ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs tried to trade Charles (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=221040)

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:05 PM

I'll dumb it down for you:

When Matt Cassel has a good game statistically (according to the QB rating), it is because he made those stats in garbage time.

But when I try and make a point that Tyler Thigpen had the worst game I've ever seen from a QB, someone tries to refute MY OPINION by posting a QB rating of Matt Cassel this year.

I live in Illinois, I've seen Rex Grossman put up a 0.0 QB rating. Even that game was better than the game Tyler Thigpen had last year against the Falcons.

Matt Schaub threw a pick yesterday that bounced off of Jacoby Jones' hands...I'm pretty sure that goes against his QB rating, not Jones' WR rating.

Again...QB rating can give you an idea, but it doesn't necessarily paint an accurate picture.

I guess everyone forgets Huard and his 100 QB rating in 2006.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-04-2010 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6408668)
how is that incoherent?

That was pretty ****ing clear buddy.

Try re-reading.

Do they make Rosetta Stone: Frat-Tard?

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6408668)
how is that incoherent?

That was pretty ****ing clear buddy.

Try re-reading.

I put my rambling decoder glasses on, let me know if I hit something...

Are you implying that Cassel had games with a good QB rating, but he accumulated the stats in garbage time?

If so, that happened once. Philly. You know, The game where he threw for 90 yards?

Otherwise, the only game he had a QB rating over 100 is the Steelers game - which we won, and he actually played decent.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-04-2010 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6408685)
Again...QB rating can give you an idea, but it doesn't necessarily paint an accurate picture.

I guess everyone forgets Huard and his 100 QB rating in 2006.

The same Huard that you defended incessantly is now the one you use to show the fallacy of QB rating, and I'm the hypocrite?

ROFL ROFL

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6408687)
Do they make Rosetta Stone: Frat-Tard?

ROFL

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6408692)
The same Huard that you defended incessantly is now the one you use to show the fallacy of QB rating, and I'm the hypocrite?

ROFL ROFL

And boom goes the dynamite.

Game, set and mother****ing match.

Seriously, this is like debating with the love child of Terri Schaivo and Merrill Hoge.

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6408692)
The same Huard that you defended incessantly is now the one you use to show the fallacy of QB rating, and I'm the hypocrite?

ROFL ROFL

No...I never said Huard was a good QB...ever.

I said he was the best chance we had at winning...because he threw the ball to a covered Tony Gonzalez and it worked out more often than not...something Trent Green wouldn't do...

There are hundreds and hundreds of posts where I've always said Huard wasn't a good QB...just the right QB for that Herm Edwards team...

but I was right and 90% of the board was wrong and we all moved on...

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:09 PM

Oh my god!

Wow.

What do you know everyone?

hamas and otwp are following each other around with LMAO emoticons!

What do you know? This is certainly something new!

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-04-2010 02:09 PM

Hootie in this thread:

http://www.misanthropytoday.com/wp-c...atty_moped.gif

Inspector 01-04-2010 02:10 PM

I knew exactly what was going to happen but forgot to tell anyone.

Don't ask me to make any predictions now because, for some reason, I've lost the gift.

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:11 PM

Hamas said earlier this year that Tony Romo was the worst QB in the NFL...but he's bashing me for bashing Thigpen after his performance against Atlanta last year...without ever looking at my posts where I compared him to a Tony Romo light all of last year after his nice little stretch...a more raw version of Tony Romo (who got to watch from the sidelines for 4+ years)...

Of course I was the first one on this board to dub Jamaal Charles "Chris Johnson light" but I'm just a moron...(and I might be since he might even be just as good as CJ...drop the light)

DeezNutz 01-04-2010 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6408632)
DeezNutz took Cassel over Romo.

Well, that statement was full of fail on my part.

Obviously, I was trusting in the wisdom of Pioli. ;)

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6408710)
Hootie in this thread:

See this is all you ever have against me...

If people really do "win" threads...

I'd love to see someone without bias look at this thread between our posts...but make them "ghost style" without the username and then try and tell me that you're "winning" this thread against me.

You've looked like a moron the whole ****ing time...just because OTWP is chasing you around with LMAO emoticons doesn't mean a thing...that dude took Athan's story as gospel early in this thread to further push his anti-Pioli/Haley agenda...

Remember when you left the board forever? You can't ****ing STAND being in the minority and having people fire back at you....but you're too stubborn to ever admit when you're wrong...I bet your head will explode if we ever win this division under this regime.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6408732)
See this is all you ever have against me...

If people really do "win" threads...

I'd love to see someone without bias look at this thread between our posts...but make them "ghost style" without the username and then try and tell me that you're "winning" this thread against me.

