completing 59.1% of their passes against us and have a 89.6 QB rating. Having all day to throw obviously results in higher stats in those areas. Slow safeties play a factor too. Then again, when you are playing a team that's ranked #31 in rushing yards allowed, why pass?

Bill Muir probably deserves some credit for coaching the crap he inherited and showing progress as the season has gone on. Cassel was sacked 24 times in the first 7 games compared to 17 times in the last 7.

Fire the WR coach (Dedric Ward and Richie Anderson). There is no way you lead the league in dropped passes and don't fire the WR coach.

Just saying that when you are as bad as we are, you take baby steps and you don't throw the baby out with the bath water.

Every time someone brings up a thread from the past I immediately think "Oh great, what did I say on this thread that I'm gonna regret?" Thankfully on this thread there isn't much, but Haley & co have certainly done a much better job than I would have expected.

Pasta Little Brioni 12-26-2010 09:16 AM

[QUOTE=kstater;7288362]So Mecca, what would you think about those that consider those answers like process, time, yadda yadda

Jeez, no wonder the guy went into hiding. I've seen alot of fail here, but he set the bar in the last year or so.

Marcellus 12-26-2010 09:57 AM

[quote=PGM;7288449]
Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 7288362)
So Mecca, what would you think about those that consider those answers like process, time, yadda yadda

Jeez, no wonder the guy went into hiding. I've seen alot of fail here, but he set the bar in the last year or so.


Mecca isn't close to being the biggest dumbass in this thread.

Full of total fail.

Pasta Little Brioni 12-26-2010 10:02 AM

[QUOTE=Marcellus;7288494]
Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 7288449)


Mecca isn't close to being the biggest dumbass in this thread.

Full of total fail.

I know and I don't think he is a dumbass at all, but was he right about anything?

Marcellus 12-26-2010 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 7288504)

I know and I don't think he is a dumbass at all, but was he right about anything?

No he wasn't but he also isn't telling people they are stupid *****.

Not a 1 of the 4 horsemen appear to have many (and in some cases none) correct posts thoughts or opinions in this thread.

Yet they know more than you do and as I have seen stated and backed up by other horsemen, they are better than you, end of story.

Pablo 12-26-2010 10:18 AM

LMAO

These threads are going to be bumped forever, aren't they?

Hammock Parties 12-26-2010 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo (Post 7288535)
LMAO

These threads are going to be bumped forever, aren't they?

When we're 7-9 next year the drafturbators will bump them.

Pasta Little Brioni 12-26-2010 10:20 AM

[QUOTE=Marcellus;7288528]
Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM (Post 7288504)

No he wasn't but he also isn't telling people they are stupid *****.

Not a 1 of the 4 horsemen appear to have many (and in some cases none) correct posts thoughts or opinions in this thread.

Yet they know more than you do and as I have seen stated and backed up by other horsemen, they are better than you, end of story.

I like many of thier takes, but it's been a rough year for those guys.

Pablo 12-26-2010 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7288537)
When we're 7-9 next year the drafturbators will bump them.

True story.

Marcellus 12-26-2010 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7288537)
When we're 7-9 next year the drafturbators will bump them.

Lol, no shit, its a vicious circle.

I do love the immediate defense they go into about - "Is this all CP is about now? Proving people wrong for having an opinion?"

LMAO

Pablo 12-26-2010 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 7288544)
Lol, no shit, its a vicious circle.

I do love the immediate defense they go into about - "Is this all CP is about now? Proving people wrong for having an opinion?"

LMAO

LOL.

I'm pretty sure that's all CP has ever been about; since I've been here at least.

I could count the number of civil football conversations on one hand.

Saul Good 12-26-2010 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 7288544)
Lol, no shit, its a vicious circle.

I do love the immediate defense they go into about - "Is this all CP is about now? Proving people wrong for having an opinion?"

LMAO

Yep. CP was way better when you couldn't make a post in a thread anywhere on the forum that disagreed with anything they had to say without being called a stupid MF'er.

milkman 12-26-2010 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo (Post 7288551)
LOL.

I'm pretty sure that's all CP has ever been about; since I've been here at least.

I could count the number of civil football conversations on one hand.

There was a time when we did have civil discusssions.

There was a time when namecalling was virtually non existent.

At some point, name calling became much more prevalent, and speaking for myself only, I responded in kind, and it became a part of the every day debates.

Deberg_1990 12-26-2010 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7288576)
There was a time when we did have civil discusssions.

There was a time when namecalling was virtually non existent.

At some point, name calling became much more prevalent, and speaking for myself only, I responded in kind, and it became a part of the every day debates.

Sounds like a moderator problem.

Marcellus 12-26-2010 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7288576)
There was a time when we did have civil discusssions.

There was a time when namecalling was virtually non existent.

At some point, name calling became much more prevalent, and speaking for myself only, I responded in kind, and it became a part of the every day debates.

I can only think of 3 people who call people names on a consistent basis. '

I have been guilty of being drawn into it and have mad a very concerted effort to not do that even when "debating" with the master name caller.

SAUTO 12-26-2010 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse (Post 7288537)
When we're 7-9 next year the drafturbators will bump them.

Bound to happen, look at the falcons if you want the model.....
Posted via Mobile Device

milkman 12-26-2010 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 7288625)
Bound to happen, look at the falcons if you want the model.....
Posted via Mobile Device

It's a possibility, because the schedule will be tougher.

However, I also don't believe that one can look at another franchise and point to it as a model for how things will play out.

SAUTO 12-26-2010 11:19 AM

Falcons had a good year then regressed. Now came back stronger. That's how I can see it playing out.
Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 7288631)
It's a possibility, because the schedule will be tougher.

However, I also don't believe that one can look at another franchise and point to it as a model for how things will play out.

Posted via Mobile Device


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.