ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs JuJu to Kansas City (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=343028)

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200546)
Hey, there's no need to be nasty.

Remember what happened to eDave.

I’ve actually TRIED to get banned twice and it didn’t take.

I’m pretty sure I could fix Daface’s moms shit at this point and maybe just get a thread ban for it…

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 05:45 PM

Can't wait for the "yeah, but" folks when JuJu goes off for 100 and 2 tuddys in the opener.

KING OF THE JUJUS!

ToxSocks 03-18-2022 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PattyFlakes (Post 16200550)
Well no Jag that we’ve thrown at it has accomplished that. Not even the almighty Pringle. So I’d say it makes sense to get a young guy with a few good seasons under his belt to give it a shot at a pretty decent price.

Considering we were WR by committee last season....and Pringle still managed nearly 600 yards...

Shit, he didn't even get consistent reps till halfway through the season after the Hardman experiment ended. And even then, Gordon started eating some of his snaps too.

So yeah, it shouldn't be that hard.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16200555)
I mean, Hardman damn near hit those numbers last year and he was in the doghouse half the season...

Trying to hammer the Hardman square peg into the X receiver round hole is all that prevented Pringle from putting up 800 yards out of that spot.

Defensible attempt, don’t get me wrong. That’s just the reality of things.

The Franchise 03-18-2022 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200558)
I’ve actually TRIED to get banned twice and it didn’t take.

I’m pretty sure I could fix Daface’s moms shit at this point and maybe just get a thread ban for it…

One of those was because of me.

ToxSocks 03-18-2022 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200565)
Trying to hammer the Hardman square peg into the X receiver round hole is all that prevented Pringle from putting up 800 yards out of that spot.

Defensible attempt, don’t get me wrong. That’s just the reality of things.

yup.

RunKC 03-18-2022 05:49 PM

JAG’s don’t have 1,400 yrs seasons. They also don’t have 9 TD years as well. Good ****ing God

ToxSocks 03-18-2022 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200565)
Trying to hammer the Hardman square peg into the X receiver round hole is all that prevented Pringle from putting up 800 yards out of that spot.

Defensible attempt, don’t get me wrong. That’s just the reality of things.

Just looked. Yup, Hardman had 700 yards last season.

Which is about my projection for JuJu, who will be replace Robinson/Pringle's production.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16200566)
One of those was because of me.

Yup.

The other was a valiant effort over in DC but to no avail.

Sometimes you’re just too damn valuable to send to the bench.

I might just be Ray Lewis…

RealSNR 03-18-2022 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16200573)
JAG’s don’t have 1,400 yrs seasons. They also don’t have 9 TD years as well. Good ****ing God

Have you ever heard the tale of Derrick Alexander's 2000 season?

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16200573)
JAG’s don’t have 1,400 yrs seasons. They also don’t have 9 TD years as well. Good ****ing God

I’ve got Derrick Alexander on Line 2…

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16200577)
Have you ever heard the tale of Derrick Alexander's 2000 season?

Oh **** off!!!

Stupid phone posting.

PattyFlakes 03-18-2022 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200563)
Considering we were WR by committee last season....and Pringle still managed nearly 600 yards...

Shit, he didn't even get consistent reps till halfway through the season after the Hardman experiment ended. And even then, Gordon started eating some of his snaps too.

So yeah, it shouldn't be that hard.

But it has been that hard, because nobody has done it. Watkins, Pringle, Robinson, etc.. None of them have put those numbers up, it’s why Veach keeps trying to address the position. So once again, I don’t get the bitching from some about bringing in a young guy with some pedigree on a 1 year prove it deal.

Bump 03-18-2022 05:53 PM

it's absurd to complain about a 1 year deal when we needed another WR and has potential to be a really solid #2 and he probably will ball out because he will want a contract the year after...hardly any risk involved here. Great signing.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200574)
Just looked. Yup, Hardman had 700 yards last season.

There is a vast difference in the way he got most of those yards and the way JuJu will get his.

On third and seven, Hardman is almost useless.

On third and goal from outside the 5, you don't want him on the field.

JuJu EXCELS in those situations.

Having JuJu drawing the opposition's #2 corner on every play is going to make Hardman's touches go way down, but his per-play averages go way up.

JuJu's non-explosive ass is going to open up this entire offense.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16200577)
Have you ever heard the tale of Derrick Alexander's 2000 season?

This is stupid. Derrick was a damn good receiver before he got to KC, and was damn fine when he was here, despite the mongoloid offenses he played in.