You've looked like a moron the whole ****ing time...just because OTWP is chasing you around with LMAO emoticons doesn't mean a thing...that dude took Athan's story as gospel early in this thread to further push his anti-Pioli/Haley agenda...

Remember when you left the board forever? You can't ****ing STAND being in the minority and having people fire back at you....but you're too stubborn to ever admit when you're wrong...I bet your head will explode if we ever win this division under this regime.

Here we go again with Hootie's delusions...

I was in the thread first, ****stick. I'm not following anyone. I'm simply agreeing with his post.

You wouldn't know anything about that, considering people rarely, if ever agree with you.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-04-2010 02:21 PM

I never said he was the worst in the NFL...ever.

Again, keep making shit up, because you can't deal with reality.

dirk digler 01-04-2010 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6408667)
because you're an idiot...

you are the same type of fan that thinks Tom Brady is clutch.

I challenge all of you to rewatch the Cowboys/Giants game in the playoffs the year the Giants won the Super Bowl...and then tell me Tony Romo is a choker...

He played a hell of a game and was the only reason they had a chance to win...the Cowboys let HIM down...

Romo played a thousand times better against those same Giants as the 18-0 Tom Brady did in the Super Bowl...and it wasn't even close.

Patrick Crayton lost that game for the Cowboys...the defense let Eli score a TD at the end of the 1st half with 35 seconds to make it 14-7 rather than 14-0...

but Tony Romo is a choker for playing a hell of a game against that pass rush...against the team that beat the 18-0 super Pats...

LMAO

Meh. I have been called worse. And yes Tom Brady is hell of alot better QB than Romo ever will be.

Anyway we have had this discussion before Hootie so until Romo proves it in the playoffs like Peyton did he will be considered a choker. He is playing pretty good right now so he might prove me wrong this year. I guess we will see.

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6408758)
Here we go again with Hootie's delusions...

I was in the thread first, ****stick. I'm not following anyone. I'm simply agreeing with his post.

You wouldn't know anything about that, considering people rarely, if ever agree with you.

well maybe they should start...

I have a pretty good track record on this site...

Unless you want to cherrypick posts from a game where I was with the 100% majority on this site...

because people really thought Thigpen deserved a roster spot after the Atlanta game last year ROFL

Lets see...I'm up by about 25K in gambling challenge...I was a co-winner in the midseason playoff contest where I picked against Denver to make the playoffs AND picked the entire NFC correct 1-6...

I told mecca Chris Johnson was the best back in the NFL...LAST YEAR...

I am on record saying Tony Romo is a future hall of famer and will win a Super Bowl...

have said Peyton Manning is the greatest QB of all time for years and years and years...

and am on record talking about how vastly overrated Carson Palmer is...for the last three years...

but I'm just an idiot that knows nothing about anything etc. etc. etc.

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6408773)
I never said he was the worst in the NFL...ever.

Again, keep making shit up, because you can't deal with reality.

"Tony Romo is the one of the worst starting QBs in the NFL. If Dallas had a competent QB last week, they would have put up another 10-14 points. Dude is flat out taint."

My bad...you said he was ONE of the worst...

Sorry dude.

I assumed "flat out taint" meant you thought he was pretty much camp fodder.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6408784)
well maybe they should start...

I have a pretty good track record on this site...

Unless you want to cherrypick posts from a game where I was with the 100% majority on this site...

because people really thought Thigpen deserved a roster spot after the Atlanta game last year ROFL

Lets see...I'm up by about 25K in gambling challenge...I was a co-winner in the midseason playoff contest where I picked against Denver to make the playoffs AND picked the entire NFC correct 1-6...

I told mecca Chris Johnson was the best back in the NFL...LAST YEAR...

I am on record saying Tony Romo is a future hall of famer and will win a Super Bowl...

have said Peyton Manning is the greatest QB of all time for years and years and years...

and am on record talking about how vastly overrated Carson Palmer is...for the last three years...

but I'm just an idiot that knows nothing about anything etc. etc. etc.

So, basically, you're good at handicapping games.

Otherwise, nothing there is either solid - Palmer being overrated and Romo being a HOF are opinion and unfounded - or so ridiculously basic anyone with any football knowledge at all would agree.

Peyton Manning one of the greatest QB's ever?

Way to really go out on that limb, dude.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6408792)
"Tony Romo is the one of the worst starting QBs in the NFL. If Dallas had a competent QB last week, they would have put up another 10-14 points. Dude is flat out taint."

My bad...you said he was ONE of the worst...

Sorry dude.

I assumed "flat out taint" meant you thought he was pretty much camp fodder.

Someone with your grasp of logic shouldn't assume anything.

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:28 PM

I didn't go out on a limb...

