ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs reached agreement in principle on deal with former Saints QB Chase Daniel (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=271044)

DaneMcCloud 03-12-2013 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9491990)
Build.

He doesn't have the shoulders to power through it or the height to get on top of it and drive it.

It's just raw physical limitations. Getting his body leaner and developing more raw strength would've helped a little, but he just doesn't have the frame or body type to really spin it.

So he's like Jeff Garcia but less mobile?

KurtCobain 03-13-2013 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9491997)
So he's like Jeff Garcia but less mobile?

I would say he is plenty mobile. That's from mu days, and from preseason play. And I've watched his every preseason play.

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-13-2013 12:04 AM

You think his immobile because he's a 6'0 QB with a beer gut, but he's got wheels for a little tubby bastard.

DaneMcCloud 03-13-2013 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9492006)
You think his immobile because he's a 6'0 QB with a beer gut, but he's got wheels for a little tubby bastard.

So he sounds like an inexperienced Garcia (who played in the CFL before the 49ers).

Yay? Nay?

alanm 03-13-2013 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9490700)
Maybe Daniel is my "in" to returning to the happy, carefree days before I came to the planet and took the red pill. Perhaps Thignorance WAS bliss...
Is it possible to re-achieve True Fandom? Guys, I'm trying here because the only other option is to just let go of KC altogether. This is truly a sad ****ing sequence of events and day.
Posted via Mobile Device

Oh no, no. It's too late now. You've already been sucked into the Chiefs fandom vortex. At least I got to see them win a Superbowl when I was a wee lad of 12. :banghead:

mcaj22 03-13-2013 12:07 AM

id say hes a better Tyler Thigpen than Jeff Garcia

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-13-2013 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9492010)
So he sounds like an inexperienced Garcia (who played in the CFL before the 49ers).

Yay? Nay?

According to the me from 5.5 years ago, yes.

BigChiefFan 03-13-2013 12:11 AM

Let's clear something up, he was NOT coached by Sean Payton last year. Payton was SUSPENDED AND NOT ALLOWED TO COACH last year.

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-13-2013 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 9492011)
Oh no, no. It's too late now. You've already been sucked into the Chiefs fandom vortex. At least I got to see them win a Superbowl when I was a wee lad of 12. :banghead:

Uncle Alanm, what was it like when the Chiefs were innovators and winners?
Posted via Mobile Device

DJ's left nut 03-13-2013 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9491997)
So he's like Jeff Garcia but less mobile?

I don't think he's any less mobile than Garcia but perhaps less wiley. Garcia was just clever as hell with his wheels and I don't see that in Daniel.

I also don't see him as being as accurate a passer as Garcia.

Unfortunately I agree with the later poster - he's closer to Thigpen than Garcia. He's better than Thiggy, don't get me wrong. But Garcia was actually pretty damn good in his own spastic, completely inexplicable way. I don't think it's fair to really compare anyone to him because Garcia's effectiveness made so little sense.

So until someone is like Garcia and good, I think all you can really do is call that person Thigpen.

DaneMcCloud 03-13-2013 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9492020)

Cool. Well, as I said earlier, he sounds like the best backup QB the Chiefs have had since 2006, and if so, it's another nice signing.

DaneMcCloud 03-13-2013 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan (Post 9492024)
Let's clear something up, he was NOT coached by Sean Payton last year. Payton was SUSPENDED AND NOT ALLOWED TO COACH last year.

I said Payton AND Lombardi, not just Payton.

Just to clear something up.

Hammock Parties 03-13-2013 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9491815)
It's funny how 99.999999% of this forum was all for giving ***** a "pass" for 2009, making all kinds of excuses for his shit moves such as Cassel, Toomer, Goof, Thomas, etc. and so on.

Yet, the new GM that's spent the past 21 years in Green Bay and a man who coached his team to five consecutive NFC Championships and a Super Bowl are already considered morons just a few weeks into their tenure.