Stupid, stupid post.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 16200577)
Have you ever heard the tale of Derrick Alexander's 2000 season?

May I offer a Eddie Kennison’s 1100 yards and 8 scores in 14 games as an alternative?

OnTheWarpath15 03-18-2022 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PattyFlakes (Post 16200582)
But it has been that hard, because nobody has done it. Watkins, Pringle, Robinson, etc.. None of them have put those numbers up, it’s why Veach keeps trying to address the position. So once again, I don’t get the bitching from some about bringing in a young guy with some pedigree on a 1 year prove it deal.

Wait, what?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16200532)
I think i've compromised just fine.

Like i said, 30-40 yards a game. 700 yard season.

Of course that assumes he stays healthy. Is that not giving enough credit?

And yes, i do think any JAG off the street can do that in this offense.

You've literally been given one example to hit that mark last year and another that came within 100 yards.

-King- 03-18-2022 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PattyFlakes (Post 16200582)
But it has been that hard, because nobody has done it. Watkins, Pringle, Robinson, etc.. None of them have put those numbers up, it’s why Veach keeps trying to address the position. So once again, I don’t get the bitching from some about bringing in a young guy with some pedigree on a 1 year prove it deal.

Because the thing is, if it's successful, we'll be back in this situation next year except he'll be more expensive and we might still have Tyreek deal to deal with.

I like signing him, just wish it wasn't 1 year. Cause next year will make year 3(or 4 depending on your perspective) that we're looking for a WR2.

RealSNR 03-18-2022 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200580)
Oh **** off!!!

Stupid phone posting.

Are you just copying all of my great ideas and passing them off as your own? Seriously, my post is the one RIGHT BEFORE yours! You're not fooling anybody with this tactic, man. Gonna have to do your own homework if you want to look smart!

OnTheWarpath15 03-18-2022 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200590)
May I offer a Eddie Kennison’s 1100 yards and 8 scores in 14 games as an alternative?

:popcorn:

staylor26 03-18-2022 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16200592)
Because the thing is, if it's successful, we'll be back in this situation next year except he'll be more expensive and we might still have Tyreek deal to deal with.

I like signing him, just wish it wasn't 1 year. Cause next year will make year 3(or 4 depending on your perspective) that we're looking for a WR2.

That’s exactly why he will be paired with a rookie WR.

Of course it would be ideal to have JuJu under contract for 2-3 years, but that clearly wasn’t an option.

You just want to bitch.

Sassy Squatch 03-18-2022 06:00 PM

Ask Burfict how explosive JuJu is.

RunKC 03-18-2022 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200579)
I’ve got Derrick Alexander on Line 2…

I’d take a young Alexander over Pringle and Robinson every time.

Idk what is so confusing here? He’s the 3rd receiver at best. Probably splitting targets with Hardman at times.

He’s a solid possession receiver who is young and has potential to break out as proven before. Nobody is expecting the guy to be a number 1 caliber receiver

RealSNR 03-18-2022 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16200598)
I’d take a young Alexander over Pringle and Robinson every time.

Idk what is so confusing here? He’s the 3rd receiver at best. Probably splitting targets with Hardman at times.

He’s a solid possession receiver who is young and has potential to break out as proven before. Nobody is expecting the guy to be a number 1 caliber receiver

**** OFF I THOUGHT OF DERRICK ALEXANDER FIRST, ASSHOLE!!!!!

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 06:02 PM

Now we're shitting on Kennison?

What the ****.

In those days, a JAG was a dude like Lake Dawson.

Eddie Kennison had seven seasons of at least 800 yards playing on some of the most shit****ed offensive teams.

If we're comparing JuJu to Derrick and Eddie, we're going to do damned fine with him. Those guys were quality ****ing starters once they got into good situations.

Byron Pringle my ass...

-King- 03-18-2022 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16200595)
That’s exactly why he will be paired with a rookie WR.

Of course it would be ideal to have JuJu under contract for 2-3 years, but that clearly wasn’t an option.

You just want to bitch.

LMAO

I love how you're the police of people talking about deals in the moment. So now I have to assume that he'll be paired with a rookie WR even though it hasn't happened yet? And we just have to live in this reality you've created for us dumb chiefs fans?

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200587)
There is a vast difference in the way he got most of those yards and the way JuJu will get his.

On third and seven, Hardman is almost useless.

On third and goal from outside the 5, you don't want him on the field.

JuJu EXCELS in those situations.

