ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   The logic of drafting OT in the 1st. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=336512)

Chris Meck 02-06-2021 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15531319)
The Chiefs have won plenty of football games since Reid arrived with such run of the mill tackles as Brandon Albert, Donald Stephenson, Jah Reid, Cam Erving, Mike Remmers, Bryan Witzmann and even Yasir Durant.

Reid just schemes around any deficiency.

at some point there will be too many.

And why just allow them to be there anyway, when you can take steps to avoid that deficiency?

Just...forget it. We'll see what happens.

DaneMcCloud 02-06-2021 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15531310)
Dude. Erving was a backup.

I feel like your arguments aren't even honest.

What the **** is this shit?

Fisher tore a core muscle and instead of panicking, they just plugged in Cam Erving. Now, they're plugging in Rankin.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15531310)
Eric Fisher #1 overall. Mitchell Schwartz 2nd round pick, nice fat contract.

Fisher was clearly the best choice in a shitty draft and he obviously didn't like Brandon Albert or he wouldn't have drafted Fisher.

Schwartz was a nice free agent signing but again, as you can see, the Chiefs haven't drafted a starting Right Tackle since Reid arrived in 2013.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15531310)
We were willing to dedicate significant resources to the position at both ends of the line.

And that was a different time, was it not? Alex Smith needed as much protection as possible.

Can you say the same about Mahomes? Clearly not, as he's had 4 starting Right Tackles this season without missing a beat.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15531310)
We'll see what Veach does, but I seriously doubt he does nothing, which is what you're saying.

I didnt' say that the Chiefs will do nothing. I clearly stated that I think they'll take a tackle on Day 2 or Day 3 but that depends on Fisher's availability AND Rankins' performance tomorrow.

There's no reason to waste a Day 1 or Day 2 on a tackle if the Chiefs are good with their current tackles heading into the 2021 season.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15531310)
Anyway, we'll have to agree to disagree.

Yeah, I guess so. You're overreaching when no one knows whether or not Fisher and Schwartz will be available to start the 2021 season and if so, this entire conversation is for naught.

kccrow 02-06-2021 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15530707)
Fisher turned 30 in January 2021.

Considering there are plenty of offensive lineman that play at a high level well into their 30’s, missing a year with an Achilles shouldn’t hamper his career moving forward.

If the Chiefs happen to move on from him, which I highly doubt at this point, he’ll have a bevy of suitors.

https://www.aaos.org/aaosnow/2020/aa...ch/research17/

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf...3011417S000314

I'm just providing these to give you some background that there is absolutely no guarantee Fisher returns at all, much less as the same caliber player.

I'm not a doctor, so I go with the statistics from people that are. An Achilles is the most damning injury in sports today. Everyone heals differently from it given the lack of blood flow.

kccrow 02-06-2021 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15530695)
I still think you guys are overlooking Martinas Rankin, who will start the Super Bowl at LT.

The Chiefs have one more year of cheap control and if he plays well tomorrow, I don’t think there’s any doubt that he’s the 2021 starting left tackle, at least until Fisher is healthy.

It would be nice, for sure. I don't trust him out there but we'll have to see. I have to imagine we'll see more rolling away from that side and some chips to help, but we'll see how much faith Andy puts in him and how well he responds. For the sake of winning a title, I sure hope it works well.

DaneMcCloud 02-06-2021 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 15531458)
https://www.aaos.org/aaosnow/2020/aa...ch/research17/

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf...3011417S000314

I'm just providing these to give you some background that there is absolutely no guarantee Fisher returns at all, much less as the same caliber player.

I'm not a doctor, so I go with the statistics from people that are. An Achilles is the most damning injury in sports today. Everyone heals differently from it given the lack of blood flow.

Thanks for the links. The good thing is that he's not a running back because if that were the case, I'm sure the Chiefs would just move on.

The second link stated that the recovery time is 9 months and that "more players are returning to play after injury and with better post-injury performance as compared to the previous two decades".

So if that's the case, Fisher might be ready by Training Camp but I think it's probably safer to guess that he'll end up on the PUP and return somewhere around Week 9, as long as his recovery goes smoothly.

