Calling TwistedChief a dumb **** is peak Dunning Kruger.

The very tip top of Mount Stupid, standing on a step stool with your arms extended far over your head, holding a broom straight up.

Suck my ****ing dick.

I've also called him a smart dude in this very thread. I know he's not actually dumb bundle of sticks.

You ****ing pussies are being the most annoying Buffalo dick riders.

Or maybe we just don't get off on whining about how much the league hates the team that has made it to the AFCCG four years in a row and two Super Bowls in that time.

It's weak. It's insecure. It's embarrassing.

I originally said they voted against it because I could have sworn I thought I saw something at the time that said they did. That Ben Volin tweet was probably what I was thinking of, but I overstepped when I called it a vote.

I think everybody is clear on what happened with the Bills. Let's all group hug it out.

Eff the Bills

Once again, I didn't ****ing say this.

Neither did SNR. We actually BOTH specifically said that's NOT what we are saying.

You make up shit constantly. I even had to DM you to walk you through it but apparently you can’t follow.

Sad.

“Went from having no support to having 24 owners.” I love you how define “anywhere from potentially 0-23 owners” as clearly representing “no support.” Again, make shit up.

It is just a football game; the change does seem a bit arbitrary. As far as the overtime rules, I think it should be played similar to baseball; you play full periods until someone wins. No one really seemed all that interested in changing the rules when the Patriots benefitted in the SB and AFCC games. Of course, I'm biased because I'm a Chiefs fan. The Chiefs have had three overtimes in the AFCC, winning one and losing two.

Yeah, boo hoo, call me a waaaaahmbulance. Chiefs should have taken care of business in the first four quarters and not let it get to that point. Especially against the Bengals.

Git Gud

You seem upset.

Figured that was the case. I know about the scenarios. Just found it odd the national idiots didn't seem to understand the same scenarios.

What the **** have I "made up"? You're talking completely out of your ass.

You DM'd me because I made you looks like a ****ing moron for thinking that the Chiefs/Pats and Bills/Chiefs are the only times a game went to OT and the other team never got the ball.

It's happened 4 times in the playoffs going back to the Falcons/Patriots SB. It happened once in between those 2 games. Not my fault that you're talking about things you obviously don't know about.

It had "no support" because it didn't even go to a vote. A tweet from a blue check mark journalist saying just that still isn't enough?

Just like Florio clealry saying that the players still "didn't want to play the game" wasn't enough?

Obviously nothing is enough for you and you're willing to die on this hill.

This thread got really angry really quick LMAO

Have the Bengals taken the villain mantle from the chiefs on social media?

You seem like a ****ing pussy.

You’re going full Diqlix. Never go full diqlix.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/h_gD45ngr_E" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Hope everyone is having a wonderful Saturday. Go Chiefs!

Come on Twisted... Answer one question, as honestly as you can...

If the Bills were up 21-3 against the Bengals, or if they were down 7-3 to the AZ Cardinals when Damar got injured, would they have tried to resume the game, or would they have been fine giving up control of the #1 seed?

How was your breakfast? Did it hit you in the feels?

Now that Dane is gone staylor is the most emotional poster on the board

Shut up bundle of sticks.

I had a protein waffle with natural peanut butter and a protein shake. My usual. It’s delicious!

Wbu?

I actually skipped it and jogged a bit, was gonna go full on rocky on some eggs but decided against

If you looked at the instant reaction of the players on the field, then you know the answer to that question. They were not mentally prepared to continue that game regardless of score. No coach ran up to each of them and told them to start acting distraught. They just were.

And there is no evidence that Buffalo asked for a neutral field. The anger against Buffalo is without reason, until someone can show some sort of proof that they asked for any of it.

He has the nerve to say shit like that then wonders why I'm calling him out for simping for the Bills.

He's literally been white knighting for them throughout this entire thread.

Then again, this is one of the only pussies I saw white knighting for Will Smith and Jada after the slap. I'm convinced this guy gets ****ed with a strap-on.

TIL Dunning Kruger applies to an opinion.

Okay, that was ****ing funny. LMAO

Just got my workout done too.

I’m ready to root on the Chiefs with the inseparable family that is ChiefsPlanet.com.

Should have been picked up the following day. The NFL can clearly ignore their own rulebook regarding staging a contest on the day of travel so there was no excuse not to resume the game.

Are you ready for some football?