Having JuJu drawing the opposition's #2 corner on every play is going to make Hardman's touches go way down, but his per-play averages go way up.

JuJu's non-explosive ass is going to open up this entire offense.

On third/4th down and 7 or greater, Mecole Hardman has been targeted 21 times for 13 receptions yielding 10 1st downs.

Good for a catch rate of 62% and a first down rate of 48%

In the same scenario SS has been targeted 68 times for 42 receptions and 28 1st downs. Good for a catch rate of 62% and a first down rate of 41%.

Try again. And next time maybe look it up first.

staylor26 03-18-2022 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16200605)
LMAO

I love how you're the police of people talking about deals in the moment. So now I have to assume that he'll be paired with a rookie WR even though it hasn't happened yet? And we just have to live in this reality you've created for us dumb chiefs fans?

It’s common ****ing sense. Hardman and JuJu are both set to be free agents next year, and they’re about to pay Tyreek top dollar. They have 4 picks in the top 100ish.

Of course they’re going to draft a WR.

PattyFlakes 03-18-2022 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200587)
There is a vast difference in the way he got most of those yards and the way JuJu will get his.

On third and seven, Hardman is almost useless.

On third and goal from outside the 5, you don't want him on the field.

JuJu EXCELS in those situations.

Having JuJu drawing the opposition's #2 corner on every play is going to make Hardman's touches go way down, but his per-play averages go way up.

JuJu's non-explosive ass is going to open up this entire offense.

Yip.

BossChief 03-18-2022 06:08 PM

For all intents and purposes, this was a perfect signing.

I’d still love to grab Cordarelle Patterson before the draft and then draft a WR in the first 2 rounds.

We do that and anything opposing defenses in the AFCW do will be wasted and this offense will be nearly impossible to stop.

Even when we have injuries.

Titty Meat 03-18-2022 06:08 PM

I'm sitting on some ether here folks.

In our Sandbox league I got DJ to trade me his 2nd rounder where I was able to select Jalen Ramsey. Guess who he took with his pick? JUJU SCHUSTER

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200606)
On third/4th down and 7 or greater, Mecole Hardman has been targeted 21 times for 13 receptions yielding 10 1st downs.

Good for a catch rate of 62% and a first down rate of 48%

In the same scenario SS has been targeted 68 times for 42 receptions and 28 1st downs. Good for a catch rate of 62% and a first down rate of 41%.

Try again. And next time maybe look it up first.

Now here's a prime example of twisting the stats to suit your narrative...

You're telling me the Chiefs don't even ****ing throw him the ball in that situation. ROFL

-King- 03-18-2022 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16200609)
It’s common ****ing sense. Hardman and JuJu are both set to be free agents next year, and they’re about to pay Tyreek top dollar. They have 4 picks in the top 100ish.

Of course they’re going to draft a WR.

Any other future moves we should be aware of before we talk about the moves made today?

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PattyFlakes (Post 16200610)
Yip.

Nope.

staylor26 03-18-2022 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16200615)
Any other future moves we should be aware of before we talk about the moves made today?

Yea, they’ll draft an EDGE too. You’re welcome.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200616)
Nope.

60 catches, 900 yards, 6 TD

He's going to have a damn good season.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16200612)
I'm sitting on some ether here folks.

In our Sandbox league I got DJ to trade me his 2nd rounder where I was able to select Jalen Ramsey. Guess who he took with his pick? JUJU SCHUSTER

It was 4 years ago!!

And what else did I do? Traded him 2 years ago and kept such luminaries as Leviska Shenault because I think Shenault will be a better player.

Oh sir, you have backed a bad horse here. My Sandbox actions perfectly mirror my thoughts on SS (and he’ll, Shenault as well for that matter).

PattyFlakes 03-18-2022 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200613)
Now here's a prime example of twisting the stats to suit your narrative...

You're telling me the Chiefs don't even ****ing throw him the ball in that situation. ROFL

Absolutely terrible comparison. Hardman barely sees the ball on 3rd down based on those numbers.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200613)
Now here's a prime example of twisting the stats to suit your narrative...

You're telling me the Chiefs don't even ****ing throw him the ball in that situation. ROFL

Want me to bring out the respective offensive snaps for each player and the ratios?

Because you’re not winning this one. You made a poor argument and you should probably just pretend it never happened.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200623)
Want me to bring out the respective offensive snaps for each player and the ratios?

Nope.

I'd say you proved my point just fine.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200624)
Nope.

I'd say you proved my point just fine.

Probably wise.