I feel bad for the guy because he's missing out for a chance to win a second consecutive Super Bowl as an NFL starter. Hopefully, he'll come back and play in a third straight Super Bowl.

DaneMcCloud 02-06-2021 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 15531467)
It would be nice, for sure. I don't trust him out there but we'll have to see. I have to imagine we'll see more rolling away from that side and some chips to help, but we'll see how much faith Andy puts in him and how well he responds. For the sake of winning a title, I sure hope it works well.

I almost want to re-watch the Week 17 Chargers game to get a really good look at his performance in that game.

Almost.

:D

htismaqe 02-06-2021 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15530526)
Walker Little, for example, is a Niang type situation and keeps lasting into the early 3rd. A legit starting LT talent that would be a first rounder other than coming off an injury and a sitting out a covid season. He's a perfect Reid style OT, Stanford doesn't put out dummies, and now healthy would be a great #64 pick.

Eichenberg is not a guard, and is projected as a plug-and-play starter at LT and is always there at #64.

Jalen Mayfield is always there at #32. Radunz is too.

You can argue the mocks are wrong, and they might well be. You can argue with the scouting reports if you want to, but I'll defer to guys who do it for a living.

Niang was probably going to start the season on PUP and they planned on using him as a backup guard to start with. In other words, if Little is a Niang type, he's not starting at LT next year.

Eichenberg projects as a RT. He's strong in the running game but struggles in space.

Jalen Mayfield is always there at 64 and I see him available into the 4th at times. He's just not a top flight prospect.

And Radunz is probably the best LT prospect of that bunch but even he isn't going to be able to start day 1. He's extremely raw.

And these aren't my opinions, these are all opinions I've drawn from scouting reports.

kccrow 02-06-2021 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15531725)
I almost want to re-watch the Week 17 Chargers game to get a really good look at his performance in that game.

Almost.

:D

If I had access to it, I would. I passively watched that game because it was pretty well a throw-away game. I don't recall him being overly impressive, but hey I could be waaaaaay off base there.

Chris Meck 02-07-2021 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15531766)
Niang was probably going to start the season on PUP and they planned on using him as a backup guard to start with. In other words, if Little is a Niang type, he's not starting at LT next year.

Eichenberg projects as a RT. He's strong in the running game but struggles in space.

Jalen Mayfield is always there at 64 and I see him available into the 4th at times. He's just not a top flight prospect.

And Radunz is probably the best LT prospect of that bunch but even he isn't going to be able to start day 1. He's extremely raw.

And these aren't my opinions, these are all opinions I've drawn from scouting reports.

Those are nothing like the scouting reports that I have read on ANY of those guys.

Kiper is mocking Mayfield at #14. He has him ranked as the #3 tackle, and says he'd rank him first but Mayfield has 15 starts. Now, it's Kiper, whatever, but he's NEVER there at #64 in any of the mocks I run or have seen. Late first-early second in every one.

I say Little is a Niang situation meaning that he's a first round talent but drops due to an injury in mid 2019, and covid opted out in 2020. So not in a "we gotta wait a year for him to be healthy" , he's healthy NOW. Nobody's projecting him to play Guard-and Niang was only projected there because you had a healthy Fisher and Schwartz at the time. What they were saying was they thought Niang would be one of their best 5; but I think you know that and are just being difficult.

NFL Draft Network's analysis of Liam Eichenberg says, "NFL ready starting Left Tackle who should find assimilating to the pro game fairly easy"-Crabbs So no, that doesn't sound like a RT or a G.

I get that you REALLY don't want to take an OT early. Like you hate the idea. But you're showing a lot of confirmation bias here. You've even had to take OT in your own mock machine drafts because you've seen that's literally where the value wants to fall.

Stryker 02-07-2021 09:06 PM

Fix the offensive line? That would be ridicules! We lost because of our offensive line - let it go! God damn it!

Chris Meck 02-07-2021 09:14 PM

I take no pleasure in being right.

But anyone who tells me that it's a bad use of resources, or to just keep adding playmakers can eat a dick.

We lost this game because we could not function up front, and got dominated. Even Mahomes needs blocking.

Chris Meck 02-07-2021 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15531109)
I have to disagree. That would be a terrible plan.