Welcome Fam, let's whip up some raiduz

In an ironic twist (see what I did there), you're the one menstruating all over this thread.

https://y.yarn.co/2b1aa999-3f89-4054...00ade_text.gif

Ever do two GDTs at the same time?


Tonight's your chance.

Who downvoted this? you got a stalker? LMAO

You’re a ****ing moron.

You said the Bills didn’t want to play against the Patriots and were bitching about it. I said there was nothing to prove that they didn’t want to play the Patriots. You and others cited Mike Reiss, a Pats reporter. I showed you that he also said he was just speculating and had no information and made you look like a fool.

I never for a second said or thought that the Bills wanted to play the game in the 2-3 days after and never had any strong opinion on anything they did or didn’t want to do after this weekend as it relates to the Bengals game.

Next, I’m well aware that other playoff games have gone into OT and been decided like that. You - as per normal - completely missed the point. You asked why the owners decided to approve it then and not before and one of my speculations was that it had happened again in a short period of time in truly marquee games and that the Bills/Chiefs was widely recognized as maybe the greatest game of all-time yet it ended like that.

If you played “gotcha” with facts, then we could certainly have normal debates and conversations. But somehow a “blue check” journalist throwing something vague out there with nothing other than idle speculation counts as fact-checking for you.

And that’s why you’re a ****ing moron.

Filter evasion

To the Statue!!!!!

Report me then. Bitch.

It’s Biggest Discuss.

**** shit **** piss blowjob Billay’s mom.

I cannot believe you support a narrative that being down 7-3 in the middle of the first quarter had any bearing on their decision not to continue that game. I am honestly floored that you would think that.

If you want to tell me it’s late in the third and it’s a 3 score game, I would then definitely entertain it. But 7-3 in the first? OMG.

I’m honestly glad I don’t live my life as cynically as many of you apparently do.

Insell typing detective!

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/H6QsEh8PNlU" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I apologize for people like that, dude. It’s clearly just a major overcorrection/backlash after people were expected to show a modicum of empathy toward the Bills. Very clear that many were triggered and thus here we are.

No, I said "sounds like they might not want to". Huge difference. And it wasn't the point. The point was about them not wanting to play the game they clearly refused to resume. Only reason I brought up the Pats game is because I was saying if that's even a question, they obviously didn't want to resume the Bengals game.

Just like DJ pointed out, you need 200% confirmation of everything because you're incapable of reading between lines.

I liked the Vegas idea as well, but a few minutes ago on Chiefs radio program the field reporters said it was in rough shape like Arizona Cardinals bad.

Interesting thing is UNLV apparently plays games in the Raiders' stadium with artificial turf. Maybe they could switch out the Raiders' grass turf and put in UNLV's fake turf for this potential neutral site playoff game.

I guess when people get called out for making up shit based on incomplete information while wanting to put it in their angry box, they should just say I'm reading between the lines.

ROFL You are embarrassingly pathetic.

Nobody made anything up.

I said it "sounds like they might not even want to play the Pats game". I was acknowledging that we didn't know for sure.

However, anybody pretending that we still don't know whether the Bills wanted to resume the OTHER game, you know the one that all the fuss I about, obviously can't read between the lines. Or they're playing stupid and refusing not to.

Let me stretch first

C'mon guys. You're both gonna agree about a ton of Chiefs stuff as the playoffs are in session and into the offseason and beyond. Let's all be friends!

In fairness, Twisted flamed away first... at least I believe reading the thread. I think we are all a little uptight and need a come together Chiefs beatdown of the Raiders today to bring unity...

Let's try this again as I type slower... If they were leading 21-3 against the Bengals Monday, early in the 2nd quarter, or if they were playing someone like the Cardinals and were down 7-3 early in the second quarter, do you think they make every effort to resume the game on Tuesday or Wednesday night after Damar was stabilized, improving and high probability of a positive outcome, or do they not play and give up control of the #1 seed?

Don't apologize to that turd. Embarrassing....

Cincy was going to beat Buffalo and if that causes asshurt for some...so be it

Surely though you can understand how Chiefs fans are saying WTF when teams are not supportive of us when we get screwed and then when we benefit everything changes.

Yes I am aware that the argument will be that the Bills game broke the camels back. But did it? After the Bills game so many in the media, and fans alike, were feeling so sorry for the Bills.