Titty Meat 03-18-2022 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200620)
It was 4 years ago!!

And what else did I do? Traded him 2 years ago and kept such luminaries as Leviska Shenault because I think Shenault will be a better player.

Oh sir, you have backed a bad horse here. My Sandbox actions perfectly mirror my thoughts on SS (and he’ll, Shenault as well for that matter).

You tried to trade him to me and I said NO!

In all seriousness I think he could have SOME value when teams like decide to drop into zone against us. It wouldn't surprise me if he grabs 5+ red zone touchdowns. I think this is what the Chiefs hoped they could get from Gordon

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16200626)
You tried to trade him to me and I said NO!

In all seriousness I think he could have SOME value when teams like decide to drop into zone against us. It wouldn't surprise me if he grabs 5+ red zone touchdowns. I think this is what the Chiefs hoped they could get from Gordon

I tried to trade him to damn near anyone. Got him moved and he promptly cratered.

Because…yknow…he ain’t that good.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200625)
Probably wise.

https://i.imgur.com/0F1rtT0.png

dirk digler 03-18-2022 06:19 PM

Reading through this thread on r/nfl I was surprised how complimentary Steeler fans were to JuJu. Blaming most of the offensive issues on Ben.

https://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/comment...ing_a_oneyear/

Quote:

He's a 3rd and short clutch machine.

Yep juju was basically our only Rb/Wr/ Te who could catch the football in 2020 so he kinda got pushed into a possession role, excited to see what he can do in KC
Quote:

He's not a legit WR1. But he's about as good a #2 you could ask for. Ultimately safety blanket that also makes the occasional big play. Tough. Won't quit on the team.

Titty Meat 03-18-2022 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200627)
I tried to trade him to damn near anyone. Got him moved and he promptly cratered.

Because…yknow…he ain’t that good.

I agree with you regarding his skill level but there will be certain situations where he will add some value that we didn't have last year. Again not the route I would have gone but the contract to me isn't as egregious as Clarks

The Franchise 03-18-2022 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200620)
It was 4 years ago!!

And what else did I do? Traded him 2 years ago and kept such luminaries as Leviska Shenault because I think Shenault will be a better player.

Oh sir, you have backed a bad horse here. My Sandbox actions perfectly mirror my thoughts on SS (and he’ll, Shenault as well for that matter).

And since you brought him up....I'd still trade for Shenault.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16200637)
I agree with you regarding his skill level but there will be certain situations where he will add some value that we didn't have last year. Again not the route I would have gone but the contract to me isn't as egregious as Clarks

Sure.

And again, at this contract the opportunity cost isn’t even a problem. He’s a fine get.

At this point this is mostly just a Clay is an idiot thread.

PattyFlakes 03-18-2022 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16200637)
I agree with you regarding his skill level but there will be certain situations where he will add some value that we didn't have last year. Again not the route I would have gone but the contract to me isn't as egregious as Clarks

Don’t agree on the skill level I think he’s better than most do, but totally agree on the contract, it’s pretty low risk.

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16200639)
And since you brought him up....I'd still trade for Shenault.

KYZIR!!!

…oh wait, sorry. I just got a little excited there a moment.

The Franchise 03-18-2022 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200645)
KYZIR!!!

…oh wait, sorry. I just got a little excited there a moment.

I’m just over here jerking.

FloridaMan88 03-18-2022 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16200592)
Because the thing is, if it's successful, we'll be back in this situation next year except he'll be more expensive and we might still have Tyreek deal to deal with.

I like signing him, just wish it wasn't 1 year. Cause next year will make year 3(or 4 depending on your perspective) that we're looking for a WR2.

JuJu on a 1 year deal is better than having him on a zero year deal… i.e. not signing him at all.

JFC the Chiefs just added an established WR who is still just 25 years old on basically a zero risk contract and people are grasping for reasons to bitch.

This is how it’s going to be in this era with minimal salary cap room and Mahomes’ contract.

I prefer Veach maximizing every way possible to continuously improve/upgrade compared to a team like Green Bay whose GM’s going back to Ted Thompson never did shit in free agency to maximize opportunities to improve/upgrade around a great QB and a tight salary cap situation.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16200640)
Sure.

And again, at this contract the opportunity cost isn’t even a problem. He’s a fine get.

At this point this is mostly just a Clay is an idiot thread.

https://bigamartusax.s3-accelerate.a...AC_SL1000_.jpg

SDChiefs 03-18-2022 06:30 PM

Juju Smith Schuster career stats: 5 years, 3855 yards, 11.9 Avg, 26 TDs.