I've been arguing he was better than Brady since 2003...since right after the no punt game against the Chiefs...

I knew then that no one had ever played the QB position as good as Peyton Manning.

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6408805)
Someone with your grasp of logic shouldn't assume anything.

so by one of the worst...he probably just meant one of the worst of the top 5 QB's in the NFL?

Oh ok I got it.

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:30 PM

P.S. I'm going to bring this up ONE time...but I was 100% right for two straight years regarding Huard/Green and Huard/Croyle...but I don't feel like rehashing that shit anymore...a new era in KC! The Jamaal Charles/Todd Haley era featuring Matt Cassel.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6408808)
I didn't go out on a limb...

I've been arguing he was better than Brady since 2003...since right after the no punt game against the Chiefs...

I knew then that no one had ever played the QB position as good as Peyton Manning.

Dude, it's not groundbreaking. You're acting like you knowing Manning is one of the best of all time is some ****ing revelation that only you were privy to.

Gimme a break.

RNR 01-04-2010 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6408828)
Dude, it's not groundbreaking. You're acting like you knowing Manning is one of the best of all time is some ****ing revelation that only you were privy to.

Gimme a break.

No shit~

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6408813)
so by one of the worst...he probably just meant one of the worst of the top 5 QB's in the NFL?

Oh ok I got it.

Oh, FFS.

Please tell me you think Romo is a Top 5 QB.

PLEASE.

And FWIW, personally, I would take "one of the worst" as anyone from 16-32.

So if he can come up with 15 QB's he'd rather have than Romo, so be it.

Bottom line:

You're the only one invested in this, because everything was based on opinion, until you decided to say he would make the HOF and win a SB.

So, when that doesn't happen, are you going to claim it was just a joke, or that it was just TIC?

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6408828)
Dude, it's not groundbreaking. You're acting like you knowing Manning is one of the best of all time is some ****ing revelation that only you were privy to.

Gimme a break.

Well if you don't want to acknowledge that Brady was considered by 90% of anyone with an opinion to be better than Manning just two years ago then I guess that's your prerogative...

Just know where I always stood (on the right side of the fence)...I doubt you were there...I'm sure you jumped that fence sometime this year like everyone else...

AustinChief 01-04-2010 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6408669)
For me to be a hypocrite, I'd have to have supported Romo. Never did. Always thought he was a mediocre QB (or worse). Still do.

He has weapons all over the place, but he's basically Neil Lomax.

Dude that's not fair on Neil Lomax..

Roy Green? Pat Tilley? JT Smith?

Terrell Owens... Terry Glenn... Jason Witten... Ro Williams... Miles Austin...

With CRAP Lomax still put up a 4600 yard season in 1984.

Romo has yet to do that with a freaking all star lineup around him.

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:35 PM

If I had to rank my QB's in terms of the best QB's in the NFL...it would go like this:

P. Manning
GAP
GAP
GAP
GAP
GAP
Brady
Brees
GAP
Roethlisberger/Romo/Rodgers/Rivers/McNabb/Warner (in no particular order)

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:36 PM

I'm sorry...

Someone please tell me how Roy Williams/Miles Austin and Jason Witten looked before the season started?

We're not going to give Romo ANY credit for the emergence of Miles Austin?

Haha.

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:36 PM

oh and Eli is probably right with, or slightly below that final tier.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6408842)
Well if you don't want to acknowledge that Brady was considered by 90% of anyone with an opinion to be better than Manning just two years ago then I guess that's your prerogative...

Just know where I always stood (on the right side of the fence)...I doubt you were there...I'm sure you jumped that fence sometime this year like everyone else...

Who gives a shit who's better?

Both are sure-fire, stone cold lock 1st ballot HOF'ers.

You're arguing whether $100 in 20's is better than a $100 bill.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6408843)
Dude that's not fair on Neil Lomax..

Roy Green? Pat Tilley? JT Smith?

Terrell Owens... Terry Glenn... Jason Witten... Ro Williams... Miles Austin...

With CRAP Lomax still put up a 4600 yard season in 1984.

Romo has yet to do that with a freaking all star lineup around him.

Damn, Kyle breaking out the old STL Cardinals history.

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:38 PM

and yes, Carson Palmer and Matt Cassel are both in the same tier as Kyle Orton and Jay Cutler...except Cutler probably has the Romo tier potential at least.

Palmer is done. That guy is never going to be the franchise everyone thought he was going to be.

RNR 01-04-2010 02:38 PM

Hootie you are getting kicked around like a soccer ball in this thread~

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6408857)
Who gives a shit who's better?

Both are sure-fire, stone cold lock 1st ballot HOF'ers.

You're arguing whether $100 in 20's is better than a $100 bill.

no there is a big difference...