It makes no ****ing sense.

People (including me) gave Pioli a pass because it the first new GM we had had in 20 years.

We were willing to wait and see.

Now that we know what fail GM looks like, we're sniffing it again when we see another douche acquire a pair of noodle arms to address the the QB position.

Fool me once...

Chiefshrink 03-13-2013 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9492006)
because he's a 6'0 QB

I love your positive attitude. But all serious die hard MU fans(myself included) know he is only 5'10 1/2".;)

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-13-2013 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefshrink (Post 9492068)
I love your positive attitude. But all serious die hard MU fans(myself included) know he is only 5'10 1/2".;)

Measured at 6'0 at the combine.

Chiefshrink 03-13-2013 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9492071)
Measured at 6'0 at the combine.

The officials measuring probably gave in to his begging to wear his helmet while he was getting measured for height;)

cdcox 03-13-2013 01:05 AM

Chase Daniel's ceiling is Doug Flutie in kitten heels.

keg in kc 03-13-2013 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9491815)
Who's "We"?

I called out ***** and Haley as frauds in early 2009. But I believe in giving Reid and Dorsey some time to reshape this roster and put a plan in place because the Chiefs have been an epic cluster**** since 2005.

It's funny how 99.999999% of this forum was all for giving ***** a "pass" for 2009, making all kinds of excuses for his shit moves such as Cassel, Toomer, Goof, Thomas, etc. and so on.

Yet, the new GM that's spent the past 21 years in Green Bay and a man who coached his team to five consecutive NFC Championships and a Super Bowl are already considered morons just a few weeks into their tenure.

It makes no ****ing sense.

Perhaps we're learning.

Unlike the franchise.

themanwithnoname 03-13-2013 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9492066)
People (including me) gave ***** a pass because it the first new GM we had had in 20 years.

We were willing to wait and see.

Now that we know what fail GM looks like, we're sniffing it again when we see another douche acquire a pair of noodle arms to address the the QB position.

Fool me once...

Exactly, Pioli is the reason why people are tense about Reid and Dorsey's moves.

DaneMcCloud 03-13-2013 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9492102)
Perhaps we're learning.

Unlike the franchise.

This franchise has had two playoff berths since 2004. Since then, they've had 4-12, 2-14, 4-12, 7-9 and 2-14 seasons. The fans finally revolted and the organization responded.

For better or worse, I don't think you can ask that same fan base to endure even more losing seasons in an effort to develop a QB from the weakest draft class in recent memory.

That just wasn't going to fly.

keg in kc 03-13-2013 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9492111)
This franchise has had two playoff berths since 2004. Since then, they've had 4-12, 2-14, 4-12, 7-9 and 2-14 seasons. The fans finally revolted and the organization responded.

For better or worse, I don't think you can ask that same fan base to endure even more losing seasons in an effort to develop a QB from the weakest draft class in recent memory.

That just wasn't going to fly.

What does developing a QB have to do with anything. Trading for Alex Cassel isn't an effort to play winning football. 20 years of history tells us that.

DaneMcCloud 03-13-2013 01:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9492112)
What does developing a QB have to do with anything. Trading for Alex Cassel isn't an effort to play winning football. 20 years of history tells us that.

You're speculating.

Trent Green won plenty of games. Joe Montana led them to the AFC championship. Both were fine QB's.

I don't understand how Matt ****ing Cassel could spook so many people into believing that no one can win unless they're a first round QB that's been drafted by the Chiefs.

That mantra is out of control.

crazycoffey 03-13-2013 02:10 AM

It's draft a QB to win a Super Bowl. That's all there is, anything else is just a lesson in mediocrity

Hammock Parties 03-13-2013 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9490697)
There's no Geno bluff.

Sure there is, just a different kind of bluff.

