ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs **** Official Chiefs VS Patriots AFC Championship Game Thread **** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=320346)

TomBarndtsTwin 01-14-2019 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobertWeathers (Post 14038535)
Patriots Fatigue has been around since 2004

Maybe.

But my point still stands.


In the game in New England earlier this year, Chiefs had 9 penalties called on them and New England had ZERO. And the Chiefs still only lost by 3 on a last second field goal.

Think that's likely to happen again this Sunday night in KC? Yeah, me neither.

RobertWeathers 01-14-2019 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomBarndtsTwin (Post 14038543)
Maybe.

But my point still stands.


In the game in New England earlier this year, Chiefs had 9 penalties called on them and New England had ZERO. And the Chiefs still only lost by 3 on a last second field goal.

Think that's likely to happen again this Sunday night in KC? Yeah, me neither.

Actually you guys were 5 for 58 and in that game were sloppy as hell.

If your point is if the NFL wanted the NEP out of the SB in theory we'd be penalized more, right?

TomBarndtsTwin 01-14-2019 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobertWeathers (Post 14038573)
Actually you guys were 5 for 58 and in that game were sloppy as hell.

If your point is if the NFL wanted the NEP out of the SB in theory we'd be penalized more, right?

We had 9 penalties called on us, only 5 were accepted.

My point was New England got a bit of home cooking in that game, on top of Pat not being a fully known quantity at that point.

Pats will not have a penalty disparity in their favor playing in Arrowhead this Sunday and they are going up against the soon to be named NFL MVP.


That won't exactly work in their favor . . . .

RobertWeathers 01-14-2019 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomBarndtsTwin (Post 14038589)
We had 9 penalties called on us, only 5 were accepted.

My point was New England got a bit of home cooking in that game, on top of Pat not being a fully known quantity at that point.

Pats will not have a penalty disparity in their favor playing in Arrowhead this Sunday and they are going up against the soon to be named NFL MVP.


That won't exactly work in their favor . . . .

I think if you go back and look at each penalty it wasn't because of home cooking. It was because KC wasn't ready to play the game. False starts, neutral zone, holding, etc.

Sorry but I'm not into conspiracy theories.

Play disciplined you often win. Play sloppy you often lose.

htismaqe 01-14-2019 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobertWeathers (Post 14038616)
I think if you go back and look at each penalty it wasn't because of home cooking. It was because KC wasn't ready to play the game. False starts, neutral zone, holding, etc.

Sorry but I'm not into conspiracy theories.

Play disciplined you often win. Play sloppy you often lose.

It's not really a conspiracy. NFL refs favor the home team, it's just statistically true. It's not sinister or anything, it's probably just human nature, or incompetence, or a little of both.

But the stats don't lie - home teams get the calls about 60/40.

RaidersOftheCellar 01-14-2019 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14038620)
It's not really a conspiracy. NFL refs favor the home team, it's just statistically true. It's not sinister or anything, it's probably just human nature, or incompetence, or a little of both.

But the stats don't lie - home teams get the calls about 60/40.

I don't think it's anything supernatural. Refs prefer to be cheered rather than booed.

RobertWeathers 01-14-2019 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14038620)
It's not really a conspiracy. NFL refs favor the home team, it's just statistically true. It's not sinister or anything, it's probably just human nature, or incompetence, or a little of both.

But the stats don't lie - home teams get the calls about 60/40.

I agree with that.

An agenda I don't.

htismaqe 01-14-2019 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobertWeathers (Post 14038640)
I agree with that.

An agenda I don't.

Yeah, I don't think it's a conspiracy.

I think it's easier for a home team to execute, leading to more penalties for visitors.

I think there's a tad of bias towards home teams from the refs.

And I definitely think that the NFL rules are too interpret-able and the refs by and large aren't very good. Lots and lots of bad calls this year that were just flat out mistakes. Incompetence.

RobertWeathers 01-14-2019 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14038656)
Yeah, I don't think it's a conspiracy.

I think it's easier for a home team to execute, leading to more penalties for visitors.

I think there's a tad of bias towards home teams from the refs.

And I definitely think that the NFL rules are too interpret-able and the refs by and large aren't very good. Lots and lots of bad calls this year that were just flat out mistakes. Incompetence.

Agree 100%

Dr. Yu Weed Tard 01-14-2019 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 14038656)
Yeah, I don't think it's a conspiracy.

I think it's easier for a home team to execute, leading to more penalties for visitors.

I think there's a tad of bias towards home teams from the refs.

And I definitely think that the NFL rules are too interpret-able and the refs by and large aren't very good. Lots and lots of bad calls this year that were just flat out mistakes. Incompetence.

If people keep making mistakes like that at my job, we find people who can do those jobs, and fire the people who can't.

saphojunkie 01-14-2019 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EyePod (Post 14038210)
Is that leaving Gronk in single? Oof.

Gronk is a shell of his former self.

Kiimo 01-14-2019 05:38 PM

I don't care if he's a shell. A shell of his former self is still a good tight end single covered. If the Patriots have to rely on Edleman beating us I like our chances. Gronk has been the #1 problem in the past. I have no interest in him flying off into the sunset with a 150 yard day. Double cover him.

Sassy Squatch 01-14-2019 05:41 PM

Gronkowski has 3 TDs this season. Demetrius Harris has 3 TDs this season.

Kiimo 01-14-2019 05:48 PM

Turtle you know as well as I do that this defense can turn some rando into a superstar. Don't let Gronk beat us. Everybody else is coverable.

htismaqe 01-14-2019 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 14038731)
Turtle you know as well as I do that this defense can turn some rando into a superstar. Don't let Gronk beat us. Everybody else is coverable.

I imagine they'll have some high-low stuff ready for him. They might not double him all the way but I doubt they'll have Josh freaking Shaw singled up on his with the game on the line either.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.