Peyton would have been 1st ballot on the Chiefs/Colts/Bengals/Texans/Cowboys/any NFL team...

Tom Brady stumbled into the perfect situation...you know...the same team that Matt Cassel led to 11-5 last year...

Jim Sorgi wins 2 games with the Colts last year if Manning blows out his knee week 1 like Brady...instead he wins 12 games with a team that was so inferior I don't even know where to begin...that team was an abortion because of injuries for the first half of last season and they played with a WR that was more washed up than any guy I can ever remember that used to be a star...

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider (Post 6408881)
Hootie you are getting kicked around like a soccer ball in this thread~

care to elaborate? Or are you just playing buddy/buddy with the populars? I'll assume the latter...

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 02:53 PM

One last comment before I leave this beatdown...

Hootie, you're damn good at picking games, and do have decent football smarts at times, but the people that give you a hard time do so because you make shit up to try to prove a point.

If you'd stick to the facts, instead of making shit up to give yourself an opportunity to use "draftubaters" in a post, and take shots at Hamas, Dane, Mecca, etc - this place would be better for it.

Example:

You saying I pissed all over the game thread.

Again, I called it as I saw it. Which means there was some pissing. And it was deserved. But I was right there rooting for the win, and giving praise to the players that deserved it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6403896)
That's not a drop, that's a great play by Flowers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6403950)
Good play there, Carr.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6403202)
DJ!

NO FLAGS!

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6404086)
JAMAAL CHARLES, YOU ARE RIDICULOUS!

Quote:

Originally Posted by SportsRacer (Post 6404344)
This is the most I've enjoyed a Chiefs game in at least three years.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6404354)
Thanksgiving, 2006 for me.


OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6408905)
no there is a big difference...

Peyton would have been 1st ballot on the Chiefs/Colts/Bengals/Texans/Cowboys/any NFL team...

Tom Brady stumbled into the perfect situation...you know...the same team that Matt Cassel led to 11-5 last year...

Jim Sorgi wins 2 games with the Colts last year if Manning blows out his knee week 1 like Brady...instead he wins 12 games with a team that was so inferior I don't even know where to begin...that team was an abortion because of injuries for the first half of last season and they played with a WR that was more washed up than any guy I can ever remember that used to be a star...

So, there's a huge difference, but only because you say so.

You have no evidence whatsoever to back up your claim. It's nothing but opinion.

You have no idea how Manning's career would have turn out had he been drafted elsewhere, you just like to claim he'd still he a lock HOF, and that Brady's career has been nothing but luck because it suits your argument.

Hootie 01-04-2010 02:59 PM

well...

Like I said...I read the entire game thread from page 1-30 last night and I felt as if you were not really enjoying the game...just trying to blast Haley/Cassel whenever the opportunity arose...

can I ask you what happens if Castille completes a beautiful TD pass to Cassel?

What about that 3rd and 7 draw play to Charles where he busted a 52 yard run? If they stop him short of the chains...then it becomes a terrrrrrrible playcall according to most.

No one is every going to call the "perfect" game...but I think Haley has potential to be a solid head coach...

I said from day 1 that I was going to keep an open mind all season long and at least give the new regime a year before I started getting antsy/critical...

We'll see what happens in 2010...but as for 2009...perfect way/perfect game to end an overall shitty/unsatisfactory season.

At least it gives me a hint of optimism.

Hootie 01-04-2010 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6408948)
So, there's a huge difference, but only because you say so.

You have no evidence whatsoever to back up your claim. It's nothing but opinion.

You have no idea how Manning's career would have turn out had he been drafted elsewhere, you just like to claim he'd still he a lock HOF, and that Brady's career has been nothing but luck because it suits your argument.

and no one knows that the Bulls would have won titles both years Jordan played baseball and could have easily won 9 titles in a row but everyone pretty much assumes that, don't they?

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6408961)
well...

Like I said...I read the entire game thread from page 1-30 last night and I felt as if you were not really enjoying the game...just trying to blast Haley/Cassel whenever the opportunity arose...

can I ask you what happens if Castille completes a beautiful TD pass to Cassel?

What about that 3rd and 7 draw play to Charles where he busted a 52 yard run? If they stop him short of the chains...then it becomes a terrrrrrrible playcall according to most.

No one is every going to call the "perfect" game...but I think Haley has potential to be a solid head coach...

I said from day 1 that I was going to keep an open mind all season long and at least give the new regime a year before I started getting antsy/critical...

We'll see what happens in 2010...but as for 2009...perfect way/perfect game to end an overall shitty/unsatisfactory season.

At least it gives me a hint of optimism.