After you, true fans.

http://www.tanveernaseer.com/wp-cont...-off-cliff.jpg

Pasta Little Brioni 03-13-2013 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump (Post 9491957)
If Chase Daniels played for Tennessee or some shit, you guys wouldnt even care lol. You'd say "camp fodder" and the thread would be over in 3 pages.

So, there is more discussion on a player many saw every game of for a few years? Who knew!!!!!

kcxiv 03-13-2013 04:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9492114)
You're speculating.

Trent Green won plenty of games. Joe Montana led them to the AFC championship. Both were fine QB's.

I don't understand how Matt ****ing Cassel could spook so many people into believing that no one can win unless they're a first round QB that's been drafted by the Chiefs.

That mantra is out of control.

That was not franchise qb's. If Montana was Smith's age then maybe, but if he's smith age, h's not gonna get traded.

Im sorry but Montana and Green were still ****ing failures. 1 play off win doesnt mean shit to me, Tim Tebow has 1 win as a starting qb.

Your in L.A you see how a top notch sports organization is. If the Lakers dont win it all its a ****ing failure. Doesnt matter if they go to the finals and lose, its not good enough. Thats how it has to be, thats how it is for the Patriots, the Steelers and ev3ry other elite franchise.

Spott 03-13-2013 04:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefshrink (Post 9492068)
I love your positive attitude. But all serious die hard MU fans(myself included) know he is only 5'10 1/2".;)

I met him his rookie year after a preseason game when he was with the Redskins. He's probably 5'10" at the most.

Chiefnj2 03-13-2013 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9492114)
You're speculating.

Trent Green won plenty of games. Joe Montana led them to the AFC championship. Both were fine QB's.

I don't understand how Matt ****ing Cassel could spook so many people into believing that no one can win unless they're a first round QB that's been drafted by the Chiefs.

That mantra is out of control.

When Vermeil first signed it was for three years with the understanding it was a quick-turnaround and win-now approach. That's why they went heavy on FA's and experienced players. A lot of fans on CP don't want that 3 year window approach. They want to draft early and develop someone that can help the team contend for years.

Alex Smith and Chase Daniel reeks of the Cassel blueprint. Bring in an average vet and don't have any real competition to mess with him at the #2 spot.

Right now, on paper, next year's QB class doesn't look phenomenal either.

Bootlegged 03-13-2013 06:45 AM

March 12th and you are still here. Shocking.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 9492071)
Measured at 6'0 at the combine.

Old 02-27-2013, 10:53 PM #7
'Hamas' Jenkins 'Hamas' Jenkins is offline
Now You've Pissed Me Off!!

'Hamas' Jenkins's Avatar


Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Koyaanisqatsi
Casino cash: $144048

Guys,

I'm waiting until March 12. If this goes through I'm ****ing done caring about this draft and this team. It's supposed to be entertainment, not torture, and it's emotionally ****ing ruinous. I spent the last five ****ing years hoping the Chiefs would be terrible enough to get a high draft pick and take a QB and both times when they were in position they traded for someone else's backup.

I'm ****ing done with the bullshit. Done. I'm rearranging my office this weekend. I'm taking down autographed photos, framed photos, memorabilia, art, clothes, hats. Anything that has to do with the Chiefs is getting expunged from my life, because I'm not going to continue to devote time and emotional energy into a team whose owner detests his fans and continually charges them more and more for the same shit sandwich.

E-****ing-nuff.
__________________
Phil Pressey is a one who sucks the penis and I hope he ****ing dies.

Mr_Tomahawk 03-13-2013 06:59 AM

@JuniorG93: Y'all sleeping #Chase Has A Cannon 4 Arm Most Definately will give Alex A run for his Money #WHODAT

RyFo18 03-13-2013 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 9492200)
@JuniorG93: Y'all sleeping #Chase Has A Cannon 4 Arm Most Definately will give Alex A run for his Money #WHODAT

A cannon he does not have.

htismaqe 03-13-2013 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9492114)
You're speculating.