Byron Pringle: 3 years, 898 yards, 13.4 avg., 7 TDs.

Pringle had Mahomes passing to him. Smith Schuster had Big Ben at the end of his career. There's always combine warriors. All that matters is production. It's not even close, let alone the base salary.

BossChief 03-18-2022 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16200639)
And since you brought him up....I'd still trade for Shenault.

I would, as well.

He and JuJu are similar in a lot of ways so I’m sure Veach has already reached out.

Maybe Veach went back to JuJus agent and said “this is our final offer, take it or we’re making a move for another player”…I’d love to have both, but I’m not sure Veach wants that.

BossChief 03-18-2022 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200655)

You’ve opened yourself up to this.

Hold that L

DJ's left nut 03-18-2022 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16200652)
I’m just over here jerking.

<div class="tenor-gif-embed" data-postid="10261374" data-share-method="host" data-aspect-ratio="1.78571" data-width="100%"><a href="https://tenor.com/view/jacking-for-the-lord-southpark-gif-10261374">Jacking For The Lord Southpark GIF</a>from <a href="https://tenor.com/search/jacking+for+the+lord-gifs">Jacking For The Lord GIFs</a></div> <script type="text/javascript" async src="https://tenor.com/embed.js"></script>

duncan_idaho 03-18-2022 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16200654)
JuJu on a 1 year deal is better than having him on a zero year deal… i.e. not signing him at all.

JFC the Chiefs just added an established WR who is still just 25 years old on basically a zero risk contract and people are grasping for reasons to bitch.

This is how it’s going to be in this era with minimal salary cap room and Mahomes’ contract.

I prefer Veach maximizing every way possible to continuously improve/upgrade compared to a team like Green Bay whose GM’s going back to Ted Thompson never did shit in free agency to maximize opportunities to improve/upgrade around a great QB and a tight salary cap situation.


Next few years will be interesting.

Herbert is going to get his deal. Wilson is going to get his new deal. Lamar Jackson and Josh Allen, too. Watson already got his huge deal, and it doesn’t look as flexible at Mahomes, not even close.

So all these AFC teams better hope they make it happen this year, before their QBs start catching up to Mahomes in pay structure (and passing him).

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 16200672)
You’ve opened yourself up to this.

Hold that L

I'll hold it when JuJu hands it to me, not you.

I want you to think about THIS.

If JuJu merely maintains 90% of his career per game average, next year he gets:

78 rec, 936 yards, 6 TD

And that includes his awful season last year, which was a huge outlier.

THIS IS GONNA BE AWESOME

DRM08 03-18-2022 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 16200678)
Next few years will be interesting.

Herbert is going to get his deal. Wilson is going to get his new deal. Lamar Jackson and Josh Allen, too. Watson already got his huge deal, and it doesn’t look as flexible at Mahomes, not even close.

So all these AFC teams better hope they make it happen this year, before their QBs start catching up to Mahomes in pay structure (and passing him).

Allen already signed his deal last offseason. Slightly less average salary than Mahomes, but more guaranteed money on fewer years for Allen. He will be back on the market 4 years earlier than Mahomes.

Russell Wilson is going to be demanding huge money ($50M per year fully guaranteed) from Denver. They would be wise to get that done pretty quick while they still have 2 cheaper years from his old contract to help lower the average salary over the next 6 years.

Marcellus 03-18-2022 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16200426)
Juju 8.6 Pringle 13.5 OK not nearly double but still a considerable amount more. Not a very good argument arguing the guy getting 8.6 is more explosive

Ju JU's career YPC avg is 11.9 with 323 career catches and 26 TD's. That's after only playing 5 games last year due to injury.

Pringle has 67 career catches and 7 TDs and is 2 years older.


Yall need to stop being stupid.

BossChief 03-18-2022 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16200685)
I'll hold it when JuJu hands it to me, not you.

I want you to think about THIS.

If JuJu merely maintains 90% of his career per game average, next year he gets:

78 rec, 936 yards, 6 TD

And that includes his awful season last year, which was a huge outlier.

THIS IS GONNA BE AWESOME

You know exactly what I mean, but go ahead and dance.

Maybe if you dance for 4 years you might make 85 dollars.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 06:58 PM

That's irrelevant. You should be celebrating with me, Brother BossChief. Do not give into the sinful temptations being offered to you by the hatemongering crew of Chiefsplanet.