The Chiefs can't waste valuable resources with the "hope" that the draftee would be an adequate Left Tackle on a team that's hoping to become a dynasty.

Hell, even Fisher, who was drafted #1 overall, wasn't ready to start at left tackle his rookie season and was nothing short of a disaster at Right Tackle.

Reid greatly prefers experience but since they don't have any cap space, it's most likely going to be someone who's already on the roster.

Dead ****ing wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

Did I mention wrong?

WRONG.

Stryker 02-07-2021 09:16 PM

This is the most embarrassing loss I have ever witnessed as a Chiefs fan. Even more that the kicker who shall be unnamed God damn this hurts. A 25 year old QB with no OL help vs. a ****ing 43 yr old QB who made us look like absolute fools! Yes, WE NEED AN OFFENSIVE LINE - no doubt about it - DRAFT OL FIRST, SECOND, THIRD! This is ridicules!

htismaqe 02-07-2021 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15532356)
I get that you REALLY don't want to take an OT early. Like you hate the idea. But you're showing a lot of confirmation bias here. You've even had to take OT in your own mock machine drafts because you've seen that's literally where the value wants to fall.

Except that I don't.

I don't hate the idea at all.

What I'm against is drafting a tackle in the first regardless of who is there. I want a guy that can actually start on the left side day 1 if I'm taking a tackle that high. If Fisher comes back, then move him to the right, that's fine too.

There's very few guys that fit that bill, though.

Mayfield's lack of experience is concerning. Eichenberg absolutely is better suited for right tackle. Little's history is a red flag. None of those guys jump off the page for any other reason than they are tackles, not because they are top flight prospects.

Now, if we end up at #31 with one of those guys available and a bunch of other prospects with question marks at other positions, like DE, then you have to give the nod to need and take the tackle.

But if a potential blue chipper drops out of the 20's into our lap and we take a 2nd tier tackle, that's just bad drafting.

Hoover 02-07-2021 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15536330)
I take no pleasure in being right.

But anyone who tells me that it's a bad use of resources, or to just keep adding playmakers can eat a dick.

We lost this game because we could not function up front, and got dominated. Even Mahomes needs blocking.

Agree.

I don't want to reach for an LT, but I sure as hell don't ever want to relive this Super Bowl. That was awful.

htismaqe 02-07-2021 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stryker (Post 15536354)
This is the most embarrassing loss I have ever witnessed as a Chiefs fan. Even more that the kicker who shall be unnamed God damn this hurts. A 25 year old QB with no OL help vs. a ****ing 43 yr old QB who made us look like absolute fools! Yes, WE NEED AN OFFENSIVE LINE - no doubt about it - DRAFT OL FIRST, SECOND, THIRD! This is ridicules!

Absolutely DO NOT draft OL in all 3 rounds. That would be the dumbest move ever.

Hoover 02-07-2021 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15537153)
Absolutely DO NOT draft OL in all 3 rounds. That would be the dumbest move ever.

Agree. Plus in 4 years you get so see most of that talent walk.

RunKC 02-07-2021 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15531017)
I actually like Wylie ok

How bout now?

Cosmos 02-07-2021 11:20 PM

Wouldn’t mind having that 3rd round comp the next 2 years for coach Bienemy about now....

Stryker 02-07-2021 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15537153)
Absolutely DO NOT draft OL in all 3 rounds. That would be the dumbest move ever.

Of course not - I am just pissed right now. Forgive me!

htismaqe 02-07-2021 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cosmos (Post 15537255)
Wouldn’t mind having that 3rd round comp the next 2 years for coach Bienemy about now....

EB is not going to be a HC, probably ever.

There's something not right there.

htismaqe 02-07-2021 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stryker (Post 15537283)
Of course not - I am just pissed right now. Forgive me!

Okay, I can forgive that. :D

mkp785 02-08-2021 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15537300)
EB is not going to be a HC, probably ever.

There's something not right there.

Really. What?

RealSNR 02-08-2021 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15537300)
EB is not going to be a HC, probably ever.

There's something not right there.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ripjDCR17XM" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Dull Tools 02-08-2021 10:38 AM

I know feel the opposite of how I did before the game. We should only by drafting OL in the first round. Mahomes was incredible with no protection at all.