Trent Green won plenty of games. Joe Montana led them to the AFC championship. Both were fine QB's.

I don't understand how Matt ****ing Cassel could spook so many people into believing that no one can win unless they're a first round QB that's been drafted by the Chiefs.

That mantra is out of control.

What's the one thing they haven't won in the last 30 years?

What's the one way they haven't tried to address the QB position?

You just don't ****ing get it. NOBODY is saying they CAN'T win without a first round QB.

If you look at NFL history, and especially Chiefs history, there's a CLEARLY ESTABLISHED line of probability.

Get your head out of your ass, homer.

htismaqe 03-13-2013 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9492111)
This franchise has had two playoff berths since 2004. Since then, they've had 4-12, 2-14, 4-12, 7-9 and 2-14 seasons. The fans finally revolted and the organization responded.

For better or worse, I don't think you can ask that same fan base to endure even more losing seasons in an effort to develop a QB from the weakest draft class in recent memory.

That just wasn't going to fly.

Because filling the stands is more important than winning playoff games.

Hammock Parties 03-13-2013 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9492236)
What's the one thing they haven't won in the last 30 years?

What's the one way they haven't tried to address the QB position?

You just don't ****ing get it. NOBODY is saying they CAN'T win without a first round QB.

If you look at NFL history, and especially Chiefs history, there's a CLEARLY ESTABLISHED line of probability.

Get your head out of your ass, homer.

The bottom line is it's OK to sit here and do whatever the **** you want to do in the offseason. I really don't care. Have a ball with 2-gap slapdicks.

Just draft a goddamn QB in the first round. NO ONE can be SO SURE of a rookie class to completely write off ANY QB in the first round this year. Scouting isn't an exact science.

Do whatever the **** you want to do. Trade for Alex Smith and get raped, I don't care. Just spend the 1.1 on a QB you morons. We don't need a LT.

oldandslow 03-13-2013 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9492236)
What's the one thing they haven't won in the last 30 years?

What's the one way they haven't tried to address the QB position?

You just don't ****ing get it. NOBODY is saying they CAN'T win without a first round QB.

If you look at NFL history, and especially Chiefs history, there's a CLEARLY ESTABLISHED line of probability.

Get your head out of your ass, homer.

I get it. You love Geno Smith. Many don't.

Alex Smith, in Reids opinion, will win the Chiefs many more games and give them a larger chance of making the playoffs and thus the SB.

Deal with it or don't - no one cares. But Damn, the whining is just over the top BORING.

Every post from you and Clay is the same thing.

Apocalypse Now. We didn't draft Geno. blah, blah, blah.

Hammock Parties 03-13-2013 07:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldandslow (Post 9492252)
Deal with it or don't - no one cares. But Damn, the whining is just over the top BORING.
.

EVERYTHING with this franchise is boring.

Mike DeVito? BORING.

No deep threat WRs? BORING.

Not scoring? BORING.

Alex Smith? BORING.

If you're not bored by this ****ing franchise you're lying to yourself.

htismaqe 03-13-2013 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldandslow (Post 9492252)
I get it. You love Geno Smith. Many don't.

You're ****ing clueless.

I also like Tyler Wilson, Matt Barkley, and several other QBs, including a couple in next year's draft.

It's funny how you morons equate wanting to draft a QB, because of an overwhelming desire to see the Chiefs win a Super Bowl, as some kind of mindless lemming behavior.

While you simultaneously applaud moves like trading for Alex Smyth, which will all but GUARANTEE the Chiefs won't win a Super Bowl.

But that's not the goal is it? Gotta bring back the Marty years, fill the parking lots, amirite?

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldandslow (Post 9492252)
Alex Smith, in Reids opinion, will win the Chiefs many more games and give them a larger chance of making the playoffs and thus the SB.

Then Andy Reid is an idiot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldandslow (Post 9492252)
Deal with it or don't - no one cares. But Damn, the whining is just over the top BORING.