Dude, you know as well as I do that even if that pass is completed, it's a bone-headed call. A FB throwing to a QB? When you have the lead, on the road? In their territory? And you have all the momentum?

It was stupid, and kudos to Haley for saying it was a stupid call. Hopefully he learns from shit like that, and fake punts on 4th and 8 from your own 28 - throwing to your long snapper.

And personally, I think "giving them time" is a cop-out.

Funny how this place almost universally said that Pioli and new coaching along would get them close to .500

How people said, "Atlanta and Miami. Why not us?"

Then backed off and made excuse when it was obvious it wasn't going to happen, and had the gall to blame the old regime for being in that spot - instead of pointing the finger at the guy who brought in 45 stopgaps and no playmakers.

I think had Pioli done something, anything to get excited about, more people would be inclined to believe in this bullshit about it being a "process."

By ****ing up the 2009 offseason, he's extended that process - and it didn't have to be that way.

Yesterday was as fun a game as I've watched in years. And you haven't heard a peep from me about the change in draft position. I enjoyed the hell out of yesterday.

That win does not, however, excuse the shortcomings of the previous 11 months. Huge mistakes were made, and it's going to take an offseason of a lifetime to fix them.

I hope he can do it, but nothing he's shown me makes me think he can.

I hope I'm wrong.

Hootie 01-04-2010 03:13 PM

hey you can write them off all you want...

My personal stance all along was to not judge too harshly, if at all, this season.

And that's where I still stand.

Looking forward to this offseason and looking forward to taking Jamaal Charles with my 1st pick in every league next season.

tyler360 01-04-2010 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6408854)
I'm sorry...

Someone please tell me how Roy Williams/Miles Austin and Jason Witten looked before the season started?

We're not going to give Romo ANY credit for the emergence of Miles Austin?

Haha.

I am not going to get in on this on going debate except to say that I credit Mike Brown with the emergence of Miles Austin.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6409009)
hey you can write them off all you want...

My personal stance all along was to not judge too harshly, if at all, this season.

And that's where I still stand.

Looking forward to this offseason and looking forward to taking Jamaal Charles with my 1st pick in every league next season.

I'm not writing them off. They just haven't given me any reason to think he can pull off the offseason needed to get this thing back on track.

Question:

IYO, what has Pioli done to give you hope he knocks this offseason out of the park?

Hootie 01-04-2010 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6409029)
I'm not writing them off. They just haven't given me any reason to think he can pull off the offseason needed to get this thing back on track.

Question:

IYO, what has Pioli done to give you hope he knocks this offseason out of the park?

Well dude...

I called it right away...I knew none of you would like Pioli. Dude, that Patriots fans themselves, until a couple of years ago, ALWAYS hated EVERY single draft...that's just how it was...the Patriots drafted the players they thought fit their system regardless of whether it was a reach or not...

Hey...looking back on it...Tyson Jackson looks like a god awful pick...Matt Cassel looks less than iffy at best...Alex Magee looks like a waste...

You're right, right now...it doesn't look so great.

But like I said, I'm willing to give that draft class and Matt Cassel another year...as well as Pioli and Haley...before I get critical.

I still wouldn't mind seeing the Chiefs trade up to take Clausen or Bradford if they fall past 16th or so...they have the pieces and at least we could hedge our bets on Cassel...drafting a QB towards the middle-end of the 1st is like paying for a decent QB2 anyways...and best case scenario is we end up with something similar to the Brees/Rivers situation in San Diego.

I don't feel like getting into that right now...I said all along I wasn't going to let this year impact any thoughts I'd have on Pioli...if you and Hamas want to berate that stance by me and others then so be it.

Rudy tossed tigger's salad 01-04-2010 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6408838)

And FWIW, personally, I would take "one of the worst" as anyone from 16-32.

So if he can come up with 15 QB's he'd rather have than Romo, so be it.


what an awful attempt at a spin. Hamas is still your daddy

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6409055)
Well dude...

I called it right away...I knew none of you would like Pioli. Dude, that Patriots fans themselves, until a couple of years ago, ALWAYS hated EVERY single draft...that's just how it was...the Patriots drafted the players they thought fit their system regardless of whether it was a reach or not...

Hey...looking back on it...Tyson Jackson looks like a god awful pick...Matt Cassel looks less than iffy at best...Alex Magee looks like a waste...

You're right, right now...it doesn't look so great.

But like I said, I'm willing to give that draft class and Matt Cassel another year...as well as Pioli and Haley...before I get critical.

I still wouldn't mind seeing the Chiefs trade up to take Clausen or Bradford if they fall past 16th or so...they have the pieces and at least we could hedge our bets on Cassel...drafting a QB towards the middle-end of the 1st is like paying for a decent QB2 anyways...and best case scenario is we end up with something similar to the Brees/Rivers situation in San Diego.