Just give him a decent line and it doesn't matter who he throwing to (as long as they can run basic routes.)

O.city 02-09-2021 10:08 AM

Is there a chance Cosmi falls to 31?

Chris Meck 02-09-2021 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15540405)
Is there a chance Cosmi falls to 31?

Sure.

staylor26 02-09-2021 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15540405)
Is there a chance Cosmi falls to 31?

Yea, but it’s rather small.

There’s a small chance that one of Mayfield or Cosmi fall to 31.

But unless they do, I think we’re better off taking somebody like Little or Hudson on day 2.

O.city 02-09-2021 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15540458)
Yea, but it’s rather small.

There’s a small chance that one of Mayfield or Cosmi fall to 31.

But unless they do, I think we’re better off taking somebody like Little or Hudson on day 2.

I like it.

If I could have Cosmi and Niang at my tackle spots going forward, that could solidify it for a while. I like it.

staylor26 02-09-2021 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15540476)
I like it.

If I could have Cosmi and Niang at my tackle spots going forward, that could solidify it for a while. I like it.

The problem is, when you look at who’s drafting ahead of us, there’s a few picks where a run on OT’s could/should occur.

The Redskins, Bears, and Colts all need a T and are picking back to back to back in the early 20’s. Then there are some teams like the Steelers and Bills who could also be taking a T.

Ultimately, that’s where I think those guys go.

I still think WR or DE is where the value will be at in round 1.

O.city 02-09-2021 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15540488)
The problem is, when you look at who’s drafting ahead of us, there’s a few picks where a run on OT’s could/should occur.

The Redskins, Bears, and Colts all need a T and are picking back to back to back in the early 20’s. Then there are some teams like the Steelers and Bills who could also be taking a T.

Ultimately, that’s where I think those guys go.

I still think WR or DE is where the value will be at in round 1.

Yeah, thats true.

I wouldn't be upset at looking around and trading a pick for an established LT. Not necessarily a high pick, but wiht the cap issues, if we can get it under control we could make a move of someone looking to move on.

In58men 02-09-2021 10:59 AM

Hearing multiple teams interested in Ravens Pro Bowl OT Orlando Brown, who has permission to seek a trade. Based on level of interest, good chance a trade that makes sense for all parties comes together. Brown has strong relationship w/Ravens, who would want value for him.

staylor26 02-09-2021 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15540502)
Yeah, thats true.

I wouldn't be upset at looking around and trading a pick for an established LT. Not necessarily a high pick, but wiht the cap issues, if we can get it under control we could make a move of someone looking to move on.

Yea I think that’s something they will consider as opposed to having Niang and another rookie.

But I agree it would be awesome to have Cosmi and Niang.

I think there are 4 day 2 T’s that are good fits though.

Dillon Radunz, North Dakota St.- Looked very good at the Senior Bowl and surprised people in comparison to his 2019 tape. Would likely require a trade up, but it’s possibly he makes it to 63.

Walker Little, Stanford- 1st round caliber prospect that had a injury in 2019 and opted out of 2020. Would be a perfect fit scheme wise.

James Hudson, Cincinnati- Still learning to play T after moving over from DT, but this guy has great athleticism and movement skills for the position.

D’Ante Smith, East Carolina- Another guy that shocked people at the Senior Bowl. He was dominant in 1 on 1 drills.

The Franchise 02-09-2021 11:09 AM

I just wish I knew what their plan was for Niang. Is he a guard? Is he the future RT? LT?

And what **** are we doing with Rankin?

duncan_idaho 02-09-2021 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15540535)
Yea I think that’s something they will consider as opposed to having Niang and another rookie.

But I agree it would be awesome to have Cosmi and Niang.

I think there are 4 day 2 T’s that are good fits though.

Dillon Radunz, North Dakota St.- Looked very good at the Senior Bowl and surprised people in comparison to his 2019 tape. Would likely require a trade up, but it’s possibly he makes it to 63.

Walker Little, Stanford- 1st round caliber prospect that had a injury in 2019 and opted out of 2020. Would be a perfect fit scheme wise.