Every post from you and Clay is the same thing.

Apocolypse Now. We didn't draft Geno. blah, blah, blah.

I've already dealt with it. I'm no longer a Chiefs fan.

I'm just hear to troll you idiots.

Hammock Parties 03-13-2013 07:48 AM

And the great thing is they hedged their shitty Alex Smith bet with Chase Daniel.

I could at least get slightly optimistic, be a little interested, if they had done something AMAZING like drafting a QB in the 2nd (we haven't done that in 20 years, BTW). But they're not even gonna do that.

**** 'em. Win NOW or GTFO.

ChiTown 03-13-2013 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9492259)

I've already dealt with it. I'm no longer a Chiefs fan.

I'm just hear to troll you idiots.

:huh:

oldandslow 03-13-2013 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9492256)
EVERYTHING with this franchise is boring.

Mike DeVito? BORING.

No deep threat WRs? BORING.

Not scoring? BORING.

Alex Smith? BORING.

If you're not bored by this ****ing franchise you're lying to yourself.

Not bored at all. I believe in slow steady progress. I have run my professional life on that mantra for years. Sports franchises that do that are much more stable and successful (Cardinals in baseball and Steelers in football, for example). And have done very well, I might add.

DeVito is a fine signing, as is Fasano. I suspect we will have a deep threat before August. Alex Smith will be a good QB. And he will bring us much closer to the SB than G. Smith will ever take anyone.

Hammock Parties 03-13-2013 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldandslow (Post 9492262)
Sports franchises that do that are much more stable and successful (Cardinals in baseball and Steelers in football, for example). And have done very well, I might add.

The Steelers were a boring-ass three-yards and a cloud-of-dust franchise that didn't win SHIT for YEARS until they drafted a first-round QB.

htismaqe 03-13-2013 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldandslow (Post 9492262)
Not bored at all. I believe in slow steady progress. I have run my professional life on that mantra for years. Sports franchises that do that are much more stable and successful (Cardinals in baseball and Steelers in football, for example). And have done very well, I might add.

DeVito is a fine signing, as is Fasano. I suspect we will have a deep threat before August. Alex Smith will be a good QB. And he will bring us much closer to the SB than G. Smith will ever take anyone.

Comparing the Chiefs to the Steelers is laughable. The Chiefs approach is NOTHING like the Steelers. NOTHING.

Enjoy mediocrity moron. Slow steady progress. ROFL ROFL ROFL

Donger 03-13-2013 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9492260)
I could at least get slightly optimistic, be a little interested, if they had done something AMAZING like drafting a QB in the 2nd.

Do you think that it's a little strange that you wrote that in the past tense?

oldandslow 03-13-2013 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9492259)


I've already dealt with it. I'm no longer a Chiefs fan.

I'm just hear to troll you idiots.

Great. Glad to know what you are.

Hammock Parties 03-13-2013 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9492266)
Do you think that it's a little strange that you wrote that in the past tense?

No, because I can see the future.

We're NOT drafting a QB high this year.

Donger 03-13-2013 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9492268)
No, because I can see the future.

We're NOT drafting a QB high this year.

Seems rather silly to me to get all worked up over something that hasn't taken place yet, and may not.

htismaqe 03-13-2013 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 9492261)
:huh:

Maybe the mods should have dealt with the OBVIOUS trolls when they had the chance, huh?

This type of behavior is obviously condoned here, so might as well make the most of it.

Look, these sheep are just gonna have to deal with it. All I wanted was to see the Chiefs win a Super Bowl. I was patient for 30 years. I'm tired of being treated like wanting your team to win is a CRIME.

It isn't a crime. The true crime is continuing to support a team that respects you SO much, they don't even have to ACT like they're trying to win it all. Just win 10 games, fill the seats, the KC fans eat that shit up with a ****ing shovel.