I don't feel like getting into that right now...I said all along I wasn't going to let this year impact any thoughts I'd have on Pioli...if you and Hamas want to berate that stance by me and others then so be it.

YOU called it right away? That we wouldn't like Pioli?

Jesus, dude. There are mountains of posts and thread where we came right out and SAID he wasn't our first choice before he was ever hired.

Hell, I had few expectations to begin with, but he didn't even meet those.

And again, what has Pioli done that gives any impression he can meet your expectations?

Anyone? Feel free. Can anyone answer that question?

wild1 01-04-2010 04:01 PM

pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks pioli sucks

SAUTO 01-04-2010 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6409244)
YOU called it right away? That we wouldn't like Pioli?

Jesus, dude. There are mountains of posts and thread where we came right out and SAID he wasn't our first choice before he was ever hired.

Hell, I had few expectations to begin with, but he didn't even meet those.

And again, what has Pioli done that gives any impression he can meet your expectations?

Anyone? Feel free. Can anyone answer that question?

well i, for one, am glad that he has taken his time and seen for himself if the players we had could fit in his system. i'm also glad that he didnt go out and break the bank on high (over) priced free agents BEFORE seeing first if we had someone that could play whatever role they would have played in our system. thats the key to me. we kept tank around until it was pretty obvious that he wasnt fitting then we got something for him.


hey man be glad pioli didnt take your advice on thigpen. he got a 5th rounder out of the guy YOU would have cut

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6409281)
well i, for one, am glad that he has taken his time and seen for himself if the players we had could fit in his system. i'm also glad that he didnt go out and break the bank on high (over) priced free agents BEFORE seeing first if we had someone that could play whatever role they would have played in our system. thats the key to me. we kept tank around until it was pretty obvious that he wasnt fitting then we got something for him.


hey man be glad pioli didnt take your advice on thigpen. he got a 5th rounder out of the guy YOU would have cut

And he cut players that are performing damn well for other teams.

Your point?

C'mon, Jason. Even the casual fan knew what this team had - next to nothing.

There's no excuse for not upgrading the talent. None.

BigMeatballDave 01-04-2010 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6408066)
I think we need to turn the page on many of these debates.

The first year for the new regime did NOT go well. There's simply no getting around that. There were failures in the draft, FA, and talent evaluation. Game management was often a travesty.

That said, Pioli and Haley are going to be around in 2010. I'm hopeful they'll have learned from their mistakes, and I'm also ready to start evaluating new decisions from here on out.

This. I know if they make the same stupid decisions this yr, I'm done. I won't trust single thing they do. Most of us are skeptical of them anyway. I know I am now. I was drinking the Pioli Kool-aid last yr. After a season of fail, they need to show us something.

SAUTO 01-04-2010 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6409322)
And he cut players that are performing damn well for other teams.

Your point?

C'mon, Jason. Even the casual fan knew what this team had - next to nothing.

There's no excuse for not upgrading the talent. None.

How would he know how some of these guys would fit in the NEW system? had they played extensively in it before?


who was cut that is performing "well" for another team? which player"s" plural.

pollard? pollard couldnt tackle for shit for THIS TEAM never did and IMO never would have. why? **** i dont know. but the guy missed how many tackles in the preseason for us? how many against the seahawks alone? look at the gif'ed up thread and see how well pollard played for us.

Abba-Dabba 01-04-2010 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhitiE (Post 6407596)
ohhh i was wondering why i felt so at home....

I'm not one that's going to argue that...

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6409384)
How would he know how some of these guys would fit in the NEW system? had they played extensively in it before?


who was cut that is performing "well" for another team? which player"s" plural.

pollard? pollard couldnt tackle for shit for THIS TEAM never did and IMO never would have. why? **** i dont know. but the guy missed how many tackles in the preseason for us? how many against the seahawks alone? look at the gif'ed up thread and see how well pollard played for us.

So you ignore acquiring talent because the leftovers MIGHT be serviceable in the new scheme?

Are you kidding me?

SAUTO 01-04-2010 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6409404)
So you ignore acquiring talent because the leftovers MIGHT be serviceable in the new scheme?

Are you kidding me?

ROFL so you would bitch if he came in and cut everyone and some of them went on to be serviceable players elsewhere, and you will bitch when he keeps some and they end up not working out.


so what would have made YOU happy? to bring in half a roster of upgrades while not cutting anyone?

SAUTO 01-04-2010 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6409404)
So you ignore acquiring talent because the leftovers MIGHT be serviceable in the new scheme?