In58men 03-18-2022 07:07 PM

Is this team better with Juju or Watkins? I’m having a debate, need feedback.

duncan_idaho 03-18-2022 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRM08 (Post 16200691)
Allen already signed his deal last offseason. Slightly less average salary than Mahomes, but more guaranteed money on fewer years for Allen. He will be back on the market 4 years earlier than Mahomes.

Russell Wilson is going to be demanding huge money ($50M per year fully guaranteed) from Denver. They would be wise to get that done pretty quick while they still have 2 cheaper years from his old contract to help lower the average salary over the next 6 years.


Right, but the real big pay raise doesn’t kick in until this year/next year. Just like Mahomes.

BWillie 03-18-2022 07:11 PM

Coming soon: Tik Tok videos with Jackson Mahomes and JuJu

staylor26 03-18-2022 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 16200737)
Is this team better with Juju or Watkins? I’m having a debate, need feedback.

Watkins is better when healthy, but JuJu is more reliable, and paired with Hardman gives the Chiefs their best trio of the Mahomes era.

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 16200737)
Is this team better with Juju or Watkins? I’m having a debate, need feedback.

I think Watkins is more explosive, slightly better route runner, but JuJu is better at the point of the catch and stronger.

Since health is a talent, you give a slight nod to JuJu.

YMMV

Marcellus 03-18-2022 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16200744)
Watkins is better when healthy, but JuJu is more reliable, and paired with Hardman gives the Chiefs their best trio of the Mahomes era.

This is my exact thought.


Both healthy Watkins is better by a marginal level but Watkins just isn't healthy most of the time. We got lucky with him being healthy in the playoffs in 2019.

If JuJu stays healthy for a full season its not close.

Mecca 03-18-2022 07:16 PM

When JuJu does a TikTok with Jackson Mahomes, we will truly be the most hated team.

comochiefsfan 03-18-2022 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 16200737)
Is this team better with Juju or Watkins? I’m having a debate, need feedback.

Watkins never had a season as good as Juju's 2018.

I think Juju is gonna be a souped up Sammy in this offense.

Ming the Merciless 03-18-2022 07:19 PM

is it appropriate to scream TO THE SHIP when one is already on board and pretending he is Kate Winslet opposite of mahomes in Titannic

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 07:20 PM

Whole new dimension.

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/K6o4...11818697.0.jpg

https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-p...5957/2314.jpeg

https://www.reviewjournal.com/wp-con...Football-8.jpg

https://www.sportscasting.com/wp-con...1080377420.jpg

https://static.clubs.nfl.com/image/p...dqhnlyil9vpsgi

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f1/fc...18b07a9e7b.jpg

FloridaMan88 03-18-2022 07:35 PM

Fun fact… JuJu is one year younger than Courtland Sutton… a.k.a. the massively overhyped WR who headlines the supposedly “loaded” Denver offense that Russell Wilson is walking into.

JuJu’s career year in 2018:
111 receptions, 1,426 yards receiving, 7 TD’s

Sutton’s career year… which took place in 2019 (take note for the haters who are bitching about JuJu’s career season taking place 4 years ago):
72 receptions, 1,112 yards receiving, 6 TD’s

SAGA45 03-18-2022 07:36 PM

I think Veach adds a size/speed stud WR in the draft. If Gordon benefits from a full round of ota's and camp and plays like he has a pulse...this offense will be scary af.

staylor26 03-18-2022 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16200797)
Fun fact… JuJu is one year younger than Courtland Sutton… a.k.a. the massively overhyped WR who headlines the supposedly “loaded” Denver offense that Russell Wilson is walking into.

JuJu’s career year in 2018:
111 receptions, 1,426 yards receiving, 7 TD’s

Sutton’s career year… which took place in 2019 (take note for the haters who are bitching about JuJu’s career season taking place 4 years ago):
72 receptions, 1,112 yards receiving, 6 TD’s

OTWP described the Broncos WRs as “monstrous” IIRC LMAO

In58men 03-18-2022 07:39 PM

Hardman feels disrespected, comment at the bottom.

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...6bb4e27078.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Hammock Parties 03-18-2022 07:40 PM

We're going to have three receivers on contract years. LMAO

Bowser 03-18-2022 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SAGA45 (Post 16200798)
I think Veach adds a size/speed stud WR in the draft. If Gordon benefits from a full round of ota's and camp and plays like he has a pulse...this offense will be scary af.

I do too. That comp 3rd is going to give us wiggle room with regards to drafting a receiver early-ish.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.