Yet when the Chiefs lost to the Patriots I don't remember much sympathy at all. That game was also an amazing game, perhaps an all-timer itself. Do you disagree that the sympathy for KC was equal to Buffalos? I stuck my head in the sand after that game so it's possible I missed it. This is why I feel like it's reasonable to allow Chiefs fans to be pretty damn bitter about the entire situation.

https://i.imgur.com/9qEqzdK.gif

And again, there was a playoff game in between that nobody gave a **** about either. Then all of a sudden everybody in the media and fans are crying about the rules as if they just learned of them? Bull****ingshit.

I think the Bengals will beat the Bills no matter where they play. Bills pass rusher is finished and they’ve lost too much in the secondary. Not to mention that Tre’Davious White looks awful.

Just don’t see it

Dude, again... Not saying that night, but there is no reason there wasn't an effort to resume the game once he was stabilized and improving, which according to the Dr's press conference, he was improving hourly. The Bengals agreed because they thought the written rules would be followed, they weren't. You're team, after Damar was improving and alive are the ones who chose not to play. Don't say it was the NFL, because if Josh Allen and the Bills came out and said, " Damar is stabilized and we know it won't be easy, but we want to continue to our ultimate goal of bringing a Superbowl Trophy back to Damar and Buffalo", they would have played, period. They didn't and I believe it was because of the Bengals and being down 2 dbacks and possibly losing the 2seed. Again, it my opinion if they were up 21-3 or playing a lesser team they would have did so, again, with Damar stable and improving hourly.

For the Bills, it's obviously not "when the Chiefs benefit", it's "now we care because the rules ****ed us".... I mean, do you think the Chiefs would want a rule change in 2018 had they won the toss and won? It's the same damn thing... teams care a whole lot more when it actually impacts them.

There was plenty of coverage about it after the Chiefs game, too (I posted ~10 articles earlier).... a ton of people hated the Patriots at the time and called out the rule due to that alone.

Also, you can call east coast bias, NFL wanted the Patriots to win anyway... AND not be about the Chiefs and screwing the Chiefs.

LMAO... really.

If we would have been one of our players and 2 days later you see the timeline and that he was defib'd once and given CPR quickly and you see that the odds of him surviving and thriving were quite high from the time he was revived, I would be pissed that our team didn't want to play and finish the game, and if they didn't the rules should have been followed. Again, if resuscitation wasn't successful and he died, that's a different story. They proceeded like he had died and had no chance, which just wasn't the case with the info the timeline that has now been shared.

Yeah my issue at the time was just that I don't understand the sympathy for the Bills when the Chiefs themselves tried to fix it and they weren't supported. I was, as SNR said, partially motivated by that tweet that I thought meant the Bills voted against it.

All I know is the rule was a joke and should have always been both teams get the ball. I along with many have felt that way for a while.

Yeah, I wouldn't mind sudden death if the home team got the ball first in OT... you earned HFA, so just give it to the home team.

Defenses are so helpless against some of these offenses though, it makes sense to guarantee at least one possession each.

shut the **** up you virtue signaling emotional ****

you speak for no one

you're a douche

apologizing to this troll is ridiculous

:popcorn:

:toast:

So if Buffalo loses tomorrow is the AFCCG gonna be at neutral site?

No.

Sent from my SM-S906U1 using Tapatalk

Updated the table in the OP

Nobody should be defending any ****ing Bills fan on here after their shitty Chiefs/Raiders GDT, wanting Mahomes to get hit late an concussed, and a bunch of other shitty comments...

https://www.twobillsdrive.com/commun...430pm/page/29/

Lol of course, but they were so morally superior a few days ago and wanted to be awarded the 1 seed because their team couldn't finish their game. It's not about football though guys it's not.

Sent from my SM-F711U1 using Tapatalk

Any chance the bills rest starters tomorrow? Is the neutral site game enough of a benefit to risk injury?

Bengals are a better team, they would've smacked Buffalo had the game continued. They'll beat them if they play again too. Which is fine I want the rematch with Cincy. They've won far too many games vs us.

Yeah, for all the rival fans who think this place is a cesspool, that place scrapes the bottom of the barrel.

Absolutely not. They're going for blood if anything. They lose and they get the 3rd seed and a possible date with the LAC.

You do not understand their culture. They wanted him down so they could take advantage of him. From them that's a high compliment

That thread on their forum has to be the most bitter loser mentality in all of sports fandom.