James Hudson, Cincinnati- Still learning to play T after moving over from DT, but this guy has great athleticism and movement skills for the position.

D’Ante Smith, East Carolina- Another guy that shocked people at the Senior Bowl. He was dominant in 1 on 1 drills.


Adrian Ealy is also a good developmental fit. Needs a year or two but has the tools to be a high-level guy.

staylor26 02-09-2021 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15540550)
I just wish I knew what their plan was for Niang. Is he a guard? Is he the future RT? LT?

And what **** are we doing with Rankin?

Yea, there are just so many question marks on the OL.

On top of where do they see Niang playing:

When will Fisher be back? Is he still in their long term plans?

Is Schwartz going to retire?

Do they even want LDT back?

Are they going to let Reiter walk like we expect?

Do they see Allegretti as the future starter at C? If not, do they just pencil him in at LG again?

It’s way too early to have any idea what is going to happen to the OL.

In58men 02-09-2021 11:19 AM

I bet Kilgore and Stefan both retire.

O.city 02-09-2021 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 15540533)
Hearing multiple teams interested in Ravens Pro Bowl OT Orlando Brown, who has permission to seek a trade. Based on level of interest, good chance a trade that makes sense for all parties comes together. Brown has strong relationship w/Ravens, who would want value for him.

Would it take a 3rd to get it done?

The Franchise 02-09-2021 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15540688)
Would it take a 3rd to get it done?

Doubtful. He’s 25 and better than average.

Sassy Squatch 02-09-2021 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15540688)
Would it take a 3rd to get it done?

Lol no. They'll want a first.

htismaqe 02-09-2021 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15540405)
Is there a chance Cosmi falls to 31?

No. Maybe 1 in a 1000. He's a top 15 prospect right now so unless one of the other guys moves up past him, he's not getting to 31. Most places have him going to the Chargers at 13.

htismaqe 02-09-2021 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15540550)
I just wish I knew what their plan was for Niang. Is he a guard? Is he the future RT? LT?

And what **** are we doing with Rankin?

Right now, all we have to go on is that Veach said Niang was going to be a guard to start with. Who knows now.

O.city 02-09-2021 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15540695)
Doubtful. He’s 25 and better than average.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15540697)
Lol no. They'll want a first.

No way. I’d guess a 2nd maybe

But he’ll if you feel like he’s a legit long term LT (or rt) send them 31

The Franchise 02-09-2021 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15540721)
No way. I’d guess a 2nd maybe

But he’ll if you feel like he’s a legit long term LT (or rt) send them 31

If it takes a 2nd....then I’m doing that in a heartbeat. But there are 29 other teams who have a higher pick in the 2nd round that could make that deal.

htismaqe 02-09-2021 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15540721)
No way. I’d guess a 2nd maybe

But he’ll if you feel like he’s a legit long term LT (or rt) send them 31

They're going to want a 1st. Bank on it.

If Jamaal Adams is worth two 1sts, a starting LT of his quality is worth at least one.

In58men 02-09-2021 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15540688)
Would it take a 3rd to get it done?

24 yrs old, 2x pro-bowler.

I’d say 1st round pick and a starting caliber player.

O.city 02-09-2021 12:31 PM

Iirc he needs a new contract too?

O.city 02-09-2021 12:31 PM

If Schwartz is done, you could have brown play rt once Fisher comes back

The Franchise 02-09-2021 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15540764)
If Schwartz is done, you could have brown play rt once Fisher comes back

Pretty sure he wants out of Baltimore because he wants to be a LT.

In58men 02-09-2021 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15540763)
Iirc he needs a new contract too?

This is true

O.city 02-09-2021 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15540770)
Pretty sure he wants out of Baltimore because he wants to be a LT.

That’s fine

Pay him well and he won’t care I’d guess

duncan_idaho 02-09-2021 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15540816)
That’s fine

Pay him well and he won’t care I’d guess


He wants the deal they gave Ronnie Stanley.

Chris Meck 02-09-2021 03:40 PM

yeah not gonna happen.

RunKC 02-14-2021 01:47 PM

If we’re looking for a 3rd rd gem I highly recommend D’Ante Smith. He can play anywhere but C and looks athletic as all hell.