**** oldandslow, **** Chiefs fans, and **** the Chiefs.

htismaqe 03-13-2013 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldandslow (Post 9492267)
Great. Glad to know what you are.

I already knew what you were, loser.

ptlyon 03-13-2013 07:56 AM

:popcorn:

Hammock Parties 03-13-2013 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 9492272)
Seems rather silly to me to get all worked up over something that hasn't taken place yet, and may not.

I have a brain. It tells me they're not taking a QB high. Not after paying a 6-foot QB $10 million.

ChiTown 03-13-2013 07:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9492274)
Maybe the mods should have dealt with the OBVIOUS trolls when they had the chance, huh?

This type of behavior is obviously condoned here, so might as well make the most of it.

Look, these sheep are just gonna have to deal with it. All I wanted was to see the Chiefs win a Super Bowl. I was patient for 30 years. I'm tired of being treated like wanting your team to win is a CRIME.

It isn't a crime. The true crime is continuing to support a team that respects you SO much, they don't even have to ACT like they're trying to win it all. Just win 10 games, fill the seats, the KC fans eat that shit up with a ****ing shovel.

**** oldandslow, **** Chiefs fans, and **** the Chiefs.

**** you, **** very much!

Donger 03-13-2013 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9492278)
I have a brain. It tells me they're not taking a QB high. Not after paying a 6-foot QB $10 million.

That doesn't change the fact that it hasn't happened yet, and still may not.

Sorry.

oldandslow 03-13-2013 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 9492274)
Maybe the mods should have dealt with the OBVIOUS trolls when they had the chance, huh?

This type of behavior is obviously condoned here, so might as well make the most of it.

Look, these sheep are just gonna have to deal with it. All I wanted was to see the Chiefs win a Super Bowl. I was patient for 30 years. I'm tired of being treated like wanting your team to win is a CRIME.

It isn't a crime. The true crime is continuing to support a team that respects you SO much, they don't even have to ACT like they're trying to win it all. Just win 10 games, fill the seats, the KC fans eat that shit up with a ****ing shovel.

**** oldandslow, **** Chiefs fans, and **** the Chiefs.

You're right. They don't want to win. Thank you for showing me the light. They just want to steal your money. Big bad corporation...Down with the MAN, I say. I think I will go on a message board and post bad things about them and curse their fans. That'll show 'em.

Bootlegged 03-13-2013 08:12 AM

Love me a good temper tantrum. Please continue. And is the GotoHell guy GoChiefs or whatever he used to be called? If so I'm definitely taking football advice from the little fat kid.

htismaqe 03-13-2013 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldandslow (Post 9492298)
You're right. They don't want to win. Thank you for showing me the light. They just want to steal your money. Big bad corporation...Down with the MAN, I say.

ROFL

I didn't expect you to acutally understand the argument but points for creativity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldandslow (Post 9492298)
I think I will go on a message board and post bad things about them and curse their fans. That'll show 'em.

Again, you completely missed the point.

I'm not trying to show the Chiefs anything.

Moron.

duncan_idaho 03-13-2013 08:32 AM

The San Francisco 49ers put the best roster in football around Alex Smith, and he couldn't make it to the Super Bowl.

His grand sum of accomplishments includes a playoff win against an incredibly flawed team with an awful defense and a crap-tastic performance against the Giants in which his crap play was a significant factor in the loss.

Oh, and he also was coached by one of the best coaches in the NFL while doing this (who benched him the first time he got a chance)

Anyone who thinks they can win the Super Bowl with Alex Smith is crazy.

That wouldn't have even been so bad. I get trying to bring in a decent QB for a few years, who isn't the worst guy in the NFL (I'll give you that Alex Grbonossel is at least a 15-22 QB in the NFL).

But the exorbitant price the Chiefs paid for him makes it extremely difficult - and much less likely - the Chiefs will draft someone who actually CAN be a top tier QB, good enough to win playoff games against elite teams and get the Chiefs to the Super Bowl.

