RunKC |
04-21-2020 03:25 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
(Post 14921468)
Luck was an athlete damn near on par with RGIII (better in many ways) and had a !@#$ing CANNON.
Dial down Luck's athleticism and raw arm strength and I think Ryan is essentially who you end up with. I think you're selling Ryan short a bit - dude's not just some game manager. Ryan's a great passer and a really smart player. There's not a lot to dislike in Ryans game, he's just not a guy with truly plus plus arm strength or athleticism (though he was a decent athlete at Burrows age).
Burrow is absolutely not Andrew Luck. Luck's a guy you'd draw up in a lab - there was nothing missing on that kid. Powerful arm, great mind, great size and premier athleticism. If you were building a QB in Madden you'd build Andrew Luck.
Burrow ain't Luck.
|
No he’s not and again I’m not saying he is the prospect Luck was. I didn’t want to bring him up bc it’s basically a sin to compare prospects to him, but he’s a bit like Peyton Manning, who also did not have great mobility or a cannon arm that Luck had, but had elite football IQ and feel for the pocket.
I can’t think of a recent QB prospect that has the mental processing and football IQ that Burrow does. Luck is the last one that comes to mind, but before him? Probably Matt Ryan.
Burrow is already throwing the ball in the right places to receivers, exploiting zone coverage, reading most blitzes pre-snap, understanding defensive coverages and just seems like he’s every bit prepared for anything. Brent Venables is a damn good defensive coordinator. He’s been even better with the insane talent he’s got at Clemson. And Burrow wrecked them. He just beautiful destroyed that defense with his goddamn mind the same way Manning and Luck did to defenses.
Matt Ryan was pretty good but never that good. Neither was Romo.
Prospects like Burrow don’t come along very often.
|