Here’s some footage:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">D&#39;Ante Smith is another player who has had a strong week. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ECU?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ECU</a> <a href="https://t.co/WP4SihL7Nx">pic.twitter.com/WP4SihL7Nx</a></p>&mdash; Billy M (@BillyM_91) <a href="https://twitter.com/BillyM_91/status/1354814191421407238?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 28, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Now D&#39;Ante shows what he can do at RT <a href="https://t.co/NcL7z4Elft">pic.twitter.com/NcL7z4Elft</a></p>&mdash; Billy M (@BillyM_91) <a href="https://twitter.com/BillyM_91/status/1354815218820374533?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 28, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">To the echo of the whistle! D’Ante Smith (#67) plays with a nasty temperament. Most of his experience is at left tackle, some teams may value that type of disposition inside. <a href="https://t.co/iDDHqfuXsI">pic.twitter.com/iDDHqfuXsI</a></p>&mdash; Ryan Roberts (@RiseNDraft) <a href="https://twitter.com/RiseNDraft/status/1343385518164357120?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 28, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

kccrow 02-14-2021 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15550139)
If we’re looking for a 3rd rd gem I highly recommend D’Ante Smith. He can play anywhere but C and looks athletic as all hell.

Here’s some footage:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">D&#39;Ante Smith is another player who has had a strong week. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ECU?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ECU</a> <a href="https://t.co/WP4SihL7Nx">pic.twitter.com/WP4SihL7Nx</a></p>&mdash; Billy M (@BillyM_91) <a href="https://twitter.com/BillyM_91/status/1354814191421407238?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 28, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Now D&#39;Ante shows what he can do at RT <a href="https://t.co/NcL7z4Elft">pic.twitter.com/NcL7z4Elft</a></p>&mdash; Billy M (@BillyM_91) <a href="https://twitter.com/BillyM_91/status/1354815218820374533?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 28, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">To the echo of the whistle! D’Ante Smith (#67) plays with a nasty temperament. Most of his experience is at left tackle, some teams may value that type of disposition inside. <a href="https://t.co/iDDHqfuXsI">pic.twitter.com/iDDHqfuXsI</a></p>&mdash; Ryan Roberts (@RiseNDraft) <a href="https://twitter.com/RiseNDraft/status/1343385518164357120?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 28, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Reminds me a ton of Matt Peart from last year who ended up going 99th. Same guy, light in the pants but ultra-athletic and pops on tape. I think you'd have to spend a year bulking him up to move him inside unless he could end up handling center, otherwise you're probably looking at leaving him at LT. Interesting guy though.

staylor26 02-14-2021 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15550139)
If we’re looking for a 3rd rd gem I highly recommend D’Ante Smith. He can play anywhere but C and looks athletic as all hell.

Here’s some footage:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">D&#39;Ante Smith is another player who has had a strong week. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ECU?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ECU</a> <a href="https://t.co/WP4SihL7Nx">pic.twitter.com/WP4SihL7Nx</a></p>&mdash; Billy M (@BillyM_91) <a href="https://twitter.com/BillyM_91/status/1354814191421407238?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 28, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Now D&#39;Ante shows what he can do at RT <a href="https://t.co/NcL7z4Elft">pic.twitter.com/NcL7z4Elft</a></p>&mdash; Billy M (@BillyM_91) <a href="https://twitter.com/BillyM_91/status/1354815218820374533?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 28, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">To the echo of the whistle! D’Ante Smith (#67) plays with a nasty temperament. Most of his experience is at left tackle, some teams may value that type of disposition inside. <a href="https://t.co/iDDHqfuXsI">pic.twitter.com/iDDHqfuXsI</a></p>&mdash; Ryan Roberts (@RiseNDraft) <a href="https://twitter.com/RiseNDraft/status/1343385518164357120?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 28, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I’ve been on the Smith bandwagon ever since I saw him during Senior Bowl week.

He’s going to be a great late day 2 to early day 2 value.

Dull Tools 02-15-2021 08:19 AM

I am currently thinking I would prefer an edge rusher in round 1 and then an OT in round 2 and WR in Round 3.