We're down to hoping:

1) That Alex Grbonossel magically turns into an elite QB after nearly a decade as a starting QB in the league (Call this the Gannon Gambit)
2) That Chase Daniel blossoms in his chance to start, wins the job, and becomes an elite QB (can't even come up with a case of this to reference... Brunell Bullet?)
3) That the Chiefs turn a draft pick that is, at best, a scratcher ticket (3rd round or later) into a franchise QB (Call this the Brady Bluff)

King_Chief_Fan 03-13-2013 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bootlegged (Post 9492303)
Love me a good temper tantrum. Please continue. And is the GotoHell guy GoChiefs or whatever he used to be called? If so I'm definitely taking football advice from the little fat kid.

:LOL:

Hammock Parties 03-13-2013 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bootlegged (Post 9492303)
Love me a good temper tantrum. Please continue. And is the GotoHell guy GoChiefs or whatever he used to be called? If so I'm definitely taking football advice from the little fat kid.

I'm 31 ****ing years old and I'm rapidly approaching disgruntled crusty old fart Chiefs fan status. Go **** yourself.

King_Chief_Fan 03-13-2013 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Go to Hell (Post 9492373)
I'm 31 ****ing years old and I'm rapidly approaching disgruntled crusty old fart Chiefs fan status. Go **** yourself.

:LOL:

Cmd'r&Chief 03-13-2013 08:57 AM

I sure as shit hope we trade down. If we draft an OT with our once in a life-time #1 pick I'm going drive to Arrowhead Stadium and I'm going to shoot myself

Frazod 03-13-2013 08:58 AM

I'm still happy! PBJ

Fish 03-13-2013 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldandslow (Post 9492262)
Not bored at all. I believe in slow steady progress. I have run my professional life on that mantra for years. Sports franchises that do that are much more stable and successful (Cardinals in baseball and Steelers in football, for example). And have done very well, I might add.

DeVito is a fine signing, as is Fasano. I suspect we will have a deep threat before August. Alex Smith will be a good QB. And he will bring us much closer to the SB than G. Smith will ever take anyone.

You believe in slow steady progress? Why would you not believe in quick immediate progress? Many teams manage that in today's NFL. Why should Chiefs fans be resigned to slow steady progress?

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-13-2013 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9492111)
This franchise has had two playoff berths since 2004. Since then, they've had 4-12, 2-14, 4-12, 7-9 and 2-14 seasons. The fans finally revolted and the organization responded.

For better or worse, I don't think you can ask that same fan base to endure even more losing seasons in an effort to develop a QB from the weakest draft class in recent memory.

That just wasn't going to fly.

"weakest class"? Fallacy. Straw man. Bullshit.
Posted via Mobile Device

Rausch 03-13-2013 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cmd'r&Chief (Post 9492413)
I sure as shit hope we trade down. If we draft an OT with our once in a life-time #1 pick I'm going drive to Arrowhead Stadium and I'm going to shoot myself

I always fell back to my no 2 team (the Steelers) once the playoffs rolled around but **** me if re-Todd isn't over there ****ing $3it up now...:banghead:

Sweet Daddy Hate 03-13-2013 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9492498)
I always fell back to my no 2 team (the Steelers) once the playoffs rolled around but **** me if re-Todd isn't over there ****ing $3it up now...:banghead:

Theres nothing wrong with Haley as coord, especially when you have Mike "The Rock" Tomlin to keep his ass in check.
Posted via Mobile Device

Cmd'r&Chief 03-13-2013 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9492498)
I always fell back to my no 2 team (the Steelers) once the playoffs rolled around but **** me if re-Todd isn't over there ****ing $3it up now...:banghead:

Meh, never been a fan of the Steelers. Re-Todd can f#*k things up over there all he wants.

alnorth 03-13-2013 10:02 AM

Well, thats it. Even if we trade back and get a 2nd-round pick, we will not draft a QB in the first two rounds.