Are you kidding me?

and what did we lose this year? we came out right about where YOU predicted us to be. why does it matter that we didnt get there just how you would have liked it

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6409414)
ROFL so you would bitch if he came in and cut everyone and some of them went on to be serviceable players elsewhere, and you will bitch when he keeps some and they end up not working out.


so what would have made YOU happy? to bring in half a roster of upgrades while not cutting anyone?

Who said anything about coming in and whacking everyone?

I'm saying it's no excuse to ignore bringing in a pass rushing OLB via the draft or FA just because you want to see if Hali can do it.

****. That.

You acquire talent first and foremost. If Hali ends up being serviceable, even better. You can mow move him to the other side, which is a gaping ****ing hole, or at worst have quality depth at a position you previously had nothing at.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6409417)
and what did we lose this year? we came out right about where YOU predicted us to be. why does it matter that we didnt get there just how you would have liked it

Record wise, sure.

But talent wise, this team is no better today than it was when Pioli took over.

Wait, scratch that, he acquired a solid PK, and a WR3.

Carry on.

SAUTO 01-04-2010 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6409425)
Record wise, sure.

But talent wise, this team is no better today than it was when Pioli took over.

Wait, scratch that, he acquired a solid PK, and a WR3.

Carry on.

didnt he also get a 5 tech that we didnt have to start with? also a couple of linemen the could probably work out for a year or two.

KCBOSS1 01-04-2010 04:46 PM

We are one year into a total re-build that we all knew was going to have to happen and of course, the planet is exploding because we're not 8&8. It took Herm a few years to completely demolish a winning program and it's gonna take a few years to re-establish one.

SAUTO 01-04-2010 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6409423)
Who said anything about coming in and whacking everyone?

I'm saying it's no excuse to ignore bringing in a pass rushing OLB via the draft or FA just because you want to see if Hali can do it.

****. That.

You acquire talent first and foremost. If Hali ends up being serviceable, even better. You can mow move him to the other side, which is a gaping ****ing hole, or at worst have quality depth at a position you previously had nothing at.

hali worked out in that regards, no? so why overspend on a high priced pass rusher in FA? what if he didnt feel as though the draft had one that was worth our pick in a given round? no you... him. his feelings. that what he's paid for correct? and that's why he was voted wait for it i know you love this here it comes EXECUTIVE OF THE DECADE.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6409429)
didnt he also get a 5 tech that we didnt have to start with? also a couple of linemen the could probably work out for a year or two.

Are you serious?

You're going to claim that Jackson, Alleman and Ndukwe are "acquiring talent?"

You're going to ridiculous lengths to defend a guy that brought in 45+ new players, and found zero playmakers, a guy that is a borderline WR2, more like WR3, and a place kicker.

All of the elite talent, playmakers, however you want to slice it - all came from previous regimes.

After one year, that is completely unacceptable.

Hootie 01-04-2010 04:52 PM

Yawn.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6409439)
hali worked out in that regards, no? so why overspend on a high priced pass rusher in FA? what if he didnt feel as though the draft had one that was worth our pick in a given round? no you... him. his feelings. that what he's paid for correct? and that's why he was voted wait for it i know you love this here it comes EXECUTIVE OF THE DECADE.

No, he really didn't.

Unless you're OK with your "best" LB getting 8 sacks a year and getting abused in the run game.

There are a handful of positions that are unlikely to be able to be upgraded:

CB, LT, K, P

You can add Charles to that list, but we have no depth, nor anyone to spell him.


Otherwise, every position on the roster could be pretty easily upgraded - and could have been last offseason as well.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6409454)
Yawn.

Yeah, arguing with Sauto is boring.

Arguing with you is much more exciting.

SAUTO 01-04-2010 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6409447)
Are you serious?

You're going to claim that Jackson, Alleman and Ndukwe are "acquiring talent?"

You're going to ridiculous lengths to defend a guy that brought in 45+ new players, and found zero playmakers, a guy that is a borderline WR2, more like WR3, and a place kicker.

All of the elite talent, playmakers, however you want to slice it - all came from previous regimes.

After one year, that is completely unacceptable.


so the guy rated as the BEST 5 TECH in the draft wasnt "talent" that was acquired?

what about o'callahan? he wasnt acquired? he hasnt played lights out but he has been an upgrade from who was there to start the season.

You are the one going to ridiculous lengths to bash the guy. hell you have spent all ****ing day doing just that. it was obvious you were looking for a fight at 8 am this morning and you have spent all day fighting. did you have a bad weekend? you seem a little tense today. its funny how you use tis place as an outlet. you need to yell at someone you are here. i'm just glad hootie took one for the team today.

Hootie 01-04-2010 04:56 PM

no you're just a broken record

we get it

we do

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6409470)
no you're just a broken record

we get it

we do

Obviously, Sauto doesn't.