Think the field is deep for WR and OT but not so for edge rushers.

Chris Meck 02-15-2021 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dull Tools (Post 15550631)
I am currently thinking I would prefer an edge rusher in round 1 and then an OT in round 2 and WR in Round 3.

Think the field is deep for WR and OT but not so for edge rushers.

this is exactly what I have found.

RunKC 02-15-2021 04:43 PM

Gonna have to ask htismaqe about the Iowa kid Alaric Jackson. He seems like an excellent G prospect who has played extensive time at Tackle.

Seems like an ideal mid rd option

htismaqe 02-15-2021 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 15551439)
Gonna have to ask htismaqe about the Iowa kid Alaric Jackson. He seems like an excellent G prospect who has played extensive time at Tackle.

Seems like an ideal mid rd option

Probably a little later than mid-round. He was inconsistent at tackle but could definitely play inside in the NFL. I think he'll likely be a 5th round pick at this point.

Hoover 02-15-2021 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15551623)
Probably a little later than mid-round. He was inconsistent at tackle but could definitely play inside in the NFL. I think he'll likely be a 5th round pick at this point.

Yes. Nice prospect if you can get him at the right price. I think he might be able to play RT in the NFL, but he's a little raw. I don't think he's ever played inside at Iowa.

htismaqe 02-15-2021 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 15551700)
Yes. Nice prospect if you can get him at the right price. I think he might be able to play RT in the NFL, but he's a little raw. I don't think he's ever played inside at Iowa.

He hasn't but he doesn't really have the length to play outside. He's a "box" guy so he would likely operate better inside with guys to either side of him.

Chris Meck 02-16-2021 11:19 AM

Man, one thing is for sure:

There is no consensus this year on anyone outside the top maybe 20 guys. Everyone else's boards are all over the place. Some mocks have guys going late first/early second and other mocks have them as fourth rounders. I mean it's really all over the place.

I don't expect that to change, honestly. It's going to come down to scouting and scheme fits because there won't be the work-out warrior thing as guys shoot up due to the combine.

htismaqe 02-16-2021 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15552248)
Man, one thing is for sure:

There is no consensus this year on anyone outside the top maybe 20 guys. Everyone else's boards are all over the place. Some mocks have guys going late first/early second and other mocks have them as fourth rounders. I mean it's really all over the place.

I don't expect that to change, honestly. It's going to come down to scouting and scheme fits because there won't be the work-out warrior thing as guys shoot up due to the combine.

Yeah, there's some weird takes out there for sure.

I saw a Zeirlein (I think it was) mock where he had 6 ILB going in the 1st round.

Chris Meck 02-16-2021 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15552250)
Yeah, there's some weird takes out there for sure.

I saw a Zeirlein (I think it was) mock where he had 6 ILB going in the 1st round.

It's weird, but I have to think it will favor stable organizations. We should have a good draft.

htismaqe 02-16-2021 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15552267)
It's weird, but I have to think it will favor stable organizations. We should have a good draft.

I agree. It sure seemed to be okay last year for us.

Hoover 02-16-2021 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15552248)
Man, one thing is for sure:

There is no consensus this year on anyone outside the top maybe 20 guys. Everyone else's boards are all over the place. Some mocks have guys going late first/early second and other mocks have them as fourth rounders. I mean it's really all over the place.

I don't expect that to change, honestly. It's going to come down to scouting and scheme fits because there won't be the work-out warrior thing as guys shoot up due to the combine.

Thats actually great news, plus with no combine... Advantage Veach!

The Franchise 02-16-2021 03:16 PM

So maybe not in the first but what about James Hudson out of Cincy?

Converted from d line to LT and in 2 years he gave up 0 sacks and only 6 pressures.

DaneMcCloud 02-16-2021 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 15536344)
Dead ****ing wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

Did I mention wrong?

WRONG.

:rolleyes:

Yeah, I sure hope the Chiefs draft a tackle in every round! That'll fix all of their issues!

DaneMcCloud 02-16-2021 03:54 PM

The Combine isn't happening this year in Indy so the draft will be even more risky than in past years.