L.A. Chieffan 03-13-2013 10:31 AM

I don't see what the problem is...

DaneMcCloud 03-13-2013 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9492488)
"weakest class"? Fallacy. Straw man. Bullshit.
Posted via Mobile Device

Prove it

ToxSocks 03-13-2013 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9492739)
Prove it

How do you expect him to prove it when they haven't even played a game in the NFL yet? His comment is no more ridiculous than yours.

DaneMcCloud 03-13-2013 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie (Post 9492558)
Theres nothing wrong with Haley as coord, especially when you have Mike "The Rock" Tomlin to keep his ass in check.
Posted via Mobile Device

Bullfickingshit.

Roethlisberger was pissed all last season. Mike Wallace had his YPC cut in half and left. The Steelers went 8-8.

Haley was a failure, just like he was a failure in KC. Art Rooney II is clueless.

DaneMcCloud 03-13-2013 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9492748)
How do you expect him to prove it when they haven't even played a game in the NFL yet? His comment is no more ridiculous than yours.

Well, considering just about everyone that follows the NFL (outside of this forum, of course) believes this is the weakest class in years, I'd say its far less ridiculous.

The mantra in this forum spread by a few people regarding QB's has not only been the most ****ing annoying thing in my 13 years on the 'Planet, there is literally NOTHING to support that position.

DaneMcCloud 03-13-2013 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 9492604)
Well, thats it. Even if we trade back and get a 2nd-round pick, we will not draft a QB in the first two rounds.

It was obvious to anyone that listened to the initial press conference along with interviews with Dorsey, Clark and Reid, that they were not drafting a QB earlymI the draft.

But people didn't want to hear it, made excuses, etc.

It's actually been quite bizarre to witness.

Prison Bitch 03-13-2013 10:40 AM

So back to Chase Daniel. Why did we just give a backup 3M per season? I really want to try and understand this. It's truly mind-boggling that we would do something so.....insane.

DaneMcCloud 03-13-2013 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 9492772)
So back to Chase Daniel. Why did we just give a backup 3M per season? I really want to try and understand this. It's truly mind-boggling that we would do something so.....insane.

Miami paid Matt Moore $4 million per.

jd1020 03-13-2013 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 9492772)
So back to Chase Daniel. Why did we just give a backup 3M per season? I really want to try and understand this. It's truly mind-boggling that we would do something so.....insane.

Probably because Alex Smith is garbage and can be counted on to break something so Daniel is more of a tweener backup/starter.

Hammock Parties 03-13-2013 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9492763)
there is literally NOTHING to support that position.

Sure there is. You're just blind to it.

Barkley, Glennon and Geno compare pretty well to other first round QBs.

I mean when guys like Cam Newton go #1 overall...the bar is set low.

RyFo18 03-13-2013 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prison Bitch (Post 9492772)
So back to Chase Daniel. Why did we just give a backup 3M per season? I really want to try and understand this. It's truly mind-boggling that we would do something so.....insane.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>I think the Chiefs may have arbitraged our asses with the Chase Daniel signing.</p>&mdash; Fantasy Douche (@FantasyDouche) <a href="https://twitter.com/FantasyDouche/status/311879822311821312">March 13, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>They basically signed a guy who probably has as much EV as the top QB in the draft, and didn't give up any draft picks to do it.</p>&mdash; Fantasy Douche (@FantasyDouche) <a href="https://twitter.com/FantasyDouche/status/311880136398090240">March 13, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Prison Bitch 03-13-2013 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9492779)
Miami paid Matt Moore $4 million per.

So you found a team more stupid than us. Great. Now how do we compete with the 30 who are more intelligent?

KCinNY 03-13-2013 10:53 AM

I always saw Daniel as a Koy Detmer-type backup.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.