SAUTO 01-04-2010 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6409470)
no you're just a broken record

we get it

we do

mecca has rubbed off well on this one. hell he spent quite some time asking if anyone heard him this morning, then when some replied they werent what he was looking for so he still said he was being ignored. poor guy

SAUTO 01-04-2010 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6409474)
Obviously, Sauto doesn't.

uuummmmm yes i do, like hootie said you are a broken ****ing record saying the same thing, over and over and over and over, and then to make it even better you say it in every thread no matter the topic.

charles=pioli
cassel=pioli
waters=pioli
everything goes back to you standing on your little box ranting about what they did wrong and what YOU would have liked to happen. Are you that ****ing spoiled that if you dont get you way you keep going over it again and again until someone caves?

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6409467)
so the guy rated as the BEST 5 TECH in the draft wasnt "talent" that was acquired?

what about o'callahan? he wasnt acquired? he hasnt played lights out but he has been an upgrade from who was there to start the season.

You are the one going to ridiculous lengths to bash the guy. hell you have spent all ****ing day doing just that. it was obvious you were looking for a fight at 8 am this morning and you have spent all day fighting. did you have a bad weekend? you seem a little tense today. its funny how you use tis place as an outlet. you need to yell at someone you are here. i'm just glad hootie took one for the team today.

Oh, FFS.

Who did we acquire that's a PLAYMAKER?

A DIFFERENCE MAKER?

An IMPACT PLAYER?

Your defense of Pioli is Tyson Jackson, who plays a complementary position, and Ryan ****ing O'Callaghan, who was no better (also no worse) than McIntosh?

Really?

That's your case?

Wow.

Well, I can't beat stupidity. I'm done.

Enjoy the Kool-Aid. Yay Pioli. Yay 2/45.

SAUTO 01-04-2010 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6409486)
Oh, FFS.

Who did we acquire that's a PLAYMAKER?

A DIFFERENCE MAKER?

An IMPACT PLAYER?

Your defense of Pioli is Tyson Jackson, who plays a complementary position, and Ryan ****ing O'Callaghan, who was no better (also no worse) than McIntosh?

Really?

That's your case?

Wow.

Well, I can't beat stupidity. I'm done.

Enjoy the Kool-Aid. Yay Pioli. Yay 2/45.

now it changes (par for the course with you) originally it was who was an UPGRADE. now it's a playmaker. just make up what you want and run with it cool guy

Hootie 01-04-2010 05:04 PM

I'm all for firing Pioli and hiring Mecca and OTWP...with Hamas and Dane on their staff...

that's what they want...they spend so much time breaking down tape and scouting prospects...they'd be perfect hires

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 6409493)
now it changes (par for the course with you) originally it was who was an UPGRADE. now it's a playmaker. just make up what you want and run with it cool guy

Didn't change anything, you just can't, or choose not to read.

The following was said early in the conversation, you just chose to focus on the talent comment, because without it, you're argument look seven more ridiculous that it already does.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6409447)
Are you serious?

You're going to claim that Jackson, Alleman and Ndukwe are "acquiring talent?"

You're going to ridiculous lengths to defend a guy that brought in 45+ new players, and found zero playmakers, a guy that is a borderline WR2, more like WR3, and a place kicker.

All of the elite talent, playmakers, however you want to slice it - all came from previous regimes.

After one year, that is completely unacceptable.

Later.

OnTheWarpath15 01-04-2010 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie (Post 6409496)
I'm all for firing Pioli and hiring Mecca and OTWP...with Hamas and Dane on their staff...

that's what they want...they spend so much time breaking down tape and scouting prospects...they'd be perfect hires

Ah, Hootie's back.

Thought he might have turned a corner there for a bit - we were having a good discussion.

So much for that.

See ya, dude.

SAUTO 01-04-2010 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6409522)
Didn't change anything, you just can't, or choose not to read.

The following was said early in the conversation, you just chose to focus on the talent comment, because without it, you're argument look seven more ridiculous that it already does.



Later.

whoa you said you were done several posts ago, now youre back? cant even keep your word huh? and you have also said 45+players and only 2 were an upgrade many many times. no mention of playmakers there huh?

CoMoChief 01-04-2010 05:16 PM

I can believe it. Charles couldn't hold on to the damn football.

siberian khatru 01-04-2010 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6409525)
Thought he might have turned a corner there for a bit - we were having a good discussion.

Haha, I was reading those exchanges and thought, "Damn, they're about to kiss and make up." :)

WilliamTheIrish 01-04-2010 05:22 PM

Complaining about a trade that didn't happen. This is delicious. LMAO


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.