And to be quite honest, I don't think there's a tackle at #31 in this draft that can start in Week 1, whether it's Left or Right, so if Fisher and Schwartz are both out for the year, the Chiefs will need to sign guys in free agency.

staylor26 02-16-2021 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 15552689)
So maybe not in the first but what about James Hudson out of Cincy?

Converted from d line to LT and in 2 years he gave up 0 sacks and only 6 pressures.

James Hudson and D’Ante Smith are my guys in the 3rd. Walker Little if we want to see if he slides into the 3rd and trade up too.

There’s value at OT in rounds 2-3, no need to reach for one in the 1st.

Stryker 02-16-2021 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15552934)
James Hudson and D’Ante Smith are my guys in the 3rd. Walker Little if we want to see if he slides into the 3rd and trade up too.

There’s value at OT in rounds 2-3, no need to reach for one in the 1st.

Didn't read all of the previous posts but if that is the case then who do you like in the first? Or do you trade down to gain more picks? Do you trade our 1st for a player on another team? Just curious of your thoughts.

htismaqe 02-16-2021 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stryker (Post 15552942)
Didn't read all of the previous posts but if that is the case then who do you like in the first? Or do you trade down to gain more picks? Do you trade our 1st for a player on another team? Just curious of your thoughts.

It depends on the board but there should be value at both DE and WR at #31, in addition to OT. If things fall right, trading down would be a good option.

Stryker 02-16-2021 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15552957)
It depends on the board but there should be value at both DE and WR at #31, in addition to OT. If things fall right, trading down would be a good option.

Thanks just wanted to follow along and get feedbacks. Another crazy year!

DaneMcCloud 02-16-2021 07:28 PM

I've rarely been critical Chiefs since Reid took over in 2013, other than some questionable contracts and draftees by John Dorsey, but I have to say, I am very disappointed by the fact that the Chiefs haven't directly addressed the timetable for Schwartz and Fisher's recovery/return.

The season is over, both men ended last season on IR and they don't need to play any games with the roster.

They've had plenty of time to appraise the fans of their injury status, so what's the holdup?

mkp785 02-16-2021 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 15552957)
It depends on the board but there should be value at both DE and WR at #31, in addition to OT. If things fall right, trading down would be a good option.

Trade down would be great if some team wants to move up for Trask or Jones- provided they don't go earlier. I was thinking Carolina might do it but who knows now with Watson rumors.

Stryker 02-16-2021 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15552999)
I've rarely been critical Chiefs since Reid took over in 2013, other than some questionable contracts and draftees by John Dorsey, but I have to say, I am very disappointed by the fact that the Chiefs haven't directly addressed the timetable for Schwartz and Fisher's recovery/return.

The season is over, both men ended last season on IR and they don't need to play any games with the roster.

They've had plenty of time to appraise the fans of their injury status, so what's the holdup?

Great question and this needs to be addressed sooner than later. We, as fans, would like to know what's what - like NOW!

Stryker 02-16-2021 08:32 PM

Last thought on this currently is:

What will the salary cap be in the end?
Who gets cut and what does the roster look like after said cuts
How can we restructure the remaining
What do we do in FA
Who is there @ #31
What do we do with that pick? Do you move up to try and get Azeez Ojulari · Edge rusher or Teven Jenkins · OT or take Landon Dickerson · C ( Azeez Ojulari is my choice of the 3 here)
I believe in Veach so far so I think he knows what he is up against and how to handle it efficiently

Just my .02

On to the 21 season!

In58men 02-17-2021 06:53 AM

I say we go hella heavy on OL, like 2 in the first 3 rounds.

Go DE in the 3rd round and maybe go somebody like Amari Rodgers in the 4th.


Mahomes made Albert Wilson look decent, he could do the same if not more with a guy like Rodgers. I’m down.

Hoover 02-17-2021 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 15553249)
I say we go hella heavy on OL, like 2 in the first 3 rounds.

Go DE in the 3rd round and maybe go somebody like Amari Rodgers in the 4th.


Mahomes made Albert Wilson look decent, he could do the same if not more with a guy like Rodgers. I’m down.

If you want anything other than a project at DE, you need to grab one in the first round.

I think this really sets up for a Chiefs trade down if they are going to use early picks on offensive linemen.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.